CHARGE SHEET Expedition & FAIR INVESTIGATION before CS !!!


CHARGE SHEET Expedition & FAIR INVESTIGATION before CS !!!
(Most of these are the discussions of early 2014)
Dear Freinds,
CS can be expedited using rules by CVC for 3 months to complete investigation.
CS needs to be based on FAIR INVESTIGATION.

Now, I need suggestiopn from u people.
Please provide me copy of a judgment by SUPREME COURT where SC held in January 2014 that, POLICE OR IO IS LIABLE TO BE PROSECUTED IF HE KNOWS THAT A PERSON IS INNOCENT BUT STILL FILES CHARGE SHEET.

Friends, Pls remember that, when CS does NOT have any charge then its known as 'B' Report.

Since, I relied on lawyers while in CAW so I could NOT do some steps which I knew already hence NOW i am NOT relying on any lawyer & fighting myself.

CS Rules are as follows (sharing for all my friends here):-

Read FIR & ask IO to provide allegations list before filing CS in court.

This is your right but CS officers rarely follow this & they directly submit in court the CS.

Now it becomes duty of IO to respond to you else one can tell court to return CS.

Now, get certified copy of the complainant version and her supporters (witnesses) version
then see whether all the details of the allegations are present or not viz., offence date, time,
place and the witnesses for that allegation at the crime place etc....

then give your reply in details and the evidence that is available etc....

send this reply to all police officers so that the IO can not do anything wrong to you....

 REMEMBER, if the IO is going to file a CS against accused, then they have to supply first a copy to the accused for giving information that under which section they are filling challan in the court.

Without giving a copy of challan to the accused the challan will not be accepted by the court.
 This is Rule related to CS.

 In case it is not filed within 2 months you should get a certificate from the IO, that the 498a complaint is false or get the FIR quashed from High Court.

in the meantime file an RTI.

This is an important rule related to CS. I need a supporting judgment or rule book.

 Examples:- If in the CS there is NO statement of jeweller. Then u know how to file your reply.

Friends, One should file all replies himself. Even if one is NOT that intelligent then before your lawyer files anything on your behalf read that at least 3 times at different intervals & make various amendments.

Dear Friends,
Pls give me copy of this SC Judgment of January 2014, "Punish cops who file false charges: SC"
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Punish-cops-who-file-false-charges-SC/moviereview/
29226094.cms
http://mumbaicrimereport.blogspot.in/2014/01/punish-cops-who-file-false-cases.html
Friends,
Be ready to fight against injustice.

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"
Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur
Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com


disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com
…………………………………………………………………


SOME1
Action Against IO
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1485 OF 2008 in Supreme Court - State of Gujarat v/s Kishanbhai Etc
(46 page judgement, read from page 41)

CHARGE SHEET Expedition & FAIR INVESTIGATION before CS !!!
PUNISH COPS WHO FILES FALSE CHARGES : SC
http://indiankanoon.org/doc/25369927/

Hurrah!!! I found that.
I am sharing this judgment for you all.
This is the Perfect Judgment & will help to catch the wrongs done by Dirty Cops.

Along with this also go through:-
http://www.socialstigma.in

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"
Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur
Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com


disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com
…………………………………………………………………


SOME1
Atur chatur sir, please post is here for everyone’s benefit.
thanks

CHARGE SHEET Expedition & FAIR INVESTIGATION before CS !!!
r/w Supreme Court (Supra) ., CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1485 OF 2008
"Accordingly we direct, the Home Department of every State Government, to formulate a procedure for taking action against all erring investigating/prosecuting officials/officers. All such erring officials/officers identified, as responsible for failure of a prosecution case, on account of sheer negligence or because of culpable lapses, must suffer departmental action. The above mechanism formulated would infuse seriousness in the performance of investigating and
prosecuting duties"

"23. We hope and trust the Home Department of the State of Gujarat,will identify the erring officers in the instant case, and will take appropriate departmental action against them, as may be considered appropriate, in accordance with law."

Friends,
Also provide me Jan 2014 judgment pls.

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"
Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur
Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com


disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com
…………………………………………………………………


SOME2
I have prepared my RTI for the IO 2 months ago but decided not to post it. I believe it needs another revision.
There is no medical report mention of physical hart or Dowry in the FIR- still the IO lodged 498a and 325.
I will wait for your input and try to make my case against 498a.

CHARGE SHEET Expedition & FAIR INVESTIGATION before CS !!!
Today MM tried to reject my CrPC 91 & I asked to pass whatever order he seems justified and I told him that he can not hold that CrPC 91 because that is agains the law.
I asked him to allow the CrPC 91 application or reject it so that at least I can go in the sessions to challenge it..

This is against law as CrPC 91 is almost a right available in the hands of a defendant but one always has an option to challenge this rejection of CrPC 91 in High Court.

OK, Forget to tell you, that I am NOT the defendant but I am the complainant and normally the complainant does NOT have a right to CrPC 91 but I know that when the defendant is police and the matter relates to dirty cops i.e., some corruption then even CrPC 91 can be moved by the complainant against the police. The MM seems to having no option.

I will update u guys what happened next.

SOME2 mail me your drafted RTI so I can provide feedback. Also tell ur stage after FIR & other cases.
aturchatur@yahoo.com

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"
Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur
Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com


disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com
…………………………………………………………………

CHARGE SHEET Expedition & FAIR INVESTIGATION before CS !!!
One friend sent me the judgment of 2014 asked above by me.
Thanks buddy.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.169 OF 2014
(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No.1221 of 2012)
Perumal …Appellant
Versus
Janaki …Respondent
J U D G M E N T
CJI (P. Sathasivam), Chelameswar, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. Aggrieved by an order in Crl. R.C. No.1119 of 2011 of the High Court of Madras, the
unsuccessful petitioner therein preferred the instant appeal.
3. A petition in C.M.P. No.4561 of 2010 (private complaint) under section 200 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter for short referred to as “the Cr.P.C.”) filed by the
appellant herein against the respondent came to be dismissed by the Judicial Magistrate No.2
at Pollachi by his judgment dated 31st August 2010. Challenging the same, the
abovementioned Crl. R.C. was filed.
4. The factual background of the case is as follows:
5. The respondent was working as a Sub-Inspector in an All-Women Police Station, Pollachi at
the relevant point of time. On 18th May 2008, one Nagal reported to the respondent that the
appellant herein had cheated her. The respondent registered Crime No.18/08 under sections
417 and 506(i) of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter for short referred to as “the IPC”).
Eventually, the respondent filed a charge-sheet, the relevant portion of which reads as follows:
“On 26.12.07, that the accused called upon the de-facto complainant for an outing and while
going in the night at around 10.00 via Vadugapalayam Ittori route the accused enticed the defacto
complainant of marrying her and had sexual interaction several times in the nearby
jungle and on account of which the complainant became pregnant and when she asked the
accused to marry him he threatened the complainant of killing her if she disclosed the above
fact to anybody. Hence the accused committed an offence punishable u/s. 417, 506 (i) of IPC.
[emphasis supplied]
6. The appellant was tried for the offences mentioned above by the learned Judicial Magistrate
No.1, Pollachi. The learned Judicial Magistrate by his judgment dated 15th March 2010
acquitted the appellant of both the charges.
7. It appears that the said judgment has become final.
8. In the light of the acquittal, the appellant filed a complaint (C.M.P. No.4561 of 2010) under
section 190 of the Cr.P.C. on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.2 at Pollachi praying that the
respondent be tried for an offence under section 193 of the IPC. The said complaint came to be
dismissed by an order dated 31st August 2010 on the ground that in view of sections 195 and
340 of the Cr.P.C. the complaint of the appellant herein is not maintainable.
9. Aggrieved by the said dismissal, the appellant herein unsuccessfully carried the matter to
the High Court. Hence the present appeal.
10. The case of the appellant herein in his complaint is that though Nagal alleged an offence of
cheating against the appellant which led to the pregnancy of Nagal, such an offence was not
proved against him. Upon the registration of Crime No.18/08, Nagal was subjected to medical
examination. She was not found to be pregnant. Dr. Geetha, who examined Nagal,
categorically opined that Nagal was not found to be pregnant on the date of examination which
took place six days after the registration of the FIR. In spite of the definite medical opinion that
Nagal was not pregnant, the respondent chose to file a charge-sheet with an allegation that
Nagal became pregnant. Therefore, according to the appellant, the charge-sheet was filed with
a deliberate false statement by the respondent herein. The appellant, therefore, prayed in his
complaint as follows;
“It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to take this complaint on file, try
the accused U/s. 193 IPC for deliberately giving false evidence in the Court as against the
complainant, and punish the accused and pass such further or other orders as this Hon’ble
court deems fit and proper.”
11. The learned Magistrate dismissed the complaint on the ground that section 195 of the
Cr.P.C. bars criminal courts to take cognizance of an offence under section 193 of the IPC
except on the complaint in writing of that Court or an officer of that Court in relation to any
proceeding in the Court where the offence under section 193 is said to have been committed
and a private complaint such as the one on hand is not maintainable.
12. The High Court declined to interfere with the matter in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction.
The operative portion of the order under challenge reads as follows:
“3. … This court is in agreement with the conclusion of the court below in dismissing the
complaint. The complaint provided very little to take action upon, particularly, where this court
finds that the respondent had not in any manner tampered with the medical record so as to
mulct the petitioner with criminal liability. The wording in the final report informing of the de
facto complainant having been pregnant can in the facts and circumstances of the case, be
seen only as a mistake.
4. In the result, the criminal revision stands dismissed.”
13. We regret to place on record that at every stage of this matter the inquiry was misdirected.
14. The facts relevant for the issue on hand are that:-
(1) The appellant was prosecuted for the offences under sections 417 and 506 (i) IPC. (The
factual allegations forming the basis of such a prosecution are already noted earlier).
(2) The respondent filed a charge-sheet with an assertion that the appellant was responsible
for pregnancy of Nagal.
(3) Even before the filing of the charge-sheet, a definite medical opinion was available to the
respondent (secured during the course of the investigation of the offence alleged against the
appellant) to the effect that Nagal was not pregnant.
(4) Still the respondent chose to assert in the charge-sheet that Nagal was pregnant.
(5) The prosecution against the appellant ended in acquittal.
15. The abovementioned indisputable facts, in our opinion, prima facie may not constitute an
offence under section 193 IPC but may constitute an offence under section 211 IPC. We say
prima facie only for the reason this aspect has not been examined at any stage in the case nor
any submission is made before us on either side but we cannot help taking notice of the basic
facts and the legal position.
16. The offence under section 193[1] IPC is an act of giving false evidence or fabricating false
evidence in a judicial proceeding. The act of giving false evidence is defined under section
191 IPC as follows:
“191. Giving false evidence.— Whoever, being legally bound by an oath or by an express
provision of law to state the truth, or being bound by law to make a declaration upon any
subject, makes any statement which is false, and which he either knows or believes to be false
or does not believe to be true, is said to give false evidence.
Explanation 1.—A statement is within the meaning of this section, whether it is made verbally
or otherwise.
Explanation 2.—A false statement as to the belief of the person attesting is within the meaning
of this section, and a person may be guilty of giving false evidence by stating that he believes a
thing which he does not believe, as well as by stating that he knows a thing which he does not
know.” It can be seen from the definition that to constitute an act of giving false evidence, a
person must make a statement which is either false to the knowledge or belief of the maker or
which the maker does not believe to be true. Further, it requires that such a statement is made
by a person (1) who is legally bound by an oath; (2) by an express provision of law to state the
truth; or (3) being bound by law to make a declaration upon any subject.
17. A police officer filing a charge-sheet does not make any statement on oath nor is bound by
any express provision of law to state the truth though in our opinion being a public servant is
obliged to act in good faith. Whether the statement made by the police officer in a charge-sheet
amounts to a declaration upon any subject within the meaning of the clause “being bound by
law to make a declaration upon any subject” occurring under section 191 of the IPC is a
question which requires further examination.
18. On the other hand, section 211 of the IPC deals with an offence of instituting or causing to
be instituted any criminal proceeding or falsely charging any person of having committed an
offence even when there is no just or lawful ground for such proceeding to the knowledge of
the person instituting or causing the institution of the criminal proceedings.
19. Irrespective of the fact whether the offence disclosed by the complaint of the appellant
herein is an offence falling either under section 193 or 211 of the IPC, section 195 of the
Cr.P.C. declares that no Court shall take cognizance of either of the abovementioned two
offences except in the manner specified under section 195 of the Cr.P.C.:
“195. Prosecution for contempt of lawful authority of public servants, for offences against public
justice and for offences relating to documents given in evidence.—(1) No Court shall take
cognizance— (b) (i) of any offence punishable under any of the following sections of the Indian
Penal Code (45 of 1860), namely, sections 193 to 196 (both inclusive), 199, 200, 205 to 211
(both inclusive) and 228, when such offence is alleged to have been committed in, or in
relation to, any proceeding in any Court, or except on the complaint in writing of that Court or
by such officer of the Court as that Court may authorise in writing in this behalf, or of some
other Court to which that court is subordinate.”
20. In the light of the language of section 195 Cr.P.C. we do not find fault with the conclusion of
the learned Magistrate in dismissing the complaint of the appellant herein for the reason that
the complaint is not filed by the person contemplated under section 195 Cr.P.C. It may be
mentioned here that as a matter of fact the Court before which the instant complaint was
lodged is not the same Court before which the appellant herein was prosecuted by the
respondent.
21. Under section 340(1) of the Cr.P.C., it is stipulated that whenever it appears that any one of
the offences mentioned in clause (b) of sub- section (1) of section 195 appears to have been
committed in or in relation to a proceeding before a Court, that Court either on an application
made to it or otherwise make a complaint thereof in writing to the competent Magistrate after
following the procedure mentioned under section 340 of the Cr.P.C.[2]
22. Admittedly, the appellant herein did not make an application to the judicial magistrate No.1,
Pollachi under section 340 to ‘make a complaint’ against the respondent herein nor the said
magistrate suo moto made a complaint. Therefore, the learned judicial magistrate No.2 before
whom the private complaint is made by the appellant had no option but to dismiss the
complaint.
23. But the High Court, in our view, is not justified in confining itself to the examination of the
correctness of the order of the magistrate dismissing the said private complaint. Both Section
195(1) and Section 340(2) Cr.P.C. authorise the exercise of the power conferred under
Section195(1) by any other court to which the court in respect of which the offence is committed
is subordinate to. (hereinafter referred to for the sake of convenience as ‘the original court’)
24. It can be seen from the language of Section 195(4), Cr.P.C. that it creates a legal fiction
whereby it is declared that the original court is subordinate to that court to which appeals
ordinarily lie from the judgments or orders of the original court. (hereinafter referred to as ‘the
appellate court’) In our view, such a fiction must be understood in the context of Article 227[3] of
the Constitution of India and Section 10(1) and 15(1) of Cr.P.C[4]. Article 227 confers the power
of superintendence on a High Court over all courts and tribunals functioning within the
territories in relation to which a High Court exercises jurisdiction. Section 10(1) and 15(1) of
Cr.P.C. declare that the Assistant Sessions Judges and Chief Judicial Magistrates are
subordinate to the Session Judge and other Judicial Magistrates to be subordinate to the Chief
Judicial Magistrate subject to the control of the Session Judge. It may be remembered that
Section 195(4) deals with the authority of the superior courts in the context of taking
cognizance of various offences mentioned in Section 195(1). Such offences are relatable to
civil, criminal and revenue courts etc.[5] Each one of the streams of these courts may have their
administrative hierarchy depending upon under the law by which such courts are brought into
existence. It is also well known that certain courts have appellate jurisdiction while certain
courts only have original jurisdiction. Appellate jurisdiction is the creature of statute and
depending upon the scheme of a particular statute, the forum of appeal varies. Generally, the
appellate for a are created on the basis of either subject matter of dispute or economic
implications or nature of crime etc.
25. Therefore, all that sub-section (4) of Section 195 says is that irrespective of the fact whether
a particular court is subordinate to another court in the hierarchy of judicial administration, for
the purpose of exercise of powers under Section 195(1), every appellate court competent to
entertain the appeals either from decrees or sentence passed by the original court is treated to
be a court concurrently competent to exercise the jurisdiction under Section 195(1). High
Courts being constitutional courts invested with the powers of superintendence over all courts
within the territory over which the High Court exercises its jurisdiction, in our view, is certainly a
Court which can exercise the jurisdiction under Section 195(1). In the absence of any specific
constitutional limitation of prescription on the exercise of such powers, the High Courts may
exercise such power either on an application made to it or suo moto whenever the interests of
justice demand.
26. The High Courts not only have the authority to exercise such jurisdiction but also an
obligation to exercise such power in appropriate cases. Such obligation, in our opinion, flows
from two factors – (1) the embargo created by Section 195 restricting the liberty of aggrieved
persons to initiate criminal proceedings with respect to offences prescribed under Section 195;
(2) such offences pertain to either the contempt of lawful authorities of public servants or
offences against public justice.
27. A constitution Bench of this Court in Iqbal Singh Marwah & Anr. v. Meenakshi Marwah &
Anr., (2005) 4 SCC 370, while interpreting Section 195 Cr.P.C., although in a different context,
held that any interpretation which leads to a situation where a victim of crime is rendered
remediless, has to be discarded[6]. The power of superintendence like any other power
impliedly carries an obligation to exercise powers in an appropriate case to maintain the
majesty of the judicial process and the purity of the legal system. Such an obligation becomes
more profound when these allegations of commission of offences pertain to public justice.
28. In the case on hand, when the appellant alleges that he had been prosecuted on the basis
of a palpably false statement coupled with the further allegation in his complaint that the
respondent did so for extraneous considerations, we are of the opinion that it is an appropriate
case where the High Court ought to have exercised the jurisdiction under Section 195 Cr.P.C..
The allegation such as the one made by the complainant against the respondent is not
uncommon. As was pointed earlier by this Court in a different context “there is no rule of law
that common sense should be put in cold storage”[7]. Our Constitution is designed on the
theory of checks and balances. A theory which is the product of the belief that all power
corrupts - such belief is based on experience.
29. The appeal is, therefore, allowed. The matter is remitted to the High Court for further
appropriate course of action to initiate proceedings against the respondent on the basis of the
complaint of the appellant in
accordance with law.
CJI (P. Sathasivam)
January 20, 2014. J. (J. Chelameswar)
New Delhi;
-----------------------[1] Section 193. Punishment for false evidence.—Whoever intentionally gives
false evidence in any stage of a judicial proceeding, or fabricates false evidence for the
purpose of being used in any stage of a judicial proceeding, shall be punished with
imprisonment of either description for a term which may extended to seven years, and shall
also be liable to fine, and whoever intentionally gives or fabricates false evidence in any other
case, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extended
to three years, and shall also be liable to fine.
Explanation 1.—A trial before a Court-martial; is a judicial proceeding.
Explanation 2.—An investigation directed by law preliminary to a proceeding before a Court of
Justice, is a stage of a judicial proceeding, though that investigation may not take place before
a Court of Justice. [2] Section 340. Procedure in cases mentioned in section 195.—(1) When
upon an application made to it in this behalf or otherwise, any Court is of opinion that it is
expedient in the interests of justice that an inquiry should be made into any offence referred to
in clause (b) of sub-section
(1) of section 195, which appears to have been committed in or in relation
to a proceeding in that Court or, as the case may be, in respect of a
document produced or given in evidence in a proceeding in that court, such
Court may, after such preliminary inquiry, if any, as it thinks necessary,-
(a) record a finding to that effect; (b) make a complaint thereof in writing;
(c) send it to a Magi?

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"
Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur
Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com


disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com
…………………………………………………………………

CHARGE SHEET Expedition & FAIR INVESTIGATION before CS !!!
I am looking for judgments related to CS Expedition.
I am looking for judgments related to CS Delay.
I am looking for judgments related to Vigilance leak out.
I am looking for judgments related to Corruption in Vigilance.

Members, Experts , pls feel free to post judgments specifically for the above four topics & pls color the extracts also for quick grasp.

Basically looking for CONTEMPT related to CS Delay.
Second purpose is CONTEMPT IN VIGILANCE.

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"
Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur
Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com


disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com
…………………………………………………………………

 CHARGE SHEET Expedition & FAIR INVESTIGATION before CS !!!
Vague allegations not acceptable

Summary: Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in CRL.M.C.7262/2006 on 23.02.2007 in Smt. Neera
Singh Vs State and Ors held that “vague allegations made against every member of the family
of husband cannot be accepted by any court at their face value and the allegations have to be
scrutinized carefully by the Court before framing charge”.

Other nice inferences from the judgment include – 1) taunting for bringing insufficient dowry
does not amount to an offense under Section 498-A of the IPC, 2)verification of the source and
flow of funds should be done if dowry is allegedly given, and 3) wife and her parents should be
prosecuted for giving dowry.

Full judgment:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Reserved on: 12.02.2007
Date of Decision: February 23, 2007
CRL.M.C.7262/2006
23.02.2007
Smt. Neera Singh ….. Petitioner
Through:Mr. L.B. Rai and Mr. V.K. Singh,
Advocates
versus
THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI)andORS…..Respondents
Through: Mr. Vikas Arora, Advocate for respondent
Ms. Richa Kapoor with Ms. Sukriti Bhardwaj, Advocates for State.
CORAM:
JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? YES.
2.To be referred to the Reporter or not? YES
3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? YES
SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA, J
1. This petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. has been made on behalf of petitioner for
quashing/setting aside the order dated 20th July, 2006 passed by learned Additional Sessions
Judge, Delhi whereby the learned ASJ upheld the order of the Trial Court discharging
appellants Bishan Pal Singh, Smt. Santosh Devi, Gajendar Singh and Toshan Singh. Bishan
Pal Singh is the father-in-law of the complainant, Smt. Santosh Devi is the mother-in-law of
complainant and Gajender Singh and Toshan Singh are the brothers-in-law (husband’s
brothers) of the complainant. The complainant made allegations involving almost every
member of the family of her in laws. Learned Metropolitan Magistrate, after going through the
evidence observed as under:
?Perusal of record shows that the allegations of the complainant are against the accused
person except the accused husband with respect of taunting for bringing insufficient dowry. But
there is not a single allegation that the accused persons made any subsequent demand for
dowry and consequent harassment for not meeting with their demands. Admittedly the
complainant and her husband and in laws of the complainant were staying at Ghaziabad.
Whereas the complainant most of the time resided with her husband at Riwari. It was held in
AIR 1996(Supreme Court) 67 that taunting for not bringing sufficient dowry is distinct from
demand of dowry and should not be confused with. Though taunting for bringing insufficient
dowry is also an uncivilized act but does not come within the purview of Section 498A,
sufficient to constitute the offence i.e. the cruelty to the complainant with respect to not
fulfillment of demand of of dowry. There is not a single allegation that except for the alleged
taunting the complainant was ever harassed with respect to further demand of dowry. Hence
the prima facie case under Section 498A is not made out against accused Bishan Pal, Santosh
Devi, Gazender Singh and Kaushan Singh.?
2. Against this order, the petitioner preferred a revision petition before the Court of Sessions
and the learned Sessions Judge after considering the entire material observed as under:
? In the present case, husband, Yashwant Singh, after marriage was residing separately from
his parent and brothers. He was residing at Rewari, Haryana. The
Ld. Trial Court found that allegation of the complainant are against the husband
only. There were no specific allegations against the accused persons, namely, Bishan Pal
Singh, Smt. Santosh Devi, Gajender Singh and Toshan Singh. The Ld. Trial Court was of the
opinion that there was not even a single allegation that the accused persons made any
subsequent demand of dowry and harassed the complainant for not fulfilling their demand. The
complainant most of the time was residing with her husband at Rewari, Haryana. There might
have been one or two instances of taunting for not bringing sufficient dowry but they are not
sufficient enough to attract Section 498A. There are not specific allegations with respect to
entrustment of dowry items to the accused persons. Since, the complainant stayed with her
husband at Rewari, Haryana, the entrustment of dowry articles can be presumed to be to the
husband. There were no specific allegations of entrustment to the accused person, namely,
Bishan Pal Singh, Smt. Santosh Devi, Gajender Singh and Toshan Singh.?
3. A perusal of the complaint would show that as per allegations dowry demand was made
even before marriage i.e. at the time of engagement and an AC was demanded from her father
by her in-laws and her father had assured that AC would be given at the time of marriage.
However, she told her father ?You have given car and AC at the demand of in laws, what will
happen if they demand a flat tomorrow?. Despite her this conversation with her father and
despite her knowing that dowry demand had already been made, she married in the same
family irrespective of the fact that she was well-educated lady and was an engineer and her
brother was in police. In fact, these kinds of allegations made after breakdown of the marriage
show the mentality of the complainant. I consider where these kinds of allegations are made,
the police should simultaneously register a case under Dowry Prohibition Act (in short ? the
Act?) against the parents of the complainant as well, who married their daughter despite
demand of dowry. Section 3 of the Act prohibits giving and taking of dowry. If a woman of
grown up age and well educated gets married to a person despite dowry demand, she and her
family becomes accomplaice in the crime under Dowry Prohibition Act.
4. Now-a-days, exorbitant claims are made about the amount spent on marriage and other
ceremonies and on dowry and gifts. In some cases claim is made of spending crores of rupees
on dowry without disclosing the source of income and how funds flowed. I consider time has
come that courts should insist upon disclosing source of such funds and verification of income
from tax returns and police should insist upon the compliance of the Rules under Dowry
Prohibition Act and should not entertain any complaint, if the rules have not been complied
with. Rule 2 of the Dowry Prohibition(Maintenance of List of Presents to the Bride and
Bridegroom) Rules, 1985 reads as under:
?2. RULES IN ACCORDANCE WITH WHICH LISTS OF PRESENTS ARE TO BE
MAINTAINED.-(1) The list of presents which are given at the time of the marriage to the bride
shall be maintained by the bride. (2)The list of presents which are given at the time of the
marriage to the bridegroom shall be maintained by the bridegroom. (3)Every list of presents
referred to in Sub-rule(1) or Sub-rule(2)- (a) shall be prepared at the time of the marriage or as
soon as possible after the marriage; (b) shall be in writing; (c) shall contain:- (i) a brief
description of each present; (ii) the approximate value of the present;
(iii) the name of the person who has given the present; and (iv) where the person giving the
present is related to the bride or bridegroom, a description of such relationship. (d) shall be
signed by both the bride and the bridegroom.
5. The Metropolitan Magistrates should take cognizance of the offence under the Act in respect
of the offence of giving dowry whenever allegations are made that dowry was given as a
consideration of marriage, after demand. Courts should also insist upon compliance with the
rules framed under the Act and if rules are not complied with, an adverse inference should be
drawn. If huge cash amounts are alleged to be given at the time of marriage which are not
accounted anywhere, such cash transactions should be brought to the notice of the Income
Tax Department by the Court so that source of income is verified and the person is brought to
law. It is only because the Courts are not insisting upon compliance with the relevant
provisions of law while entertaining such complaints and action is taken merely on the
statement of the complainant, without any verification that a large number of false complaints
are pouring in.
6. I consider that the kinds of vague allegations as made in the complaint by the petitioner
against every member of the family of husband cannot be accepted by any court at their
face value and the allegations have to be scrutinized carefully by the Court before framing
charge. A perusal of the complaint of the petitioner would show that she made all kinds of
allegations against her husband regarding beating, that her husband was having illicit
relationship with 35 girls; he forced her to write suicide note, abused her, taunted her,
threatened and told her that he was getting another bride of more richer family while she was
in Rewari with her husband and she made telephone call to her parents who came to Rewari
and took her to parental home. She had also given phone to one of her friends Jigyasa. A
perusal of the statement of Jigyasa would show that she told Jigyasa that it was her husband
who was torturing her and behaving with cruelty. However, in her complaint, she made
vague and omnibus allegations against every other family members. The statement
made by her and other witnesses have been scrutinized by me, except vague allegations and
allegations of taunting, there are no allegations of perpetuating cruelty on her by any of the four
respondents in order to compel her to bring more dowry or any particular items.
7. In view of my foregoing discussion, I find no reason to disagree with the order of two Courts
below. The petition is hereby dismissed being devoid of merits.
February 23, 2007 SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA, J.

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"
Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur
Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com


disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com
…………………………………………………………………

CHARGE SHEET Expedition & FAIR INVESTIGATION before CS !!!
How to ensure Fair Investigation while making CS

to ensure that those proofs in your favor get recorded loop the IO, SHO, DCP & PHQ in a single letter (paper tiger)
letter to SHO
copy to IO
copy to DCP
copy to PHQ

(1) then same day goto first SHO & give him first two copies & get receiving (diary number) hand to hand.
(2) then same day after above step goto DCP & get stamp & sign.
(3) then same day after above steps goto PHQ & get stamp & sign.

then after three working days goto DCP & get diary number recorded by them on the (2) above.
then after four working days goto PHQ & get diary number recorded by them on the (3) above.

Now, if in next CS if that is not recorded then that entails departmental action against the IO thru PHQ. On that basis you can do the following:-
(1) Complaint to CP PHQ for non-compliance
(2) Complaint to Vigilance CP PHQ or at lower level you can also complaint to CB CID
(3) Contempt of Court complaint to concerned judge or MM citing SC Judgment of Jan'2014
against IO

That's it !!!

What to do after CS
Source:- http://www.lacunaeinthechargesheet.blogspot.com

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"
Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur
Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com


disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com
…………………………………………………………………

CHARGE SHEET Expedition & FAIR INVESTIGATION before CS !!!
SOME3 wrote:
@aturchatur sir, is there any way to pressurize the dirty/corrupt cops towards fair invstigation ?
Or you feel only money can make the mare go ?

(Note:- Most of these are the discussions of the year 2014)
aturchatur wrote:
@ SOME3, Yes, I will post that letter of mine asap after CS is prepared for my case. I wrote the hints already above,i.e., after writing that paper tiger, how I approached IO, SHO, DCP & PHQ thru valid method.

I Already posted regarding perjury against dirty cops at social stigma thread above also reflected below. JUST SEARCH AS FOLLOWS ON SOCIAL STIGMA:-
How to file a Criminal Application u/s 340 CrPC against Dirty Cops - When they file a False Affidavit in the Court
Source:- http://www.pejuryagainstcops.blogspot.com

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"
Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur
Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com


disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com
…………………………………………………………………

CHARGE SHEET Expedition & FAIR INVESTIGATION before CS !!!
SOME4 wrote:
if possible then pls post that letter asap as i also am in need of it.
Thanks

aturchatur wrote:
@ SOME4 bro, check PM
aturchatur@yahoo.com

SOME4 wrote:
atur bhai send to my email also. mjbo....
thanks

SOME4 wrote:
atur bhai.
i have received a letter yesterday from PHQ saying that on your rti the same has been forwarded to SPUWC and East District for sending reply directly. however, i have asked some points which were concerning PHQ. should i appeal to PHQ for those points (first appeal). i am again sending you my rti application in email. seek ur and other members inputs. the information which i will be receiveing will be useful for other members also.
thanks

aturchatur wrote:
@ SOME4 bro, reas as follows:-
Yes, you need to mention that point no, XX & YY concerns your esteemed PHQ so I request that those info be provided by your respecxted authority.
For all other points, SPUWAC wll answer & you will wait for their answer.
NOTE:- In that letter while forwarding your RTI to SPUWAC by PHQ there is always a mention of FAA. If NOT then designate it to FAA PHQ Delhi. It will automatically reach the exact destination. Since you feel that this letter will help fellow figters, hence feel free to post there so others can also suggest directly to you.
Thanks & Regards
Atur Chatur
aturchatur@yahoo.com

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"
Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur
Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com


disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com
…………………………………………………………………


SOME4 wrote:
thanks brother for your prompt response chatur bhai.
1. my family court hearing is on 5th september. i am thining that in my reply, i will enclose some photos of children (in colour) in the court copy. wife copy and my copy i will just photocopy in black andwhite. as i sent u some photos of my childern, especially son looking very sad in 5-6 photos without father. in colour photos, it is more prominent.
2. another thing - what is dasti order. and how to apply for it during the hearings....
thanks


CHARGE SHEET Expedition & FAIR INVESTIGATION before CS !!!
ANTICIPATORY BAIL ORDER SAMPLE
SOME6 wrote:
Below is my anticipatory bail order, sharing for the benefit of all:

By this order, I propose to decide the bail application filed on behalf of accused
XXXXX. Arguments have been heard on the bail application from the learned
Additional PP assisted by the learned counsel of the complainant as also from the
learned counsel of applicant/accused. The present case has been registered under
Section 498-A/406/34 IPC. The learned counsel of the complainant has argued that the
allegations in the FIR are false and baseless. It is stated that the complainant left the
matrimonial home on XXXXX at her own. On XXXX, she again came to the matrimonial
home with her parents, brother and some other relatives and took away all the
jewellery articles with her.
It is stated that the complainant and her family has been extending threats to the
applicant/accused and his family and using unparliamentary language and passing
defamatory remarks. It is stated that on XXXX, complainant and her family created a
massive drama at Police Station XXXXX and had also manhandled the accused. It is
also submitted that complainant herself is not ready to take the dowry articles offered
by the applicant/accused before CAW Cell. The applicant had filed applications before
DCP, and SHO PS XXXXX for return of dowry articles. He also filed an application
before the court of learned MM for giving directions to SHO to take into possession the
admitted articles and on the said application, police filed a report that complainant is
not interested in coming to the police station for identification of her articles.
Along with this application, applicant has filed transcripts of recorded audio and video
conversation and has also filed a CD. The application has been opposed by the
learned Additional PP assisted by the learned counsel of complainant arguing that the
parents of the complainant had spent beyond their capacity but applicant and his family
were not happy and they demanded more dowry and that complainant's father
managed Rs. 5 lacs which were paid to the family of the applicant. It has been
submitted that the entire articles of Istridhan are in possession of the applicant and the
in-laws of the complainant and that custodial interrogation is required for the recovery
of articles of Istridhan.
The marriage between the applicant and complainant was solemnized on XXXX. As
per allegations in the FIR, at the demand of mother in law of the complainant, Rs. 5 lacs
were paid prior to the marriage. It has been stated in the FIR that the mother in law of
the complainant taunted her several times that there were more eligible matches than
her for her son. She was told that she has destroyed the sanctity of her house. She was
made to wash clothes including bedsheets. Her mother in law used to incite her
husband against her and used to tell repeatedly that her marriage will never last. The
applicant did not want the complainant to talk her parents for help. On XXXXX, her
mother in law threw her out of the house. The applicant supported his mother in her
decision. The applicant followed the complainant out of the house but when he found
that she had contacted her parents for help, he wanted her to come back in the house.
It is stated in the FIR that her in-laws and husband insulted her and that on XXXXX,
applicant threatened to kill her.
It is also stated that applicant under the influence of his mother, tortured her mentally
and threatened to divorce her several times. It has also been stated in the FIR that all
the valuable jewellery and belongings given to her by her parents have been retained
by her in-laws.
Along with the bail application, the applicant has filed various documents. He has filed
applications filed before the ACP and SHO for the return of admitted articles. He has
also filed the copy of an application which he filed before the court of learned MM for
giving directions to SHO/IO for taking possession of the admitted articles. In response
to the said application, IO filed the report that he has telephonically informed the
complainant but her response was that she would first consult her advocate and then
tell as to what she is to do.
The learned counsel of the applicant has argued that he had given CD to the DCP as
proof of his false implication vide letter dated XXXXX. The copy of the said letter has
been placed on record. The applicant has filed the CD along with bail application and
has also filed the transcription of recorded conversation with the parents of the
complainant and her relatives on XXXX when the applicant went to her place to pick
her up and in the said conversation, the parents and relatives of the complainant
agreed that there was no dowry demand and the complainant was not harassed
physically at all.
The applicant has also filed the transcripts of his conversation dated XXXX with the
complainant wherein the complainant admitted having taken her belongings with her.
The learned counsel of the complainant has argued that applicant is an IT expert and
has used his expertise to fabricate the CD but the learned counsel of applicant has
argued that he has also filed the video footage of the scene created by the complainant
and her parents at the main gate of the society of applicant which has been captured in
the CCTV camera of the society and the same cannot be fabricated and manipulated
and in this regard, a certificate has been issued by the President of society regarding
the genuineness and authenticity of the said video footage. It has also been argued by
the learned counsel of the applicant that in the CCTV footage, it can be seen that
complainant and her parents hurled most vulgar abuses on the mother of the applicant
and also made allegations of illicit relationship between the applicant and his mother.
The mother of the applicant has already filed criminal complaint under Section 500 IPC
for defamation against the complainant and her parents. Having gone through the
contents of the FIR, it is found that there is no allegation of dowry demand against the
applicant. Rather, most of the allegations are directed against her mother in law by the
complainant. The transcripts of recorded conversation prima facie show that applicant
had taken back her belongings. The applicant has already offered to return the dowry
articles before the police as also before the court. Otherwise also, the bail cannot be
denied on the ground that dowry articles are to be
recovered as the present proceedings are not for recovery of articles of Istridhan.
Hence, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the light of the
arguments addressed, it is directed that in the event of arrest, applicant/accused be
released on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- with surety of the
like amount with condition that he shall join the investigation and shall not tamper with
the evidence and shall not leave the country without the prior permission of the court.
He shall also surrender his passport, if any, with the IO.

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"
Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur
Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com


disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com
…………………………………………………………………


SOME4
dear atur bhai and other fighters
on friday family court hearing the principal judege of vishwas nagar family court said that now
the case is in karkardooma court since madhu vihar ps jurisidction in that court. so next hearing
on 22nd septembr 2.00 pm in karkardooma court principal judge mr. chadha.
will keep on updating

CHARGE SHEET Expedition & FAIR INVESTIGATION before CS !!!
Reply to SOME4 rgarding RTI Activism
Source:- check post in SOCIALSTIGMA thread with heading RTI ACTIVISM

SOME4 wrote:
brother atur
tomorrow i am planning to file rti first appeal for the reply so far provided by mha and phq in my case.

on my detailed rti (i had sent an advance copy to u also), mha ut division have just said that all the advisoryes are in their website. they are silent on teh officer to whom complaint to be made if violation etc. and some other points on the delhi police front, the phq have just forwarded my application to dcp east and spuwc without providing information available with them.

so will file first appeal after bringing the papers from home. seek advice and guidance.

aturchatur wrote:
@ SOME4, Since the letter has been forwarded to SPUWAC etc hence from that date of forwarding you need to wait for their reply for at least 35 days. On 36th day, you can shoot a FIRST APPEAL.

Further, whom to complaint is a very small question because you can complaint to PHQ directly if any problem & the letter moves from there so this need not to be disputed. Directly catch their wrongs towards contempt if they did contempt of any standing instructions or court orders.

You can get your First Appeal prepared or perfectly drafted by me as I have a very good expertise in this matter. We need to catch the PIO and also ask for FIR or other legal action agains the PIO within our FA so that he doesn’t gets any out gate in connivance with the FAA.
Immediately send me the RTI and PIO Reply to my email id for guidance. thanks
aturchatur@yahoo.com

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"
Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur
Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com


disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com
…………………………………………………………………


SOME3
thanks brother i want to catch falseness of the fir lodged against me. also i think delhi gov.t mediation has failed since i am now not inclined to do it. 5th septe hearing in principal judge talwant singh family court of vishwas nagar. judge said that since it concern madhu vihar ps so case will be shifted to karkardooma court principal judge pradeep chaddah 22nd september 2 pm. i was able to give my reply to the court and also a copy to their lawyer. their lawyer saying that if u want court appointed mediator - not like the delhi govt. mediator. he will also protect ur interest and also he will directly report to the court / judge so no middleman. will see after some time.

i am also seriously thinking of filing complaint to cp, dp reg. invt. to be fair and fully to protect the interst of my children.
seek advice.
also if posible send me email abt ur case status

CHARGE SHEET Expedition & FAIR INVESTIGATION before CS !!!
aturchatur wrote:
thanks brother i want to catch falseness of the fir lodged against me.
do u mean CS not yet presented ?

also i think delhi gov.t mediation has failed since i am now not inclined to do it.
need not worry about it's failure/ success. just concentrate on your terms.

5th septe hearing in principal judge talwant singh family court of vishwas nagar. Judge said that since it concern madhu vihar ps so case will be shifted to karkardooma court principal judge pradeep chaddah 22nd september 2 pm.
Yes, that is fine because in March there were HC directions in regard thereof so that is a normal procedural aspect.

i was able to give my reply to the court and also a copy to their lawyer.
what reply you gave. important point to chhod diya tumne. pls write what u replied.

their lawyer saying that if u want court appointed mediator - not like the delhi govt. mediator.
if their lawyer saying verbally then let them say. if they give in writing anything or any such thing comes on court record then take out CC & discuss so we can discuss. the opp g@ng seems to be in a bit/bot hurry to trap u thru mediation route. Stand firm dear like u followed my advise 6-8 weeks back when you were highly fed up & tensed due to
the biased mediator at DDRS

he will also protect ur interest and also he will directly report to the court / judge so no middleman.
just say hmmm hmmm i.e., willingness. as u say. do not say no to any mediation. just attend it. opp g@ng will be more worried if mediation fails as I knows ur case so far.

will see after some time.
OK

i am also seriously thinking of filing complaint to cp, dp reg. invt. to be fair and fully to rpotect the interst of my children.
Yes, that I encourage. Go ahead. Post here itself the letter so amendment can be suggested by other fighters also & that will also facilitate learning for many more prospective fighters over the yrs to come.

seek advice.
read above.

also if posible send me email abt ur case status
if u check page 2 of SOCIAL STIGMA thread then you will find the updates there itself, else more we will talk thru other communication channels
aturchatur@yahoo.com

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"
Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur
Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com


disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com
…………………………………………………………………

CHARGE SHEET Expedition & FAIR INVESTIGATION before CS !!!
SOME7 wrote:
Members,
Police has denied to answer my RTI questions. I sent RTI to Police Commisioner office on Aug 13th from there it was sent to corresponding office for answer and then finally I got reply that they can not answer my RTI.
What to do.

aturchatur wrote:
If you asked the question, for which the answer has to be provided under RTI Act'2005 then they have to provide you the answers.
Can u copy-paste just your RTI Application so exact/ to-the-point suggestions can be provided?

Thanks & Regards
Atur Chatur
aturchatur@yahoo.com

SOME4 wrote:
give first appeal to Police commissioner enclosing the rejection letter of the police. also say that since it concerns human rights violation it is a serious violation that police is point blank denying your information. do it fast and update members also abt the reaction.

rti, sc judgement, etc are meant for protecting human rights information.

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"
Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur
Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com


disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com
…………………………………………………………………

CHARGE SHEET Expedition & FAIR INVESTIGATION before CS !!!
Charge Sheet Returned due to LACUNA
https://in.news.yahoo.com/court-returns-charge-sheet-against-amit-shah-080211662.html

UP court returns charge sheet against Amit Shah
The magistrate returned the charge sheet with directions to police that the case should be reinvestigated as there were many lacuna in the sections slapped on Shah.

The rejection left the Akhilesh Yadav government red-faced as the BJP state unit has alleged that the Samajwadi Party government added new sections - some serious and nonbailable - against Shah out of political vendetta.

Shah reportedly delivered the speedch April 4. He was then booked by police for breaching prohibitory orders under Section 144. He was at that time in charge of the BJP poll campaign in Uttar Pradesh.

Now, more Sections - 153(a), 295(a) and 505 of the Indian Penal Code - have been added to the charge sheet filed by Nai Mandi police of Muzaffarnagar.

Meanwhile, home department officials said police would will be asked to re-investigate the matter thoroughly and submit a new charge sheet.

SOME1 wrote:
Neta logo ka kanoon aam aadmi pe apply nahi hota
These are political moves

aturchatur wrote:
You are correct SOME1, that's why heading includes the terminology LACUNA.
Summary:- If any1 wants to raise questions on CS then it will be lacuna (i.e., the gaps) which one needs to concentrate on.

LACUNA are of Two Types viz.,
(A)   that favors accused:- SOME1 uses M Power & get dirty cops leave some lacuna in CS so that accused can file for quash. This is practical one which was suggested to me by a lawyer some time back to which I said no as my complaint against dirty cops was already started & I wanted all my fight on ethics & contempt & standing circulars & guidelines etc.
(B)    When there is NO lacuna using M power:- but SOME2 still finds such lacuna. for instance:-
FIR starts from 498/406/34. But in CS 313 is also added. Now, after getting CC of CS & annexed documents, the accused PIP/counsel finds that there are no proofs i.e., Lacuna, that can be way of fighting.
Hope it clarifies.

Thanks & Regards
Atur Chatur
aturchatur@yahoo.com

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"
Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur
Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com


disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com
…………………………………………………………………

CHARGE SHEET Expedition & FAIR INVESTIGATION before CS !!!
Jeweller's tax evasion caught after complaint on false bills
SOME1 wrote:
Hi all,
I have been following messages/posts in this forum from quite some time and have learned a lot. I thought to share a success story with all members.

A dowry harassment case under IPC 498a and 406 was filed last year on my entire family. Girl's side submitted false jewellery bills to the police, when my family members were arrested, so that they can get the custody of my family members extended under the garb of streedhan recovery.

These jewellery bills were prepared by girl's cousin, who is a jeweler himself. He didn’t mention any VAT on those bills. Moreover, many irregularities are there on these bills, as these were prepared in hurry and with mal-intention. Police didn't investigate those bills at all and shared there incapability in investigating an economic offence.

We sent a complaint to Commercial Tax Department for the investigation of these bills and after consistent follow up and couple of RTI's, we received the information. The anti tax evasion team nailed down the jeweler and found an offence under section 25(1), 55 and 61 of VAT act 2005 on him. During the audit of his documents for the last three
years, anti tax evasion team found no entries in his books on the sale of jewellery worth Rs 50 Lakhs. Jeweller accepted his offence and paid the required tax with interest and penalty.

I have few queries and appreciate comments from the experts in this forum

a. Would this story be of interest for media and is this a good time to share this story on the subject or as a success under RTI. If yes, I will be grateful if you could share contacts of the journalists, who will be interested in such story. Your inputs/ideas are welcome.

b. The other query is on the authenticity of the bills. Now since he has paid taxes on those jewellery bills after 3 years from the date of cash memo and post the complaint, would that mean that the bills can be treated genuine by the court?

SOME4 wrote:
brother some quick inputs from y side.
1.       your wife cousin brother if preparing false bills for convicting u and your family is not only guility of tax evaision but also guilty of criminal case and extortion and contempt of court and others.... i think u should file a criminal complaint in this matter not only against the wife but also against this cousin also.
2.       yes this should be also in the media. it is not a matter of simple fraud but a criminal connivance between ur wife and cousin and their family. it should also be taken up strongly in the relevant court also and i think u should also request the hon'ble court to start criminal proceedings against them also.
3.       since one of their major lies has been exposed they will be on the backfoot and will not be able to defend other charges being made.
4.       even in ipc i think 188 misleading charge made so that the other party is sent to jail - u can press for charges on that point aklso.
thanks

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"
Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur
Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com


disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com
…………………………………………………………………

CHARGE SHEET Expedition & FAIR INVESTIGATION before CS !!!
CHARGE SHEET PRESENTED OR NOT - Find Out thru RTI
SOME1 wrote:
APPLICATION FOR INFORMATION UNDER THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT 2005

FORM A

SECTION 6(1) OF THE RTI ACT,2005 READ WITH

To,
The State Public Information Officer,
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, IPS
Deputy Commissioner of Police (Headquarters), XXXXXXXXXXX,
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Subject: Application under Section 6(1) of the RTI Act – 2005, as being this matter concerns to the life and liberty of applicant XXXXXXXXXXXX.

Reference: XXXXXXXXX P.S. Case No. XXXX, Dated: XXXXXXX filed at XXXXXXXXXXX by XXXXXXXXXXX against XXXXXXXXXXXX and XXXXXXXXXXX u/s 498a, 406, 34, 3-4 DP Act.

Respected Sir,
Kindly provide me the requested information the details of which are given below:
1. Full name of the applicant : XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
2. Father’s Name of applicant : XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
3. Address :
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Email id.: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX Mobile No.: XXXXXXXXXXXX
4. Particulars of information required :
4.1 Certified copy of FIR XXXXX P.S. Case No. XXXXXX, Dated: XXXXXXXX filed at XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX.
4.2 Certified copy of Charge Sheet against FIR XXXXX P.S. Case No. XXXX, Dated:
XXXXXXXXX filed at XXXXXXXXXXXXX.
4.3 Certified copies of all documents, annexures, case diaries, medical reports, list of dowry items, witness statements, seizure list, PR Bond, bail order, etc. complete in all aspects related to XXXXXX P.S. Case No. XXXXX Dated: XXXXXX filed at XXXXXXXXXXXXX.
4.4 In case any of the information sought above is denied, kindly provide justification for the same.
4.5 Whether the applicant is below poverty line: NO
4.6 Whether applied earlier to other PIO: NO
5. I state that the information sought does not fall within the restrictions contained in Sections 8 and 9 of the Act and is a matter of my life and liberty.
6. I state to the best of my knowledge that the information sought above pertains to your office (vide police order no. 8/2012 dated 19/04/2012).
7. Attached Documents:
7.1 Indian Postal Order No. _____________ dated ____________ Post Office City________________ Rs________________ as application fees.
7.2 Copy of Identity card of applicant as proof of identity and proof of address.

Signature of the applicant
Place:
Date :

Copied to:
1. XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Commissioner of Police (Headquarters), XXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

2. Inspector in charge
XXXXXXXXXX Police Station,
XXXXXXXXXXXX

I had sent these application along with the postal order attached through registered post (status delivered.. took print out from indiapost.gov.in) to the PIO but not received any communication from them... should I go for first appeal ? if yes can anyone please provide a the details i should include into first appeal?

SOME1 wrote:
I got a letter from PIO which gave the Charge sheet number and asked me to collect the documents from court.
I have got the copies from court... Also I sent another RTI (around 12 pages) mostly Yes/No, amounts, justification, etc to get information about investigation of 498a case under 7.1 Life or Liberty around 5 - 6 days back.. I am waiting for them to come back..

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"
Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur
Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com


disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com
…………………………………………………………………

CHARGE SHEET Expedition & FAIR INVESTIGATION before CS !!!
SOME8 wrote:
Aturchatur Bhai,
Well FIR already done which is Xerox copy of complaint of bitch she gave in CAW. No allegation of dowry and I already returned all stridhan and took receving from her as well as I/O of CAW cell attested the same that all her stridhan received. Then I left India . After that CAW sent complaint to Her thana and they filed fir . I got a copy from DP website. Tracked the court proceeding and notice issued first time came back as premised lock and on second date judge
sent notice thru speed post and next date is in dec.

I brief u all thru pm but now I am writing in detail.

1. As stridhan return can I file rti that y 406 is put in fir although I already returned all before fir.
2. There is no dowry allegation then why they put 498 a although bitch had mentioned in complaint of physical abuse.
3. At this stage what type of rti and to whom I can send which help me to get AB and later qashing the FIR.
4. Please keep in mind I am outside India. So I have to file RTI from outside India. Should I mention my outside India address.
5. If possible give me RTI format which is applicable in this stage.
6. If possible give me your cell number thru pm so I will talk to u. No pressure.
Regards
SOME8

SOME8 wrote:
Cont: bitch filed the case I. Delhi her residence but we stayed together in noida. She had mentioned in complaint that crime happened in Delhi neither there is anything which shows crime spread. Prima facie shows crime that bitting her only happened in my home by me. Truth is that we had arguments and quarrel but no physical a used happened. Neither she have any medical to prove.
2. She filed complaint after 20 days leaving my house.
Just see how I can handle all.

SOME8 wrote:
Sorry read as follow: she had not mentioned that crime happened In Delhi (her maternal house). Can case to change judriction filed.

aturchatur wrote:
RTI must be filed from Indian Address.
Get a postbox number & let any1 file it on your behalf.
Or better, tell any family relative to file it.
Mention dhingra contempt of court judgment which says FIR can't be done without proper probe. It will be even better if you directly file a complaint to Delhi PHQ regarding FIR done in contempt of court.
Yes your other points regarding 406 & 498a seem to be something worth which can form part of RTI or complaint.
Your other two postings had something which are called as contradictions which will be answered when she will file DV or 125 or 24HMA or any other case on you.
Hope this clarifies

SOME8 wrote:
Thanks aturchatur Bhai,
I do have dhingra judgement. Can you please pm me rti format/ complaint format to send to PHQ.
Regards
SOME8

aturchatur wrote:
Regarding RTI formats etc you must be a regular at RTI CONSULTANT DELHI website.
Visit:-
http://www.RTIconsultantDELHI.blogspot.com
Regarding complaint to PHQ, simply write a letter as per your best judgement make it a final draft.
When it's fully finalized then post it here for suggestions.
aturchatur@yahoo.com

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"
Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur
Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com


disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com
…………………………………………………………………

CHARGE SHEET Expedition & FAIR INVESTIGATION before CS !!!
SOME4 wrote:
atur bhai i have sent a draft of the complaint to cp, dp. kindly have a look and email me with ur suggestions or pm me.
yesterday hearing nothing happened. principal judge of karkardooma gave next date for 25.2.2015. also thinking of writing to teh chief justice of delhi high court for fair trial and child visitation on urgent basis.
thanks

aturchatur wrote:
@ SOME4, can u please post the letter here ?
aturchatur@yahoo.com

SOME4 wrote:
I will PM right now
aturchatur@yahoo.com

aturchatur wrote:
replied SOME4, also post here the RTI response that you received regarding contempt
aturchatur@yahoo.com

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"
Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur
Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com


disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com
…………………………………………………………………
 CHARGE SHEET Expedition & FAIR INVESTIGATION before CS !!!
RTI to police on false 498a arrest
(prepared SOME9)

Application for obtaining information under the Right to Information Act, 2005

From:
(Your Name and Adress)

To:
Public Information Officer
O/o SSP
XYZ CITY

Reference : FIR No —–Dated—– at XYZ Police Station

Respected Sir,

Subject: Particulars of Information Required on Cr.No:XXYY/2009

1.       Please provide me the Station Diary / Police diary and Roll Call of Cr.No: XXYY/2009 starting from dd/mm/yyy to dd/mm/yyyy and the entire case dairy details (communication docs between I.O, Inspector of Police and ACP).
2.       Please supply me information on date, time & place of crime happened.
3.       Please provide me I.O details, date, time & place of investigation.
4.       As per the complainant statement, she left matrimonial house on —– due to harassment,please supply the address and time of the incident.
5.       Please supply me Cr.No: XYZ/2009 Investigation/enquiry details (happened at crime place,).
6.       Please provide me Cr.No: XYX/2009 case certified FIR copy, documentary evidences collected & Charge Sheet.
7.       Please supply me certified copies of the documentary evidences collected by the I.O before fixing my family into the case (collected from Miyapur for the allegations happened at Miyapur).
8.       Please supply me certified copies of the documentary evidences collected by the I.O before fixing my family into the case (collected from Dilsuknagar for the allegations happened at Dilsuknagar).
9.       Please supply me information which are the allegations happened at Dilsuknagar.
10.   As per the complainant’s statement, they gave 2 plots, 11 lacks rupees cash and 40 tulas gold. Please provide those 2 plots details given and the date of transfer of property and documentary evidences collected by Investigation officer.
11.   Please provide the documentary evidences or bank statements for the transaction of 11 lakhs amount.
12.   Please provide documentary evidences or receipts for 40 tulas Gold and on which date they have given to accused.
13.   Certified copy of complainant’s medical or hospital records showing the physical harassment.
14.   Please supply me information on when Mr.FIL came to know about the incident (time, place and through which media).
15.   Kindly supply information under which sections of the Cr.P.C, the investigation is carried out at Dilsukh Nagar.
16.   As per Cr.P.C- 177 to 181, investigation on the crime should have happened at the crime place (in the present case crime place is Miyapur). Please provide me details whether this investigation is done as per the legal procedure.
17.   Kindly provide me information under which section(s) of Cr.P.C or other supporting Act, investigation is carried out for the crime FIR. xyz/2009.
18.   As per complaint, it is stated that my family members instigated me to demand dowry, does this allegation, abetting demanding dowry attracts 498-A IPC on my family members. If answer is YES, please provide the supporting reference docs for the same.
19.   All the allegations reported on accused persons happened at Miyapur. For the investigation on the crime happened outside your FIR registered PS limits, needs Honorable Court cognizance under Cr.P.C (156 & 170) sections, correct me if I am wrong. Please supply me the permission received from Honorable Court by the investigation team to continue their investigation.
20.   Kindly supply me information on the legal Act with section (sub-section if any) under which Saroor Nagar PS can investigate (to file charge sheet U/s-498A IPC) for the crime FIR No.xyz/2009 happened at Miyapur.
21.   As per Cr.P.C-161 statements of the complainant’s mother and witnesses dowry is given at the time of marriage. Giving dowry and abetting giving dowry is also crime. Kindly supply information why police did not register the case against these persons.
22.   Kindly provide me information on not collecting the neighbor’s statements at my house, Miyapur, Hyderabad.
23.   Please supply me information when I.O met (date, time and place) my sister, brother, parents and relatives (accused) and informed (with which medium) about the allegations on them during the investigation.
24.   Please supply me the details of people with whom I.O met during his/her investigation.
25.   Please supply me information why the complainant delayed to report the crime on May-15th 2008.
26.   Please supply me the documentary evidences supporting the crime by my relatives.
27.   Please send me the details (with bills) of the furniture that the complainant gave to us.
28.   Please specify the duration of stay of the complainant with my family at Miyapur and also specify the address of stay.
29.   Does any proof submitted to the police that show complainant lived with us.
30.   Complainant’s maternity uncle Mr. BOBBA Reddy says that 1 lack rupees dowry given at the time of marriage. Her mother says 11 lacks dowry given. Which statement is considered to be true by the I.O before filing the charge sheet?
31.   Does the I.O have given the opportunity to the accused to tell the facts with him/her before submitting the charge sheet in the honorable court? Please supply me the supporting evidence.
32.   Please provide me why I.O not interested to collect the statements from neighbors at Miyapur.
33.   Does it require collecting the statements from the neighbors at Miyapur?
34.   Please supply me information on “Jurisdiction” of PS in dealing the criminal cases.
35.   Does your PS have the jurisdiction to file the charge sheet?
36.   Does it required to inform the accused persons about the allegations on them. If answer is yes, does it happen in this case?
37.   Do you admit that I.O failed to transfer the case to the respective PS, which has jurisdiction to entertain the case?

Please provide me information on the above mentioned. For any particular item above if information is not available, kindly inform me why that particular item details were not available. If any of the above items is not understood kindly let me know, for rest of the items please send me the information.
Information required: Through Registered Post
Whether the applicant is below poverty line : No
Language demanded (U/s 6(1) of the RTI Act 2005): English
I.P.O (for Rs. 10/-) Number:……………………………….
In case the subject matter /any of the information is held by / related to another public authority, You are requested to transfer the application or such part of it as may be appropriate to that other Public authority with intimation to the undersigned (Section 6(3) of RTI Act).
Place:
Date: Signature

1. I have given a petition dated ——- requesting my wife to join matrimonial life, why IO did not disclosed that information in the Charge sheet or did not present it to the Honourable court.
2. Complainant and her parents very well knows about this petition for reqest to join marital life and in reply to that she denied to join marital life, but nowhere they mentioned about this in the FIR. Why the investigation officer did not disclosed this information in the charge sheet.
(This are Sample questions, you can change / add as per your situation)

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"
Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur
Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com


disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com
…………………………………………………………………

CHARGE SHEET Expedition & FAIR INVESTIGATION before CS !!!
If IO tries to Convict you Falsely by committing Perjury then use this judgment

The prosecution for perjury should be sanctioned by courts only in those cases where the perjury appears to be deliberate and conscious and the conviction is reasonably probable or likely. No doubt giving of false evidence and filing false affidavits is an evil which must be effectively curbed with a strong hand but to start prosecution for perjury too readily and too frequently without due care and caution and on inconclusive and doubtful material defeats its very purpose. Prosecution should be ordered when it is considered expedient in the interests of justice to punish the delinquent and not merely because there is some
http://indiankanoon.org/doc/185142878/

CAUTION:- It will work ONLY FOR DELIBERATE PERJURY so go ahead only if u can prove
that this perjury committed by dirty copy was deliberate.

We have given serious consideration to the material on record. However, we could not convince ourselves to take a view contrary to that of the High Court. The High Court has rightly reached the conclusion that there was no deliberate perjury to misguide the court while making such statement or filing the affidavit. In such a fact- situation, the question of allowing application under Section 340 Cr.P.C. read with Section 195 (1)(b) Cr.P.C. was not warranted.

Perjury Application Sample against Dirty Cops
http://www.perjuryagainstcops.blogspot.com

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"
Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur
Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com


disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com
…………………………………………………………………

CHARGE SHEET Expedition & FAIR INVESTIGATION before CS !!!
GOLD ITEM BILLS IN CS / WITNESS PROOFS

SOME10 wrote:
Hi Friends & atur chatur sir,
Need your advice here urgently...
My wife has produced 3 making bills of Gold items of 60 tola to IO in Police station...They are claiming that they have old gold with them ( Pushtaini ) and they have given that gold to Jeweller and he made new gold items of 60 tola...

They produced 3 bills where jeweller name is mentioned and description of items made ny jeweller and their weight is mentioned..

And making charges are also mentioned used to make that gold items...

NO VAT ...Service Tax is mentioned on bills and also Owner name to whom gold items are given is not mentioned...

IO is saying that she has taken statement from jeweller and he is saying that he has made those gold items out of old gold..

My question is....
1) Are these bills valid in court...will these be considerd as legally valid bills?
2) What complaint , RTI ..i can file to trap the jeweller as they have shown huge gold (60 tola )..
3) Where all i can file RTI..and what info i can ask from RTI
4) How to trap my in laws and jeweller using those bills ?

SOME11 wrote:
We have trapped N number of jewellars by summoning them in courts and in fact they all have denied and haave mentioned that they never issued such bills and never gave any statements to IO.

IO is also in dilemma now and some of the IO's are running behind to get this summoning closed as they also are getting trapped because jewellars and other shopkeepers mentioned that IO never came or never visited them for any kind of
statement in any case.

So I would advice you to file a criminal complaint under various sections and summon Sales Tax department and all bill owners during Pre-Evidence stage of that criminal case and see the results.

SOME12 wrote:
These bills are not sustainable in the eyes of law due to following reasons-
1- There is no name of purchaser
2- There is no vat paid
3- It may be their own justification to show the source of gold by saying that it is pustani, but how they will satisfy sales tax/vat depatt.and justify non-payment of vat?
4- If it would have been authentic nobody would pay vat. If we see practically, You go to the same jeweler and say you want to purchase fresh ornaments by exchanging old gold, he would first deduct 10% from old gold then charge labour charges, and if pacca bill required would have to charge vat.
5- Better forward the bills to vat/tax depatt. for verifying its authenticity.
6- Generaly it hapens that such bills are got prepared by giving extra payment to jeweler and presented to police to pressurise the boy to extort money with hope that the matter would not reach court but when after bail ,the matter goes to court, such people have to face music if matter is pursued properly.

Also check if bills have been issued on letter head or bill book form.
Other members may also give their views.

SOME13 wrote:
u must plead reconstruction of new jewellery from old does not mean that it was given to u
pukka bills are needed with sale tax etc
reconstruction can be for their own use
bill are false,fake,fabricated,manipulated and afterthought and procured one with malafide intention
u must summon jeweller along bill book and examine him as follows:-

have u bill books

why issued kacha bill in spite of fact u had pakka bill book with numbering

to whom u issued pukka bill on that date and not them why (why issued kacha bill)

who purchased whether written on bill

to whom u issued bill and have u any record

when purchased written on bill

it can be 10 yr ago bill or 6 month ago

have u licence to melt down and construct along with sale and purchase of jewellery

are doing work of dye cuting or goldsmith or sale purchase of jewellery or all

whether bill can be of other person as no name mentioned

what purpose for u reconstructed jewellery written on bill or u know

whether paid sale tax

whether u shown in ur income tax

give discription of old and new jewellery

have maintained separate record of reconstructed jewellery and brought today

whether u purchased old and sold new jewellery

anw record record of sale and purchase

old jewellery can be theft jewellery and u enquired about it and any info to police

aturchatur wrote:
@ SOME10, hope this clarifies your issues.
These are very very good explanations especially you get hold of this point mainly viz.,
(a)    if they say its old jewellery then you ask for sales tax and vat for reconstructing that old jewellery into new. Then why jeweler did not pay cat and sales tax on it. why io did not verified such validity & verifiability of such bills.
Valid Verified Bills

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"
Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur
Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com


disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com
…………………………………………………………………

CHARGE SHEET Expedition & FAIR INVESTIGATION before CS !!!
AFTER CHARGE SHEET PROBLEM SOLVED THRU RTI [FIRST APPEAL]
SOME1 wrote:
After 35 days wait, RTI application for inspection of case file and certified copies of identified records in an already chargesheeted case was denied in by PIO citing this rule:
http://highcourtofkerala.nic.in/RTI_Subordinate%20courts%20&%20tribunal.pdf
Section 12: "No application for information of document relating to any judicial proceedings shall be entertained under these rules"
What are my options now? I found so many CIC decisions stating otherwise, but I don't feel so hopeful...

SOME1 wrote:
I desperate to do an inspection of the case file as I'm suspecting foul play. Copy applications for certain documents within the case file was denied earlier citing various reasons like:

  1. document in file is not original or certified copy, so certified copy cannot be provided [how do I see whats in that document then?]
  2. certified copy of another court's order cannot be provided from this court [which I agree, but I need a copy of whats there in the case file]
Earlier foul play that we uncovered include deliberately providing incomplete certified copies (yeah, pages from middle were skipped/removed, caught it multiple times already), refuse copy application citing document do not exist in
case file. They succeeded in delaying me but eventually I got what I wanted.

Outlaws are quite influential...

For reasons above, I need to succeed in inspection of the case files in that court where DV & 498a are running...

SOME1 wrote:
Hurray!!! FAA allowed my appeal and ordered PIO to arrange for inspection of case file! Certified copies of any document identified should be provided through regular court process.

Here's what I wrote in appeal:
i. Section 22 of RTI Act 2005 clearly states that the information which is not available to citizens under any other disclosure laws should be disclosed under RTI. Though the Section 12 of High Court’s 2006 rules deny information
on judicial proceedings, it has been clarified multiple times by Central Information Commission that any documents which doesn’t fall under other Court rules for information dissemination and unless expressly forbidden from
disclosure should be allowed under RTI. Please refer to enclosures for list of CIC orders.

ii. ... [not relevant]

iii. Nothing in the case file has been expressly forbidden from disclosure by the JFCM Court. Hence by the CIC decisions enclosed, PIO was wrong in rejecting the RTI application.

iv. To best of my knowledge, no other provisions are available for inspecting the case file. Hence, u/s 22 of RTI Act, 2005 the PIO should have allowed inspection of the case file.

SOME1 wrote:
Just heard now - PIO got punishment transfer for malpractices including tampering court records and is facing departmental enquiry. Truth prevails!!!
THANKING ATUR CHATUR SIR FOR ALL QHE SUPPORT & GUIDANCE PROVIDED YOU YOU.
YOU ARE THE REAL RTI EXPERT CHATUR SIR. I HIGHLY RECOMMEND YOU TO EVERY VICTIM OF FALSE 498A.

aturchatur wrote:
@ SOME1, congrats for your success. It’s my honor to be part of your success story. It will be my honor to help each & every 498a victim of India and also NRI’s trapped in false 498a, crpc 125, DV and maintenance cases.
RTI is the best tool which can help one in gathering evidences. These evidences can directly help break the false 498a, false DV, false 125, false RCR and other false cases of your beloved wifey.
Contact me for preparing your RTI’s, FA, SA/ CIC matters in an expert manner.
aturchatur@yahoo.com

Best Wishes & Happy fighting false cases & SOCIAL STIGMA on u & family!!!

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"
Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur
Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com


disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com
…………………………………………………………………





Comments

  1. Men Cell in Delhi is the one stop solution if you are looking for Men's helpline in Delhi or Man Cell in Delhi or a helpline for harassed husbands in Delhi.

    When someone gets a false FIR u/s 498a ipc registered by his wife, then, first thing that comes to the mind is helpline for harassed husbands in India or men's rights activists delhi i.e., where a harassed husband may file complaint against the wife in delhi.

    The complaint letter against wife in Delhi may be suggested by men cell in delhi in the form of man cell in south delhi, man cell in rohini or man cell delhi contact number.

    Similarly, if a Non Resident Indian boy married in India or marries a girl from Delhi and she files subsequently a false complaint with women cell in Delhi i.e., at Crime Against Women Cell in Delhi which is also known as CAW Cell Delhi then the NRI husband may start looking for NRI MEN CELL IN DELHI or a NRI HELPLINE IN USA/ UK or simply a helpline for harassed husbands in Delhi.

    Since the male harassment cases in India especially in Delhi are on a rise and therefore Delhi may not be just called only as a rape capital but also a false 498a harassment capital and therefore harassed husbands helpline in Delhi may lead you to man cell in delhi or you may check for male harassment in India statistics by way of save indian family of delhi helpline numbers in delhi or simply men's right whatasapp group in Delhi

    At Man Cell Delhi we provide the men with atur chatur counselling in which guidance is provided regarding how to file false cases. Also RTI , dp3, extortion, perjury, malicious prosecution, crpc 91, 21-b etc type fighting tactics are guided to you so that you can fight the false cases on you & your family at your own.

    mobile :- +91-9873540498
    email:- aturchatur@yahoo.com
    website:- http://manhelpdelhi.blogspot.in
    free ebook:- http://bit.ly/1GH4v4r

    ReplyDelete
  2. A Non Resident Indian (NRI) husband when trapped in a false 498a FIR looks for help seeking Quash Petition or Samples of a Quash Application u/s 482 Criminal Procedure Code.

    But, in order to have a better discussion on the dowry laws procedures and especially relating to closing of a false FIR under section 498a ipc FIR, then as per Atur Chatur, one may contact the NRI 498a Helpline in India for the NRI husbands.

    NRI QUASH
    http://www.nriquash.com

    The above website for NRI Quash relates to some steps which may be done by a NRI before he files a quash petition so that the chances of success of a Quash Petition are higher for the simple reason that a Quash u/s 482 crpc or a Bail or Anticipatory Bail u/s 438 or u/s 439 CrPC may comes with conditions such as:-
    - Travel Restrictions
    - Passport Impounding
    - Attending Court or Joining Police Investigation by personal visit to India despite the busy schedule of the Non Resident Indian husband who may be working in USA/ UK/ Dubai/ Australia/ NZ etc

    Hence, vis-a-vis a NRI Men Cell or a Helpline for the NRI's especially for the NRI husbands to counter false 498a, the help may be sought from:-
    http://www.nri498ahelpline.com

    Since a false FIR is a human rights issue for a NRI husband, hence, it may be utmost necessary to invoke the Human Rights of the Non Resident Indian husband living abroad so that the wife does not get blue corner notice or god forbid even a red corner notice issued against a NRI by contacting USA Immigration against the NRI husband using her false, wild/ bald and concocted stories.
    Therefore, Human Rights of a NRI may be invoked by understaindg some key human rights issues related to a NRI husband listed at:-
    http://www.humanrightsofnri.com

    if any help is needed then contact any time (24 hours):-
    http://freeconsultationonemail.aturchatur.com

    email:- aturchatur@yahoo.com

    or visit the website:-
    http://quashpetitionfir498adiscussiondowrylawhelplinenri.mancell.org/

    ReplyDelete
  3. A Non Resident Indian (NRI) husband may get his passport seized and if he is so scared of false 498a ipc FIR or soft laws for women in India then he may start running like proclaimed offnder or he may start avoiding the summons or notices and this ignoring of false 498a may cost dear to the husband.

    When the Non Resident Indian husband applies for Anticipatory Bail or Bail under sections 438 or 439 of criminal procedure code then he may be shocked to hear the conditions laid down by the court while rejecting his bail application vis-a-vis:-
    - Passport Seizure
    - Travel Restrictions
    - Look Out Circular Issues
    - Passport Impounding
    - Proclaimed Offender Issues
    - Attending Court or Joining Police Investigation by personal visit to India despite the busy schedule of the Non Resident Indian husband who may be working in USA/ UK/ Dubai/ Australia/ NZ etc
    - Red Corner Notice or a Blue Corner Notice
    - and so on

    Hence, a NRI husband needs to be extremely cautious while travelling to India when the 498a FIR is on because this false 498a ipc complaint/ FIR by wife in the PS or within the Crime AgainstWomen (CAW) Cell may cause some real troubles for the NRI especially in the Immigration.

    For Example:-
    If the NRI husband is staying in USA on a H1 B Visa, and the wife approcahes US Immigration or Indian Immigration in the USA/ American Peninsula.

    So, dear Non Resdient Indian husband, even if your wife has played some mischief with you by way of L1 Fraud and she married you just to get herself settled in USA Virginia with her boyfriend and you were just a puppet then you need to file counter LTR against the wife or at least a SILENT LTR to protect yourself from false and arbitrary arrest and if you do NOT fear the arrest in false 498a FIR then at least you may learn the legal procedure to close a false FIR in India.

    Since a false FIR is a human rights issue for a NRI husband, hence, it may be utmost necessary to invoke the Human Rights of the Non Resident Indian husband living abroad so that the wife does not get blue corner notice or god forbid even a red corner notice issued against a NRI by contacting USA Immigration against the NRI husband using her false, wild/ bald and concocted stories.
    Therefore, Human Rights of a NRI may be invoked by understaindg some key human rights issues related to a NRI husband listed at:-
    http://www.humanrightsofnri.com

    Similarly, there may be men rights for nri's in India to guide them about real men rights activists in India and also teach them about some people with vested interests or political interests cartying out bogus men rights organisations at India Gate Delhi or elsewhere all over India. To know more, check:-
    http://www.menrightsfornri.com

    if any help is needed then contact any time (24 hours):-
    http://freeconsultationonemail.aturchatur.com

    email:- aturchatur@yahoo.com

    or visit the website:-
    http://passportseizureand498anritravelingtoindialocissue.mancell.org/

    ReplyDelete
  4. A Non Resident Indian (NRI) husband may start looking for best NRI Lawyer in Delhi when his wife goes to Crime Against Women Cell (CAW) in Delhi and she files multiple false cases against the Non Resident Indian Husband vis-a-vis false dowry claims.

    Instead of a best NRI Laqwyer in Delhi or a best NRI Dowry cases lawyer in Delhi or a best 498a counter cases Lawyer in Delhi or best advocate in Delhi, it is suggested to the NRI to get in touch with aturchatur and file a LTR as per the given link below:-
    http://www.socialstigma.in/2017/10/how-to-close-false-caw-or-false-fir.html

    Hence, when a Non Resident Indian's wife leaves USA and goes to India without his consent or avoids to come back to USA/ abroad with the NRI, then the NRI must immediately file a LTR instead of waiting for the wife to take a step ahead.

    Similarly, a LTR Fair and Unbiased Investigation and also a LTR Protection from False and Arbitrary Arrest and also a LTR Protection from False Cases, are the three major types of LTR which a NRI may file immediately when a wife goes to CAW or a FIR is lodged at PS.

    if any help is needed then contact any time (24 hours):-
    http://freeconsultationonemail.aturchatur.com

    email:- aturchatur@yahoo.com

    or visit the website:-
    http://falsenri498abestlawyernridivorcedowrycasesindelhi.mancell.org/

    ReplyDelete
  5. A Non Resident Indian (NRI) husband may get issued against him a proclamation order under section 82 of the criminal procedure code but as per sub section (4) of section 82 of the crpc, such a proclamation order is false and arbitrary and is therefore null and void in cases relating to matrimonial disputes because section 498a ipc is not registered as a crime under sub section 4 i.e., list of crimes for which such an order may be passed.

    Hence, a NRI may not be made a proclaim offender or absconder in a false 498a ipc FIR. And even in cases of Indian resident husbands, the proclaim offender may not be legally or technically issued against a husband in a matrimonial dispute involving section 498a ipc or 406 ipc or 34 ipc charges

    And even in matters pertaining to 120B or Dowry Prohibition Act 3 & 4 rules, i.e., 3 & d/p act, the PO may not be declared legally or technically by the court, and if any court issues any such illegal orders then this needs to be challenged. For details please visit:-
    http://proclaimedoffender.blogspot.com/

    Similarly, for a Red Corner Notice or a Look Out Circular Notice against a NRI (Non Resident Indian) husband need be cancelled immediately and the passports seized need to be revoked but after knowing the right steps for:-
    http://howtocancelfir.aturchatur.com/2018/05/how-to-cancel-look-out-circular-as-per.html

    Similarly, Section 498a ipc is being grossly misused in India and due to this reason there is possibility of creation of a men cell in delhi by the government of india in near future but if you wish to know What is Section 498a? and Is Section 498a non bailable?
    Is 498a applicable after 7 years?
    Can 498a case be withdrawn?
    then you need to update yourself with 498a amendment vis-a-vis section 498a punishment and also punishement for wife who files false 498a charges against husband as per the 498a judgments and therefore the punishment for misuse of 498a may act as a deterrent and also as protection against section 498a ipc so get yourself with 498a latest update in 498a cases by visiting the following link:-
    https://howtocancelfir.aturchatur.com/2019/03/498a-ipc-by-atur-chatur.html

    if any help is needed then contact any time (24 hours):-
    http://freeconsultationonemail.aturchatur.com

    email:- aturchatur@yahoo.com

    or visit the website:-
    http://proclaimationordersection82issuedagainstnriusauk.mancell.org/

    ReplyDelete
  6. Atur Chatur Sir from NRI 498A HELPLINE may suggest the Non Resident Indian (NRI) some fighting tactics to those NRI's whose wives have filed false 498a ipc FIR against them and such NRI husband may not have to come to India to fight or close a false 498a ipc FIR and any such false 498a and false divorce and false domestic violence complaint filed by wife in India need to be fought from abroad party in person without using the servivces of any advocate.

    Atur Chatur may suggest you the right legal procedure after FIR under section 498a of Indian Penal Code. This procedure under the legal or technical terms is called as fair and unbiased investigationbut if the FIR is false then the investigation is bound to be false else either the complainant or the enquiry officer may get in trap of the clutches of law for getting a false FIR registered hence also in cases where the false FIR is registered by complainant using M power by the complainant wife then she may again use the M power to bribe the investigation officer because the FIR is false and when a FIR is false then the procedure for investigation has to be biased otherwise a B Report may get presented instead of a Charge Sheet.

    Hence, the right legal procedure for investigation after FIR requires:-
    (a) FAIR INVESTIGATION
    (b) Unbiased Investigation
    (c) Procedure to investigate each and every allegation
    (d) Procedure to issue CrPC 91 Notice to the complaint to submit proofs or evidences in support of her false, wild, bald allegations, after thoughts and concocted stories.

    In Delhi, there may be team working to help against false FIR in Delhi or to help against false CAW Cell Complaint by Wife in Delhi, who in order to harass their Non Resident Indian husbands from USA/ UK etc may try to extort money from them vis-a-vis Legal Extortion hence, the Delhi Men Rights Activists or Men Cell Delhi may be contacted at:-
    http://mencelldelhi.mencell.org

    Therefore, it can be seen that after FIR, the procedure for investigation after FIR demans strict counter action against a false FIR complainant as and when it is established that the allegations are false i.e., without any legs to stand on.

    When Prima Facie no case is made out i.e., when the case is not maintainable under the eyes of law, then as per the right technical and legal procedure after FIR, the investigation officer needs to prepare counter Charge Sheet against the complainant wife who lodged false FIR against the NRI husband deliberately and wilfully.

    if any help is needed then contact any time (24 hours):-
    http://freeconsultationonemail.aturchatur.com

    email:- aturchatur@yahoo.com

    or visit the website:-
    http://nrifightingdivorce498afromabroadwithoutcomingindia.mancell.org/2019/02/atur-chatur-on-procedure-for.html

    ReplyDelete
  7. Men's Helpline in Delhi for NRI's is provided. The help is also provided to men/ boys/ husbands who are not a NRI (non resident indians)
    http://mencelldelhi.mencell.org
    Call:- 9873540498

    Domestic Violence & Dowry Laws Experts are available for the NRIs & also for the Indian Businessmen trapped in false police complaints by their wives. If you have difficulty in learning the Domestic Violence & Dowry Laws & 498a or CrPC 125, then we can train you very well in all these areas. We specialise in False FIR 498a, False FIR Domestic Violence & Dowry Laws & False FIR CrPC 125 also.
    Our students are highly satisfied & have now good command in 498a & Domestic Violence & Dowry Laws & CrPC 125 respectively. We have different teachers for different levels of 498a, Domestic Violence & Dowry Laws & CrPC 125. We provide 498a Expert in Delhi, CrPC 125 Expert in Delhi & also Domestic Violence & Dowry Laws Expert in Delhi
    http://mencelldelhi.mencell.org
    Call:- 9873540498

    Learn 498a | Domestic Violence & Dowry Laws | CrPC 125 in as early in 20 classes based upon the level of the candidiate.
    498a | CrPC 125 | Domestic Violence & Dowry Laws | Expert | DELHI | These three subjects viz., 498a, Domestic Violence & Dowry Laws & CrPC 125 are the only three false cases in which we specialise. You can learn proper 498a, CrPC 125 & Domestic Violence & Dowry Laws & communicate confidently with the people surrounding you.
    http://mencelldelhi.mencell.org
    Call:- 9873540498

    498a Expert in West Delhi (9873540498), 498a section FIR Home Expert in North Delhi, 498a men rights activicts in delhi, 498a Grammer, CrPC 125 to 498a Expert for West Delhi, North Delhi, Rajouri Garden, Pitampura, Rohini, Paschim Vihar, Shalimar Bagh
    http://mencelldelhi.mencell.org
    Call:- 9873540498

    We provide very good 498a Experts in Delhi, Domestic Violence & Dowry Laws Expert & CrPC 125 Experts also provided for business people & NRIs. 498a section FIR Expert in west delhi, 498a Expert in south delhi, 498a grammer Expert in central delhi, 498a men rights activicts in delhi Expert in north delhi, public section FIR Expert in delhi, , rajouri garden, friends colony, pitampura, new friends colony, greater kailash, gk-i, ii, iii, gk-1,2 kalkaji, nehru place, vasant vihar, vasant kunj, basant vihar, 498a teacher, teachers, tuition, tuitions, tution, tutions, Expert, Experts, eng Expert in south delhi, False FIR 498a & grammer & 498a men rights activicts in delhi home Expert in delhi for confidence building, public section FIR 498a presentations, fluent 498a section FIR, 498a fluency, 498a talking, men rights activicts in delhi making, direct & indirect men rights activicts in delhi, reported men rights activicts in delhi, adjectives, noun, pronoun, adverb, verb, present tense future perfect, past tense, present tense future tense, future indefinite tense, confidence building Expert in delhi for 498a CrPC 125 Domestic Violence & Dowry Laws, business letter writing in 498a, notes making, men rights activicts in delhi, school 498a, False FIR 498a school, call center training, 498a trainers, corporate 498a trainers, 498a trainers for corporate houses, 498a trainer Expert in delhi, we provide corporate 498a training classes, corporate 498a trainers Experts in delhi & gurgaon, masters in 498a home Expert for 498a, better englisg, learn good 498a, my 498a Expert, 498a child custody & visitation petition Expert delhi south west delhi central & north delhi 498a Expert, my private 498a Expert, private 498a Experts network in delhi, 498a counter case Expert, 498a as a foreign counter case, test of 498a, best 498a Expert in delhi
    Call:- 9873540498
    http://mencelldelhi.mencell.org

    Web Site: http://mencelldelhi.mencell.org
    Contact Details: 0091-9873540498
    delhi

    ReplyDelete
  8. man helpline delhi (9873540498)
    http://manhelpdelhi.blogspot.com/

    this helpline provides help Non Resident indians working abroad in fighting false 498a and false divorce and other cases filed by wife while the NRI is abroad and this helpline may help the husband fight or contest and close a false 498a or other false cases from abroad without coming to India and without even using any vakalatnama or an advocate / lawyer/ counsel/ solicitor etc

    atur chatur 498a helpline for men (9873540498)
    http://www.socialstigma.in/2017/03/making-of-atur-chatur.html

    the helpline for nri husbands also suggest to fight these cases party in person

    ReplyDelete
  9. man cell delhi (9873540498)
    https://bit.ly/2JRMn6q

    if you want to know how to close a false fir then you must also know the difference between case closed and a fir closed

    so if a NRI is trapped in false cases then the delhi based men helpline may be contacted to know the real meaning of a false fir and how to close a false fir through fair and unbiased investigation thereby preparation of a b report by the state or police through it's IO i.e., investigating officer

    consultation by atur chatur on phone (9873540498)
    http://www.aturchatur.com/2015/05/atur-chatur-counselling.html

    ReplyDelete
  10. men cell delhi (9873540498)
    http://mencelldelhi.mencell.org

    if you want to know the procedure for quashing then you must know what is the meaning of quashing because under section 482 of the criminal procedure code then quash of a FIR depends upon several factors viz., grounds for quashing, vague allegations, no prima facie case made out, non maintainability of the case and technical error in the state FIR or court complaint etc

    the procedure for quashing may be to first file a LTR to weaken the case and also may file few RTI's in which the High Court or the lower court may ask you itself to file a Quash Petition, and if after LTR a quash is filed then the chances of success may be higher.

    a LTR means a Lego Technical Representation details of which may be found at socialstigma.in

    atur chatur india (9873540498)
    http://www.aturchatur.in/

    ReplyDelete
  11. man cell in delhi (9873540498)
    https://www.change.org/p/atur-chatur-man-cell-delhi-9873540498

    section 409 of the crpc and also the criminal breach of trust are some of the provisions which need to be studied closely before filing for quash

    but if a LTR is filed before going for a quash then that may be the best stratgey as the falsity comes on record of the courts and this may make the quashing feasible or possible with least pain hence in complaints related to 409 ipc also these may be studied invariably.

    atur chatur's helpline for men rights activists in delhi (9873540498)
    http://www.aturchatur.org/

    ReplyDelete
  12. men cell in delhi (9873540498)
    http://www.cityclassified.co.in/man-help-delhi-or-men-cell-in-delhi-ph-9873540498-suggests-man-cell-india-helpline/

    compromise is always sought in a false 498a not just by wives but also by the husbands especially if the husband is a NRI for the simple reason that this compromise is based on an agreement to close all false cases but if the wife is cunning then after receiving initial amount she may turn hostile to the agreement of mutual contested divorce and the husband i.e., NRI husband may lose his hard earned money and this part payment given to the wife may be used against the NRI husband itself by his disgruntled wife.

    go for compromise in a false 498a but at your terms and if you are adamant to pay to the wife despite falsity of these cases then go for LTR based compromise and details about LTR may be found at socialstigma.in and the reason for this LTR is that the section 89 of civil procedure code guides the mediation and if the MCD or agreement is made as per LTR 89 CPC then this may help husband put on record those things which otherwsie may be difficult to.

    hence, it is always beneficial to file for compromise even if the matter is a false 498a especially if you are a NRI and your life and career suffers and you want to get rid of this parasite to go on with your new life with a new wife or live in

    atur chatur helpline on internet and email for nri's (9873540498)
    http://www.aturchatur.net/

    ReplyDelete
  13. man helpline in delhi (9873540498)
    https://www.complaintboard.in/complaints-reviews/man-cell-delhi-9873540498-v-good-l399779.html

    quashing means to quash the basic FIR whereas the cancellation of FIR means that state filing a favorable report in favoir of accused and sometimes also as against the complainant and the two modes to achieve this goal is to g for b report or a c report vis-a-vis a final report i.e., FR of Truth

    atur chatur consultation on email (9873540498)
    http://www.aturchatur.info/

    ReplyDelete
  14. man cell delhi (9873540498)
    https://mancelldelhi.wordpress.com/

    supreme court of india has issued guidelines on quashing due to the reason that the state usually holds the FIR and as soon as the husband files for quashing then the state/ police i.e., the investigating officer presents a charge sheet which is technically invalid because where was the IO sleeping so long, hence the SC has issued guidelines that even if the CS has been filed after quash petition u/s 482 crpc is filed by husband or co-accused in a 498a matter, or any other matter then, even then the HC or SC may listen to the FIR quashing so this is not an excuse that a CS hjas been filed and the FIR may NOT be quashed but even better would be an approach wherein the husband files a LTR as per the link socialstigma.in before filing for quash u/s 482 crpc

    atur chatur (9873540498)
    https://bewareofdivorceyers.tumblr.com/

    ReplyDelete
  15. men cell delhi (9873540498)
    https://in.linkedin.com/in/man-cell-529573bb

    whenevr a man/ boy or husband from delhi starts seqarching/ looking for ways to get your fir quashed especially when a false FIR is lodged by the efforts of a wife or girlfriend then the first and foremost strategy is to contact a man cell in delhi but indian government may be in no mood to start such a helpline for men so the boys especially may start looking for man cell or NRI MEN CELL IN DELHI but the real help is provided only by those themselves experts in quashing of a FIR

    hence to get a FIR quashed a LTR may be filed as a pre-requisite to a 482 petition sample

    how to fight false domestic violence case as per atur chatur (9873540498)
    http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/Best-way-to-fight-against-false-domestic-violence-124445.asp

    ReplyDelete
  16. men rights for nri (9873540498)
    http://www.menrightsfornri.com

    if you want to cancel a fir from delhi police online portal then you may be at wrong place so far as the delhi police portal is concerned for the cancellation of the FIR

    but if you want to know the right legal procedure to cancel a FIR then you may be at a right place for the sole reason that a FIR is a public document which is placed in the public domain and therefore if you want to close a false FIR then you may need to file a LTR which may be done with the help or assistance of the delhi police or the opnline portal so check the details or procedure of a LTR at the socialstigma.in or the link below.

    498a ipc by atur chatur (9873540498)
    https://howtocancelfir.aturchatur.com/2019/03/498a-ipc-by-atur-chatur.html

    ReplyDelete
  17. man helpline delhi (9873540498)
    http://manhelpdelhi.blogspot.com/

    if the FIR has sole sections i.e., 376 and also the 34 ipc then there may be a greatert possibility of gang rape allegations against those accused who have been made co-accused of the crime with common objective

    and not necessarily the commo0n objective may be to gang rape but it may also be to abet the victim to suicide and one of those accuysed may have actually committed rape crime but the co-accused must have the common intention

    the false rape allegations especially those along with 34 ipc crime in a 376 FIR needs to be studied very carefully and found out the loopholes and after that a LTR as per socialstigma.in may be filed.

    atur chatur 498a helpline for men (9873540498)
    http://www.socialstigma.in/2017/03/making-of-atur-chatur.html

    ReplyDelete
  18. man cell delhi (9873540498)
    https://bit.ly/2JRMn6q

    whenever a FIR has been filed then there is no question left to ask what happens after FIR because the basic purpose of registration is to conduct an investigation and if the investigation is not conducted then the investigation is not fair and thereafter if the husband files for quash and the IO prepares a Charge Sheet in haux pauz or in a haste then the FIR Quashing petition may still be heard and even the FIR may be quashed without having to go into or look into the CS

    the SC is strict on the state but still for the success of a Quash, a LTR may be filed before filing 482 petition in high court

    consultation by atur chatur on phone (9873540498)
    http://www.aturchatur.com/2015/05/atur-chatur-counselling.html

    ReplyDelete
  19. men cell delhi (9873540498)
    http://mencelldelhi.mencell.org

    quashing of fir means quashing of criminal proceedings and the section 482 of criminal proicedure code may be used for such quashing but before going for quashing it may be relevant to file a LTR before hand so that the unethical practices may be duly curbed and the human rights of the accused may be protected and invoked

    in delhi, the men cell delhi needs a push from the government so that such org's come up and get estabished by the government of india like there may be women cells in almost all localities of delhi

    atur chatur india (9873540498)
    http://www.aturchatur.in/

    ReplyDelete
  20. man cell in delhi (9873540498)
    https://www.change.org/p/atur-chatur-man-cell-delhi-9873540498

    best way to clear false allegations and to close a FIR may be to file a LTR given at socialstigma.in

    this LTR may help in closing a false 498a FIR and even the young boys trapped in false 376 related FIR by their livein partners or girfriends needs to be closed via b report or even by a c report and this may be done only by a LTR

    so boys and men need to understand the need for breaking sanctity of a women or at least break the sanctity of that women who has filed a false case on you and this breaking of sanctity needs to be legal or technical i.e., through a LTR only as per the best of our knowledge

    atur chatur's helpline for men rights activists in delhi (9873540498)
    http://www.aturchatur.org/

    ReplyDelete
  21. men cell in delhi (9873540498)
    http://www.cityclassified.co.in/man-help-delhi-or-men-cell-in-delhi-ph-9873540498-suggests-man-cell-india-helpline/

    there is no tme limit to file a FIR but if there is a LIAR then 24 hours is the time as per rule i.e., a crime must be reported immediately or within a maximum period of 24 hours

    else the reason for delay of reporting a crime in delhi needs to be explained and a IO may not be a mute spectator and he is duty bound to do fair investigation of a FIR in Delhi so that the accused if innocent does not have to go into the hardships of mental trauma due to false 498a or other false FIR filed by disgruntled wife or some other disgruntled women

    atur chatur helpline on internet and email for nri's (9873540498)
    http://www.aturchatur.net/

    ReplyDelete
  22. man helpline in delhi (9873540498)
    https://www.complaintboard.in/complaints-reviews/man-cell-delhi-9873540498-v-good-l399779.html

    yes the police may very well be able to close a FIR but there needs to be followed a set procedure

    either the IO needs to be non-corrupt but if he is not corrupt then why did he registered the FIR at first instance if he was involved in that FIR registration process

    but if there is a 7 days time limit for enquiry as per Lalita Kumari Judgment which was amending later on to 15 days time by SC then also the State/ Police needs to follow not just the time limit of FIR but also the enquiry procedure prescribed under the law

    atur chatur consultation on email (9873540498)
    http://www.aturchatur.info/

    ReplyDelete
  23. man cell delhi (9873540498)
    https://mancelldelhi.wordpress.com/

    procedure for investigation after FIR may also include testification of the veracity of the complainant because if the complainant is of shady character then the FIR may be false and the IO therefore has the legal duty to weed out false FIR during his investigation

    the set procedure needs to be followed for investigation and this investigation may be unbiased and fair otherwise the husband may be required to file a LTR

    atur chatur (9873540498)
    https://bewareofdivorceyers.tumblr.com/

    ReplyDelete
  24. men cell delhi (9873540498)
    https://in.linkedin.com/in/man-cell-529573bb

    when you wish to leqarn how to fight a false domestic violence complaint, then simultaneously you may also wish to learn the entire procedure i.s., what happens once a FIR has been registered

    similarly, in case of a FIR u/s 498a filed by a wife the police may be asked to close a false FIR in Delhi by contacting the men rights activists in Delhi

    men cell delhi or man cells in delhi may be contacted for filing a LTR against a wife if the case is outrightedly false and the husband has 'n number of evidences

    so, go ahead and file a LTR as per socialstigma.in

    how to fight false domestic violence case as per atur chatur (9873540498)
    http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/Best-way-to-fight-against-false-domestic-violence-124445.asp

    ReplyDelete
  25. men rights for nri (9873540498)
    http://www.menrightsfornri.com

    legal procedure to cancel a registered FIR may be read at the below link i.e., 498a ipc by atur chatur

    but so far as the legal proceudre after FIR is concerned this procedure is very very simple i.s., to visit the place of crime and to do investigation because if the investigation is done following the right legal procedure then the cancellation of fir may be known

    and the right legal procedure for the cancellation of fir means to ask legally or technically the police to do fair and unbiased investgation and to do investigation as per the documentary evidences of the husband and thereby to prepare a B Report removing names of all the accused

    498a ipc by atur chatur (9873540498)
    https://howtocancelfir.aturchatur.com/2019/03/498a-ipc-by-atur-chatur.html

    ReplyDelete
  26. man helpline delhi (9873540498)
    http://manhelpdelhi.blogspot.com/

    if a NRI from Delhi is settled in USA and he wants to understand the deportation procedure then he may sit confident because the deportation of extradition of a husband or a NRI husband from USA to India even by intervention of immigration/ i.e., Indian Immigration in US is not that easy

    because this is not a case of financial fraud like mallaya modi etc and a mere matrimonial dispute does not attract deportation or extradition so easily if a LTR may be filed as per socialstigma.in

    so, go ahead and file a LTR

    atur chatur 498a helpline for men (9873540498)
    http://www.socialstigma.in/2017/03/making-of-atur-chatur.html

    ReplyDelete
  27. man cell delhi (9873540498)
    https://bit.ly/2JRMn6q

    in order to remove a red corner notice against a NRI by visiting men cell in delhi, it may be even better if the consultation by atur chatur on phone may be taken

    because during 498a consultation by atur chatur on phone consultation, the NRI may be able to clear a lot of doubts and thereby 498a consultation or at least a false domestic violence consultation with atur chatur by a NRI husband may be the right procedure or the right approach at this point of time

    consultation by atur chatur on phone (9873540498)
    http://www.aturchatur.com/2015/05/atur-chatur-counselling.html

    ReplyDelete
  28. men cell delhi (9873540498)
    http://mencelldelhi.mencell.org

    by contacting any valid men cell in delhi or a legally authorized man cell in delhi, one may come to know that a 498a is applicable to foreigner also, if that marriage happened in India

    even through Priyanka Choprta and Nick Jonas marriage got happened in USA but still, this marriage was again taken place in India so evenb those marriages with a foreigner like Nick Jonas come under the purview of Indian Marriage and 498a is applicable with full force if such marriage with a Foreigner by an Indian Girl comes at a stand still

    So, why not file a LTR, in case a foreigner marries an Indian Girl in India because that marriage is then said to be Accure or Arisen out of Indian Soil.

    Similarly, a foreigner for his protection may never get his marriage registered in India so that the jurisdiction is never in hands of Indian Judicial System and in that way he may get out of the clutches of the biased laws or procedures in India

    atur chatur india (9873540498)
    http://www.aturchatur.in/

    ReplyDelete
  29. man cell in delhi (9873540498)
    https://www.change.org/p/atur-chatur-man-cell-delhi-9873540498

    in delhi, when a NRI husband may look for a helpline for boys in Delhi or a NRI based helpline like men cell or man cell in delhi then he may come across some advocates/ lawyers

    but as per atur chatur, if the 498a FIR is false i.e., based on false and concocted events and the NRI husband has 'n' number of evidences rebutting those false, wild and bald allegations then the advocate may not be looked or searched for in a false 498a FIR

    atur chatur's helpline for men rights activists in delhi (9873540498)
    http://www.aturchatur.org/

    ReplyDelete
  30. men cell in delhi (9873540498)
    http://www.cityclassified.co.in/man-help-delhi-or-men-cell-in-delhi-ph-9873540498-suggests-man-cell-india-helpline/

    how to hire best advocate for divorce of a NRI spouse or NRI couple is a madly searched query so the answer by atur chatur is to either do not get married but if you being a NRI has gotten married to a wrong lady then you may never try to hore an advocate or a lawyer especially if such non resident indian husband from USA/ UK etc has rebuttals or documents prving falsity of the FIR

    whenever your docs are not able to divert the investigation then in order to influence the investigation, you may never contact a lawyer or advocate and there is also no concept of hiring or firing of an advocate or lawyer

    it is called engaging a lawyer and signing a vakalatnama but as per the best knoweldge of atur chatur, the advocate need not/ never be engaged or hired in a false FIR if your evidences/ proofs are sufficient to suffice the falsity of the FIR and the complainant

    atur chatur helpline on internet and email for nri's (9873540498)
    http://www.aturchatur.net/

    ReplyDelete
  31. man helpline in delhi (9873540498)
    https://www.complaintboard.in/complaints-reviews/man-cell-delhi-9873540498-v-good-l399779.html

    if you want to know how to get bail under false 498a FIR
    or how to get the FIR quashed

    then go no further and read nriquash.com
    because this site explains the importance of quashing for a NRI and the propper procedure and pre-requisites before filing a quash u/s 482 crpc

    the LTR may be filed as a pre-requisite to a Quash so that the NRI husband does not have to go into the ordeal despite having tonnes of proofs against FIR

    atur chatur consultation on email (9873540498)
    http://www.aturchatur.info/

    ReplyDelete
  32. man cell delhi (9873540498)
    https://mancelldelhi.wordpress.com/

    if the parents of a NRI husband have been arrested then the right legal procedure may be to file for bail in the court

    rather and pre-requisite before a Bail u/s 438 or 439 of crpc, a LTR may be helpful for some NRI parents who may have been arrested under wrong surmises

    therefore the mandatory period of stay in jail i.e., around two months for a NRI husband's parents in a false 376, 313, 377 or false attempt to murder i.e., 307 ipc complaint or FIR u/s 307 Indian Penal Code, the husband needs to search for party in person tactics rather than contacting divorce lawyers so as per atur chatur, BEWARE OF DIVORCE LAWYERS may be an attempt to guide men victims of false cases especially those NRI husbands in USA/ UK who search for Men Cell in Delhi or a NRI MAN CELL IN DELHI

    Therefore the man cell delhi needs urgent attention so that the government of India plans to starting a similar helpline or men rights activists for men or boys from delhi

    atur chatur (9873540498)
    https://bewareofdivorceyers.tumblr.com/

    ReplyDelete
  33. men cell delhi (9873540498)
    https://in.linkedin.com/in/man-cell-529573bb

    if a NRI arrested under false FIR having false domestic violence or dowry charges then the NRI needs to file LTR by showing his evidences and rebuttals to atur chatur so that only those or all those relevant proofs may be used or not used in a manner best conducive to uplift the case of the NRI before the bail authorities

    once the bail is obtained the next procedure for a NRI is to go for regularisation of bail from the court

    passport revoked or passport seizure if happened with the NBon Resident Indian husband then that needs to be taken back legally or technically and a LTR may be filed by the NRI husband

    how to fight false domestic violence case as per atur chatur (9873540498)
    http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/Best-way-to-fight-against-false-domestic-violence-124445.asp

    ReplyDelete
  34. men rights for nri (9873540498)
    http://www.menrightsfornri.com

    men rights for nri may help the non resident indian husband in knowing how to file marriage visa for spouse and this application contains specific details about the girl to be married and taken to the USA/UK by the NRI husband

    498a ipc by atur chatur at the link below may also help non resident husband knowing his rights and procedure for cancellation of a FIR under section 498a of Indian Penal Code

    498a ipc by atur chatur (9873540498)
    https://howtocancelfir.aturchatur.com/2019/03/498a-ipc-by-atur-chatur.html

    ReplyDelete
  35. atur chatur helpline for men in false 498a (9873540498) for NRI (Non Resident Indian) may help a NRI in knowing how to reduce alimony because the alimony or maintenance may be cut by invoking human rights and attacking legal extortion at the right point

    a LTR may be the right approach if the husband wishes to expose falsity of wife thereby reducing alimony or may be arriving at Zero Alimony for the wife based on LTR as per socialstigma.in

    In Delhi also such NRI from all over India may be able to get help from Atur Chatur by his able consultation

    so, go ahead and file LTR

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to close false CAW or false FIR?

SOCIAL STIGMA !!!

SOCIAL STIGMA !!!