SOCIAL STIGMA !!!

aturchatur

Friends!!!

A Boy was trapped in False 498a. And he was in SOCIAL STIGMA. I found on internet about him:-

SOME1

where are the suggestions u found?

aturchatur

He did this as I found this on internet.

• GENERAL1.Sent CrPc 161 witness statements with all the blatant lies to 498a family's relatives, family elders and neighbours.2.Sent copies of newspaper & magazine articles about 498a misuse, to their relatives, family elders and neighbours.3.Called up 498a gang's relatives, family elders and neighbours & explained about the false 498a case.4.Complained to Tamilnadu Revenue Secretary, & District Collector about the false 498a case & extortion threats.

5.Complained to State Human Rights Commission on extortion threats by 498a gang, police & lawyers.

6.Complained to Lok Adalat Judges on extortion threats by 498a gang, police & lawyers.

7.Complained to DGP of the state, on extortion threats by 498a gang, police & lawyers.

AGAINST 498a FAMILY

8.Sent RTIs to FIL's Dept., to get his pay scale & asset declaration details, as per Tamilnadu Govt. Servants Conduct Rules.

9.Sent RTI to FIL's Dept., to get Compliance of Dowry Prohibition Act, by Govt employees, as per Tamilnadu Govt. Servants Conduct Rules.

10.Sent RTI to FIL's dept., to get his declaration on list of gifts received for her daughter's marriage, as per Tamilnadu Govt. Servants Conduct Rules.

11.Sent 12 RTIs to FIL's office to get his office deliverable, accounts maintenance and Govt. money spending details in last 25 years.

12.Complained to Revenue Dept. on disproportionate asset accumulation details by FIL.

13.Complained to Revenue Dept. to report non-compliance of Dowry Prohibition Act by FIL, with respect to his CrPc statement.

14.Complained to DSP-Vigilance & Anti Corruption Dept.in person, to report disproportionate asset accumulation details by FIL.

15.Complained to State Water Board dept about the use of electric motor to fill water from public pipeline, at FIL's residence.

16.Complained to Revenue dept. about misuse of official post by FIL to get 10 Birth certificates to his grand son.

17.Complained to HR department of 498a girl's brother's company, who had submitted fake certificate to get job.

18.Sent RTIs to Directorate of Technical Education, to get details of the employment of 498a girl, who is working as Lecturer in a private engineering college.

19.Sent RTIs to Directorate of Technical Education, to get details of pending cases, complaints and arrears during graduation of 498a girl, who is working as Lecturer in a private engineering college.

20.Complained to State Information Commission on refusal of information for one of the RTI by FIL.

21 Complained to State Revenue Secretary & District collector on RTI reply delays by Revenue department.

22.Sent RTI to District Collector on actions taken on the complaint on 498a family's extortion & atrocities.

23.Called up Public Information Officer of FIL's office & explained the case details &warned about repercussions on PIO, if the RTI replies are delayed.

24.Called up Principal of 498a girl's college & explained her activities to extort money by filing false case.

25.Visited 498a family's residence area with completely shaved head, to know the details of the houses they have rented out for Complaining to Vigilance department.( Since 506 IPC also in FIR, i had to go in disguise)

26. Visited FIL's office with shaved head to watch his activities & befriended a local big shot's son to set up bribe trap for FIL, as advised by DSP - Vigilance & Anti-corruption Dept. of TN Police.

AGAINST THE WITNESSES

27.Sent RTI to BSNL, to get Pay scale & asset declaration details of one of the witness (Retired), with the intention to complain to BSNL, Central Vigilance Commission & Pension Directorate.

28.Sent RTI to TN State Hand-loom Dept. to get Dowry Prohibition Act compliance declaration for their daughters' marriages, pay scale & asset declaration details of one of the witnesses (Retired), with intention to complain to Vigilance dept & State pension directorate.

29.Sent RTI to Sales Tax department, to get details of the sales tax paid by the company run by one of the witness.

V.IMPORTANT

30.Sent RTIs to one of the witness's son's parents-in-laws' offices (Govt. Job) to get Dowry Prohibition Act compliance declaration for their daughters'marriages, pay scale & asset declaration details.

31.Sent Cr.PC 161 statements to one of the witness's son's parents-in-laws & neighbours.

32. Visited parents'-in- law of one of the witness's son, & explained their Son-in-law family's false statements in 498a case.

AGAINST THE INSTIGATORS:

33. Sent RTIs to Police department to get Dowry Prohibition Act compliance declaration for their daughters' marriages, pay scale & asset declaration details of one of the instigators of the 498a case, who was working as DSP.

34.Sent RTIs to Police department to get details of NOC obtained from govt. to get passport, by one of the instigators of 498a case, who was working as DSP.

35. Complained to Enforcement Directorate to report disproportionate asset details by the retired police DSP, who used to visit USA frequently.

36.Sent RTI to Medical Council of India to get pay scale & asset declaration details of a doctor, who is the Son-in Law of one of the instigators of 498a case.

37.Sent 498a case details & 498a gang's malicious plans to Sons-in Law's family of the DSP, who was instrumental in filing false 498a case.

38.Sent RTI to SEBI (Securities & Exchange Board of India), to get details of the leave details and travel expense details of 498a girl's uncle, who used to attend the hearings, when he is on duty. (Working in a Private Listed Company)

39.Sent RTI to Reserve Bank of India to get locker details of one of witness, who has stored the 498a girl's jewels.

AGAINST THE POLICE:

40.Sent complaints to DGP, Commissioner and IO (Who registered 498a) to register case U/s 406 IPC for non return of Jewels by the 498a gang.IO refused to accept 3 registered letters. She called me up & asked not to press the 406 complaint & assured for return of Jewels worth of Rs.1.8 Lakhs.IO blasted the 498a girl & her father in my presence, for not informing about Jewels given by me.(All my Jewels were returned before Quash proceeding)

41.Sent RTIs to Police department to get pay scale & asset declaration details of 2 Investigative Officers who filed 2 FIRs.

42.Office of Commissioner of Police, Chennai, sent a warning letter to PIO (Add.Commissioner) & IO, for severe departmental action with State Information Commission's Recommendation, for non reply of RTI in time.

43.Sent RTI to Police department to get "498a case Registration Guideline Adherence" details by 2 Investigative Officers who filed 2 FIRs.

I dont know the exact definition for stridhan but I think I know difference between dowry and gifts (presents)

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

……………………………………………………………………………………

SOME2

Were you able to bring considerable harm to out laws through this?

All our efforts are based on how much harm we can cause to the other party.

aturchatur

This was done by a South Indian guy due to LEGAL TERRORISM i.s., False 498a against his

whole family.

He was in a state of SOCIAL STIGMA due to this.

SOME1

if FIL/MIL/BIL are having business, can use the following RTIs:

1) RTI to sales tax department for VAT registration/turnover/violation of VAT rules/penalties/interest levied, collected.

2) TEP to income tax dept. This has to be done if u know about the probable tax evasion/concealing of income based on the amounts of claims made in the FIR/chief examination. but this has to be followed upto the CIC level. then only u would get the result. if the in.tax dept. tries to side line the inquiry or does not make inquiry, take up with CVC against the ITO, ACIT and CIT.

3) if having any production unit, RTI to factories dept., public health dept. in municipality/panchayat for registration details/inspections done in past 4 to 5 years/violations found, penalty/fine imposed and collected.

4) RTI to labour dept. if any child labour is engaged/details of inspections done in past 5 years in this regard/violations found/penalties levied etc.

5) RTI to labour dept. if minimum wages/bonus are paid or not/inspections done/violations found/penalties levied etc.

6) RTI to factories dept. that all safety norms are followed or not; details of inspection done/violations found/penalties levied etc.

7) RTI to municipality/panchayat for trade license obtained, trade license fee paid, penalty levied for non-obtention of the same.

8) RTI to pollution control board for details of pollution clearance obtained/details of inspection done/violations found/penalties levied etc.

9) RTI to electricity dept. for connections obtained at the respective door Nos. such as sanctioned capacity, installed capacity, actual capacity used, inspections done, excess usage found, penalties levied and collected etc.

10) RTI to municipality/panchayat for sanctioned plan of the premises; details of inspection done/violations found/penalties levied etc.

there would be a lot more loke as follows:-

1) RTI to commercial tax dept. for payment of professional tax by the business unit.

2) RTI to commercial tax dept. collection of professional tax by the business unit from the employees and its remittance to Govt. account within the time limits/inspection of records carried out/violations found/penalties levied.

3) RTI to municipality/panchayat about water connections obtained for the business premises/about water reading meters installed/payment of water charges etc.

4) RTI to municipality/panchayat about payment of property tax for the business premises/residential units of the FIL/MIL/DIL.

5) RTI to electricity dept. about connections obtained at the residential door Nos. such as sanctioned capacity, installed capacity, actual capacity used, inspections done, excess usage found, penalties levied and collected etc.

6) RTI to gas company for details of connections available at the door Nos., in name of FIL/MIL/DIL; excess usage of gas refills etc.

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

More & more men in the society are being trapped in this SOCIAL STIGMA due to false cases by women with ill motives or due to instigation by her relatives.

SOME1

RTI can be made to the Dist. collector/factories dept./labour dept [check out the correct authority from the prevention of sexual harassment at work place Act] if FIL/DIL/MIL having business unit and employing females, whether the provisions of the Act are followed or not etc.

SOME3

I will share my efforts and you all can judge whether I was able to get some success or not.

My wife after calling her brother left home with our daughter on the pretext of meeting her friend. She took all our jewelry and cash & also with lot of money in her bank account. She also got her job transferred to her home town. After reaching home they started telling our relatives and common friends that she had come empty hand to save her life and also all alone. They also started my character assasination saying that I drink and beat her and do not earn anything. They also alleged that I have sold our family jewelry and was living on my wife's salary. They also alleged that I have a girlfriend with whom I have married and want to divorce my wife.

They filed 498A & justified the same by claiming that I have filed some false case. However the allegations that they made in court are completely different of what they say to people. Then subsequently they filed more cases on me.

I listened to all false allegations carefully and made a note of everything they said to anyone. I collected the mobile no. of all her relative and close friends. I carefully chose 1 educated person who is the biggest mouth in her extended family for my counter attack. I decided to give my side of the story by sms for each & every allegation they made against me and chose this big mouth of her family so that he will do my work of spreading my sms. I requested this big mouth to not share my sms with anyone. This request of not sharing my sms acted as a catalyst. He spread all my sms as per his nature. The strategy worked very well and slowly all her extended family understood me and became my supporter. I sent different set of sms's for different set of people. I was very careful in choosing my words. I used no harsh words against anyone specially the elders. I showed full respect to all the members of her family. I showed lots of love for my wife. But I rebutted their each & every allegation by logic & explaining the facts. They slowly started trusting me & also started interacting with me. Then I met with this big mouth and had a long discussion.

It is common sense that people support girls because they think that she had to leave home because of torture. It is our duty to explain them the situation under which she left home. People who supported her were actually supporting an abla nari. I changed their point of view by explaining them that by supporting her they are actually breaking a family and destroying a childhood. My strategy worked very well as no one wanted to destroy a childhood or break a family. When I saw change in her extended family behaviour towards me, at the right moment I changed my strategy from defending myself to attacking them. Slowly slowly I started targeting her father and brother by saying that they have done all these things for money. Then I targeted the real culprit, her mother. It sounds easy but it was very difficult to chose each and every word carefully and what should be sent to whom. In total I was charged for 2000 sms by my mobile company :) before I was able to convince everyone but 5 people including her parents and one brother and his wive.

As a reward of my effort, they have stopped uttering even a single bad word about me and have conceded that I do not drink, I do not have a girlfriend, She left with money, and I was not dependent on her income.

Now only court cases are left. After getting bail in the 498 A case, I have filed for quash. Second case of 406 can also be quashed because second FIR from same set of facts is bad in law and is liable to be quashed. Maar peet case & 125 can be fought on merits.

I have filed three cases including two criminal cases recently involving everyone who did not get convinced by my nice words. Now it is time to teach them a lesson in the court in my home ground.(laato ke bhoot baton se nahi mante). They think only wife can file cases specially the non bailable ones. I will show them that our constitution gives us equal rights irrespective of what sex we are. The court is yet to take cognizance but I hope that in both the cases a non bailable section will be imposed. My next effort will be in sending arrest warrant against my wife and her family. The husband loses his job because of these bitches but I will see how my wife works with a bank and fight two criminal cases on her and her family. I will oppose their bail. I have also made sure that they do not get any support from their extended family and friends. Once I gain success, I will share how I moved step by step in detail in this forum.

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

it is really sad to hear how people got hurt thru false case on themselves.

SOME2

I am actually planning to create a anonymous blog with the case she has filed against me and my family members and her demand.

I will put some other details like call records of she talking to boy friend etc and sending it to entire community group.

Before marriage out-law was boasting that his was a very big and respected family. May be if I share it with their big family, his strength of big family will be his weakness.

I will put only truth so that in case I get fired with defamation case, I can tell court that everything is truth and I have proof for the same.

Is it a good idea?

aturchatur

Truth always WIN !!!

SOME2

Not sure if you aware of some blogs who are facing same problem as us.

http://manavkalia.wordpress.com/2012/11/03/the-power-of-truth-by-manav-kalia/

http://iitbiimb498a.wordpress.com/

http://iluvshrutiverma.wordpress.com/

In doing this, we would be bringing social stigma to a greater extend.

What do you say?

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

The father of nation MAHATMA GANDHI ji also preached TRUTH & NON-VIOLENCE.

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

Dear Friends, We see many men in the society getting trapped in false 498a & many other false cases.

It is a pity & these biased laws needs amendment because these go against the principle of equality & fairness.

SOME3

My wife's plan has failed miserably because she could not get me arrested. I got AB from high court as she was waiting for me & my family to come for reconciliation talks and get ourselves arrested. My wife wants to run away back to Mumbai to live a life which she imagined in her dreams without me and all my money. But now since her fathers(she wants my daughter to have multiple father, so she must also be having many fathers) and brothers are losing interest in her case, i am afraid she may implicate them in false rape case to put pressure on them to get me arrested and blackmail me into alimony and divorce. Bitch pahle hi 35 lakh le kar gayi hai. But my two criminal cases will take care of her greed and will break her dreams to make quick money. Only two dates left for cognizance in both the cases. Max one month. And then summon, warrant, non bailable warrant against wife, her mother, father, brother and his wife. Fun will start with the issue of non bailable warrant. So three more months. Difficult to wait. I will be contesting their bail efforts, etc etc etc. I will make sure that bail is rejected in both the cases in the session court. In high court, i will keep on taking dates and let the sword hanging on their neck. The high court lawyers fees will give her nightmares for rest of her life. Even if they get bail, they will have to furnish bail bond (six local people for each case). Kahan se aynge. They will buy local bail bond but these are people with false documents. Will put petition in court to ask the local police station about the authenticity of the bailers. Then i will break their bail if bailers are found unauthentic. Ha ha will be a lot of fun. The two cases means dates every one week. Travelling, staying in hotel for at least 1 night every week. Will take dates in middle of the week. In few weeks no job. No future. Mumbai dream shattered. My lovely wife will be left with little money because in financial cases most of the money has to be deposited before high court grants bail. So no money, no job, running around courts, mental torture(for which i am an accused), etc etc. Please pray for me so that I can teach lesson to a 498 bitch.

I hope every deserving husband gets a chance to teach their 498 criminal wife a lesson. And bring them to their knees where they originally belong. We kept them in our hearts but now we should show them their right place.

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

do u mean counter cases ?

SOME3

The opposite gang may enter this forum. So there is a risk to share too much information at this stage. I will share it at an appropriate time. But if anyone wants to know anything, I can give all information in PM.

SOME4

can you provide me your email id or contact details on my email pls.. I need some suggestions from you.

aturchatur

aturchatur@yahoo.com

SOME3

Kindly read more as follows:-

Today one of my relative visited my place from my wife's town. She told me things which I could not believe. She told me that everyone in her extended family (100 people) and even people in the town knows that my wife has cheated me of my money and jewelry. Due to my sms and pressure from relatives my wife had admitted that she has my money in her bank account. She also admitted that she brought all the jewelry to take care of my kid but she has denied bringing any business cash. People do not believe her(but she is not lying). I planted this additional thing to bring out confession from her. There is a dialog from Sehanshah film "Ama yaar JK, jab jangal mein aag lagti hai to un darkhto ka hisaab bhi ho jaata hai jo kabhi uge hi nahi the".

One of her bua said to my relative that "wo itni badnam ho gayi hai ki xxxxxxx(her father) chah kar bhi uski dusri shaadi nahi kara sakta".

This is how I did it

I made 40 sets of our photo (100 photo per set). The set consisted of pics of our 1st honeymoon, 2nd honeymoon, all trips, all baby bday, all diwali etc. I visited her home town every weekend, stayed in hotel, arranged meetings with her neighbours, her doctor, her kirana wala, her branch manager, other people in town. I invited them over a drink through my friend who is in network marketing and shared a set of photo and shown them documents related to money transfer and her locker operation and narrated my story of how we were living, what happened and how she filed cases to keep my money and how they r blackmailing me into divorce. I sent thousands of sms to all her relatives regarding how much i love her and respect her family and what and why she did all what she did.

I am ready to face any defamation case (Bhai defame to wo hota hai jiska koi fame ho). I have achieved what I wanted to achieve. Jahan itne case wahan ek case aur sahi :)

Reason for doing it

1. To shatter her father's dream of her 2nd marriage

2. To demolish their false propaganda towards me. I have shown them how propaganda is done.

I have AB in my hand and they could not do anything. They were caught by surprised when I acquired the bail. They are frustrated and have stopped meeting people and attending functions in town because they are exposed in front of everyone. Now I will be sending NBW against her and most of her family members in a couple of months. Let them have the taste of dealing with lawyers to file bail, furnish bail bond etc. The entire process will make them understand what pain we have gone through. Cases filed by her has maximum jail term of three years but the case filed by me has the maximum jail term of life.

I spent around 75000/- only to achieve this which is a very small price for such a reward. I had no job, so i used my time for this purpose. Her home town is just 5 hrs by train. Hotels are dirt cheap in W.B.

aturchatur

Now I will be sending NBW against her and most of her family members in a couple of months.

explain this procedure with your situation & other examples similar to those

SOME3

I was staying in Mumbai with my wife and daughter. My marriage lasted for 8 yrs and her leaving home was a complete shock for me. I was doing my business & my wife was working in a bank. I had transferred some funds in her account. This was a foolish act done by me but I realized very soon that this will help me to win this battle. Because of long marriage, I have all possible proofs of my innocence. But these proves can help me get out of it in the long run. My wife called her brother and without my knowledge on the pretext of meeting her friend left home with our daughter and all jewelry. I could have filed a case of kidnapping and theft/loot but I did not want to initiate any legal proceedings against 2my wife because I loved her so much and I do not regret my decision although legally it was a blunder not to initiate any action.

After she left home and I got the info that she had filed 498A case against me & my family, I started to collect all evidence to protect me. To my surprise, I found that she had left two signed cheques, although she had taken her cheque books and all her documents. I applied for bail and started reconciliation efforts to bring back my wife. But these people only wanted to keep my money and extort more money. They filed more cases on me when they knew about by bail.

I knew it was high time for a counter attack to bring them down from mount everest to the negotiating table.

I went to my lawyer and told him about the fund transfer and the cheque. My lawyer and my friends advised me to forget about filing any case and just defend the cases. But I had made up my mind to go ahead with it.

SOME3

I decided to file two cases.

1. Myself against my wife and her brother & his wife

2. My mother against my wife and FIL and MIL

1 st ca se -

Documents I have in my possession

There was funds in my wife's account transferred from my account and signed cheque of her.

This is the case

Soon after marriage my wife started asking me to help her unemployed brothers. She insisted me to transfer all my savings in her bank account so that she could earn extra interest (as a part of employee benefit) from which she could help her brothers. I visited her home town for some marriage (with date & details) where her brother and his wife asked loan from me to start some business and convinced me that if I give money to them through my wife, she will guarantee the refund of the money. I should trust her because she is a banker. They kept on insisting me and under pressure and to keep the heart of my wife decided to help her brother & his wife and gave loan(without interest). My wife took cash as well as bank transfer before going in another marriage where her brother & his wife were also coming. She gave all money to her brother & his wife.

They did not return the money as per promise and when my parents visited Mumbai and asked my wife about the return of loan, she became angry on my parents and told them to not speak about her brother & issued the PDC cheque of entire outstanding loan amount saying that her money is in FD and the cheque date is according to the maturity date of the FD. This cheque was issued just to buy time and she never intended to honor the cheque.

Few days after issuing the cheque, she left Mumbai and went to live with her brother & bhabhi & also got her job transferred to a nearby bank branch near her brother's home. The cheque bounced on presentation due to stop payment, notice sent but refused, no payment received, hence case filed.

It is a clear case of 420, 406, 409, 120B read with 138 NI.

2nd case -

Documents I have in my possession

Jewelry bill and her cheque

This is the case-

My mother bought a jewelry set from a reputed jewelry showroom from her savings, I and my wife visited my home town for some marriage where my wife's parents were also invited. My wife saw the jewelry purchased by mother and she liked it. She discussed it with her parents and all three of them requested my mother to give the jewelry to my wife on consideration. My mother refused initially saying that she could buy another set from the same shop from where my mother had purchased. But my wife wanted the same design and the same set. Her parents insisted my mother and also promised to contribute in the payment of the set to enable her daughter to arrange for the payment.

My mother finally agreed and they requested my mother to keep the set with her till my wife arranges the money. We came back to Mumbai but my wife kept reminding my mother about the jewelry set over phone. Since the gold price was rising, this kept her interested for a long time.

Finally we visited our home town in some other family function. My wife had no cash but she had brought a PDC and she requested my mother to accept it since her money was in FD. Her parents also talked with my mother on phone and requested my mother to accept the PDC and hand over the jewelry. My mother gave the jewelry and accepted the cheque.

On returning Mumbai she left home and went to live with her parents and also got her job transferred to a near by bank branch. On presentation cheque bounced due to stop payment. Sent notice but neither payment received nor jewelry returned. She never intended to honor the cheque. It was just a conspiracy to grab the hard earned saving of an old lady by my wife and her parents. It is a clear case of 420, 406, 409, 120B read with 138 NI

Sequence of events in both cases

10 Aprl 14- Got Cheque bounce info from bank

21 April 14- Sent demand notice

22 May 14- Filed complaint case in court

6 court dates attended till date in 1st case and 4 court dates in 2nd case but the judges are absent in many dates and so there have been only 3 fruitful court dates in each case till now.

Complainant disposed as witness under 200 CrPC in both the cases

One witness under 202 crpc disposed under both the cases

List of documents filed in both the case

Now one more witness to be disposed next week in both cases & will close the evidence. Then argument by my lawyer and then in next date order & then summon will be issued. My wife did not receive the legal notice, so it is safe to assume that she will also refuse to accept the summon. A bailable warrant or a NBW will bring her to terms of reality.

Both the judges are aware that there is a dowry case on the complainant and the witnesses. Judges are asking multiple questions to understand the case and they look surprised/worried that how can a dowry accused claim to have been cheated by his wife (with loads of evidence). My wife has no proof of giving any dowry or being tortured but no body asks her any questions. One judge even made this remark "your case is interesting". But none of the judges made any negative remarks about the case. They are requesting their peshkars to not give short dates of 3-4 days. One judge even gave a long date of 18 days.

Question asked by judges:

1.Have she filed any case against you? (asked with each witnesses)

Ans. Yes she filed dowry case. (short answer)

2.Have your surrendered?

Ans. Yes surrendered and furnished bail bond.

3.Have her parents filed any cases?

Ans. No

4.Do you have any agreement that she purchased jewelry from you?(who makes written agreements at home for such small transactions)

Ans. No only oral agreement happened. ( In law oral & written agreements are equal provide there are witnesses to prove oral agreement took place.

5.Is the jewelry bill & cheque both in your name?(clearly mentioned in the complaint)

Ans. Yes

6.What was the reason of fights between your son and his wife? (is this question related with the case)

Ans. We never saw any differences between them.

7.Is she still working with the bank? (despite being mentioned in complain & reiterated by the

witness) An s. Ye s

8.In which bank she is maintaining her FD'S (already mentioned in the complaint & reiterated by the witness)

Ans. With the same bank from which she issued the cheque

Both the judges have been routinely taking cognizance under sec 420 ipc with 138 NI in the past. There has been no discrepancies or contradictions in any of our statements & I hope that the judges do not show any soft corner to the abla nari who has misused the law. The things that is going against my wife & going in my favor

1. She is a bank employee having FD in her bank account. Despite having money she is not paying me back. How can the wife of a dowry seeker maintain FD's in her account?

2. Long marriage of 8 years. So dowry case probable may be false and out of some other reasons.

3. She has stopped the cheque issued by her and then refused to accept the legal notice. If there was no debt or she had not issued such cheque, she could have replied to the notice stating the facts and could have warned me of appropriate legal action for misuse of her cheque .

4. Parents stayed in another city but they are named in dowry case.

5. I have evidence of not only cheque bounce but also of legally payable debt in both the cases with eye witnesses to both the transactions.

Ideally the dowry case is a different matter but since judges want to see if I have filed the case as a counter blast. I am sure the judges will take all facts into consideration before taking any decision.

FRIENDS, Every situation is different. If the enemy has filed the cases and is pursuing the cases carefully, then the best option is to defend oneself and not file any counter case. In such cases only counter cases of perjury should be filed if any falsity is found in the evidence of opposite gang to make them realise that they will not only lose the cases but they will also face prosecution. As in my case, the opposite party is not interested in pursuing the case, but only in filing the cases and managing the police station to put pressure on me for compromise. They have done enough damage to their case by giving contradictory statements in different FIR's. So the idea is to file counter cases and send arrest warrant in the same police station against them. The cases are bound to drag for years without anyone going to jail. The counter case may make them realise that it is better to solve the issue or it will bring difficulties in their life also.

According to me in such cases counter attack is the best option. Almost all friends were advising me to not file the cases but now they are happy to see the fruits and even my lawyer is saying that it will not be easy for her the get bail and there is a fair chance that they will come to negotiating table. These are difficult times for all of us. Many of us have faced situations where our parents are put in jail and we want to take revenge from the system. We start sending RTI's and start doing a lot of stuff which takes a lot of our time and effort but do not directly harm our enemy or help us to solve our problem. My suggestion is that we should not think from our heart but from our mind. The strategy should be to first defend ourselves and our family. So all our effort should be targeted towards getting AB for all accused. Lawyers should be selected carefully and we should draft the bail application carefully. The bail application should be unique for each case and not a standard format. Once bail is secured than we should plan to attack our opponent with the ammunition we have.

The attack should be targeting our real enemy (spouse & her family) and not the entire system. We cannot fight with the system individually but through collective efforts. Therefore it is not the time to correct the system but to fight the immediate threat and get out of the mess as quickly as possible. The girl side generally start character assassination from the word go. They file false case for quick settlement amount. After securing bail the counter attack should be targeted towards saving oneself and ones family of the character assassination and it should be done very carefully and a lot of effort should go into it. In my earlier posts I have written how I was able to win this battle of my character assassination. The counter cases should be filed simultaneously to bring them to their knees. It is difficult but not impossible to file counter cases. The catch is that, it may be easy to file a case but very difficult to get result out of it. Be

prepared to visit court 100 times before issue of any kind of summon or warrant. But it will worth every penny you spend and every hour you spend in the court. It feels better to visit the court as a victim than as an accused. Attend every date yourself and watch each and every process very carefully. Your life depends on the success of the counter case and not that of your lawyer. Once you are able to call you wife and her family as an accused. you have won the battle. I am a businessman and disputes are part of business life. I have learnt that we should cut our losses at first available opportunity and move ahead. One should never try to convert a loss making deal into a profit preposition. So on first available opportunity, negotiate with your enemy and close the matter as soon as we get a fair deal. Do not try to take any revenge for the jail time or any other problem faced due to the corrupt system and a bad law. Life will teach them the lesson.Life is very precious and we should not waste it on taking revenge.

Once we get out of it, we should not forget the people who will be left behind fighting this mess. So now will be the time to join hands with people and put all efforts in changing the law, reporting the corruption in the system etc.

aturchatur

The bail application should be unique for each case and not a standard format. Once bail is secured than we should plan to attack our opponent with the ammunition we have.

pls email me your bail application. i want to read it for knowledge sake.

I have written how I was able to win this battle of my character assassination. The counter cases should be filed simultaneously to bring them to their knees.

pls tell in brief how she assassinated ur character & what cases u filed against her. also tell how soon i.e., within how many days of her complaint u did that?

It is difficult but not impossible to file counter cases. But the catch is that, it may be easy to file a case but very difficult to get result out of it. Be prepared to visit court 100 times before issue of any kind of summon or warrant.

pls explain this procedure for fellow fighters i.e., tell in very detail, what resistance you found while filing counter cases. What happened on each date in court? How many hurdles u need to pass thru. write down in very detail as many will follow it hopefully. tell events occured with u in court in every date till cognizance & after that also.

Once you are able to call you wife and her family as an accused. you have won the battle.

did u called as accused in criminal court or civil court with perjury. tell in brief pls

So on first available opportunity, negotiate with your enemy and close the matter as soon as we get a fair deal. Do not try to take any revenge for the jail time or any other problem faced due to the corrupt system and a bad law.

do u think PLEA BARGAINING is good? Should it NOT be on your terms ? What one should do if they are NOT willing to accept your terms ?

SOME3

pls email me your bail application. i want to read it for knowledge sake.

I have mailed you the bail application.

pls tell in brief how she assassinated ur character & what cases u filed against her. also tell how soon i.e., within how many days of her complaint u did that?

As soon as she reached her parents home, they started my character assassination. They spread lies by saying the following things.

1. That my wife has come empty hand to save her life because I was pushing her from terrace.

Ans. She took all money & jewelry after calling her brother. She had more money in her account than she ever earned in her entire carrier. The day she left, she was on bank helpline for over 1 hr just to update her new address, mobile no., passwords etc. to secure money which i transferred in her a/c. So it was a planned departure. And by the way our building terrace is locked. Mumbai is not a village, where we go on terrace to push able bahu of house.

2. I was not doing anything and I was surviving on her salary Ans. My salary was 5 times of her salary.

3. I used to drink a bottle of whisky everyday

Ans. I neither drink nor smoke

4. When our daughter was born, I tortured her

Ans. I have photos to prove how happy we were. I kept puja and invited everyone, book hotel rooms, arranged taxis for each guest. Spent over 2 lakhs for the function.

5. I used to beat my wife regularly

Ans. She never complained in 8 yrs but only after running away with my money 6 . I was already married .

Ans. Good. She is my 2nd wife. So dowry case is not sustainable. There are only two girls in my life whom i love. My wife and my daughter.

I reported the jewelry and money that she took away with her at the police station on the next day itself with acknowledgment. She filed 498 after 15 days of leaving home. Then she filed 406 after 7 months. I filed cheque bounce case after 8 months because I could not have filed a cheque bounce case before the date of the post dated cheque became due. She filed 406 just before the date of the cheque but the court will understand that I have not done any delay in filing the case.

I have written the sequence of events in the court in my earlier posts in this thread only.

Cognizance is yet to be taken but I am confident that things will move in the right direction. Once the warrant is issued, I will give the step by step details of my case. The biggest resistance starts from convincing oneself, then convincing the lawyer. Any good lawyer will advise you to not file any counter case but only to defend yourself properly. So it took me few months to convince my lawyer. Once the lawyer is convinced that you mean business and you will pursue the case, no matter what, no one can stop you from filing a case. In my case of cheque bounce it is easy to say that she gave me cheque in lieu of my dues but to make a full proof case was a different thing altogether. As soon as the judges feels that you are filing a case as a counter case, they will seek the smallest detail from you before taking cognizance .

The position of the law is that the burden of proof is not so heavy to take cognizance. So we just need to convince the judge that there is a probability that the offence may have been committed. Before visiting your lawyer, build a case in yourelf. The following things are needed to build a case :-

1. Details of Offence for which you are filing the case

2. Details of Accused and co accused

3. Cause of action should be in the place where FIR has to be filed for jurisdiction purpose

4. The accused must be in the place of cause of action at that time

5. Proof to substantiate the claim

6. Story

A case comprises of few true elements and few false elements. The judges should not be able to determine the false part before the trial is over. So if you can arrange these things, a good case can be formed. In my case since I decided to file a cheque bounce & cheating case, I checked each and every transaction between my & my wife's bank accounts for last two years. I checked all phone records to see on what date we were on roaming, when we visited where. Spoke to all family members to verify the timings when we were at a particular place. Checked all train & flight tickets records from email. & then prepared sequence of events for meeting my lawyer. Marriages and family functions are best because there is no chance of any goof up and the accused cannot deny their presence at the function because they will fear that photo may be produced. Give your story, proof & sequence of important events to your lawyer. A lawyer knows how to build a case without living any loopholes, but the right inputs have to come from our end. There should be nothing in the FIR which can be easily proved wrong otherwise the case will fall. The role of each and every accused should be defined and no vague allegations should be made on anyone but only specific allegations. One should make sure that the role of co accused is such that without him/her the main accused could not have deceived the

complainant. We should restrain from involving too many people. A maximum of two co accused is more than enough otherwise the judge will sense that the case is false. Never say anything which directly contradict anything u have already put on record in your bail application or anywhere else. Once the story (FIR) is written, discuss it in detail with all the witnesses in detail for many days. Each and every detail should be in each other’s mind. When we dispose as witnesses, we must share the questions asked by the judges with each other so that no contradictions comes in the statements of each other.

How to dispose as witnesses.

The complainant should exactly copy the complain and should restrain from saying anything else unless the judge asks something. The reply should be crisp and small. Other witnesses should not copy the complainant version but speak from their point of view. They should not contradict the complainant version but should substantiate it. Your lawyer must read the judge to get judgment in his favor. There r lawyers who can move the case to a favorable bench. A couple of thousand bucks and right resource can do this magic in lower courts. Its an open secret that u need to pay Rs 20-50 for taking a date. Take short dates by paying 100-200 per date (less than 10 days). Attend each & every court date & do not leave it on ur lawyer. Attend 20 dates (6 months) without fail and u will see the fruits. One must pursue the case as if ur life depends on it. Once the judge see that you r not going to give up, things will start moving fast. 1st challenge will be to get the cognizance. Then to deliver the summon and then execution of arrest warrant. The arrest warrant should be sent through SP office and not directly to the PS. Because it is very easy these days to manage local PS and since a dowry case is pending, the police may chose to not execute the warrant and may sit on it.

If the case is non bailable, the accuse will move for AB or revision petition in session court. So keep checking the session court website daily without fail and contest the bail/revision petition. Once the AB is rejected they will surely come for settlement. Negotiate at equal footing and get out of the mess.

did u called as accused in criminal court or civil court with perjury. tell in brief pls

No my case is not yet started. But I will be calling them through my two cases which I have discussed in detail in this thread in my earlier posts.

do u think PLEA BARGAINING is good? Should it NOT be on your terms ? What one should do if they are NOT willing to accept your terms ?

No plea is needed. Once they offer to talk, then we must talk. We should not expect them to accept our terms, neither do they. I am of the opinion that we should cut our losses in time. Once they offer a term which is just acceptable to us, we must close it and move ahead in life. The idea is to get out of it with a fair settlement. So keep room for negotiation and do not stick to your demands but be flexible. Do not seek revenge. BUT DO NOT GET BLACKMAILED

aturchatur

The role of each and every accused should be defined and no vague allegations should be made on anyone but only specific allegations.

Yes thats very correct.

One should make sure that the role of co accused is such that without him/her the main accused could not have deceived the complainant. We should restrain from involving too many people. A maximum of two co accused is more than enough otherwise the judge will sense that the case is false.

More accused gives what type of problems ?

Your lawyer must read the judge to get judgment in his favor. There r lawyers who can move the case to a favorable bench. A couple of thousand bucks and right resource can do this magic in lower courts.

But in Delhi its NOT possible because in Feb or March 2014 the specific areas were allocated for areawise very very specifically.

Its an open secret that u need to pay Rs 20-50 for taking a date. Take short dates by paying 100-200 per date (less than 10 days).

But dates are given by Judge. How is that possible ?

SOME3

Atur Chatur-More accused gives what type of problems ?

It depends on the case. But we should not try to put more and more accused because the judges get the hint that the case may be false. The idea is that the judge must not make up his mind that the case is definitely false. How it is possible that so many people is suddenly conspiring against you. This is just a guideline and not a rule. Involving more people will hurt the opposite party but it should not negatively effect our case.

Atur Chatur-But in Delhi its NOT possible because in Feb or March 2014 the specific areas were allocated for areawise very very specifically.

The process may vary from court to court. If this is not possible than one can delay the case & wait for new bench if the judge is not favourable. But it depends on case to case and court to court. The idea is to get maximum benefit from the corrupt system.

Its an open secret that u need to pay Rs 20-50 for taking a date. Take short dates by paying 100-200 per date (less than 10 days).

Atur Chatur-But dates are given by Judge. How is that possible ?

As a routine the dates are given by peshkars (a person in that particular court). But sometimes the judge themselves gives the dates. In such a scenario money will not work. Again the idea is to get maximum benefit from the corrupt system.

There are resourceful people around the court premises. You just need to find the right person and if any case is there, he will get the certified/uncertified copy of the same. My case is in Patna and I can find out anything which other lawyers will deny.

@ Atur Chatur- I respect you & lot of other people for their efforts towards fighting the corrupt system. But my

take is different. It is not the right time to fight the entire system which is corrupt and is tilted towards fulfilling women's whips and fancies. It will take a long time and a collective effort to make any changes in the present system. The idea is to use the same corrupt system in our favour as much possible. We must respect the law (no matter how badly it is drafted), the judges (they r bound to follow the law and the process), the investigation (by corrupt police), her extended family (for supporting an abla nari). And at the same time we must hit our enemy on their nose as I did by filing two non bailable criminal cases against them. We should get out of this mess ASAP. Once we are out of it, then we must join hand with like minded people for a long long fight in the direction of changing the law and to make sure that the process is followed by the law enforcing agencies.

aturchatur

Once we are out of it, then we must join hand with like minded people for a long long fight in the direction of changing the law and to make sure that the process is followed by the law enforcing agencies.

I welcome all to join hands.

aturchatur

Updates in a case against police by husband for forcibly taking signatures.

Husband gave WS to higher level regarding Criminal Conspiracy against various dirty cops. Subsequently , in MM they modified their responses which in itself is a contempt. This proves leakage at higher level.

Further, in their earlier reply there was no mention of my bad behavior complaint by all. This also proves CONTRADICTIONS by the the police & also proves Vigilance WS (written statement) of husband leaked.

NOW ALL MEMBERS EVEN NEW COMERS, EXPERTS, SENIORS, ALL SUGGEST YHE HUSBAND AS

FOLLOWS:-

[A] How to book police towards Contempt because MM sent them CrPC 91 on last date NOT for CrPC 91 reply but for general reply as MM tells the husband ? Whereas in reply, police has instead of replying to husbands points therein has replied that the husband had bad behavior bla bla bla and NO mention of reply to any single point asked by husband in CrPC 91 to the police by the complainant.

[B] Further, in CrPC 91 the husband blamed 4th IO by catching a point but in new reply yesterday, they (police) are

changing statement indirectly before the Hon’ble Court? – It’s in a case agains the police for taking signatures forcibly.

Now, the husband asks as to CONTEMPT KAISE LAGAU ???

Anyone reading this suggest to the husband within this thread pls.

ATUR CHATUR: Contempt needs to be filed in lower court itself however, there must be a request to forward it to the High Court concerned because when the MM forwards the contempt of court then that is usually very well taken cognizance of by the High Court against the police.

SOME4

They are the accused in the case. So they should rebut each and every allegation of yours with proper explanation. Simply saying that your behaviour was not good is the worst reply they can give. This shows their frustration and lack of defense. Did they say anything about taking signature on blank papers from you? Did they deny this allegation?

aturchatur

Yes, they denied the taking forcefully signs allegation of husband in last reply 3 months back (in year 2014) where they also told husband’s allegations as false & baseless.

Suggested a course of action to the husband w.r.t. HOW IT IS CONTEMPT OF COURT if they failed to reply all the points in that CrPC 91 when as per judge it was Neither acceptance nor rejection of husband’s CrPC 91 !!!

(The husbnd face read the MM & it seemed to the husband as if the MM (Metropolitan Magistrate) is in a fix as to how to give judgment against police who are just immediate sub-ordinate in hierarchy to a MM)

ALL ARE WELCOME TO POUR SUGGESTIONS needed URGENTLY by the husband in year 2014. Also thanks to all.

HUSBAND WANTED TO CATCH THEM IN ONLY THREE THINGS (in year 2014) VIZ.,

(A) Contempt of Court, &

(B) Contradictions, &

(C) Vague Reply (undated reply, unspecific reply, reply after husband’s 45 pages to Vigilance) to make them booked under CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY AGAINST HUSBAND !!!

Thats it !!! So Simple !!! So Fast !!!

Quick, Urgent, Deep Suggestions BY HUSBAND welcomed in 2014 !!!

SOME5

There are many of us who are effectively using RTI as a tool to fight against the corrupt system but some of us are still unaware of how to draft an RTI, how to formulate query and whom to send it. So please someone explain this subject in detail point by point, the procedure from beginning till end. Kindly also upload some RTI formats.

aturchatur

I will post some RTI's & APPEAL's used by some people so it helps. Also check few right to information applications examples at man cell and also at rticonsultant delhi.

aturchatur

FIRST APPEAL FORMAT

T o,

Appellate Authority

Adugodi Police station

Bangalore City

From,

(My Brother, who was arrested)

#1d01, Ground Floor,

XYZ AD D R ESS, Myso re - 5 7 0 0 2 6

Subject: Appeal regarding RTI Response Ref. No. G5.PS/RTI/12/2013 dated 02/01/2013

Respected Sir,

I have sent an RTI application on DD/MM/YYYY requesting information regarding my arrest and detention under Cr.No.25/2013 registered against my brother and my family members under section 498A u/s 3 & 4 of DP Act. I got a response from the concerned PIO in the letter with ref no.G5.PS/RTI/12/2013, stating that since the matter is under

investigation the requested information will not be provided under section 8(1)(B)(H) of RTI Act.

However I am not satisfied with the response as my query is nothing to do with the investigation. It seems that you are not clearly read my RTI Application. What I have requested was the details of my arrest, and the compliances to the various Guidelines and Circular as mentioned in the RTI application.

I kindly request you to review my RTI Application carefully and provide the response to each and every question accordingly. I request you to provide the information at the earliest. I'll be compelled to approach the Chief Information Commissioner for any further delay.

Enclosures:

• Response letter from PIO, Adugodi PS with ref no.G5.PS/RTI/12/2013

Date: 05/03/2013 yours sincerely

Place : Mysore

Copy to:

Appellate Authority, Office of Director and Inspector General of Police, Bangalore

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

aturchatur

Appellate Authority

Adugodi Police Station

Adugodi

Bangalore City

From

HUSBAND CHANAKYA NEETI

xx yy zz a d d re ssr

u u Ma i n R o a d

PQRST

Myso re : 5 7 0 0 2 6

Sub: Appeal regarding RTI response no G5.PS/RTI/11/2013 dated DD/MM/YYYY

Respected Sir,

Referring to your response no 2 from the above mentioned response letter. It has been mentioned that the complainant was very much dejected & depressed in life and she was not willing to go for the family counseling. Kindly clarify the below queries.

a) This shows that the Police authorities failed to recognize the mental stability of the complainant while registering the complaint, besides the authorities should have referred the complainant to a registered Mental Health Practitioner as you have found and noted at the prima facia her unstable mental conditions. Please explain.

b) As the Mental condition of the complainant is under question this will be of a great danger to the life of the complainant and our child if she takes any extreme steps like suicide/self harm/abuse of the child. As i have also seen her extreme Behavioral polarities while in our matrimonial life. I kindly request you to send her to the certified Mental Health Practitioner to avoid any such incidents. I also kindly request you that the concerned Mental Health Practitioner should be made aware of her mental situation so that life of the innocent child will not be harmed and if it is required I will take care of the child or otherwise officials from Women and child welfare should take the custody of the child for the benefit of both the mother and the child. I kindly request you to initiate the same and let me know the steps taken.

Referring to your response no 5 as DP 3 is mentioned in the FIR. Kindly clarify the below queries.

a) Please let me know the police actions taken against the Complainant and her family members in the crime of Giving dowry as you have already collected all the necessary evidences like bank statements, Jewellary bills proving the same.

b) If the FIR has been registered against them kindly mention the crime number and the actions taken. If FIR is not registered kindly explain.

c) Also let me know the reasons for not filing the chargesheets of DP3 against the complainant as you have gathered enough evidence to prove the same.

Referring to your response no 3 it has been mentioned that my brother instigated me to harass my wife for Dowry and also the other witnesses has seen this instigation, I strongly doubt the authentication of this statement. just on mere allegations you have nailed my brother which is typical in any false and frivolous 498A cases. Please explain

Date: 03-MM-2013 Thanking you

Place : Mysore

HUSBAND CHANAKYA NEETI

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

aturchatur

Appellate Authority

Adugodi Police station

Bangalore City

From

PATI CHANAKYA NEETI AAP BEETI JI

#101, Ground Floor,

XXYYZZ Address, Myso re - 5 7 0 0 2 6

Subject: Appeal regarding RTI Response Ref. No. G5.PS/RTI/11/2013 dated dd/mm/yyyy

Respected Sir,

I have sent a RTI application on mm/dd/yyyy requesting information regarding Cr.No. XXXX registered against me and my family members under section 498A u/s 3 & 4 of DP Act. I got a response from the concerned PIO in the letter with ref no.G5.PS/RTI/07/2014, stating that since the matter is under investigation the requested information will not be provided under section 8(1)(B)(H) of RTI Act. However I am not satisfied with the response as my query is nothing to do with the investigation after registering the FIR. It seems that you are not clearly referred to my RTI Application. What I have requested in my application was pertaining to the steps taken by IO to ensure that this is not a false and frivolous case and IO has performed due diligence process before registering the FIR in accordance with the various circulars referred in the RTI Query.

There is no doubt that the RTI Application has been deliberately rejected under false pretext that the matter is under investigation. The response to my RTI Application will no way affect your ongoing investigation in this case. I'd need these responses to prove my innocence before the hon'ble court of law and I'll ensure that this is not going affect your ongoing investigation if it carried in true spirit without any prejudice or bias. I kindly request you to review my RTI Application carefully and provide the response to each and every question accordingly. I request you to provide the information at the earliest. I'll be compelled to approach the Chief Information Commissioner for any further delay.

Enckosures:

RTI Application

Response letter from PIO, Adugodi PS with ref no.G5.PS/RTI/01/YYYY

P l a ce : Yours sincerely

Date:

Copy to:

Public Information Officer, Office of Director and Inspector General of Police, Bangalore

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

aturchatur

Clarification regarding RTI Acknowledgement letter

To,

Public Information Officer,

Deputy Commissioner of Police

Bangalore South,

B a n g a l o re

From,

(My Brother, who was arrested)

XX YY ZZZZ Address,

M yso re - 5 7 0 0 2 8

Subject: Clarification regarding RTI Acknowledgement letter Ref. No. RTI/412/DCP(S)/14 dated dd/mm/yyyy

Respected Sir,

I have sent a RTI application on dd/mm/yyyy requesting information regarding Cr.No. 211/2013 registered against me and my family members under section 498A u/s 3 & 4 of DP Act. This information I requested specifically from DCP, Bangalore South as he has authorized the arrest and investigation pertaining to the above said Cr.No.

What I have requested in my application was pertaining to the steps taken by DCP in compliance with the various circulars referred in my RTI Query to ensure that this is not a false and frivolous case as in majority of 498a cases. I want to make sure that DCP has followed the guidelines and procedures before authorizing the arrest and investigation in the above mention case.

It seems that RTI application has been incorrectly forwarded to IO without scrutinizing the contents as I've specifically requested information from the concerned DCP. I kindly request the PIO to review my RTI Application and provide the response at the earliest.

Enclosures:

• RTI Application

• Acknowledgement letter from PIO, DCP South with ref no. RTI/434/DCP(S)/14

P l a ce : M yso re Y o u rs si n ce re l y

Date: dd/mm/yyyy

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

aturchatur

APPEAL FROM HUSBAND CHANAKYA NEETI AAP BEETI JI

T o,

Appellate Authority

Adugodi Police station

Bangalore City

From,

PATI NAME AS ABOVE

XX YY ASDFF ADDRESS,

M yso re - 5 7 0 0 2 6

Subject: Appeal regarding RTI Response Ref. No. G5.PS/RTI/10/2013 dated dd/mm/yyyy

Respect Sir,

I have sent a RTI application on mm/dd/yyyy requesting information regarding the complaint registered by Ms. DASH DASH R D/O PITAJI in Adugodi Police station against anybody.

I got a response from the concerned PIO in the letter with ref no.G5.PS/RTI/10/2013, stating that since the matter is under investigation the requested information will not be provided under section 8(1)(B)(H) of RTI Act. However I am not satisfied with the response as my query is nothing to do with the Crime no mentioned in your response to my RTI.

There is no doubt that the RTI Application has been deliberately rejected under false pretext of referring it to an ongoing investigation. I kindly request you to review my RTI Application carefully and provide information asked in it that is the copy of the FIR and Complaint registered by Ms.DASH DASH R D/O PITAJI if any. As the FIR is a Public document and should be provided when requested, providing a copy of it will not hamper the investigation in any way. I request you to provide the information at the earliest. If not I'll be compelled to approach the Chief Information Commissioner for any further delay.

Enclosures:

• RTI Application

• Response letter from PIO, Adugodi PS with ref no.G5.PS/RTI/10/2014

Place: dd/mm/yyyy Yours sincerely

Date: Mysore

Copy to:

Public Information Officer, Office of Director and Inspector General of Police, Bangalore

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

aturchatur

RTI - IO Guidelines & Procedures

APPLICATION UNDER THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT, 2005

To:

Public Information Officer

Adugodi Police Station

Ad u g o d i Bangalore city

D e a r S i r,

Subject : Seeking Information under Section 6(1) & 7(1) of the RTI Act, 2005.

Please provide the copy of Guidelines and Circulars referred while registering and Investigating cases under IPC 498A.

Period for which information is required 01-01-2005 to Till date

Initial Fee payment Details : Rs.10/- by Postal Order No. 22F - 123679

P l a ce : M yso re , Date : dd/mm/yyyy. Signature of the Applicant.

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

aturchatur

RTI - CLOSURE REPORT

APPLICATION UNDER THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT, 2005

Public Information Officer

Adugodi Police Station Ad u g o d i Bangalore city

D e a r S i r,

Subject : Seeking Information under Section 6(1) & 7(1) of the RTI Act, 2005.

Particulars of Information/Documents/ Inspection sought :

Please provide the Complaint Closure Report/Final Report For the Crime No 127/2014,

registered in Adugodi Station on DD/MM/YYYY

Period for which information is required : 30/10/2013 to Till date

Other details, if anyCrime No: 127/2014

Initial Fee payment Details

Rs.10/- by Postal Order No. 21A - 1234772

P l a ce : M yso re , Date : DD/MM/2014 Signature of the Applicant.

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

aturchatur

CCS RULES FOR GOVT EMPLOYEES ON DOWRY RELATED CRIMES

THE WAY TO RESPOND 1 IF YOUR WIFE/ FATHER IN LAW/ MOTHER IN LAW IS GOVT.

EMPLOYEE

A) FOR FIL/ MIL

u can apply for departmental enquiry u/s 11A of all India service conduct rules 1968

or u/s 13A of state govt. service conduct rules 1966 against the person who asserts that he/she had given dowry and apply along with copy of FIR or his/her affidavit and request his/her deptt.

to take action against him/her for violation of govt. conduct rules as u/s 11A "giving and taking dowry Is crime"

It will work like double edged weapon

if he/ she repeated asserts that he/she had given dowry then punished under service conduct rules

if he deny in departmental enquiry then take copy of enquiry proceeding under RTI 2005 then submit in court and even prosecute him/her u/s 182 IPC in case of FIR or u/s 191 IPC and 193 IPC in case of wrong affidavit.

B) WIFE IF GOVT EMPLOYEE

Similarly file application against wife for abetment of dowry

Also take help of RTI Act 2005 to get copy of enquiry report for your complaint

So govt employed wife/FIL/MIL/ other relative can be even punished for abetment of dowry

THE ALL INDIA SERVICES (CONDUCT) RULES, 1968

In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the All India Services Act,

1951 (61 of 1951), the Central Government after consultation with the Governments of the

State concerned, hereby makes the following rules, namely:—

11—A. Giving or taking of dowry.— No member of the Service shall—

(i) give or take or abet the giving or taking of dowry; or

(ii) demand, directly or indirectly, from the parents or guardian of a bride or bridegroom, as the ca se m a y b e , a n y d o w ry.

Explanation.— For the purpose of the rule, "dowry" has the same meaning as in the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (28 of 1961) .

The STATE Government Employees (Conduct) Rules, 1966

(Rules Framed by the Punjab Government Under Articles 309 and 318 of Constitution of India)

13A. Prohibition to give, take or demand dowry- No Government employee shall:

(i) give or take or abet the giving or taking of dowry;

(ii) demand, directly or indirectly, form the parents or guardian of a bride or bridegroom, as the ca se m a y b e , a n y d o w ry.

*[Inserted vide Punjab Government Notification No. G.S.R.-73/Const./Arts. 309 and

318/Amd(6)/76 dated 09-06-1976] Explanation - For the purpose of this rule, 'dowry' has the same meaning as in the dowry prohibition Act. 1961 (28 of 1961)].

IF WIFE/MIL/FIL are GOVT EMPLOYEE or not govt employee then file TEP

(Tax evasion petition)

If not govt employee then file TEP (tax evasion petition) along with copy of FIR or charge sheet

or their affidavit to commissioner of income tax of his area to enquire the source of income of

that person as he had asserted that 'X" amount is spent on marriage and get information

regarding what action and steps taken by income tax deptt against your complaint via RTI 2005 time to time till enquiry is complete.

SOME6 wrote:

Dear friends, This is Shiva Prasad from hyderabad,a false 498A and DVC case was filed against me.

I have sent RTI Application to my father in law organization asking about what action will be taken for giving dowry by the govt employee? After that, I got reply for that RTI stating that if proved that my FL has given dowry, action will be taken against rule CrPC

161. After that I had filed reply to the organization of my FIL, sending the charge sheet and FIR copies of my 498A Case which are certified copies from court where he has already accepted of giving dowry.

After that I got following answers from my father in law organization. MY FL states in his reply to the memo issued by organization he has not given any dowry during the marriage, Further ,being govt servant I am aware about ccs conduct rules and not violated any of the provisions in said rules.... FL says in his statement to settle personal

scores with him i'm shooting RTI .....can any one please suggest can FILE cheating cases based on this...

1. In 498a and DVC cases and in his FIR statement he has mentioned that he has given dowry and kept our whole family behind bars.can any please suggest any possibility to file cheating or fraud or PERJURY any other case on him???plz help ......

One good son wrote:

shivas, you can complain to higher authorities of your FIL's office to take action against him under ccs rules and after a month or so shoot RTI in FIL's office regarding the progress on your complaint and ask them questions like :

1. Please give the diary number and date of receipt of my complaint in your office?

2. Please indicate the daily progress made on my complaint so far. i.e. when did my complaint reach which officer, for how long did it stay with that officer and what action did he/she took on it during that period?

3. Please give the names and designations of the officials, if any, who delayed taking action on my application/ complaint.

4. What action would be taken against these officials for delay? By when would that action be taken and under what rules?

5. By when would my complaint be dealt with? 6. What is the present status of my complaint?

7. The norms, if any, prescribed for the department to deal with these types of applications/complaints.

8. Please provide copies of the office notings and office memo's of the file related my complaint.

AS YOU ARE ALSO GOVT. EMPLOYEE SO PLEASE NOTE THAT B'FORE DOING ALL, IF YOUR FIL FIGURES OUT ANYTHING AGAINST YOU THEN HE CAN ALSO COMPLAINT AGAINST YOU IN YOUR OFFICE UNDER THESE RULES, SO BE CAREFUL.

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

aturchatur

RTI - Pension Details of MIL

http://pcdapension.nic.in/rti/rtiProc.htm

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

aturchatur

Contempt of Court to close your case

raghu.rao wrote:

Hello Everyone ,

Here is an interesting method to close your 498a case. File an RTI application to both Trial Court & Police station to Obtain the evidence against you submitted by your 498a wife or gathered by the investigating officer. Your Application under sec 7(1) of RTI act will be returned with an irrelavent reply by PIOs of both places.

Also make an third application under sec 7(1) of RTI act to the State Information commission , Seeking to Know if there is any contempt of court proceedings in the Information commission. The PIO of the Information will reply to you ,saying that there is no contempt proceedings in the Information commission . Attach this reply and the order of Information commission in your case in which the investigating officer would have been asked to provide the " So called evidence that he / she has gathered to register a 498a case against you".

Since the investigating would not have any evidence against you , as claimed by your 498a wife , he /she is in contempt of the Information commission order. Since you have the endorsement saying that , there is no contempt of court proceedings in the information commission. File a contempt of court in respective High court. Then trial judge & SPP , Investigating officer will be forced to close your 498a case.

Regards Raghu.S

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

aturchatur

A message from PATI CHANAKYA NEETI AAP BEETI JI

The father of nation once said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK YOU DON'T GET" and it's as simple as that.

He asked & got something which became our school book chapters like, non-violence, satyagraha etc

Now, it's your turn.

As per Bhai CHANAKYA NEETI AAP BEETI JI, Follow your own path.

Follow the path of non-violence. Follow the path of trruth. Follow your own mind.

Jo sahi lagta hai kar dalo.

ASK ASK & ASK, And the chances are that you will GET. So Simple !!!

A Chapter in Hindi Textbook of Class Xth said, "AGAR TUM SAMUNDAR K PAS PADI SEEPIYON SE SANTOSH KAR LOGE TO SAMUDR K BHEEETRR PADE MOKTIK KOSH KO KAUN NIKAL KAR LAYEGA"

Poochhoge nahi, to milega bhi nahi. At least I can guarantee this to everybody.

Aur agar poochh liya to mile na mile par milne ki sambhavnaayen to bad jaayengi naa priye bandhu.

Agar SLP me ARNESH KUMAR ne naa poochha hota to kya 2nd July'2014 ki SC judgment aati.

NAHI MERE BHAI NAHI. Kisi ko to uthna hi hoga.

Kisi ko to naali me utarna hi hogi safai k liye.

Example:- NAYAK movie dialogue [Similalry, YOU DON'T HAVE THE RIGHT TO CURSE THE BIASED LAWS UNLESS YOU TRIED YOURSELF & FOUND FAILURE]

Itihaas gavah hai aur internet bhi priye bandhu, those who tried &fought on their own are the ones who solved problems for them.

KHUD CHALNA KATHIN TO HOGA PAR NAMUMKIN NAHI [Example:- DDLJ Dialogue] as follows:-

SACH KA RAASTA KATHIN HOTA HAI PAR VIJAY SACH K THRU HI MILTI HAI.

Have faith in HANUMAN S A H E B

HANUMAN comes above S and A and H and E and B

Where ,

S means SOCRATES

A means ARJUN

H means HITLER

E means EKLAVYA

B means BALI

And Since HANUMAN is above all, hence he will save you from those mistakes which these true winners made.

S = SOCRATES

He just preached. Others wrote what he said. Others bole to ARISTOTLE BHAI

A = ARJUN

ARJUN HAD THE FOCUS TOWARDS HIS GOAL.

H = HITLER

He conquered the world

E = EKLAVYA

He Learned without a GURU

B = BALI

He used to pull half powers of his enemies so became undefeatable.

BUT ALL THESE FIVE GUYS FELL INTO ONE PIT OR ANOTHER AS FOLLOWS:-

S = SOCRATES

He drank poison

A = ARJUN

He was troubled by SHIKHANDI.

H = HITLER

He did suicide

E = EKLAVYA

His guru cut his thumb. [asked his thumb as gurudakshina]

B = BALI

He was killed by CHHAL. [i.e., by unfair means]

HOW BHAI CHANAKYA NEETI AAP BEETI JI protected himself from demerits of above S , A ,

H,E,B

By reciting HANUMAN CHALISA SHAT BAAR.

"Jo Shat Baar Paath Kar Koi, Chhutahi Bandi Maha Sukh Hoi."

One who recites Chalisa one hundred times, becomes free from the bondage of life and death and enjoys the greatest bliss.

"Jo Yah Padhe Hanuman Chalisa, Hoy Siddhi Sakhi Gaurisa"

As Lord Shankar witnesses, all those who recite Hanuman Chalisa regularly are sure to be benedicted.

"JAI HANUMAN CHALISA"

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

aturchatur

Salary details of FIL/MIL of Smt 498a =RTI

The Public Information Officer,

__________________________

Sub.:- Application under section 6(1) of Right to Information Act 2005.

S i r,

Kindly furnish the fallowing details under section 6(1) of Right to Information Act 2005.

1. Present Designation and department in which Shri/Smt XYZ is posted at present. ( disclosure of such information to public should be made as per RTI act 2005 under section 4(1)(b))

2. The power and duties/job responsibility/work profile of Shri/Smt XYZ. (disclosure of such information to public should be made as per RTI act 2005 under section 4(1)(b))

3. Present Gross Salary and its various components like Basic Pay, DA, Conveyance, HRA and other allowances of Shri XYZ. ( disclosure of such information to public should be made as per RTI act 2005 under section 4(1)(b))

4. His income from salary for following financial year:

• 2 0 0 4 -2 0 0 5 • 2 0 0 5 -2 0 0 6 • 2 0 0 6 -2 0 0 7 • 2 0 0 7 -2 0 0 8 • 2 0 0 8 -2 0 0 9

5. Photo copy and details of his educational/professional qualification and his bio data and age proof (like certificate of 10th or any other proof) on the basis of which he is holding a public office in _____.

(Latest relevant decision of CIC dated 10 feb,2009 No.CIC/SG/A/2008/00248/1596 regarding providing such information to public is attached for ready reference)

6. Annual property returns filed by him till date.

( Relevant decision of CIC dated 20 March,2008 No.CIC/OK/A/2007/01493 & CIC/OK/A/2008/00027 regarding providing such information to public is attached for ready reference)

7. Following details of LTC(Leave travel Concession) availed / enchased by him since last five years(Also provide Copies of LTC bills)

a) Number of persons for which LTC availed

b) Block Year of LTC

c) Financial Details like total amount claimed and its component for each LTC.

d) Destination of travel

(Relevant decision of No.CIC/AT/A/2006/00317 regarding providing such information to public is attached for ready reference)

8. Details of amount claimed by Shri XYZ during official tour since last five years and during transfer from _________ to ________(Provide Copies of TA bills) .

( Relevant decision of CIC dated 14 Feb,2007 No.CIC/AT/A/2006/00479 regarding providing such information to public is attached for ready reference)

9. Whether he has taken any advance for the marriage of his daughter Smt 498 A WIFE from department ?

10. In case an advance is sanctioned for marriage purpose(for daughter of Shri/Smt XYZ) a certificate to the effect that no element of dowry is involved, is required to be taken from him as per rules of department. Whether he has submitted such certificate ? if yes then please provide certified photocopy of such document.

11. Details of all temporary advance taken by him after 1.1.04 from department (Amount,purpose etc)

12. Has he taken any permission from department for accepting gift in the last six years ?

13. Whether as per department records he was involved in borrowing or lending money ? if yes then provide the details and also provide the information whether he has taken due permission from RBI and filed return of his liabilities ?(provide photocopy of all such documents furnished by him as per staff regulation of department /other relevant rules)

14. Whether he has informed the department in any manner that expenditure on the marriage of her daughter was Rs.__ Lacs and disclosed the source of fund ? if yes then photocopy of such document ?

Information asked through point no. 9,10,14 are very much important to bring the truth before the court and to facilitate the process of trial/investigation and thereby for protection of the innocent. So these information are going to serve much larger purpose besides the objective of RTI act in the form of protecting the innocent or in reinstating the "Satyamev Jayte" or may be in re-uniting two families after realization by my in-laws that truth can only prevail.

Initial fee of Rs. 10/- in the way of cash postal order of Rs 10/- bearing serial number '________' has been attached as prescribed under Right to Information Rules 2005.

Further it is requested that the applicant would like to receive the above said information by post on the address mentioned below, at the earliest.

For any clarification contact me at ______________or at address given below.

With best regards,

Yours truly

Address :

En cl :

1. Application fee in the form of Rs 10/- note bearing serial number '44C 740434'

2. Photocopy of following decisions of CIC are enclosed with the hope that this will avoid the wastage of money and time for public authority and for myself in pursuing the same type of case up to CIC for obtaining information:

a) Decision of CIC dated 10 feb,2009 No.CIC/SG/A/2008/00248/1596 regarding educational certificate

b) Decision of CIC dated 20 March,2008 No.CIC/OK/A/2007/01493 & CIC/OK/A/2008/00027 regarding providing property return

c) Decision of No.CIC/AT/A/2006/00317 regarding details of LTC

d) Decision of CIC dated 14 Feb,2007 No.CIC/AT/A/2006/00479 regarding TA Bills

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

SOME7

This is quite an elaborate thread and quite informative as well. I am sure this addresses the concerns of many fellow sufferers.

aturchatur

TEP+RTI (Innovation) seems to be succeeding as received favorable reply from income tax department. Opposite party is in mess as per the RTI responses received. Next step is to shoot a paper tiger now to pension department of MIL govt department to stop her pension & initiate criminal proceedings against her for giving dowry. Thereafter file dp3 in few months to further screw them in their own venom.

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

aturchatur

DV DISMISS u/s 203 + CHALLENGE SUMMONS u/s 397 + STAY

Simultaneously, an application u/s 203 can be filed in immediate higher level in district court for dismissal of Domestic Violence Complaint. It needs to be accompanied with CHALLENGIUNG OF SUMMONS application and STAY OF DV case. Challenge of Summons needs to be on technical grounds only especially for those relatives who never lived together. Further, if the wife after leaving the husband’s company also gets prepared her Voter I-Card then in that case, this proves that she has herself shunned her domestic relationship at her own good wishes. So she can not technically file a complaint under Domestic Violence Act because in DV it is a necessary pre-condition that, “Husband ne maar-peet kar nikal diya aur mujhe mera domestic relationship vapas dilvayo” i.e., husband or his relatives threw the wife out of the domestic relationship and she herself NOT left that home.

So, if the wife has got her New Voter I-Card prepared of new address and after preparing that voter id card she files domestic violence complaint then this proves that the wife has herself signed & consented and willfully left her domestic relationship. And as per technicality, “IF NO DOMESTIC RELATIONSHIP THEN NO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CASE CAN BE FILED” but this does NOT mean that her right to file IPC Sections is also taken away.

We just want to say that, NOW SHE CAN GO FOR RELIEF UNDER THE 498A or IPC or other provisions of law but NOT UNDER DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT i.e., PWDVA and remember that if DV Act is dismissed then major wrongs can NOT be done to a husband immediately in a fast track manner because PWDVA judge/MM has wider powers to frame its own rules which are NOT there with a criminal court judge/ MM so it is very much necessary that DV gets stayed or dismissed at least on technical grounds.

Remember that, DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT IS A QUASI CIVIL – QUASI CRIMINAL LAWSUIT and this DV CAN BE VERY EASILY FALLEN ON THE GROUND ON TECHNCIAL GROUNDS AS MOST OF THE DV CASES WHICH COME TO OUR KNOWLEDGE ARE FALSE BUT STILL THESE CASES RUN FOR YEARS WITHOUT EVEN SUCH FALSE DV CASES HAVING LEGS TO STAND UPON, FOR THE SIMPLE REASON THAT THE HUSBANDS ARE NOT ABLE TO MOVE APPROPRIATE STEPS IN A TECHNICAL MANNER AND THEY ARE ILL-ADVISED TO RUN TO HIGH COURT WHEN SUCH CASES CAN BE EASILY THROWN OUT OF COURT BY SIMPLE APPLICATIONS.

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

aturchatur

Husband sends RTI regarding Dowry declaration by the government employees in their family asking just the basic details related to dowry given acceptance or denial statement by them on record which can be used to prove falsity of cases because if they said no dowry was given then that proves falsity of complainant's (wife's) version & if they said yes dowry given then they also come within the dowry given clause. In both the situations, dp3 will become solid against the complainant wife because if she needs exemption in dp3 plaint against her then a case for perjury against her for filing false cases will lie against her. Friends, fellow fighters, thanked by husband for praying for his success,

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

aturchatur

CONTEMPT OF COURT BY POLICE

aturchatur wrote:

hope the following helps you & others to move a bit forward towards CONTEMPT OF COURT against the police.

http://legalmanthan498adowrymisuse.blogspot.in/2010/08/justice-dhingra-slams-delhi-police-for.html

Justice Dhingra slams Delhi Police for filing dowry cases without proper probe -abuse of police power with misuse of 498a

Bail for man in dowry death case

New Delhi, Aug 6 (PTI) The Delhi High court today granted anticipatory bail to a man who is apprehending arrest in a dowry death case registered against him following the death of his sister-in-law in June this year. The court said the Delhi Police should carry out a thorough probe before registering an FIR against the family members of a husband in a dowry harassment/death case lodged by the wife.

While granting anticiaptory bail to Jaipal in a case lodged by the father of his sister-in- law, who committed suicide in June, Justice Shiv Narayan Dhingra said that before registering an FIR, police must investigate in detail the allegations levelled against a person. Justice Dhingra said it has been noticed that innocent family members of the husband also sometimes suffered following a complaint of dowry harassment/death and granted anticipatory bail to one Jaipal, a resident of Patel Nagar.

The police should not harass the family members and investigate thoroughly before arresting the accused persons in any dowry case, the court added. While submitting his bail plea before the court, Jaipal contended that he did not demand anything either from the deceased or from any other member of her family. "There is absolutely no allegation in the entire prosecution story that the petitioner was involved in committing any act which can be covered under the four corners of the sections 498-A/304-B IPC", submitted Jaipal's counsel.

As per the prosecution, on June 26 a complaint was lodged by Ramesh Chand alleging that besides his son-in-law Mahadev, the brother-in-law and sister-in-law of his daughter Geeta used to physically harass her which drove her to comit suicide. In his complaint, Ramesh Chand had mentioned that during marriage, the father-in-law demanded a car which they could not give. After two months of the marriage, her husband Mahadev started beating her. Jaipal also used to harass his daughter to bring more dowry and finally on June 26, she committed suicide, he alleged.

http://ibnlive.in.com/generalnewsfeed/news/bail-for-man-in-dowry-death-case/210955.html

Thanks & Regards

PATI CHANAKYA NEETI AAP BEETI JI

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

aturchatur

Money Extortion by Wife

I found this in relation to a fighter on Internet few months back. This file I found again today. It might be helpful for the fellow fighters.

Quote:

Hi, You can write simple letter to SHO, and his senior officers on police department to invoke section 91 of CrPC (if required Section 173(8) of CrPC) to colect docs, thing etc.. and submit to court... if they do not do it ... then go to court ONLY after framing the charge in court U/s 240 of CrPC..... till that time court do not know whether the docs you are referring are required to court or not....

Just search in google for Supreme Court judgements...

My wife filed CrPC-125 maintenance case on me.. I filed Money Extortion case on her.... during money extortion case I asked police to use Section 91 of CrPC to get docs from:

1. Her college ,

2. Her Bank

3. Her IT details,

4. Her working experience.

5. Her properties,

6. Her LIC and Chits policies,

7. Her expenses.

8. Her other sources of income etc...

Police got all docs... then I got those documents under RTI Act.

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

SOME1

I have got successful in getting cognizance under sec 420 of the Indian Penal Code and sec 138 of the Negotiable instrument act against my wife. If found guilty u/s sec 420 IPC, she can be awarded a jail term of upto 7 years with or without fine & in sec 138 NI she can be awarded a jail term of upto two years and a fine not exeeding twice the cheque amount :). Sec 420 of the IPC is non bailable and hence she will have to apply for anticipatory bail and will also have to go through trial.

In another cheating case also I am very hopeful to get cognizance against her in one or the other non bailable sections.

Summon has already been issued against her in the earlier case.

aturchatur

That's good, Your case seemed genuine to me as it was some cheque bouncing scenario & you simply presented to that court vehemently. Did you take help of any experienced lawyer. What was your motivating force ?

Also do u have any plans regarding munadi/ news publication/ process server to push the summons to fasten the case or u are just concentrating right now on other case of yours ?

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

SOME1

I am not at all concerned about serving her summon. Summon is like an invitation card with all the case details. I am only interested in sending arrest warrant. It will take about 3 months to get the arrest warrant issued from court. She knows about the case but thieves always tries to run away from law. She will only come to terms of reality when police will knock her doors.

I studied the law and hundreds of supreme court judgments to understand how the law is applied. This gave me the understanding of my case and also helped me during recording of my statement.

I knew that my wife has cheated me & my daughter. I had to fight for my daughter no matter what. I decided to file cases on her and I did not worry about its results. I faced the judge with confidence and complete understanding of law.

My case is one of the rarest case because my wife has accused me of asking dowry and misappropriating her jewelry. And in return I filed a case of financial cheating against her with all possible proofs. I have overwhelming evidence against her and despite knowing about the 498a & 125 crpc & domestic violence cases on me the hon. magistrate had to take cognizance against her.

I love my wife despite everything. It is said that everything is fair in love or war. But for me it is both LOVE AND WAR

aturchatur

It is both LOVE & WAR for you.

Your story is an emotional one dear.

I hope you get success is at least LOVE because then the WAR will be meaningless. That will be a real win-win situation for you.

"JO TUMHARE MANN KA HO RAHA HO TO ACCHHA HAI."

"AGAR KUCHH TUMHARE MANN KA NAHI HO RAHA HO TO AUR BHI ACCHHA HAI,

KYONKI VO USKE MANN KA HO RAHA HAI (POINTING TOWARDS SKY)" Aur Vo Jo Karta

Hai, Acchhe ke liye karta hai."

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

SOME8

If anyone is serious about filing a counter case on his wife, and by any chance your case is in India, contact us and we will help you file the same. I have helped one of my friends to file a cheating case against his wife. I want my success to be applied to as many cases as possible.

aturchatur

26AS as Reply to Maintenance

Some9 wrote:

No matter how you get evidence it is admissible in court of law.

As I told earlier, Initial Judge was "Big Fuc*ing Specialist". Opposite party gave him 30,000 Rs/- (Lawyer gave in the Guest house, I was told by her relatives) and he ordered IM 8,000 per month and even didn't hear to me.

I went through one of forum to get 26AS and luckily I had her DOB and PAN and used IT website and got her 26AS.

I took printout and went to HC to set aside ex-parte order. HC directed MM Judge to reconsider my evidence and asked Judge to listen to both parties before making order.

Luckily New Judge came and accepted my evidence (Her 26AS) and rejected her IM saying that she has sufficient income to maintain herself.

It's alreay 2 Yr now, so I don't think they fight the case. Since IM got rejected, They don't have any interest to fight and came for settlement for 6 Lakhs. I denied it and trial just started, I am sure nothing they can prove.

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

aturchatur

498A COMBAT STRATERGY—CAME TO KNOW FROM FELLOW FIGHTER IN A COURTROOM

SOME1 wrote:

I went to Court today in my family Court date and encountered with a very unusual case as well situation. The family judge was directing the husband to take her wife back as he already filed sec 9 RCR HMA or give divorce under sec 13-B MCD under HMA, as his wife already filed for sec 13(1-a) HMA.

What judge said in anger, " ya to rakho ya talaaq do --- na rakh rahe ho na talaaq de rahe ho"

The Husband was without any Lawyer and replied very politely to the Judge, "Sir I have already stated in my WS that the mental condition of my wife is unstable, she is used to make a loop in home and tried many times for suicide, me and my family saved her loads of time". The same can be cross verified from the records of Mental Hospital Papers. I am ready to spend any amount on her, but she must be cured properly before entering into my home.

Wife replied- I am alright these are all concocted story of husband.

Judge -Do you want to live with him

Wife -yes

Husband-then she must give in writing that she will not make further attempt by making loop at home

Wife- No, I will not

Husband- then who will take her responsibility? I have already submitted proof of her illness along with prescriptions of Doctors

Judge- As per your view she needs treatment, then why you are not paying her maintenance?

Husband-she is not well mentally, if I will pay then she may give to some other person or someone may snatch from her.

Judge you should not be worried about her, how she will use money?

Husband-she has a legal right of maintenance from me and I am legally bound to maintain her not her relatives or parents. They will enjoy her maintenance money because she is not in a position to judge her right or wrong

Wife-I am alright, he made fake papers

Judge-That is the issue of criminal courts, you should file a case in criminal court against him

Husband- as per law , the Court cannot rely on the statements of a insane or mentally unstable person. If she wishes to file then she can. I will not stop her. its her choice plz do not persuade her as she already done so many things wrong.

Judge-Next date for hearing after 2 months

SOME2 wrote:

Wow Man.. I should have learnt from him long back. Let me see if any tricks of this can be applied. Any new guys coming here should do this before a 498a gets filed. Kudos to him..

Only this line can be a tribute to him: Das ist der mann

SOME1 wrote:

Case continued...

Later on i asked the guy that what the hell is this & how this started? and what about 498A and other cases?

He said- she already filed DV, 498A and all other criminal cases as used to be filed by lawyers and girl side.

I asked- how u find escape then?

He said- i took a girl along with me to the District mental hospital exhibiting that she is my wife as well all register entries. Later on doctors gave prescription to her. After every 15 days i visit Government hospital and take that girl along with me.

I asked -and in 498A?

He said- Law do not authorize the statement of an insane person or who is not mentally fit to give statement. The 498A case or proceedings have not moved an inch from the day last year i filed all her prescriptions. I pleaded in Court ki PAGALOON KI GAWAHI NAHIN MAANI JAATI. How come a Magistrate order me for BAIL or JAIL on the basis of statement of a mentally unfit woman. Why do i seek BAIL?

merely an unsound person gave her statement in FIR?

I asked -Your next move?

He said- i already did marriage last year and i do not want her in my life , i am just passing the time so that in frustation she may withdraw cases and live her life peacefully.

I said-she may file another case in respect of your marriage?

He said- let her file. PAAGAL KUCH BHI BOLTE RAHEIN UNKI BAAT PE YAKEEN NAHIN KARTE. JAHAN ITNE CHAL RAHE HAIN, WAHAN EK AUR SAHI.

My simple question is with all judge and magistrates that, " if she was allright then why she visited mental hospital? No sane person will go there. I could be ready to take all her blame/allegations or for TRIAL or to take her back but how come is it possible that the mentally unstable person will give all her statement correctly?? I am ready to give MCD but she is not stable, she will apply for set aside in future in higher courts.

I asked -How many persons were involved in your case 498a

He said - 9 persons

i asked-did they applied for BAIL

he said-No need for bail, pagal kisi ka bhi naam likha dein to kya sab BAIL lena shuru

kar dengein?

i asked- how much time its been since 498a

he said- 2.5 yrs complete.

aturchatur wrote:

bhai niranjan, give me his number yaar. but I could not understand one thing.

if wife NOT living with him, then how come Govt Mental Hospital made past dated certificates.

Did she came to him & then went back & then again came back to him several times ?

SOME1 wrote:

Ab suno atur bhai,

In government hospital he took some other girl along wid him and creepingly he took her again n again after 15 days or 30 days.

That girl was his girl friend

koi ladki tumhari biwi hai ye ya to tum jaante hon ya wo ladki, how come a stranger knows that the girl came along wid u is your girl friend/wife /sister/slut??

kya tumhari wife apne face pe tumahri name plate laga ke jaati hai??

he did not made any past dated certificates, he procured just the prescription slips of medicines, during the course of investigation and after filing of FIR/DIVORCE /125/24 etc on him.

He is asking for mental certificate for his wife on the basis of her treatment which run for 2 yrs.

wid dedication he visited government hospital like a preist on every day in temple.

One more thing his wife procured the medical legal report from her village Block Hospital in order to trap her husband and his relatives under false 498A.

U'll not believe and digest that it is only on plain paper just having rubber stamp of a doctor without any prescribed format like we have in towns. Doctor examined her and wrote in paragraphical form about the injury in just 5 lines. That is her valid 'medical- legal report' as per law it is admissable as evidence.

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

aturchatur

INTERFERENCE Breaks the Marriages & Families

I, Atur Chatur went to court around 10 days back (in year 2014). In courtroom I met a lady lawyer who told that these days girls are modern. Girls don't believe in institution of marriages.

I said NO. The Girls are still the same. Instead, it is the outside interference which is breaking Indian Families.

This INTERFERENCE starts from dissident relatives from wife's side who poison (indoctrination) the mind of wives against her husband &/or inlaws. And then the fire starts spreading & spreads towards which direction no one can guess.

I told that Lady Lawyer that due to this reason I fought alone in court. WHY?

Because I never wanted any form of interference from my family side at least. No one is there at least to poison my mind. So later on in life, I won't be blaming myself that I didn't tried to save my family.

I will be satisfied & content from inside that I tried & gave my best to save my family. That's my only aim.

“Suno sabki, par karo apne mann ki”

Further

“Karo mann ki, aage godd ki marzii !!!”

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

SOME1

I have not only helped one friend who is a victim of false 498 A but I am helping many such victims. I help them in various ways. Today we are a small team of three people. We do the following-

1. Do counseling of fellow victims.

2. Help them during the process of securing AB/ Regular bail.

In India there is lot of pressure from the lawyers and the judiciary to settle the matter by giving settlement amount to girls. To get anticipatory bail one has to either deposit a huge lump sum money or agree to pay monthly maintenance.

But we request our fellow victims not to agree to any such conditions and we present our side of stand in the best way in the court and our stand is that we will not pay anything even if they reject our bail. We will move to SC and even go to jail but will not pay any money for AB.

If someone goes to jail, we will take it on us to get the person out of jail as soon as possible.

We will also take care of them inside the jail. But we will not get blackmailed. If everyone stops getting blackmailed, the number of cases will come down automatically.

We are doing our bit and we also plan to start more activities like distribution of newspaper inserts etc to reach to more and more victims and get new members in our core team to take the movement forward.

SOME2

I thank u aturchatur sir for your help.

Can anyone provide details about how to use audio-video as a proof ?

aturchatur

Dear SOME2, if you want to use audio-video records as evidence then you need to keep record of the media i.e., original recording media and original storage media. For Example:- you recorded some evidences in the memory card of your phone then you need to store in a safe place the original mobile instrument or recording instrument through which you recorded that audio or video or audio-video evidences and you must also store in safe place the memory card in which such evidences have been recorded because when you will submit those evidences copy in the court then the opposite party can object to the authenticity of those evidences and may demand forensic report and even the judge has the powers to ask for the original media of such recorded evidences. Court can send the original recording media and original storage device for forensic testing.

Alternatively, the husband on non resident Indian can get pre-forensic or self forensic report prepared from truth labs Bangalore or other such forensic labs and submit that proof in the court. What will happen is that the wife & her lawyer will get to know that you have real evidences with you and their lies have been duly caught by you, As a result there may be a possibility that your opposite party comes for settlement which you might need. Otherwise, use those evidences to file perjury against the beautiful/ adulterous lady or whatever those evidences prove about the falsity of that lady named wifey.

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

aturchatur

FATHER-IN-LAW SUSPENDED FOR GIVING DOWRY

Quote from net:

H i Al l ,

Another person found another innovative method. Forget DP3 and associated counter cases. Was your FIL/ MIL a government employee. He claims that he gave dowry. He can be suspended for doing so. And if retired, his pension can be stopped.

Remember: If you have a dollar and I have a dollar, we swap, no one is richer. You have an idea and I have an idea, we swap, we both have two ideas each.

These lovely 498-A wives and their families think, so many have surrendered, how much chance these poor fellows have when we have law on our side. But honey, I AIN'T MUCH, BUT I AM ALL I HAVE GOT. I won't let go untill the aim is achieved. And honey, now my aim is vanquishing you and your intelligent family.

Don't miss pgportal.gov.in

I won't take much of the time. I am quoting the relevant experince below:

Guys,

One good achievement and would recommend specially to those whose FIL or MIL or BIL or SIL or Wife are / were Government employees , still working or retired.

When I say government employees that mean all Government Employees (Central, State, PSU, National Bank etc etc)

In my case 498A read with DP 3/4 my In-Laws in FIR claimed huge dowry and marriage expenses.

Not thinking much within week I filled TEP against my FIL , MIL and Wife and got favorable reply as expected.

Same TEP is changed and converted to Application for Corruption.

**** Best Practice : Be nostalgic and think with peg of scotch what all

your FIL/MIL/SIL/BIL/his uncle/ aunti told about their financial status to impress and match your family status during marriage talks were on. Discuss with your mom and dad/ relative those present and try to dig the info.

Jot down all the financial details / moveable and immovable. Try to collect the address of immovable property.

This took 15 days for me to do.

I prepared separate applications under Anti Corruption Act and non adhering to Code of conduct by Govt. Servant,

jotting all the financial details for my FIL and MIL, along with FIR copy, their statement in Charge sheet, reply from RTI Income tax and sent by Speed post to:

There were in total 24 applications.

1. Chief Minister

2. Secretary to Chief Minister

3. Minister to respective departments.

4. All the mentioned Secretary to Minister of respective Departments

5. Their respective Department Vigilance Officer/ Director.

6. State Anti-corruption Bureau - Director

7. District Anti Corruption Bureau

8. Zone Anti Corruption Bureau

9. Their Immediate Supervisor

10. Their Department district Head.

11. their Department Regional Head.

12. their Department State Head

15 days later I filled RTI . RTI reply returned no private action, enquiry need to be initiated by Department only.

I marked dates for 1 month in Yahoo Calendar and hibernated.

Post 1 month when calendar gave alert. I went to PG Portal

http://www.pgportal.gov.in and raised 24 separate grievance for all departments not taking action copy pasting the same application.

So it took 4 months for Grand Canon to move and make a first Shoot and finally Secretary to Chief Minister ordered Departmental Enquiry against MIL and FIL.

People from Anti corruption Police Department reached their houses for Financial details and their statements.

They reached us for our statement and we gave them solid proofs and also escorted to their properties . They have to fill the report to in Chief Minister Office in next 1 months.

If convicted they will be suspended from Govt. Job, loose pension plus criminal case under Anti Corruption act goes against them specially when they are about to retire.

What this cost me , in other words what I lost :

1. Internet research finding address of all departments - 5 days

2. Few Phone calls to RTI activist of the state/region to get the address what were not available on Internet. - 2 days

3. Preparing of Application : 2 hours 3. Will and patience.

4. Rs. 2000 toward cost of (1 RIM of copier paper + toner + speed post and RTI fees + phone calls).

5. My valuable time.

So, I would recommend all the fellow Atur Chatur Members (Men Right activists) to go ahead and write back to respective FIL/MIL/BIL/SIL departments and other I mentioned. Make extensive use of RTI and pgportal.gov.in.

Remember God help those who help themselves.

Good Luck.

warm regards,

MERE SEENE MEIN NAHI TO TERE SEENE MEIN SAHI HO KAHIN BHI AAG, LEKIN AAG JALNI CHAHIYE.

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

aturchatur

RTI reply from FL - NO DOWRY HAS BEEN GIVEN

shivas wrote:

Dear friends, This is Shiva Prasad from hyderabad,a false 498A and DVC case was filed against me.

After that I had filed reply to the organization of my FIL, sending the charge sheet and FIR copies of my 498A Case which are certified copies from court where he has already accepted of giving dowry.

After that I got following answers from my father in law organization. MY FL states in his reply to the memo issued by organization he has not given any dowry during the marriage,Further ,being govt servant I am aware about ccs conduct rules and not violated any of the provisions in said rules.... FL says in his statement to settle personal scores with him i'm shooting RTI .....can any one please suggest can FILE cheating cases based on this...

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

aturchatur

AFTER CHARGE SHEET PROBLEM SOLVED THRU RTI [FIRST APPEAL]

SOME1 wrote:

After 35 days wait, RTI application for inspection of case file and certified copies of identified records in an already chargesheeted case was denied in by PIO citing this rule:

http://highcourtofkerala.nic.in/RTI_Subordinate%20courts%20&%20tribunal.pdf

Section 12: "No application for information of document relating to any judicial proceedings shall be entertained under these rules"

What are my options now? I found so many CIC decisions stating otherwise, but I don't feel so hopeful...

SOME1 wrote:

I desperate to do an inspection of the case file as I'm suspecting foul play. Copy applications for certain documents within the case file was denied earlier citing various reasons like:

1. document in file is not original or certified copy, so certified copy cannot be provided [how do I see whats in that document then?]

2. certified copy of another court's order cannot be provided from this court [which I agree, but I need a copy of whats there in the case file]

Earlier foul play that we uncovered include deliberately providing incomplete certified copies (yeah, pages from middle were skipped/removed, caught it multiple times already), refuse copy application citing document do not exist in case file. They succeeded in delaying me but eventually I got what I wanted. Outlaws are quite influential...

For reasons above, I need to succeed in inspection of the case files in that court where DV & 498a are running...

SOME1 wrote:

Hurray!!! FAA allowed my appeal and ordered PIO to arrange for inspection of case file!

Certified copies of any document identified should be provided through regular court process.

Here's what I wrote in appeal:

i. Section 22 of RTI Act 2005 clearly states that the information which is not available to citizens under any other disclosure laws should be disclosed under RTI. Though the Section 12 of High Court's 2006 rules deny information on judicial proceedings, it has been clarified multiple times by Central Information Commission that any documents

which doesn't fall under other Court rules for information dissemination and unless expressly forbidden from disclosure should be allowed under RTI. Please refer to enclosures for list of CIC orders.

ii. ... [not relevant]

iii. Nothing in the case file has been expressly forbidden from disclosure by the JFCM Court. Hence by the CIC decisions enclosed, PIO was wrong in rejecting the RTI application.

iv. To best of my knowledge, no other provisions are available for inspecting the case file. Hence, u/s 22 of RTI Act, 2005 the PIO should have allowed inspection of the case file.

SOME1 wrote:

Just heard now - PIO got punishment transfer for malpractices including tampering court records and is facing departmental enquiry. Truth prevails!!!

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

aturchatur

Clarification regarding conflicting SC Judgments

SOME1 wrote:

Unfortunately most of laws in India are ambigous. SC says different things in 4 judgments & just opposite things 4 judgments. So a lot of stuff is left at Discretion of trial court judge. Same is true for various HCs

aturchatur wrote:

SOME1 bhai, pls enlighten some fighting tactics based on your above lines.I want to ask, if SC says 4 opposite things in 4 judgments then doesn't that prove some contradiction at apex level. and from there, how can we benefit as fellow fighters.

SOME1 wrote:

There is a SC judgment about different views taken by SC itself, it says that whichever is fit to present case, shud be used.

Otherwise there is general rule:

Latest judgment over-rides the previous one if same law point s in question

larger bench judgment overrides smaller one

aturchatur wrote:

SOME1 bhai, TUSSI GREAT HO YAR !!!

You explained it very well .

Thanks !!!

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

aturchatur

FIR against yet another Girl

Quote:

Dear Friends,

Here is another example of someone who had the conviction to fight for what is right.

I admire and salute the courage of Mr. SOME1, a retired person, whose son and whole family was charged with 498A/506/323/34 IPC.

Though he is based away from Pune, and the marriage was solemnized in Ujjain and the couple stayed most part of their married life in Pune. He left no stone unturned and saw that the other party also feels the equal amount of heat.

Here is the press release what is being given to newspapers.

I have included the email ID of Mr. SOME1 for everyone to contact him. His phone no is withheld to protect his privacy. The same can be taken on request by writing a personal mail to me. But, please don't invade his privacy unless it is required for serious help .

PRESS RELEASE

REVERSE DOWRY CASE - AGAINST THE FATHER, GIRL &RELATIVES FOR GIVING DOWRY & ABETMENT TO GIVING

DOWRY

How civilized and educated we may pause to be but still we hear umpteen number of dowry cases getting registered daily. Despite having a very strong judicial law i.e. "Dowry Prohibition Act" nothing much has come into action. One of such bizarre dowry case where an FIR has been registered at PS: Chaturshringhi, Pune (Maharashtra) against the bride's father and five other relatives for giving dowry and abetment to giving dowry, on the complaint of father of a Noida based Software engineer.

His contention: Giving dowry and abetment to giving dowry is as much an offence as receiving it.

Demanding or Taking dowry is a crime, so is giving Dowry. In a first of its kind in the state of Maharashtra, a Noida‐based software engineer Neeraj was arrested by Chaturshringhi Police for a false allegation of demanding dowry and had been in custody for eight days, was later released on bail. His parents obtained anticipatory bail from Bombay High Court. Neeraj submitted a complaint to the Chaturshringhi Police Station on 16/04/09 against the wife and her relatives for giving dowry and abetment to giving dowry but the Police refused to register the FIR on the plea of jurisdiction, since the marriage took place at Ujjain.

After receiving a reply through RTI application that his complaint has been closed and sent to record on the pretext of Jurisdiction, his father filed a case U/s 156(3) before the Ld. JMFC Court No‐9 Pune, against the daughter‐in‐law Madhvika, her father & four other relatives, saying that she had mentioned in the FIR that, "her father gave all kinds of dowry articles in her marriage as per his capacity" and for the second time in an affidavit before the Ld. Addl. Session Judge Pune with the sole motive to object the anticipatory bail of her in‐laws said, "My father gave 15‐16 tolas of Gold in her marriage to her and a few tola of gold to her husband and in‐laws.

While her father & mother mentioned in their written statements U/s 161 before the Inquiry officer Mr. B.A. Kamble that they had given following dowry articles in their daughter's marriage and all the dowry articles were sent to Pune by a vehicle after 15 days of marriage. Not only this, three of the bride's uncles (Chacha & foofa) also mentioned in their written statements U/s 161 that they were present in the marriage with their families and sufficient dowry was given by their relative in the said marriage. Neeraj separated from his wife Madhvika within five months of the marriage.

Madhvika filed a false complaint at the Mahila Thana Ujjain, which was later transferred to Chaturshringhi Police Station, roping in the entire family U/s 498A/506/323/34 IPC read with Section 3&4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

Not to take it lying down, Neeraj's father filed a complaint against them. "My daughter‐in‐law says her father had given dowry as per his capacity, which is illegal. But it's equally illegal to give dowry. So I have filed a case against her father and other relatives." He said. "We have not taken any dowry, never demanded any dowry, whatever gifts were given by her parents and relatives, were sent to Pune after 15 days of marriage but they have filed a false case roping in the entire family. We are shocked at the steps taken by our daughter‐in‐law and her family, while the marriage was

solemnised with a Kanyadaan of 11/‐ rupees. I read law books and filed the case. This is our answer to the daughter‐in‐law and her relatives, who filed false case against us." As per the law, giving dowry is as much a crime as demanding it. Hence, it attracts equal punishment under Section 3 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.

Police records and statements clearly establish that there was no demand for dowry but they alleged to have given Dowry as per their capacity. The case has been registered at PS: Chaturshringhi on the order of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Court No‐9, Shivaji Nagar Pune. Neeraj said, "The misuse of Dowry Prohibition Act and Section 498A should be stopped or it can get many innocent people into trouble."

WIFE'S CHARGE

Madhvika filed dowry harassment case against Neeraj on July 04, 2008. "I was harassed mentally and physically by my husband and his parents. They tortured me for dowry. They asked me to take a loan of Rs. 30 lacs on my salary for buying a house and warned that if they don't get money, I would be sent back," said her complaint. Madhvika has alleged Neeraj and his parents had assaulted her for more money. "I was feeling insecure," she has said. Neeraj, however, denied all these allegations. "I have already said all her allegations are baseless. How can my parents assault her when they are living 2000kms away at Noida and never visited to Pune during these five months. She did all this because she siphoned off the entire salaries to her parents on one pretext or the other and it came to my knowledge. Can a husband tolerate, his wife spending entire salary on her parents and that too without his knowledge?

SHORT MARRIAGE

Neeraj and Madhvika married on January 2 6, 2008 at Ujjain.

Neeraj is a software engineer and was working with TCS, Pune. She is a SAP Consultant at Cognizant, Pune and was staying with her husband at Aundh, Pune where Neeraj had taken a flat on rent. Neeraj's parents were staying at Noida and never visited Pune during these four months. "I loved her very much and managed my transfer to TCS Pune so that we can spend a happy life a month before marriage but she had never been faithful," said Neeraj. She filed a false dowry harassment cases against him and his parents. "Now she has filed a divorce petition in Ujjain Court asking for the given dowry returned to her while it is an admitted fact that I left the flat in a single dress leaving all the articles with her in the same flat" he said.

Enclosed: Copy of FIR U/s section 3 of DP Act against Manoj Joshi father of the girl and five others.

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

aturchatur

DDRS [Delhi Dispute Resolution Society] Applicaion Sample

aturchatur wrote:

To,

The Additional Director

Mrs.Mr. XYZ

Delhi Dispute Resolutions Society

XYZ Address

New Delhi - 1100XX

Sub:- Request to sort out all my matrimonial matters through your esteemed organization

Respected Sir/ Madam,

I am MY NAME, S/0 FATHER'S NAME, R/o RESIDENCE ADDRESS. My marriage was solemnized with WIFE NAME D/o FIL NAME, R/o HER ADDRESS on DD/MM/YYYY at Delhi.

That TWO Children were born out of this wed-lock named SON'S NAME &DAUGHTER'S NAME who are aged about XX Years & YY Years respectively.

That these two children are in care & custody of the CUSTODIAN RELATION.

That my wife is under the undue influence of her relatives & has filed false cases with FIR No. XX/2014 , Divorce u/s13(1)(i-a) & PWDVA Cases against me & my relatives under influence of her dissident relatives.

That this has caused a lot of hassles for me despite to knowing that I am taking care of my innocent minor children along with unmarried sister to be married & my parents suffering from chronic diseases & old age prolonged diseases.

That as I am a civilized person. I have never been in violation of law & order & am a responsible law abiding citizen. I straight away want to resolve all my misunderstandings through this reputed & renowned organization of Government of India & peacefully & amicably & cordially want to have a husband wife relationship as it was before this crucial & false dispute.

In eagerly awaiting of cordial settlement of this dispute from this most appropriate organization related to these kinds of disputes.

. Thanking You

. M Y N AM E

. MY SIGN

. M Y AD D R ESS

. MY PHONE

[I shall be communicated in writing]

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

aturchatur

How to get Wife/FIL/MIL property details using RTI

srinivasbr wrote:

Sent RTI to REVENUE OFFICER, urban development Authority.

I asked the below points in my RTI:

Please provide the details of the properties registered under the following person and his family members

FIL

XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX

Bangalore:560030

Details Required for Mr. FIL, Residing at: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, Bangalore:560030 under RTI ACT 2005.

1. As per my knowledge the above named person owns the following properties in his/family members name

a. Nanjappa Layout(Address mentioned above)

b. A commercial Property in Magadi Road(Near Prasanna Theatre)

c. A Residential site in Sunkkada katte

2. Details of Properties Owned by Mr.Rangappa R and His Wife Mrs.Ammayamma.

a. Details and address of the properties registered

b. Date of Property registered

c. Property value at the time of purchase

d. Current value of the properties

NOTE: After a long determined fight, i got 45pages of FIL property details, which also gave me hints to other properties n income.

For RTI copy plz PM me

Regards Srinivas

email: srinivasa498fighter@yahoo.co.in

also contact my friend:- aturchatur@yahoo.com

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

SOME3

Silly question but need answer. I never used RTI before but I now will have to use RTI to fight

false 498a case.

Along with RTI application, I attached 10 Rs Postal money order. Do I also need to put envelope with return address postage paid?

Can someone please send me a link that will explain complete procedure for sending RTI?

Thanks, Ganpati

aturchatur

no need to attach return envelope.

format already given above.

attach rs. 10 Postal order.

thats it !!!

NOTE:- You can check RTI CONSULTANT INDIA site for procedure to file RTI, FA, SA & the Writ to HC for which the weblick is:- http://www.rticonsultantdelhi.blogspot.com

You may also contact the consultants from RTI Consultant Delhi (for all 498a & DV matters or related RTI to get success in killing false 498a & false maintenance / false crpc 125 & false domestic violence complaint) at email id:- rticonsultantdelhi@yahoo.com

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

aturchatur

CONTEMPT OF COURT

Contempt of Court to close your case

aturchatur wrote:

If (Charge Sheet) CS is prepared in contempt of court then, one can work in that direction too. Before that if u go for CS Expedition process then that should help.

Quote:

CHARGE SHEET Expedition & FAIR INVESTIGATION before CS !!!

I today (in the year 2014) had PM excahnged with SOME1, who told that if 6 months have passed then that itself is a ground to file for quash. Quash f FIR on the basis of Excessive Delay.

Further, there are many judgments against the police where you can work to go for contempt of court petition in MM first & then sessions. In Jan'2014 also there was a judgment against an IO. You can search that latest SC Judgment also from internet. Also go through below link.

Quote:

FIR merely on written statement of Wife - JUDGEMENTS Vs CAW

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

aturchatur

Vigilance Compaint against 498a Father-in-law or Mother-in-Law

Vigilance Compaint against 498a Father-in-law or Mother-in-Law

Date: From SOME1

The Chief Vigilance Commissioner

O/ o Andhra Pradesh Vigilance Commission

North Wing, 'H' Block, Secretariat, Hyderabad - 22.

Sir,

Ref: (i) Rule 25(A), 9(2) & 9(7) of A.P.C.S (Conduct) RULES, 1964

(ii) Circular Memo No.695/Ser.C/2006, Dated: 12-10-2006

(iii) Circular Memo No.15486/Ser.C/2007, Dated:30-7-2007 (iv) G.O.Ms.No.528, Dated:19-08-2008.

Sub: Vide references cited (i to iv) above, this is a complaint against under-mentioned retired Government for employee U/s 10 r/w sections 8 & 9 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and violation of A.P.C.S. (Conduct) Rules 1964.

Name of Government Servant: 498a FIL/MIL

Office Address: Address of FIL/MIL

Residential Address:

I, 498a Accused-Victim S/o .... submit that following information for action against Government employee as here under:

I submit that 498aFIL/MIL performed his daughters[aka: otehr name] marriage on Date @ Place .

I further submit that 498aFIL/MIL's daughter filed a complaint against her husband and her in-laws with allegations of dowry on the file of .......... Police Station, Place and a Criminal case was registered Vide Crime No........... and the same is pending before the Hon'ble Court, ..............

I submit that as per the complainant allegations, Sri Kandala Subrahmanyeswara Sharma admitted that he allegedly given dowry and abetted for his daughter's marriage, which is gratification on his part, U/s 10 r/w sections 8 & 9 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

I submit that the offence was committed when 498 FIL/MIL was in service, as a Government employee.

I further submit that Sri K.S. Sharma had violated A.P.C.S. (Conduct) Rules 1964, which is a misconduct on his part, for not filing any declarations (dowry and property) or intimation to the government, despite, doing such transactions in the year ..........

In the light of the foregoing, I request you to initiate and take action to be ordered and taken against the said retired Government employee 498a FIL/MIL. Kindly expedite your investigation and keep me posted with details of FIR.

Thanking you, Yours faithfully, [Accused-Victim]

E n cl :

1 ) C o m p l a i n t C o p y ( E xh i b i t A ) a n d C h a rg e S h e e t (E xh i b i t B )

2) Legal Witness - III Statement of Sri K.S. Sharma (Exhibit C)

3) PIO's reply from498a FIL/MIL about non declaration of Rule 25(A) & Rule 9 of A.P.C.S(C) RULES, 1964 (Exhibit D)

4) reference ii (Exhibit E), reference iii (Exhibit F) and reference iv (Exhibit G).

Source:- Rights Activism Against Skewed Family Laws

http://archanaafoundation.blogspot.in/2012/02/vigilancecompaintagainst498father.html

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

aturchatur

TEP, CCS, Govt Emp FIL MIL BIL SIL, ITO related PROOFS COLLECTION

Quote:

CLEANCORRUPTION SAYS:-

1) approach income tax dept via RTI and get details of income tax declarations sight 498a case in RTI as reason refer Delhi HC judgement and see what is coming .

2) file Tax eavasion petition and get details via RTI from IT dept again here refer Delhi H C j u d g e me n t

The above two file fail via RTI though you can file a TEP.

There is not a single decision that asks to disclose TEP findings. That Delhi HC decision was when DGIT was not part of second schedule. In 2008 it was made part of se co n d sch e d u l e .

Absent a showing of Human Rights abuse or corruption the RTI gets defeated at CIC.

Quote:

VIJAY NARU SAYS:-

The above two ways never fails if applied properly.

People make mistake while requesting information as they ask for IT Returns. They are of no use.

One should ask whether the amount reflected in ITR of that year (year of marriage) also reflects the marriage expenses as claimed by girl i.e. if she has claimed 10 lacs then cumulative return of her family must be more then 10 lacs. Also ask for marriage expenditure survey report as per section 133A(5) of Income tAx Act with cash flow details ie. whether in-laws satisfied the cash flow details also. Dont ask for details.

This will work as two sided sword asif they says yes (which never happens) then they have to face action for tax evasion. if they say no then you can use it.

Then you get the answer in yes or no kind of thing like that there return is below that etc. Becasue in case they accept the same then they will face action for tax evasion. Which is crime with country.

Now use this RTI reply being evidence in court.

Like in my case my wife admitted giving maruti zen and AC in marriage in addition to other items but her father given statement in income tax that they only spent Rs. 2 lacs and they are not filing return as there income is below income tax limit. I insisted by filing a complaint against ITO that he has connived the act with vested interst as her daughter herself admitted giving Car and AC and because of such kind of officials in Inocme Tax , the country and department is losing heavy revenue loss.

So income tAx officer faced departmental action and finally my father in law given statment that they have not given maruti zen and ac. similar statment in police is given by my wife and hence they both themselves has contradicted their earlier statment and now i have the proof that i have been implicated in false case. and I have filed a case

for conspiracy with view of extortion.

Quote:

VIJAY NARU SAYS:-

Ask the authority that whether CCS conduct rule (relevet ) rule is applicable to women a l so .

Also ask in how many cases they have received any inforamtion of giving dowry.

In how many cases they have initiated action.

Reason as on record for not intiating action.

provision of punishment for not followin ccs conduct rules.

also file a complaitn against the officer who replied and if he is the competent authority to initiate action as being PIO does not set him free from other duties to initiate action on wrongs came to his knowledge.

RULE RELATED TO DOWRY

"13-A. Dowry

No Government servant shall-

(i) give or take or abet the giving or taking of dowry; or

(ii) demand directly or indirectly, from the parent or guardian of a bride or bridegroom, as the case may be, any dowry.

Explanation:- For the purposes of this rule, 'dowry' has the same meaning as in the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961(28 of 1961)."

Therefore a disciplinary action needs to be taken against Mr XYZ.

Quote:

shivas99 wrote:-

I have sent RTI Application to my father in law organization asking about what action will be taken against my FL who indulge in giving or abet in giving dowry?

After that, I got reply for that RTI stating that if proved that my FL has given dowry, action will be taken against central civil services( CCA) rules 1965. they have clearly mentioned that they also adopts central civil services conduct rules .

After that I had filed formal complaint to the organization of my FIL, sending the charge sheet and FIR copies of my 498A Case which are certified copies from court where he has already accepted of giving dowry. After that i have sent RTI asking about the action taken on my complaint . I got following answers from my father in law organization.

1. provide me the certified copies of action taken report on my application with ref. no

ABC.....by your department till date

a. No action taken report held.

2. According to various university ........ laws,guidelines,rules,procedures,manuals etc., in how much time should an investigation be completed after receipt of complaint.

please provide copies of such guidelines,which prescribed time limits for various stages from receipt of complaint up to filing of action taken report?

a. information not held. No defined period for such complaints in university acts and statutes terms and conditions of service rules which are on university website.

my question is public information officer clearly mention that they also obey CCS rules.

Can any one please tell me what will be the time period to take action according to CCS rule 1965 for giving dowry?

3. Whether Mr.FL has informed by any manner to university what expenditure was incurred by him on the marriage of his daughter in .... year and disclosed the source of fund?if yes, kindly furnish the photocopy of such document ? a. information not held.

I kindly request every one to help me how to go about in my case...

Thanks SHIVA

Quote:

taurus replied:-

Regarding point 1 and 3, the PIO has clearly told that he does not have the information. If you believe that this is not fair and they ought to have taken action, then make a complaint to the superiors at the PA for taking necessary action against those responsible for deriliction of duty. Regarding point 2, there is no specified time limit for taking action on a complaint. However CVC has laid down some time limits for investigation of complaints. These can be seen at the following links:

http://cvc.nic.in/oo160304.pdf

http://cvc.nic.in/004vgl265309.pdf

http://cvc.nic.in/Adherinvcomp21052010.pdf

Quote:

shivas99 wrote:-

After that I had filed formal complaint to the organization of my FIL, sending the charge sheet and FIR copies of my 498A Case which are certified copies from court where he has already accepted of giving dowry. After that i have sent RTI asking about the action taken on my complaint . After that a show cause/memo notice was issued to my FL to offer his comments against violation of employee conduct rules like Dowry Giving.

I have sent RTI TO MY FL office as "Please provide the certified response copies which was submitted by Mr. FL XXXX to the concern department to offer his comments on Violation of University of Hyderabad CCS Conduct Rules ( CCS Dowry Prohibition Act 1961 for giving dowry ) . I got reply to my RTI as in response to memo date,no response/comments received from xxxx. More over it is sitted that I (me) have submitted 10 applications under RTI act 2005 seeking various information regarding my FL xxxxx.from this information ,it is noted that u have personal dispute and for settling these you are using the RTI act to settle your personal scores and the information being sought seems to be of no public interest and thus disclosing such information amounts to invasion of privacy of an individual.Hence you are informed to

disclose as to what public interest involved in obtaining the information?

Can please active members please inform how to handle this!!!

Quote:

cleancorruption replied:-

My experience is that - you write a powerful follow up plaint to the SBI CEO, the Min of Finance and the Head of Vigilance in the Dept of Financial Services. You need to crank this out from New Delhi. I did the same - went to CIC and secured an order. Do not leave them and defend it down to the wire. Send me a personal message and I will

tell you how to do it. No flattery or flowery language please. Practice legal writing and push your law point on sec 3 of Dowry Act. I can share the RTI to you if required.

Quote:

shivas99 replies:-

thanks alot Right said and clean corruption,

I hope certainly this document will help me in my RTI. I am posting my RTI Which i had sent to PIO , Can the members can suggest necessary corrections i need to make....

2. Please provide the certified response copies which was submitted by Mr.xxxxxxxxx to the concern department to offer his comments on Violation of ............organization CCS Conduct Rules ( CCS Dowry Prohibition Act 1961 for giving dowry )

ANSWER I GOT: NO RESPONSE COMMENTS RECIEVED FROM XXX IN RESPONSE

TO MEMO DATED 29.10.2010......its been more than 2 months what should i need to do in this...

3. Provide me the certified copies of Action taken report on my application and this RTI by your department till date. If no action taken report held, please mention the reasons for that?

ANSWER I GOT: no such information or report is held;as the mater is still under process...

4. If it is a punishable crime under Sec 182 to give false information to police/Hon'ble Court and whether the ............ organization officials required to inform the concerned police station/officer/ Hon'ble Court if it finds that false information is given to police/court by their employee? If not, why?

ANSWER I GOT: Information defined in RTI doesnot include answers to such questions, for which no information is held as on date..

5. If ...........organization Employee gives false information to Hon'ble court/Police officer against the organization records/memos/comments of the employee, what kind of action will be taken on that employee?

ANSWER I GOT: Information defined in RTI doesnot include answers to such questions, for which no information is held as on date..

6. Whether Mr. xxxx has informed to xxxxx in any manner that what expenditure was incurred by him on the marriage of his daughter in xxxx and disclosed the source of fund? If yes, kindly furnish the photocopy of such document. If NO, what are the departmental action you are entitled to take against such employees who do not disclose their immediate family member's marriages expenditure..

ANSWER I GOT:information not held

7. Provide me the details in how many cases they have received any information of giving d o w ry? .

information not held

ANSWER I GOT:information not held, PIO is not the component authority

8. In how many cases public information officer have initiated action. for giving dowry by their employees? if not, reasons as on record for not initiating action?.

ANSWER I GOT:information not held, PIO is not the component authority

10. What is the provision of punishment for not following CCS conduct rules.?

answer i got : rule avialable on Ministry Of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions (http://www.persmin.nic.in)

3. according to various .organizations aws,guidelines,rules,procedures,manuals etc., in how much time should an investigation be completed after receipt of complaint. please provide copies of such guidelines, which prescribed time limits for various stages from receipt of complaint up to filing of action taken report?

answer i got :no information held

Kindly provide the each and every movement details of this RTI application till its disposal .

any suggestions from clean corruption,right and all other members in formatting my RTI

Looking for desperate help.....Right said and clean corruption can u please share ur RTI that would be great help...

Quote:

@rightsaid:-

@ shivas99, I scratched my head a lot, i think the CPIO has decided to protect the errant employee by all means come what may. I feel its no use - if you are at peak stage. These things has to be speeded up. I suggest you to shake the higher controlling authorities from the centre as suggested by cleancorruption. Shoot letters to higher ups, also i suggest you file a complaint too to the CIC, Delhi against CPIO.

@clean corruption, you have mentioned to shoot a mail personally. But please reveal how to contact you in this matter. Maybe i too can put to use your experienced knowledge. Eager to hear from you.

Quote:

shivas99 wrote:- Guys....

I got reply to my RTI ....Stating and signed by my FL that he has not given any dowry during the marriage,Further ,being govt servant I am aware about ccs conduct rules and not violaed any of the provisions in said rules.... FL says in his statement to settle personal scores with him i'm shooting RTI .....can any one please suggest can FILE cheating cases based on this...

I have lok adalat next week....I can call him for his statement....My case is running from past 2 and halF years....want any advice how I can put reverse case on him.

Quote:

cool_ris wrote:-

One more way to trap him in his lies: Let him tell (on affidavit) the court (in any of your case like 498A) that he has given dowry in his daughter's marriage, file perjury case in the same court on him for lying under oath. If he has already told in the court that he has given dowry then file the perjury in the same court. Ask your lawyer about more details.

Quote:

hardikm to shivas99

WHEN FIL SAYS No Dowry thru RTI

Based on the reply from the RTI, and the chargesheet, file the case of perjury on your FIL. This is the total contraction of the fact and is misleading to the court of justice. You can file the perjury as the part of your 498a case. This will be much more effective.

Once perjury is filed and the cognaziance is taken, send the copy of the order to the government to ask for his removal from the services and also to stop his pensions + other benefits. They will come to you to settle the case.

Regards,

Further, Shiva,

Perjury can be filed even after taking the statement under the oath or affidavid. Moreover, if the perjury is filed after the cross examination, then this would be more effective. I think thats why you lawyer is asking to file the perjury after cross examination. Perjury cannot be filed before the oath.

Thanks & Regards

Pati Chanakya Neeti Aap Beeti ji

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

SOME3

To,

First Appellate Authority

Commissioner of Income Tax,

B a n g a l o re : 5 6 0 0 0 1

From,

/* Poor Husband */

/* Address */

Subject: Appeal to RTI Response Ref. No. F.No.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX/2014-15 dated XX/XX/XXXX

R e sp e ct S i r,

This Appeal is against the above mentioned order for my RTI application dated XXXX, 2014 seeking information about the "Actions taken by the Department of Income Tax on the Tax Evasion Petition filed against /* FIL */ on XX Sep, XXXX".

My Appeal is based on the below core principles of RTI Act 2005.

1. Transparency and Accountability:

".to promote transparency and accountability in the working of every public authority,.

Referring to the above Para, I would like to mention here that it's been more than 10months from the date of TEP filed, Also on XX XXX XXXX, I have submitted Information and Evidences supporting the alleged Tax Evasion and I believe no actions have been initiated so far.

Thus to uphold this core principle of RTI Act and also for an un-biased investigation I am entitled to get information requested.

2. To curb Corruption:

".AND WHEREAS democracy requires an informed citizenry and transparency of information which are vital to its functioning and also to contain corruption and to hold Governments and their instrumentalities accountable to the governed;"

Referring to the above Para, I am in the apprehension that the evader may use illegal means to escape from the purview of law. To avoid such evasion, certain information should be shared with the informers.

3. Section 8(j) of the RTI act: "no public interest, non disclosure of personal information"

As a citizen of the country I am entitled to know whether the other person is paying the proper taxes or not, as Tax Evasion is a criminal offence.

I believe as a law abiding citizen of the country paying Tax is every citizen's prime responsibility and concealing Income/Assets to avoid taxes is a crime under the law.

Also, I would like to mention here that the alleged Tax Evader is involved in various businesses which involves Public Activities.

4. TEP still under consideration:

In the above mentioned reference letter it is stated that "TEP filed is still under consideration,

As I have mentioned earlier that it's been more than 10months of filing TEP, I believe it's been quite long enough for the evaders to route and execute an escape plan. Giving this as a reason the Department cannot take infinite time to take action on TEP. In order to maintain Transparency & Accountability I am hereby entitled to question the same.

5. CIC decisions favoring the Information givers:

One of the CIC decision says,

"the information givers would be keen to know that the information provided by them has been of some value to the authorities or not. Feed back in this regard would motivate the information givers to provide further informations to the authorities and thereby enable them to curb tax evasion and enhance the state revenues."

I hereby humbly request you to consider my RTI application and provide the information requested as early as possible.

E n cl o su re s:

Response letter F.No.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX/2014-15 dated dated XX/XX/XXXX

References:

• RTI Act 2005

• File no CIC/LS/A/2009/01014

• File no CIC/LS/A/2010/000090 • File no CIC/LS/A/2009/001067

Thanking you Yours sincerely

".....GOT TO SEE HOW IT WORKS....."

SOME4

There is a judgment of 2013 SC which says, "If wife leaves husband due to low living standard then hers & files false complaints against him, then bla bla bla"

I want this judgment, Respected srinivas sir/ chatur bhai if you or any other have that judgment then pls PM me or post it. Thanks

aturchatur

NO MAINTAINENCE without Vistazion

dv_fighter wrote:

SOME1, here it is

SOME2 wrote:

Sharmeen Hakim Indorewala, Mumbai Mirror | Jul 28, 2014, 10.46 AM IST

In a case filed by the father that his ex-wife had not allowed him to meet his children aged 11 and 13 last Diwali, the court said it will monitor if the mother allows access to the children and only if it is satisfied will it release the

outstanding maintenance for the two children. This amount will be deposited in the court.

In the process, the court also struck down the mother's entire defence in the custody battle, which also leaves the door open for the father to win custody of his children.

In the original case, the Bombay High Court has in 2007 asked the father to pay maintenance of Rs 7,500 to each kid. Till now, the father has paid Rs 1,45,000, with Rs 5,20,000 still outstanding. Family court Judge IM Bohari has ordered the father to deposit this outstanding amount in the name of the family court's principal judge Lakshmi Rao. Judge Bohari said the court will observed if the mother allowed the father access to his children and the money would be given to her with interest accordingly. If she didn't follow the courts order, the money will be put in a fix deposit under each child's name till maturity. The father, however, will continue paying the monthly maintenance.

It was the father's case that the court has allowed him to meet his children for one day a week, besides birthdays and half a day on festivals and major vacations. Last Diwali, the father had got a court order allowing him to spend 4 days with them. But when he reached the spot where he was to pick up his children, they were not present. He then filed a police complaint, submitting photographs as evidence.

The mother, on the other hand, said she was present but did not bring the kids as they were happy with her current husband. She said she was also in the process of opposing access rights to the father.

"Not only Diwali, but access on subsequent days has also been denied. If the children are living with the mother, her new husband and three children there is no reason for her to deny the children's biological father access to them," the judge said .

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

aturchatur

NO MAINTAINENCE u/s 125 CrPC

If we look at CrPC 125 relevant section below:

(4) No Wife shall be entitled to receive an allowance from her husband under this section if she

is living in adultery, or if, without any sufficient reason, she refuses to live with her husband, or if they are living separately by mutual consent.

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

aturchatur

HOW TO FILE MONEY EXTORTION CASE ON DISGRUNTLED WIVES

Money Extortion by Wife

I found this in relation to a fighter on Internet few months back (in year 2014). This file I found again today. It might be helpful for the fellow fighters (Discussions of tear 2014).

Quote:

Hi, You can write simple letter to SHO, and his senior officers on police department to invoke section 91 of CrPC (if required Section 173(8) of CrPC) to collect docs, thing etc.. and submit to court... if they do not do it ... then go to court ONLY after framing the charge in court U/s 240 of CrPC..... till that time court do not know whether the docs you are referring are required to court or not....

Just search in google for Supreme Court judgements...

My wife filed CrPC-125 maintenance case on me.. I filed Money Extortion case on her.... during money extortion case I asked police to use Section 91 of CrPC to get docs from:

1 . H e r co l l e g e ,

2 . H e r Ba n k

3. Her IT details,

4 . H e r w o rki n g e xp e ri e n ce .

5. Her properties,

6. Her LIC and Chits policies, 7 . H e r e xp e n se s.

8. Her othe sources of income etc...

Police got all docs... then I got those documents under RTI Act.

@ Experts, I found this from internet, this man filed money extortion case against wife on the basis of above alone. I don't want to know whether he won or not.

I J U S T W A N T T O K N O W , O N T H E B A S IS O F A B O V E Q U O T E D H IN T S , H o w c a n w e f ile M o n e y E x t o r t io n C a s e a g a in s t a w if e ?

Please tell the details procedure as so all fellow fighters can at least learn the procedure as how that's done PARTY-IN-PERSON (little spoon feeding please). All are Welcome to contribute their valuable guidance !!!

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

Wife is NOT attending Court Dates

aturchatur wrote:

There is an extra provision for the knowledge of all as follows:-

In Family Court, You can use Order IX Rule 8 whenever the plaintiff is absent. In Other Courts, You can use CrPC 350 whenever the plaintiff is absent.

This refers to rejection of plaint because the plaintiff is herself not interested to pursue the case and this plaint is being used only as a tool of harassment.

NOTE:- All those dates when plaintiff was absent on earlier dates need also be mentioned. Such application can be taken along every time with you. And if plaintiff is absent it can be given to the judge. Penalty is low but still you can use it. It can be rejected by the court but no harm in that. Because when judge will reject any of your valid application that time you can club this rejected & say that judge is biased. This is just an extra application which you must know only. Use it only if you want to. Otherwise let it facilitate your learning at least.

Mahatma Gandhi said, IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET.

It's as simple as that. [You can Try this even if her lawyer is present & NOT she. Also if

she / them are 5 minutes late + vehemently persuasion by you or your lawyer to

co n vi n ce j u d g e ]

Thanks

SOME1 wrote:

draft a memo. on each date assuming that the opposite party is not attending, make reference to each of the earlier dates when the party had not attended, ask for imposing fine u/s.350 crpc, ask for issue of bailable warrant/non-bailable warrant as the opp.party has no respect for the court and Law, is abusing the process of Law, is causing inconvenience and harassment to the accused which should not be allowed by the court Though amount of fine is Rs. 100 only still it has its effect.

keep the memo. ready in 3 copies and hand over two copies to magistrate if the opp.party is absent.

the courts allowing the delaying tricks as the accused/respondents are not questioning the same. if u make such a emo. the magistrate would be put on alert and take proper steps. of course, most advocates do not suggest or encourage this. yet if u take a firm stand and insist on the advocate to file the memo [or u can yourself file it] it would work.

refer to case law--2013 (5) ALJ (NOC) 441 (All) wherein it was stated that the magistrate took two years to supply copies and four years to frame charge. during entire period, nothing was done to procure presence of witnesses by issuing bailable or non-bailable warrants or imposing cost. directions issued for early disposal of cases.

SOME2 wrote:

Dear SOME3,

If your wife is not attending the court as a witness, then you may apply to the court and submit bonefidly that she herself not interested in the case. She only just filed the case for harassing you and your family. And court will in the interest of justice may discharge you. In a case Sait Mohamed vs The Inspector of Police, Prohibition& Enforcement

Wing, Coimbatore Rural District (1989 LW Crl 175)- it was held that ""Speedy trial is the fundamental right of a citizen. Having initiated criminal proceedings the second respondent seemed to have settled in her own life after obtaining a divorce and she is not interested in prosecuting the case.

The prosecution has also not chosen to dispense with the de-facto complainant and examine the other witnesses. This shows the lethargic attitude of the prosecution. Moreover, the statement of the other witnesses are only in the nature of corroborating the version of the de-facto complainant and when the de-facto complainant herself is not available, much credential cannot be attached thereto.

SOME4 wrote:

If wife is avoiding summoning or not attending/ avoiding court

Ask for Bailable Warrants in writing/ Dismissal of the case for constant non-appearance of the witness.

It has helped my cause (not that the 498-a has moved much ahead despite her p re se n ce )

In any case, when either of the party wants to delay the case, they can do it for long.

In a better way, if the wife is receiving summons and is not attending the court.

No one is running away from Summons. No summon for appearence has been sent so far. She is simply avoiding from appearing in court. The Peremtory Mandamus will demand her presence for the purpose of evidence and in case she won't be at home or try to avoid the directives of PM, the substituted services will prevail thereafter automatically court will issue NBW against her after considering a resonable time for the offence committed under Contempt of Court for disobeying PM Orders. Until then there will be stay on Proceedings.

Normally Court takes too long to excercise it's power under Sua Sponte despite knowing Madam Barbaric intentions. Make an Application Under Peremptory Writ of Mandamus ..... WHICH IS entirely different from Writ Of Mandamus. Peremptory Writ of Mandamus: An order to defendent to do the act in question. Writ of Madamus : An order to Govt. Official to perform certain act as req.

AND IF COURT DOESN'T LISTEN TO YOU THEN

APPLICATION WITH HIGHER COURT UNDER WRIT OF PROCEDENDO AGAINST THAT COURT

OR USE

C i vi l P ro ce d u re C o d e 1 9 0 8

30. Power to order discovery and the like.

Subject to such conditions and limitations as may be prescribed, the Court may, at any time, either of its own motion or on the application of any party,-

(a) make such orders as may be necessary or reasonable in all matters relating to the delivery and answering of interrogatories, the admission of documents and facts, and the discovery, inspection, production, impounding and return of documents or other material objects producible as evidence;

(b) issue summonses to persons whose attendance is required either to give evidence or to produce documents or such other objects as aforesaid;

Sir, for peremptory mandamus or peremptory writ of mandamus talk to your lawyer. He must be knowing how to prepare Petitions for Writ and If he doesn't know...then you are in deep trouble.

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

My Wife left home, What to do !!!

aturchatur wrote:

.............................. "Jai Mata Di" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

What to do when wife leaves home !!!

(1) Write a letter to PHQ that she left with jewellery or whetevr is truth & also mention whosoever threatening you for false 498a

(2) Sleep till CAW or Police intervenes

(3) When CAW Starts, Write an RTI and ask for Complaint Copy.

(3.1) And then after first or second date itself apply for anticipatory bail u/s438 CrPC.

You will get a NB. If NOT then apply again in 2-3 days with additional ground. You will get for sure. If NOT then apply in HC. You will get for sure without doubt.

(4) In CAW Wait for Dowry List. While receiving Dowry list, sign on it after writing that I am receiving without reading as I am NOT in a good mental position (if u r actually NOT w e l l ).

(5) Immediately after that put RTI to DCP that whether 07/2007 followed & whether Neera Singh followed, If then give a copy.

(6) Before Step 5 or immediately after step 5, write a letter to DCP for proper investigation mentioning 07/2007, Neera & related circulars & get receiving in person. On that same receiving wala page, take receiving of PHQ & ACP CAW. Whosoever refuses tell them to refuse in writing.

(7) Remember:- Point 6 means you are requesting CAW to follow these circulars.

(8) After this put RTI to DCP or PHQ & ask whether these circulars being followed. They will be in mess & opp gang will be pressurized by police to take back complaint (bcoz they all know its false).

(9) If they take back complaint, then thru RTI take that copy of withdrawal of complaint.

(10) File for Divorce on the basis of false complaint (Immediately on Withdrawal) in case u don't want to live with her. My Own suggestion is to GHAR BASA LE but feel free to hv ur opinion & choice.

(11) If wife comes back in CAW with new CAW then request CAW legally to re-start old complaint also bcoz that is a law & they can't deny. Above steps will start again now.

(12) Keep noting her contradictions along with new complaint.

(13) Again take Bail (for those named now in this New Complaint)

(14) Again follow above steps.

(15) In the mean time, after getting dowry list, put TEP as follows:-

(16) Goto CCIT Civic Centre Ajmeri Gate & take receiving. If staff refuses then tell them to wrote refusal in writing. They will accept it & put a stamp.

(17) Take that Stamped Receiving & within that page itself take receiving from DGIT(Investigation) & after that come home & send letter by post to Member Investigation. Thats it !!!

(18) After 10 days put first RTI regarding progress. They will say bla bla but they will now start acting as they have sensed who are NOT going to spare or leave any ch a n ce .

(19) Prepare WS through an expert who knows that, "Denial without submission is NOT a denial" so your WS must be solid & accompanied/loaded with at least 3-4 applications to dismiss the false & concocted petition. Also within that first WS you need to highlight ALL her Contradictions & Concealment of Facts.

(20) If she does NOT accept Divorce Summons then goto her colony gate with a MUNADI (nagada) & the MUNADI MAN will loudy announce SUNO SUNO SUNO . . . .

& get video recording of that MUNADI & give copy of summon to any ganya manya person of that locality. Submit this Video Proof in court that Divorce Summon (thru MUNADI) done after her failure to receive summons. This is LEGAL MUNADI after 2 failed attempts to let summons accepted by them. This point no.20 also has a SOCIAL INFORMATION (LEGALLY OF COURSE). After that you can optionally give publication i n l o ca l d a i l i e s a l so .

(21) Do NOT challenge orders of a lower court in REVISION (Sessions) or WRIT APPEAL (HC) or DIRECT SC APPEAL u/a 136 (IF YOU WANT A SPEEDY TRIAL) because time is running & longer means longer you hung & paying interim etc. Otherwise all these 3 options are available with u.

(22) If DV Judge issues Unfavorable INTERIM against you THEN DO NOT WORRY AT ALL. Simply tell them "Sir/Madam, Evidences/Trial start kijiye please". Seeing this move NOW your wife will be under pressure & resort to delay tactics because she can't prove. This approach is better than appeal otherwise you will end up paying interim till appeal is disposed off. Itne time mein kyo na evidence bhi khatm kar diya jaye.

(23) Order XI, Rule 1 (INTERROGATORY) shall be used after CROSS STAGE because otherwise they will know all your moves. Keep that interrogatory handy & from that ask questions. To learn Cross wait for my thread on Cross or goto any lower court where corss is scheduled & learn from there.

(24) Order VII, Rule 11 can be used along with WS. I strongly suggest this if u can prove with evidence that its false & vexatious complaint with NO CAUSE OF ACTION.

(25) Perjury should be filed again n again. First Perjury MUST GO along with WS itself. After that as they keep on lying on affidavit. You keep filing Perjury. If you don't have HER SALARY evidences then summon her bank manager, ITO, Employer, PIO etc thru CrPC 91 (You need to pay for their PA/DA for all those you summon but this cost is lesser than lawyers cost & cost of injustice but remember that for criminal court 498a there is NO Fees payable to summon anyone even if PM is summoned. In DV if u apply CrPC 91 then costs are payable. Strange but true.)

NOTE:- Whatever Evidence you get thru PIO's those need to be verified in Evidence Stage thru Summoning respective PIO's using CrPC 91. Call them as your witnesses.

Do NOT use family, friends, servants, neighbours etc as your witnesses AT ANY COST.

Let the opp gang use it & you cut them. Thats it !!!

(26) PRAY TO GOD and "Jai Mata Di" at every stage ONLY THEN YOU WILL WIN FOLLOWING MY ADVISE. . . . . . lol but seriously also dear.

(27) Judges have DISCRETIONARY power. Hence, never show attitude to judge even if you are 100% strong legally. Show yourself Innocent, Behave & Act Politely.

(28) If Summons NOT received by any respondent then that respondent need NOT go. And Judge can NOT tell husband to bring others even if living together. Process of summon need to be followed. And those summoned if don't go then get in writing from them like old age, health problem etc but do NOT overdo this.

(29) If CAW Complaint & FIR Copy has some contradictions then keep noting these. It will be used in 498A CASE. If CS has some contradictions then note those also.

(30) steps to quash FIR u/s 438 CrPC are listed here:- http://www.quash482.blogspot.com & http://www.nriquash.com

(31) If u want to goto HC & NO time to take CC from lower court then write a line in application(WRIT) to HCI have appled for CC (Copy Attached) & I will produce the Order Copy asap. Also use with RTI's (Result Awaited)

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

Fight Against Misuse of 498A IPC

aturchatur wrote:

Fight Against Misuse of 498A IPC.

SOME1 suggested this below to me so I felt like sharing with u.

The misuse of IPC 498A is a very big problem in India. The misuse of IPC 498A has b e co m e a b u si n e ss o f a l o t o f a) matrimonial dispute wives,

b) corrupted police offices,

c) corrupted lawyers and judges and[/u]d ) U n scru p u l o u s p e o p l e .

Though the Honorable Supreme Court of India stated that the misuse of IPC 498A as "Legal Terrorism" but still the truth is, anyone can be the victim at any moment. After 498A, the next item is 125 CrPC and Domestic Violence to extort money.

Please note that until we completely defeat the opponent on 498A, we may not get any relief on 125 and DV. Conviction rate of IPC 498A is 2% only which is rarest of rare. It is also indicate the misuse of 498A is very much. If you have incurred in this then most of the lawyers would like to prolongate the process or try to make mutual settlement to extort your money. If you are paying money then you are virtually benefiting these wrong doers to continue their business. Please don't do it. So let us stop this wrong money extorting business.

Please Note: To file and move your own case, you need not to be an advocate. Youcan file and move your own case IN-PERSON also.

To do this -

a) you need to study little law,

b) arrange sample petitions for drafting your case,

c) Study your case,

d) Arrange evidences as per Indian Evidence Act 1872.

e ) m a ke re h e a rsa l a n d

f) Download and arrange citations of other judgments for same type of your case of HC and SC in support of your arguments and produce it before the court.

Please also note that to file and move your own case in-person in the High Court or Supreme Court is easier than Lower Courts. In HC and SC cases gets disposed of within very short time, within 2/3 hearings and 2/3 weeks. Please arrange proper arguments with proper citations and evidences, prima-facies with proper rehearsal before appear in HC or SC. Please be brave and increase you will-power which will make you winner. If you know that you are innocent then nobody can defeat you.

There are two situations: -

1) Before getting 498A: -

Before you get the 498A you might predict that it might happen to you any time. You may get threats from your dispute wife and in-laws. If you get this then first of all, make your mind set like this - that you may spend one day in jail. Please don't worry for this.

But still you can avoid this. Your first job is to file NC (Non Cognizable) on both your and her local police tation against her (your wife). Also make NC by your parents, brothers, sisters and senior most members of your family against your wife. Arrange Anticipatory Bail U/S 438 CrPC (Criminal Misslanious Case) for all of you family members in the Session Court or High Court. Please note that you can file anticipatory bail both BEFORE and AFTER registering the FIR of 498A. If you have AB then police can't arrest you.

2) After getting 498A: -

After getting 498A and once you are in regular bail, your first job is to dispose of the false FIR of 498A IPC as early as possible. Please note that since it the business of some corrupted lawyer also, they will always try to make it delay and try to make you understand that you don't have any option other than to make mutual divorce by giving lot of money. Please don't listen to them.

a) Please don't file divorce of go for any mutual settlement until your 498A gets disposed of. Your advocate and others may try to make afraid you, but you must leave your fear and be brave.

b) Please go to Criminal CRIMINAL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION of High Court and file Speedy Trial U/S 483 CrPC read with Article 227 of Indian Constitution by preying that to direct the Learned JM to dispose of the 498A case within 6 months from the communication of the order. It is similar to Writ Petition. Please note that speedy trial is your right and it is mandatory to file else 498A will go for life long. Please make STATE as opposite party

c) Make petition U/S 205 CrPC for exemption from personal appearance by showing your job condition in the same court where the 498A is going on. You will make your professional appearance through your lawyer.

d) IPC 498A is as follows: -

498A. Husband or relative of husband of a woman subjecting her to cruelty.—

Whoever, being the husband or the relative of the husband of a woman, subjects such woman to cruelty shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and shall also be liable to fine. Explanation.—For the purpose of this section, "cruelty" means—

(a) any wilful conduct which is of such a nature as is likely to drive the woman to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health (whether mental or physical) of the woman; or

(b) harassment of the woman where such harassment is with a view to coercing her or any person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property orvaluable security or is on account of failure by her or any person related to her tomeet such demand.

So, the definition of cruelty U/S 498A is quite clear.

Clause A) Cruelty, such a nature, which drive a wife to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health. (Need Medical Report for this to prove).

Clause B) Harassment for unlawful demand (Dowry).

So, any other cruelty which does not falls under said Clause A & B (e.g. slapping,abusing or having extra marital affairs etc.)

cannot be chargeable U/S 498A.

i) Please go through the complain and find out that the prima-facies indicates what type of cruelty? Whether it falls under aforesaid clauses or not. If not, please go to CRIMINAL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION of High Court and file Quashing with Speedy Tiral petition U/S 401 CrPC read with 482 CrPC and 483 CrPC and Article 227 of Indian Constitution and prey for quashing. If the judge still don't grant quashing then prey for speedy trial. Please make STATE and YOUR WIFE as opposite party. Prey for call for the record also from the lower court for better judgement.

ii) If you find that you have enough evidences to prove that 498A is false then go to CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION of High Court and file Criminal Writ Under Article 227 of Indian Constitution, Indian Evidence Act 1872, Dowry prohibition Act, CrPC 482, CrPC 483 and CrPC 311 and prey for Quashing, to declare that the FIR is false, to direct the Learned JM to take appropriate action against de facto complainant (Your Wife) in accidence with law. Please make STATE and YOUR WIFE as opposite party. Prey for call for the record also from the lower court for better judgement.

iii) If you have noticed that the investigation happen in such a way that the police is biased and did not follow the Dowry Prohibition Act properly and violated you fundamental rights as per Article 14, 15, 19 and 21 then got to CONSTITUTION

JURISDICTION of High Court and file Civil Writ Petition under Article 226 read with Article 14, 15, 19 and 21 of Indian Constitution, Indian Evidence Act 1872, Dowry Prohibition Act, CrPC 482 and prey for quashing and to declare that the FIR is false and cost. Please make STATE and YOUR WIFE as opposite party. Prey for call for the record also from the lower court for better judgement.

Please file these cases IN-PERSON. To file these cases you need certified copy of: -

a) FIR

b) Final Charge Sheet

c) Seizure List

d) All Orders.

e) A Copy of Case Diary.

Perjury: - Perjury is a very important tool to fight against 498A, 125CrPC and DV. It can be file at any stage at the proceeding of 498A, 125 CrPC and DV as a counter case in the same courts where the 498A, 125CrPC and DV is going on respectively. It should file U/S 340 CrPC read with 195 CrPC. Sometimes, a few corrupted judges do not wish to take this case or wish to delay or wish to take latter. If anyone face this problem then show the following citation to that judge.

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

CRIMINAL APPLICATION No.1115/07.

(P a r a 7 & 8 )

If that judge still does not wish to take it or try to mislead you then please take the certified copy of all orders, FIR, Charge sheet, etc and file Criminal Writ under Article 227 of Indian Constitution, 483 CrPC, 482 CrPC, 341 CrPC(Appeal on Perjury) and Indian Evidence Act 1872 to CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION of the High Court with the said citation.

Another good citation of Perjury is: - CRA No. 197 SB of 2010 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGHCOURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

Once you are completely out of 498A : - Then file for divorce. Make police complaint U/S 211, 182, 200, 190, and 193 of IPC against her. File both criminal and civil defamation cases.

Please be handsome, smart, good looking and look for a good unmarried girl and start leave-in relationship until you get divorce.

Some Other Important Citations: -

498A - Legal Terrorism

Writ Petition (civil) 141 of 2005 - Supreme Court of India.

498A - Defination of Cruelty

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 57 of 2002 - Supreme Court of India.

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 773 of 2003 - Supreme Court of India.

If you need any more information regarding the aforesaid tropic then please feel free to a sk. I sh a l l a n sw e r.

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

dv_fighter

unclean hands / perjury

In order to meet the challenge posed by this new creed of litigants, the courts have, from time to time, evolved new rules and it is now well established that a litigant, who attempts to pollute the stream of justice or who touches the pure fountain of justice with tainted hands, is not entitled to any relief, interim or final.

@aturchatur, pls share this judgment with fellow fighters. i found here:-

http://terminatorak.wordpress.com/2013/01/23/supreme-court-perjury-who-attempts-to-pollute-the-stream-of-justice-or-who-touches-the-pure-fountain-of-justice-with-tainted-hands-is-not-entitled-to-any-relief-interim-or-final/

aturchatur

thanks dv

it's already shared now

one more suggested by SOME1 thru PM:-

As per Honble Apex court (2004)7 SCC 166 para 13(Supra) says:

As a general rule, supression of material fact by a litigant disqualifies such litigant from obtaining any relief. This rule has been evolved out of the need of the courts to deter a litigant from abusing the process of court by deceiving it.

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

NBW against Wife u/s 182

Quote:

Is this first one when the woman is on the run???? http://mynation.blogvis.com/non-bailable-warrant/

Non-Bailable Warrant against IIT Grad's Wife

New Delhi, 28th May, 2008: In an interesting development, Rohini Metroplitan Magistrate issued the Non-Bailable Warrant against the dishonest wife who failed to appear on last couple of dates. Jaspreet Kaur, wife of IIT alumunus Prameet S Narula was being summoned for the proceedings against her u/s 182 IPC initiated by Punjabi Bagh Police .

In this matter, Punjabi Bagh Police had filed a Kalandhra u/s 195 Cr.P.C in the Court of Metropolitan Magistrate, Rohini Court in August 2007. Metropolitan Magistrate had taken the cognizance u/s 182 IPC and had been repeatedly summoning the accused Jaspreet Kaur who is presently residing in Melbourne, Australia. On the last date of hearing in Feb, 2008, accused father Jaswinder Singh residing in India was asked by the Hon'ble Court to produce the accused on next Date Of Hearing (28th May); failing which non-bailable warrant were issued by the Metroplitan Magistrate on 28th May. "The warrants to be served by the Ministry of External affairs", the Magistrate added.

While placing the matter before the court, Punjabi Bagh Police highlighted the complaint dated 5th may, 2004 filed by Ms. Kaur against Mr. Narula alleging that the later had destroyed her passport. This complaint was filed by Ms. Kaur on 5th May, 2004.

However, in an affidavit submitted by her in an Australian Court she submitted the true copy of her passport which was issued in 2000. The same was highlighted by Mr. Narula to the Punjabi Bagh Police in May, 2007, acting upon which police submitted the Kalandera u/s 182 IPC in the Court of Metropolitan Magistrate in August, 2007. As an evidence, the copy of her passport was attached on which she had traveled to Australia in July, 2006 which carries the stamp of Australian Visa. 182 IPC deals with giving false information to the public servant in order to cause injury to someone. Maximum punishment for the offence is prescribed as 6 months of RI.

Ms. Jaspreet Kaur has also initiated another criminal proceedings against Mr. Narula, pending the court of ASJ, Rohini Courts. However after filing the case, Ms.Kaur left for Australia without even intimating the court and leaving Mr. Narula with an agony to face criminal proceedings for last four years. Ms. Kaur then in Australia filed the divorce for the fourth time (her earlier applications of divorce were either dismissed or withdrawn by herself). But here Ms. Kaur committed a mistake when she moved a true copy of her passport carrying her Australian Visa in the Australian Court. The same was produced by Mr. Narula in front of Punjabi Bagh Police.

It seems Mr. Narula's long and patient wait for justice for last four years is finally getting paid off. This should be a lesson to all those who believe that they will manipulate the law to their benefit and still go scot free.

@et al, I am still looking for steps for money extortion case against wife. anyone plssuggest.

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

Men are Superior & more evolved than Women

SOME1 through email suggested me this below (in the year 2014):-

@aturchatur, I'm from Canada and I have had all the knowledge available in the world to grow my mi n d a n d I d i d .

I know you are religious but think on this question raised by Charles Darwin: Name top 10 most important discoveries by mankind. Are any of the discoverers a female????? Electricity,

airplane, telescope, discovery of evolution, atomic bomb.. ..list is long. There is no female a n yw h e re i n o ri g i n a l i d e a o f a n yki n d .

Please don't give me a politically correct answer. You guys just elected Modi and proved that brains win over political correctness. So leave political correctness aside.

So why do you care if a female who is intellectually inferior to men (Although, a lot of men are dumber than females but no female is more intelligent than a very intelligent male) left you? Just deal with it in a healthy way.

Life threw many curve balls at me, I'm still happy.(It's a sign of intelligence: an intelligent person takes a bad situation and deals with it. Whereas a person of inferior intelligence succumbs to the situation)

AND WHO SAID THAT A MAN AND A WOMAN ARE SUPPOSE TO LIVE HAPPLIY EVER AFTER????

Can anyone prove it???

I've looked at my family/friend's circle and:::: har koi gal para dhol baja raha hai. No one's really happy in their marriage. It's an illusion.

By the way, the reason behind Charles Darwin's reasoning was: in our most recent evolutionary history, men had to go and hunt and devise plans to catch pray. To catch food, men need brilliant traps etc. Women stayed back to cook etc.

If you throw a spear where the deer is, you will miss. You need to throw the spear where the deer is going to be. This is why women are worse drivers than men. According to Darwin, to which I agree, females will need to go through thousands of generation of hunting-like-lifestyle to catch up to male brain. According to his theory, each generation passes some learned behavior from previous ancestor: males inherit their male ancestor's traits and females inherit their female ancestor's traits.

aturchatur reply to SOME1 :

Maein Zindagi Ka Saath Nibhata Chala Gaya

Har Fikar Ko Dhuen Mein Udata Chala Gaya

Barbadiyon Ka Shok Manana Fizul Tha

Barbadiyon Ka Jashan Manata Chala Gaya Har Fikar Ko Dhuen Mein Uda...

Jo Mil Gaya Usi Ko Muqaddar Samajh Liya

Jo Kho Gaya Maein Usko Bhulata Chala Gaya Har Fikar Ko Dhuen Mein Uda...

Gham Aur Khushi Mein Farq Na Mehsoos Ho Jahan

Maein Dil Ko Us Muqaam Pe Laata Chala Gaya Har Fikar Ko Dhuen Mein Uda...

Source:- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2qnwD2gsGps

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

Summons issued against my lovely wife-u/s 406 & 420

SOME1 wrote:

Finally summons have been issued in both the private complaint cases filed by me and my mother against my wife.

M y ca se i n b ri e f

My wife filed 498A after leaving home after 8 yrs of peaceful marriage. I & my family got AB from the High Court. Frustrated by my bail she filed 406 after six months of filing the 498A FIR. I did not seek any bail in 406 and asked my IO to come and arrest me. Since I live in another state I knew he will need arrest warrant for the same.

I realised that it was high time to file cases against her. I and my mother filed two private complaint cases despite adverse advice by everyone including my lawyers. The cases were of cheque bounce and cheating.

It took me about 4 months of hard work including innumerable court visits, lawyer visits to get to this stage. But I am satisfied and happy today that she will have to run around the courts and lawyers offices to seek bail and face trial in both the criminal non b a i l a b l e ca se s.

In case filed by mother the magistrate took cognizance u/s 420 of IPC & 138 of NI act.

In another case filed by me the magistrate took cognizance u/s 406 of IPC & 138 of NI a c t.

It was a painful process involving the following steps

1. Compiling the documents

2. Drafting the legal demand notice

3. Getting the notice served

4. Drafting the complaint petition

5. Filing the complaint petition in 200 crpc

6. Disposing as witness under 200 crpc

7. Disposing all witnesses under 202 crpc

8. Filing the list of documents and closing the evidence

9 . A rg u m e n t u n d e r 2 0 4 crp c

10.Getting the cognizance order

11.Issuance of summons

Now I have prepared myself to oppose her AB efforts. If she does not appear in next 3 months, the court will issue Bailable Warrants against her and I will make sure that she gets arrested and is released on bail by the police. In that way she will not be eligible for AB(Pls correct me if I am wrong). Quashing or revision will not yield her anything

because there are paper evidence against her. The only option that will be left for her will be to surrender and seek regular bail and risk herself the Judicial Custody.

Because both the cases against her are non bailable, her lawyer will make her aware of the risks of appearing before the magistrate.

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Perjury formula is also being discussed on the below link. All fighters have a look at below link.

Source:- http://www.perjury340.blogspot.com

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

SOME1 wrote:

How to frustrate wife during 498a/DV trial using Internet

Want some suggestions in my case...

My wife is staying in another city and filed 498a/DV case in her hometown...

She has taken admission for some course in college and she is hiding all past info and not wearing Mangalsutra (Not telling anyone abt 498a and other cases)

She is active online on facebook...I am planning to upload my marriage pics and send request to her NEW FRIENDS in new college

will it have any legal complications????

I will upload decent pictures only...nothing defaming.....

Plz share other ideas if u have any...

SOME2 wrote:

Till she is your wife, you can post photos (non defamatory) on facebook and upload all good content. No one can stop you from contacting her friends and asking them to help you save your marriage, telling that she under some influence filed a false case on you and you want to reconcile (even if you don't want, you can say so). Later you can say I said I will consider under so and so conditions.

Pace it carefully and motives should be achived.

SOME1 wrote:

I forgot to mention some more details

I have applied for divorce thats why not sure about this...uploading photos on facebook...

But I want to do this just to save one more person getting trapped in 498a and make everyone aware about her false cases against me

She is enjoying new life in new city and new college and cases are pending in her hometown which is far away....

CAN I INFORM HER TEACHERS ABT 498a/DV cases through any legal means so that they will also start asking her abt status of caseh

Teachers should ask her like this.....Dont waste ur time in such foolish things(498a/DV).......and some teachers will ask her like....

"WHAT'S PROGRESS OF YOUR CASE SWEETY .....Have u succeeded in sending ur husband in jail???? "".....I want everyone in her college discuss abt her cases against me continuosly....and frustrate her ....with total social boycott...

I dont want to ruin her life (HONESTLY SPEAKING).....she is not interested in me as she want some BAKRA like GHAR JAMAI...who will listen to her ALWAYS ...

The only thing I want is CLEAN divorce..

Plz suggest some more ideas......

aturchatur wrote:

Except posting her allegation in the court case word by word in the face book, all other things are not harmful and illegal. The court matter since it is pending on date, it will become a matter of subjudice and go against you, hence better keep away from meddling with the litigation issues and propagating/advertising/publicizing them in public. My advise is have a control over your anxiety as well as your excitement, if unchecked, it will become fatal for you.

Also read these blogs: -

SOME3 wrote:

Not sure if you aware of some blogs who are facing same problem as us.

http://manavkalia.wordpress.com/2012/11/03/the-power-of-truth-by-manav-kalia/

http://iitbiimb498a.wordpress.com/

http://iluvshrutiverma.wordpress.com/

In doing this, we would be bringing social stigma to a greater extend.

What do you say?

aturchatur

Man Defeats Lion (Mind Over Matter)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fOtJi8dL_8

I read at some site that 56,000 married men commit suicide every year in INDIA.

I request all members of this forum to learn from the below video & mend your ways accordingly to keep this evil out of the society which is breaking many homes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fOtJi8dL_8

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

PERJURY:- Misleading the court with False Case

SOME1:- The contents of the complaint itself cannot be denied by her, so what is the need for an affidavit. During deposition of evidence , she may choose to depose her evidence through an affidavit or else she may adduce oral evidence, thus you can ask her to confirm her allegations while cross examining her. If she is not establish her allegations, then you may go for your proposed perjury case against her for giving false information to the court thereby misleading the court with false case. This will solve the issue.

SOME2:- On that basis, Perjury can be filed against wife also if at the beginning itself if you have proofs & you attach those proofs which strongly contradict her stand , which will put doubt in the mind of the Hon'ble ldMM or Judge. From there begins the story of perjury which is said to be the strongest weapon of our fight against false cases.

aturchatur wrote:

Just now talked to SOME3, (in the year 2014) He said go ahead if you are confident that you can prove something.

And PERJURY is a big tool/weapon in this fight against false cases.

My message to all married men who feel like committing S U C ID E

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3WYjFKvrrVg

PERSUASION IS THE KEY TO SUCCESS

Whatever you do whether RTI, or TEP or PERJURY, I now feel that PERSUASION IS THE KEY TO SUCCESS.

Friends remember that, "DARR K AAAAGE JEET HOTI HAI"

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

Different Theories on Girls/ Women

SOME1:- Girls are Intelligent Species

SOME2:- Girls are Emotional Fools

SOME3:- Girls are Intelligent Species but Girls are Emotional Fools

SOME4:- Girls are Emotional Fools but Girls are Intelligent Species

SOME5:- Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus

Anyways, no idea which theory is best. Feel free to PM me if anyone has done research on it.

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

DP-3 Complain Format to Magistrate u/s 156(3) r/w 200

Quote:

DP-3 Complain Format to Magistrate

IN THE COURT OF CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,THANE

C o mp l a i n t N o . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ o f 2 0 1 1

Name and Address of the Complainant

— C o mp l a i n a n t

VER SU S

Mrs . (Name and address of Mrs.X) Mr. FIL (Name and address of FIL)

Mrs.MIL (Name and address of MIL)

Mr BIL (Name and Address of BIL)

Ms./Mrs.SIL (Name and address of SIL)

- Accu se d

Respected Sir,

The complainant respectfully submits as under:-

1. That the complainant is permanent resident of (address of the complainant)

2. That the accused No. 1 is the wife of the complainant.The accused No.2 and 3 are father-in-law and mother-in-law of the complainant.The accused No.4 is the brother-in-law and accused no.5 is the sister-in-law of the complainant.

3. That the marriage of the complainant was solemnized with accused no. 1 on 31-08- 2010 .However no child was born out the said wedlock.

4. That at the time of the said marriage, it was one of the condition of the complainant and his family members that the marriage should be solemnized in a very simple manner and no dowry/cash/ornaments etc shall be given to the accused no.1 and the complainant and his family members by the accused no. 2,3,4 & 5 and their family relatives.

5. That in spite of the aforesaid condition of the complainant and his family members, the accused persons left the dowry articles in shape of Cash/Ornaments/clothes/other articles in (address of the matrimonial relationship) (Detailed list is enclosed herewith as Annexure A-1 with the present complaint, which may be read as part and parcel of this complaint also).It is most respectfully submitted that the complainant and his family members, time and again, requested the accused persons to take back the aforesaid dowry articles as they were having no lust for it.And further the said articles already existed in the house of the complainant.

6. That the accused no. 1 remained in the matrimonial house with the complainant and his family for ___ months and during this time the complainant and his father notices sharp changes in the behavior of the accused no. 1 as she started creating bad atmosphere in the house and started quarreling with the complainant and his family members on pity issues. The situation started getting worsened day by day due to frequent interference of the accused no.2,3,4& 5 in the matrimonial relationship of the complainant and accused no.1. The complainant was having great expectations from

the accused no. 1 ,as after marriage, she will maintain their house being an Indian women. However the accused no.1 never realized her responsibility and always harassed the complainant and his family members on small and petty matters.

7 That with the passage of the time, behavior of the accused no. 1, became too worse and later on accused no.1 started to harass the complainant to leave old age ailing parents of the complainant and though them out of the house or to be a GHAR JAMAI and live with her parents. It is submitted here that the complainant, time and again, requested the accused no. 1 to treat his parents and her own parents and give their proper care and respect..However accused no. 1 remained strict to her condition.

8. That thereafter, the accused no. 1 in conspiracy with other accused persons started making allegations on the complainant and his family regarding demand of dowry and further started threatening to implicate them in a false and frivolous cases (both cri m i n a l a n d C i vi l )

9. That when the accused persons failed to force the complainant to throw the old age ailing parents of the complainant from the matrimonial house of the complainant and accused no.1 or shift to the parental home of accused no. 1 and be a GHAR JAMAI,thereafter,the accused no. 1 lodged a false and frivolous complain against the complainant. On the basis of said complaint, FIR no._____ dated mm/dd/yyyy under section ____,_____& _____ of Indian Penal Code in _______ Police Station .It is most respectfully submitted that in the said FIR, it was alleged by the accused no. 1 that her

parents have given Dowry articles delared in annexure "A1" and further accused no.2,3,4&5 have given a sum of Rs.1,50,000/-(Rupees One lakh fifty thousand only) as dowry before marriage, which were never demanded by the complainant and his family members. Besides this the accused no.1 had given list of articles including ornaments, clothes, electronic products, cash and other household articles with the said FIR, which they have allegedly given as Dowry in the said marriage.List of the articles prepared by the accused no.1 is enclosed herewith for the kind perusal of this Hon'ble court. It is relevant to mention here that the aforesaid list is handwritten by accused no. 1 and further she has signed it.

10. That it is submitted that the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, as amended up-to-date stipulated that anyone who demands or gives dowry can face punishment. In this peculiar circumstances ,it is absolutely proved that the accused persons have admitted that they have given dowry to complainant and his family members. Hence, the complainant seeks indulgence of this Hon'ble Court that directions may be issued to the concerned SHO to register a case against the accused persons.

11. That it is submitted here that the articles stated in Annexure A-1 were given by the accused persons, treating it consideration for marriage.

12. That in the modern days, there are multiple cases, containing false and baseless allegations under section IPC 498A and the Domestic Violence Act 2005, are being filed against husbands and their parents relatives. And the said FIR is one example, where the complainant and his family members have suffered in the hands of the accused persons. And the accused persons are taking premium of their own wrongs.

13. That the complainants video complaint dated dd/mm/yyyy requested to Superintendent of Police/Office of the Police Commissioner (as per the case) City Name, to register a case against the accused persons under Section 3 of Dowry Prohibition Act,1961. However no action has been taken by the police against the said accused and the complainant, without having any other option, has invoked the jurisdiction of this Hon'ble court. Hence the present complaint.

It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that the present complaint may kindly be accepted and directions to be issued under section 156(3) Cr.P.C. to the concerned S.H.O. to lodge an FIR under section 3 of Dowry Prohibition Act against the accused persons and to investigate the matter in accordance with law, in the interest of justice.

Place : Name of your City -Complainant

Dated: dd/mm/yyyy

-Through Counsel or Party-in-Person

(Name of the advocated)

Hope this will help you guys....................all the best

Source:- http://www.dp3dowry.blogspot.com

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

DENIAL Versus Submission in WS

Supreme Court in M. Venkataraman Hebbar (D) By L.RS. Vs. M. Rajgopal Hebbar & Ors. 2007

(5 ) S C A L E 5 9 8 , o b se rve d ;

"Thus, if a plea which was relevant for the purpose of maintaining a suit had not been

specifically traversed, the Court was entitled to draw an inference that the same had been

admitted. A fact admitted in terms of Section 58 of the Evidence Act need not be proved."

If NOT Denied, it's Accepted : Delhi High Court

[Asha Kapoor v. Hari Om Sharda (2010) 171 DLT 743] the Delhi High Court has explained the underlying rule in civil litigation that averments made by one party unless specifically refuted would be deemed to be accepted. The principle which is now firmly embedded in as much as determination of civil suits, in terms of Order 8 of the Code of Civil Procedure, was explained by the High Court to be one of seminal importance.

It was held that, "as per written statement of petitioner it is apparent that, she has nowherespecifically denied that she has not acquired vacant and physical possession of premises no.C-91, IIIrd Floor, West, Gorakh Park Ext. Shahadra, Delhi. 16. Order VIII Rule 3, 4 and 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short as 'Code') read as under;

"3. Denial to be specific.- It shall not be sufficient for a defendant in his written statement to deny generally the ground alleged by the plaintiff, but the defendant must deal specifically with each allegation of fact of which he does not admit the truth, except damages."

EXAMPLE OF DENIAL

"The content of the para under reply are totaly wrong, false and hence denied and each content of the para is vehemently & specifically denied in toto word by word."

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

How to write a WS ?

SOME3 wrote:

Hi,

I think you need to be prudent about how much you should reveal and when... You can go through this free writeup which would answer your questions

http://www.plainlanguagenetwork.org/legal/legalwriting.pdf

Written arguments should not be part of WS. You should only provide written arguments when actual arguments occur and in agreement with your lawyer. They should be a surprise for other party rather than a common knowledge. Citations from judgements should lie therein in the written arguments and not in WS. WS is for denial and strategy should be attack weak points so that they do not make it to the final charge list. Written args are for cutting specific charges drawn up after the judge has decided the charges.

SOME1 told me just now:-

(in the year 2014 – almost all the discussions on this website relate to year 2014)

While filing written statement, please restrict to written statement and concentrate on your defence and documents if you rely upon, if any. Arguments can be submitted at the time of arguments and not now and the citations also to be submitted during argument time only and not now. Take guidance from any lawyer for knowing about the steps and procedures.

SOME2 :-

You'll have to write your own draft because niether typist nor lawyers have any time for you. They just want to make money. You should tell your lawyer in advance that you'll create the draft and you want him to add the law points but don't have high hopes as WS to DV would be all about denying the allegations.

You should put your own first draft without holding back any thought. Expect that your lawyer will miss critical points so you'll have to stay focused on editing yourself.

Now edit it as follows:

1) Ensure that you've denied every allegation.

2) Ensure that for every allegation for which there is no time, place, witness, reasoning etc given you tell it vague and baseless.

3) Remove everything which is emotional. Put just facts.

4) Remove all the things which you want to extract out of her in cross later on and which won't make your case weak.

5) Do a thourough review and let the same be reviewed by your well wishers friends, family etc.

6) Lastly send the draft to lawyer and tell him that he has to sit with you for finalizing and he should call you only when he has read the draft.

Best of luck!

Whatever is the final output always have minimum 4 copies of it - one for each of you, court, your lawyer and other party.

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

dv_fightr

@aturchatur, you fully justify your profile name

you are a real fighter.

if u can spare some time then kindly fight for me also sir.

aturchatur

MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS ADVISORY ON ARRESTS IN MATRIMONIAL CASES

SOME1 wrote:

BINGO..............

HERE IS THE LINK TO MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS ADVISORY ON ARRESTS IN MATRIMONIAL CASES...

http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/files/104469946_advisory_sec498_140714.pdf

ACCHE DIN AANE WALE HAIN.... :-)

@dvfighter, right now i am very busy dear in WS to DV alongwith perjury application. if u are from delhi or nearby i will try to help u but after some time (these are he discussions of the year 2014).

Also check:-

No Automatic Arrest in Matrimonial Cases

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

RULES RELATED TO CrPC 91

SOME1:- CrPC 91 cannot be made by petitioner against the accused.

SOME2:- Police holds the record which u want to produce & therefore In many cases, CrPC91 may very well be used via application in court.

SOME3:- Scope of section 91 Cr.P.C. inrespect of accused = it is well settled principle of law that a summons to produce a thing or document as contemplated under CrPC 91 cannot be issued to a person accused of an offence calling upon him to produce document or thing in order to mark it as evidence against the accused. It is not established that the original

document is available with the accused and as the accused is not legally bound to produce the document, no notice could be issued to the accused under Section 66 of the Indian Evidence Act.

SOME4:- Whenever any Court or any officer in charge of a police station considers that the production of any document or other thing is necessary or desirable for the purposes of any investigation, inquiry, trial or other proceeding under this Code by or before such Court or officer, such Court may issue a summons, or such officer a written order, to the person in whose possession or power such document or thing is believed to be, requiring him to attend and produce it, or to produce it, at the time and place stated in the summons or order.

Other Rules

The issue of summons under Section 91 of the Code is in discretion of the Court to be exercised judicially and this is an absolute discretion. Before passing the order under Section 91 the Court has to satisfy itself that the document or thing has a bearing upon, and is desirable, necessary and relevant to the case.

Section 91 of the Code does not apply to the accused. The Court cannot issue summons to produce a document or thing by the accused which is incriminatory against him under Article 20(3) of the Constitution. However, the prohibition against testimonial compulsion contained in Article 20(3) does not apply to the case of public records or public documents which the accused has undertaken to keep and produce when called for.

The words 'document' and 'thing' have not been defined in this Code. The word 'thing' refers to physical object or material. The words 'document or thing' are general and seem to cover any document or thing, the production and inspection of which are necessary or desire or will serve the ends of justice.

The document or thing called for by the magistrate must have some relation to or connection with the subject-matter of the investigation, inquiry or trial.

IMPORTANT:-

The term 'the person' used in Section 91 did not include 'accused person'. As such, order passed by Police Officer issuing summon to accused person to produce documents was liable to be quashed.Also check:- CrPC 91

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

Perjury against Dirty Cops

Quote:

How to file a Criminal Application u/s 340 CrPC against Dirty Cops - When they file a False Affidavit in the Court

How to file a Criminal Application u/s 340 CrPC against Dirty Cops - When they file a False Affidavit in the Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATUREAT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 117 OF2014

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 427OF 2014

In the matter under section 340 CrPC AND FOR TAKING ACTION AGAINST ACCUSED u/s 191, 192, 193, 196, 199, 200, 201, 217, 218, 219, 465, 466, 471, 474, READ WITH 120(B) of IPC

DILIP NARAINDAS KAMWANI, )

A g e 5 8 ye a rs, re si d e n t o f 1 0 1 , )

Mauli Society, A Wing, )

Plot No. 29C, Sector No. 4, )

Va sh i )

N a vi M u m b a i - 4 0 0 7 0 3 ) A p p l i ca n t

(OriginalRespondent No.2)

V e rsu s

1. Mr. Purushottam Karad, )(Original Petitioner No.1)

DCP Vashi Zone 1,

Va sh i . N a vi M u m b a i .

2. Mr. Javed Ahmad, ) (Original Petitioner No.2)

(then Commissioner of Police,

Navi Mumbai)Presently, ADGP,

Law & Order, Maharashtra.

Maharashtra Police HQ, Colaba.

3. Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma, ) (OriginalPetitioner No.3)

C o m m i ssi o n e r o f Po l i ce .

N a vi M u m b a i , C B D B e l a p u r.

4 . M r. L a xm a n K a l e , )

SENIOR POLICE INSPECTOR

Vashi Police Station,

Va sh i , N a vi M u m b a i .

5 . M r. R a o sa h e b S a rd e sa i , )

(Ex) Sr P.I. Vashi Police Station

Vashi, Navi Mumbai. ) Respondents

THE HON. THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON.PUISNE JUDGES OF THIS HON. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

THE HUMBLE APPLICATION OF THEAPPLICANTS ABOVENAMED:

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHEWETH:

The applicantabove named most humbly submits as under:-

1. That the Applicant, Dilip Kamwani, isRespondent No.2 and his Mother Mohini

Kamwani is Respondent No.1 in the FALSECriminalWrit Petition No. 427 of 2014 filed

by Petitioners (present Respondents No.1, 2and 3), u/s 482 for Quashing of JMFC

Vashi Court Order dated 1-2-2014 for Registration of FIR against presentRespondents

No. 1, 2, 4 and 5, vide Applicants Mohini Kamwani and DilipKamwani's

Complaintu/s.156(3) CrPC for offences of Indian Penal Code (IPC) Sections 211, 466,

469,471, 474, 167, 196, 220, 191, 192, 193, 195, 201, 120 (B), 199, 200 & 145(2) Bombay Police Act, AS DIRECTED TOAPPLICANT DILIP KAMWANI AND MOHINI

KAMWANI BY HON. BOMBAY HIGH COURT THROUGHITS FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER DATED 13-6-2013 IN OUR CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1857/2013

AGAINST OUR ORIGINAL ACCUSED POLICE OFFICERS, PRESENT

RESPONDENTSNO.1, 2, 4, AND 5, AS WE HAD CLEARLY PRAYED IN OUR SAID

CRIM. WP NO. 1857/2013FOR MANDAMUS WRIT/FIR TO BE REGISTERED AGAINST

THEM FOR THEIR CRIMINALCONSPIRACY, FALSE CASE AGAINST US, FALSE SWORN AFFIDAVITS AND STATEMENTS BYTHEM, FORGERY, PERJURY, ETC.

2. Afterfearing the proposed action resulting from JMFC Vashi Court Order dated1-2-

2014 for registration of FIR against them, the Respondents No.1 and 2, ourOriginal

Accused in Crim. WP 1857/2012, and Respondent No.3, are trying to Criminallymisuse

the Process of Court by filing the FALSE Criminal Writ Petition No.427/2014 by

Dishonestly Concealing the Material Facts.The material available on record and the

documents filed by the Applicant makesit Prima Facie clear that the Respondent No.1

to 5 had Conspired with eachother and created False, Misleading and Fabricated

Evidences in order toMislead this Hon. Court and thereby committed Offences against

Administrationof Justice, Criminal Abuse of Court Process and Criminal Contempt of Court.

3. It is Pertinent to note here, that None other but this Hon. Bombay HighCourt has CAUGHT theirFalse Case against Applicant and his Mother Mohini Kamwani (they

Falsely statedthat both Applicant and his other Mohini Kamwani were going to Commit

Suicidethat is why they were Arrested), Forgery, Perjury, False Sworn Affidavits,

CriminalConspiracy of all our Original Accused includingRespondents No.1 and 2

DCP P. Karad and ADGP Ahmed Javed from 2011 onwards,etc during the hearing of

our Criminal Writ Petition No. 1857/2013 and alsofound them Guilty, Convicted and

Fined them Rs. 6 Lacs for Illegal Arrest andJailing of Applicant Dilip Kamwani and his79 year Mother Mohini Kamwani, in Blatant Violation of SC law of D. K. Basu vs.

State of Bengal. THE RESPONDENTS NO. 1 TO 3HAVE DELIBERATELY AND DISHONESTLY CONCEALED AND HIDDEN THIS FACT FROM THIS HON.COURT.

4. It is also Pertinent to note here,that the Respondents No. 1, 2, 4 and 5 along with our

other Original Accusedhad filed an SLP No. 6534/2013 in Hon. Supreme Court to

challenge the saidimpugned Hon. Bombay High Court Final Judgment Order dated 13- 6-2013, BUT HON.SUPREME COURT HAS DISMISSED THEIR SLP ON 23-9-2013.

THE RESPONDENTS NO. 1 TO 3 HAVE DELIBERATELY AND

DISHONESTLYCONCEALED AND HIDDEN THIS FACT FROM THIS HON. COURT.

5. Moreover, Maharashtra DGP has also clearlysaid vide Letter dated 2-9-2013 that necessary action will be taken against 4 Guilty Police Officers, DCP P. Karad,ADGP

Ahmed Javed, Laxman Kale and Raosaheb Sardesai, which are presentRespondents

no. 1, 2, 4 and 5, after the outcome of their SC SLP which haslong back been

Dismissed by Hon. SC. THE RESPONDENTS NO. 1 TO 3 HAVEDELIBERATELY AND DISHONESTLY CONCEALED AND HIDDEN THIS FACT FROM THIS HON.COURT.

6. That Respondents No.1 and 2 Ahmed Javed and Purushottam Karad are Openly

LYING as IApplicant Dilip Kamwani, and my 79 year mother Mohini Kamwani were not

Arrested and Jailed in a SINGLE dayby Respondent No.4 SPIMr. Laxman Kale as

Respondents No.1 and 2 Mr. Ahmed Javed and Purushottam Karad are

FALSELYCLAIMING they never knew and or are NOT Involved in our Illegal Arrest,

False Case, Forgery,Perjury, etc ; Their Falsity can be ex-faciely proved from following

evidences.Mohini Kamwani sent 100s of Complaints to Higher Authorities from 2010 onwards and Hon. Prime Minister has sent 60Letters to Chief SecretaryMaharashtra

Govt., President of India sent 3 Letters, MHA sent 3 Letters, Maharashtra Governor sent

7 Letters and Hon. Bombay High Court also sent 1 letter toMr. Ahmed Javed and all

have sent Copies to us. Then, after so many Letters from Higher Authorities, how can

RespondentNo.4, a mere SPI Mr. Laxman Kale, Arrest 79 year APPLICANT Mohini

Kamwani andher son - WITHOUT SPECIFIC ORDERSAND OR KNOWLEDGE OF HIS SENIORPOLICE OFFICERS RESPONDENTS NO. 2 AND 1 MR. AHMED JAVED and

MR. PURUSHOTTAM KARAD, as they are Falsely Claiming. THE RESPONDENTS

NO.1 TO 3 HAVE DELIBERATELY AND DISHONESTLY CONCEALED AND HIDDEN THIS FACT FROMTHIS HON. COURT.

7. Itis also very Important to Note here, that Regarding Police "Story" of we complaining

about Rs. 1.36 Crore and this being a Civil matter; thisis the Planned

CriminalConspiracy of our Original Accused andRespondents No. 1 to 5 Police

officers, who are LYING and trying to Misguide everybody since 2011 includingthis Hon. Court, (AS THEY TRIEDBEFORE ALSO IN OUR Crim.WP 1857/2013 BUT HON.

BOMBAY HIGH COURT REJECTED THEIR"STORY" AND HELD THEM GUILTY,

CONVICTED AND FINED THEM RS. 6 LACS), as ourComplaint was Clearly about our

Accused Relatives Karani Family Threatening usfrom August 2010, Criminally

Trespassingto our House and Demanding my mother Mohini Kamwani's Bank A/c No.

andSignatures to Loot, Cheat and Harm us AGAIN even though we have Severed

ourRelation with them since 2007 Legally by issuing them Legal Notices in VashiTimes

and they have No Right to even Contact us, because they Looted, Cheatedand

Destroyed our Family before also leading to the Untimely Deaths of my Father,young Brother and Suicide by my 2nd Unmarried Sister Gita in 2007.

8. BRIEF FACTS OF THECASE:

Asour Original Accused, Respondents No.1 and 2 DCP P. Karad and ADG Ahmed

Javedwere Involved and Conspired Criminally with Respondents No.4 and 5

SPIsRaosaheb Sardesai and Laxman Kale right from Beginning from December

2010,hence we are stating the Brief Facts of the Case from the Inception:

a) We had severed our relation Legallywith my sister Sumita Karani and her family in

2007 by giving them Legal Noticein Vashi Times, because they had looted and

cheated us and destroyed usfinancially leading to Deaths of my Father and Brother and Suicide by my secondSister in 2007.

b) But again from August 2010 toDecember 2010 my Nephew Manoj Karani started

Threatening us by coming to ourhouse and Demanding my Mother's Bank Account No. and Signatures to loot usagain.

c) On 23.12-2010, we went to VashiPolice Station to file FIR against Karani family, but

Police asked us to giveeverything in Writing. On 24-12-2010, we approached Navi Mumbai PoliceCommissioner Mr. Javed Ahmed who refused to take our complaint. Then we wentback to Vashi Police Station who only registered an N.C.

d) As no action was taken againstKaranis, my Mother complained to higher Authorities, but still no action wastaken.

e) So my Mother sat on Hunger Strike atAzad Maidan from 16-01-2012 to24-01-2012.

f) On 25-01-2012 Vashi Police arrestedme & my Mother illegally and Jailed us for 4 d a ys a t Ka l ya n Ja i l .

g) On 07-05-2012 we filed a CriminalWrit Petition no. 1857/2012 in Bombay High Court.

h) High Court passed the Final JudgmentOrder on 13-06-2013 holding all the 6

Accused Guilty, including Respondent No.1 and 2 DCP P. Karad and Ahmed Javed, and fined them Rs. 6 Lacs.

i) All the 6 Accused filed SLP inSupreme Court, but the Supreme Court Dismissed their S L P o n 2 3 -0 9 -2 0 1 3 .

j) On 30-01-2014, we filed Complaintno. 91/2014 u/s 156(3) with JMFC Vashi Court for registration of FIR againstfour accused Police Officers, Respondents No. 1, 2, 4, and 5, as Directed to us by Hon. Bombay High Courtvide its Final Judgment Order dated 13-6- 2013.

k) On 01-02-2014, JMFC Vashi Courtpassed the Order for registration of FIR against the four Accused PoliceOfficers, Respondent No. 1, 2, 4 and 5.

l) After fearing the proposed actionresulting from the said JMFC Vashi Court FIR Order

against them, thepetitioners are trying to misuse the Process of Court by filing this petitionby Dishonestly Concealing the Material Facts, as stated above.

9. ROLES PLAYED BYRESPONDENTS NO. 1 AND 2 DCP P. KARAD AND ADG

AHMED JAVED, ALONG WITHRESPONDENTS NO. 4 AND 5 SPIs LAXMAN KALE AND RAOSAHEB SARDESAI, FROM 2010 -WITH PRIMA FACIE DOCUMENTARY

EVIDENCES AND RELEVANT MATERIAL DISCLOSING THEIRCOMPLICITY IN

CRIME IS AS FOLLOWS:

Important Note: In our Crim.WP No. 1857/2012,where Respondents No.1, 2, 4 and 5 are our Original Accused, Hon. Bombay HighCourt has ALREADY found them Guilty,

Convicted and Fined them Rs. 6 Lacs, onthe basis of Following CRUCIAL Exhibits,

Documentary Evidences, Material Facts,etc. and we had submitted most of these with Exhibits "A" to "P" to Hon.JMFC Vashi Court in our Complaint No. 91/2014 u/s 156(3)

for registration ofFIR and After seeing the same, Hon. JMFC Vashi Court Magistrate

passed theFIR registration Order on 1.2-2014. As we Forgot to submit some

CrucialExhibits and Material Facts to JMFC Vashi Court with our said Complaint

No.91/2014, Hence we are filing them here to Further Prove the Falsity of theCrim.WP

427/2014 filed by the Respondents No. 1 to 3:

(A) On 23-12-2010, Applicant and hisMother approached Vashi Police Station to register our FIR against our AccusedKarani Family members Threatening us for

5Months from August 2010 and asking our Bank A/c No. & Signatures toLoot and

Cheat us AGAIN, but Police asked us to give everything in Writingabout why we

Severed our Relation with them and how our Relatives had Looted usin the Past also.

So on 24-12-2010, we approached the then Navi Mumbai PoliceCommissioner with

the said written complaint, but Respondent No.2 Ahmed Javed REFUSED to take our

Complaint andShouted at me and my Mother. So we went back to Vashi Police Station,

andRespondent No. 5 SPI R. Sardesai registeredonly an NC Complaint u/s 506 and 507. Annexed and marked as Exhibit "A" is Copy of our 1stComplaint to Vashi Police

dated 23-12-2010 and Exhibit "B" is Copy of our 2 Legal Notices to our AccusedKarani Family members in Vashi Times 2007.

(B) On 13-3-2011, an Underworldconnected person Hiten Sampat Looted and

Threatened Applicant and his Motherand from his Airtel CDRs (call data records) we informed Vashi Police about heand our Accused Nephew/Grandson Sanjeev Karani

and Rakhi Sanjeev Karani haveexchanged 4 calls on 17 March 2011. RespondentNo.

5 SPI R. Sardesai registered FIR against Hiten Sampat only, but no Offencewas

registered against our Accused Nephew/Grandson Sanjeev Karani and RakhiSanjeev Karani, even though we complained to Respondent No.2 Ahmed Javed.Annexed and marked as Exhibit "C"(Colly.) is Copy of our complaints sent to Respondents No. 5 and DGP.

Manoj Karani, came to India from Dubaiand called and Threatened us to take back our

Complaint against Karanis as theyare Very Rich and Powerful. We Complained to Vashi Police AGAIN that they areThreatening us, hence Respondent No.5 SPI R.

Sardesai issued 1st Legal Notices u/s 149 CrPC on19/20-6-2011to Jeetendra Karani, Sumita Karani, Narendra Karani and SanjeevKarani for Threatening Mohini Kamwani; butNo Notice was issued to Urmi Manoj Karani by Respondent No. 5 SPI R. Sardesai.Annexed and marked as Exhibit "D"is Copy of 1st Legal Notice u/s 149 CrPC issued to Karanis.

(D) On 9-7-2011 and on 14-7-2011, Applicant'sMother Mohini Kamwani has sent clear Complaints to Higher AuthoritiesPresident, PM, HM Maharashtra CM, HM DGP, etc., by

Registered Post and Emails,about Respondent No.2 Ahmed JavedLYING to Protect

Accused Karanis through his Reply sent on his behalf byRespondent No.1 DCP P. Karad. Annexed and marked as Exhibit "E" is Copy of 2complaints.

(E) Again on 26-10-2011 and28-10-2011, Applicant's Mother Mohini Kamwani has sent More Complaints toHigher Authorities, with RTI Proof, about RespondentNo.1

DCP P. Karad LYING in his Reply on behalf of Respondent No.2 ADG Ahmed Javed, to

Protect ourMain Accused Manoj Karani and his wife Urmi Manoj Karani. Annexed

andmarked as Exhibit "F" is Copyof 2 more complaints, "PlannedConspiracy of NM

Police since 24 December 2010 to Help/Protect/Save Rich &Powerful Criminals-Karani

Family"and"UGLY TRUTH OF NAVI MUMBAI DCPZONE 1 VASHI SHRI P. KARAD LYING AGAIN TO PROTECT ACCUSED KARANIS".

(F) On 11.11.2011, the Applicant's Mother Mohini Kamwani sent one more complaint to

Chief Minister explainingher grievance and the harassment faced by her, as NM

Police, Respondent No.2 and 1 are LYING to Protect our Richand Powerful Accused

Karanis. A copy of the said letter dated 11.11.2011 sentby the Applicant No. 1's Mother tothe Chief Minister is annexed heretomarked as Exhibit "G".

(G) As aconsequence of the said letter, the Applicant's Mother Mohini Kamwani wasapproached by Respondent No.4 Laxman Kale on 27.12.2011 wherein he

promised her that appropriateaction would be taken against Accused Karanis and

asked her to give a writtenundertaking stating that she would not siton any protest fast.

A copy of the letter dated 27.12.2011 given by herto the Respondent No.4 Laxman

Kale is annexed hereto and marked as Exhibit"H". But RespondentNo.4 Laxman Kale

did not take any Legal Action against Accused Karanis; he onlyissued 2nd "SOFT" Legal Notices to Jeetendra Karani, Sumita Karaniand Narendra Karani. WHY NO

LEGALACTION by Respondent No.4 LaxmanKale against Accused Karanis

FORREPEATING THE OFFENCES AND THREATENING A 79 YEAR SENIOR

CITIZEN, AS MENTIONEDIN THE 1ST POLICE NOTICE THAT LEGAL ACTION WILL

BE TAKEN AGAINSTKARANIS IF THEY THREATEN MOHINI KAMWANI AGAIN ?

Annexed and marked as Exhibit "I" is a Copy of 2nd Police Notices toKaranis u/s 149 C rP C .

(H) On 27-12-2011, RespondentNo.4 SPI Laxman Kale has sent a Letter Javak

Kramank (outward number)11884/2011to Respondent No.1 DCP P. Karad where he

has stated on page 2 that "Accused No. 4 Manoj Karani had come toIndia in August

2011 but he had to go to Pune for his company's work so he didnot come to Vashi Police Station" ???!!! - This is the UndisputableProof that Respondent No1. DCP

Karad was aware and how Respondent No.4 SPILaxman Kale was HELPING Karanis

to Protect them. Annexed hereto and marked as Exhibit "J" is the Copy of SPILaxman Kale's Letter to DCP Karad.

THIS IS THE SHOCKING TRUTH OFRESPONDENTS NO. 1 TO 5, DCP KARAD, THEN NAVI MUMBAI POLICE COMMISSIONER AHMEDJAVED, NEXT NM CP A. K.

SHARMA, SPIs LAXMAN KALE AND RAOSAHEB SARDESAI, THAT TILLDATE SINCE

2010, THEY HAVE NOT EVEN CALLED OUR MAIN ACCUSED MANOJ KARANI

TOVASHI POLICE STATION, NOR RECORDED HIS STATEMENT, NOR TAKEN ANY

LEGAL ACTIONAGAINST HIM FOR THREATENING A 79 YEAR SENIOR CITIZEN

AND DEMANDING HER BANK A/CNUMBER AND SIGNATURES ON DOCUMENTS

TO LOOT AND CHEAT US AGAIN ???!!!

(I) That In view of the fact that no action was taken by Respondent No.4 Laxman Kale,

on the complaint of the Applicant's Mother, andthe officers of Respondent No.4

Laxman Kale making false statementsbefore the Maharashtra State Human Rights

Commission, as MSHRC had sentSummons to Respondent No.2 Ahmed Javed and Respondent No.5 R. Sardesai, resulting in the closure of her complaint, Applicant's Mother addressed a letter to Sr. PoliceInspector of Azad Maidan Police Station, and thereby sought permission to sit on "peaceful Protest Hunger Strike" on 16.01.2012

against the inaction of the police. A copyof the letter dated 02.01.2012 sent by the

Applicant's Mother to the Senior Police Inspector,Azad Maidan Police Station is annexed heretoand marked as Exhibit "K".

(J) Applicant's Mother Mohini Kamwanistarted her fast (Hunger Strike) from 16.01.2012

at Azad Maidan and was stationed there for 3 days. She addressed aletter to various authoritiesinforming them that she intends to continueher hunger fast for an indefinite

time, till justice is done. A copy of the letterdated 21.01.2012 sent by Bombay High Court Public Grievances Cell to Respondent No.2 ADG Ahmed Javed, is annexed hereto and marked as Exhibit"L".

(K) As aconsequence to the above said representation, a high ranking officer of

theAzad Maidan Police station visited Applicant'sMother and convinced her that action

will be taken on her grievances and she should not take any steps thatcould be

considered contrary to the law of the land. Applicant's Mother decided to call off her fast

and gave the same in writing to the policeofficer. Copy of the undertaking dated

24.01.2012 of the Applicant's Mother wherein she has very clearly stated that in her life

of 77 years she did not breach any law and she did not intend to doso at this stage of her life is annexed hereto and marked as Exhibit "M".

(L) That The Applicant and his Mother were extremelysurprised to see two

policeofficers, one of them addressed as Kadam,accompanied by one lady police

officer addressedas Ms Chikne, SENT BY RESPONDENT NO.4LAXMAN KALE, at our doorstep at 8:30 AM on the morningof 25.01.2012. The Applicant andhis Mother were

informed that RESPONDENTNO.4 LAXMAN KALE HAD SENT THEM to register an FIR on her complaintagainst Accused Karanis and that she along with her son would have toaccompany them to the police station. Since, it was early morning Applicant's Mother

asked them to proceedahead and that she would be at the police station in half an hour. Applicantand his Mother were told that they will berequired only for about an

hour, therefore the Applicant and his Motherleft her mentally challenged

daughterbehind and arrived at the Vashi Police Station at around 9:00 AM on25.01.2012.

(M) That, on 25-01-2012, Till 1:30PM Applicant and hisMother were made to sit by

RESPONDENTNO.4 LAXMAN KALE inside the police station without any information or explanation and without any food orwater. At about 2.30 pm, the Applicant and his

Mother were escorted to the court premises by RESPONDENT NO.4 LAXMAN

KALEalong with lady police officers, LYING AGAIN TO US THAT APP WILL TELLTHEM

TO REGISTER FIR UNDER WHICH SECTIONS and were made to sit on a bench outside thecourt room of learned JMFC.

(N) At around4:45 pm the Applicant and his Mother were PUSHED BY RESPONDENT

NO.4 LAXMAN KALEand produced before the Magistrate and itwas only at this stage

that we realized that we were being touted asaccused persons and not as

complainants. RESPONDENTNO.4 LAXMAN KALE FILED A FALSE CASE IN JMFC VASHI COURT STATING ON OATH THATMOHINI KAMWANI AND HER SON WERE

GOING TO COMMIT SUICIDE (???!!!) TO OBTAIN AFAVORABLE ORDER FROM JMFC VASHI COURT AND HENCE, WE WERE SENT TO JUDICIAL CUSTODY FOR 3 DAYS

TO KALYAN JAIL. This in spite of the fact that the Applicant'sMother had givena clear

undertaking to Azad Maidan Police one day before on 24-1-2012 that shehad called off her protest fast. Copy of the order dated 25.01.2012 passed bythe Learned Magistrate, JMFC, Vashi Court in Outward No. 717/2012 is annexedhereto and marked as Exhibit "N ".

(O) The Applicant requested RESPONDENT NO.4 LAXMAN KALE that he be produced

beforethe Learned Magistrate once again so that theMagistrate could be apprised of

the facts, insteadthe Applicant was handcuffed by Mr. Kadam at the order of

Respondent No.4 Laxman Kale, and pushed intothe police van, along with his Mother.

The Applicant's Mother requested Respondent No.4 Laxman Kaleto atleast allow her to take an extra set of clean clothes, articles of necessity,and ensure that her mentally challengeddaughter who was alone at home is lookedafter by the neighbours, but this request was also turned down by RespondentNo.4 Laxman Kale.

(P) That on27.01.2012, Applicant and his Mother were produced before Learned

Magistrate,where Respondent No.4 Laxman Kale sought extension of our

detentionperiod, which was opposed by the us. On hearing the submissions made by

us,the Learned JMFC ordered release of the Applicant and his Mother. Copy of

theaffidavit dated 27.01.2012 of RespondentNo.4 Laxman Kale seekingextension of

detention period which also bears out the order of the LearnedJMFC is annexed hereto and marked as Exhibit "O".

(Q) Following the order of Learned JMFC, the Applicant and his Mother were taken

back to Kalyan Prison, for conducting releaseprocedure. On the way to Kalyan Prison the Applicant was again handcuffeddespite his protest and objection.

(R) That after their release Applicant made a complaint tothe Respondent No.2 Ahmed

Javed then Commissionerof Police narrating the above illegal incidence of being

handcuffed at theorder of Respondent No.4 Laxman Kale. Copy of the complaint made

to the Commissioner of Police by theApplicant dated 10.02.2012 is annexed hereto a n d m a rke d a s E xh i b i t "P ".

(S) Your Lordships, it is Pertinent toNote here that, Respondent No. 5 SPIRaosaheb

Sardesai has told people "Itold my Bosses ADG Ahmed Javed and DCP Karad

(Respondents No.2 and 1)NOT to Arrest 79 year Mohini Kamwani and her son but they did not listen to meand Laxman Kale was in a Hurry to get a Promotion and a Medal, so

he AGREED toArrest them by Hook or Crook". That is why Respondent No.5 SPI

RaosahebSardesai was Transferred by Respondents No. 1 and 2 ADG Ahmed Javed

and DCP P.Karad to Thane, BECAUSE HE REFUSED TO ARREST US !!! and

Respondent No.4 SPILaxman Kale, who Arrested us Illegally in a False Case, has

been given DGP'sMedal on 01-05-2013 and a Promotion as SPI In-charge of Vashi Police Station on28-05-2013 (he was API at Nerul Police Station).

(T) Your Lordships, it is again Pertinentto Note here that Respondents No.1 and 2

Ahmed Javedand Purushottam Karad areOpenly LYING as I,Applicant Dilip Kamwani andmy 79 year Mother MohiniKamwani were not Arrestedand Jailed in a SINGLE day

byRespondent No.4 SPI Mr. Laxman Kale as Respondents No.2 and1 Mr. Ahmed

Javed and Purushottam Karad are FALSELY CLAIMING that theynever knew and or are NOT Involved in our Illegal Arrest, False Case,Forgery, Perjury, etc; Their Falsity

can be ex-faciely Provedfrom following Evidences. Applicant's Mother Mohini Kamwani

sent 100s ofComplaints to Higher Authorities from 2010 onwardsand Hon. Prime

Minister has sent 60 Letters to Chief Secretary Maharashtra Govt., President of India sent 3 Letters, MHA sent 3 Letters, Maharashtra Governorsent 7 Letters and Hon.

Bombay HighCourt also sent 1 letter to Mr. Ahmed Javed and all have sent Copies

tous. Then, after so many Letters fromHigher Authorities, how can Respondent No.4, a mere SPI Mr. Laxman Kale, Arrest79 year APPLICANT Mohini Kamwani and her son -

WITHOUT SPECIFIC ORDERS AND OR KNOWLEDGE OF HIS SENIOR POLICE OFFICERS RESPONDENTS NO. 2 AND 1 MR.AHMED JAVED and MR.

PURUSHOTTAM KARAD,as they are Falsely Claiming. THE RESPONDENTS NO. 1

TO 3 HAVE DELIBERATELY AND DISHONESTLYCONCEALED AND HIDDEN THIS FACT FROM THIS HON. COURT. Annexed and markedas Exhibit "Q" (Colly.) is Copy

of Letters sent by Higher Authorities to CS Maharashtra Govt.and Respondent No.2 Ahmed Javed and Copies to Mohini Kamwani.

THATRESPONDENTS POLICE OFFICERS NO.1, 2, 4 AND 5 HAVE TAKEN A

REVENGE ON APPLICANTAND HIS MOTHER AND CRIMINALLY CONSPIRED AND

ARRESTED US ILLEGALLY AND JAILED USBY FILING A FALSE CASE IN JMFC

VASHI COURT THAT WE WERE GOING TO COMMITSUICIDE, BECAUSE MOHINI KAMWANI SENT 100+ COMPLAINTS TO HIGHER AUTHORITIESAGAINST THEM

FOR NOT TAKING ACTION AND PROTECTING OUR RICH AND POWERFUL

ACCUSEDKARANIS BECAUSE KARANIS HAD BRIBED THEM AS TOLD TO US BY CM'S SECRETARY ANDTHAT THEY WERE "MILKING THE COW".

(U) That Aggrievedby the Criminal Conspiracy of Respondents No. 1, 2, 4 and 5, our

OriginalAccused, and their illegal action the Applicant and his Mother approached

theHon'ble Bombay High Court against Respondents No. 1, 2, 4, 5, Principal Secretary

Home Dept. and State ofMaharashtra by filing a Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 1857 of

2012 seekingjustice from the Hon'ble Court against the illegal action and gross

violationof our fundamental rights. Copyof the Criminal Writ Petition being Writ Petition

(Crl.) No. 1857 of 2012 filedby the us before the Hon'ble High Court of Judicature at Bombay is annexedhereto and marked as Exhibit "R".

(V) RespondentNo.5 SPI Raosaheb Sardesai, Co-conspirator of Respondents No.1

and 2, filed aFALSE Affidavit on Oath on 03.08.2012 saying that Mohini Kamwani and

her sonwere Arrested because they were going to Commit Suicide, which has

beenREJECTED By Hon. Bombay High Court. Copy of the affidavit dated 03.08.2012

bythe Accused in Criminal Writ Petition No. 1857 of 2012 is annexed hereto a n d m a rke d a s E xh i b i t "S ".

(W) On 29-8-2012, Applicant's Mother filed a Rejoinderto Respondent No.5 R.

Sardesai's Affidavit, clearly stating that mycomplaint was about Threats by Accused Karanis and NOT about Rs. 1.36 Crore, asalso FALSELY Alleged by Respondents

No.1 to 5, and that we were NOTgoing to Commit Suicide. Annexed hereto and marked as Exhibit "T" isa Copy of Mohini Kamwani's Rejoinder.

(X) The Hon'ble Bombay High Court heard the Petition on20.11.2012 and found that

Prima Facie case is made out by us thatdirections of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the

case of D. K. Basu Vs. State of West Bengal [(1997)1 SCC 416] have not been

complied with. The Court said that "The affidavit filed (by Respondent No.5 R.Sardesai)

is totally unsatisfactory" and directed that the concerned officer (Respondent No.5 R.Sardesai) toremain present on 23.11.2012 along with entire record. Copy of the

Order dated20.11.2012 passed in Criminal Writ Petition No. 1857 of 2012 before the Hon'bleBombay High Court is annexed hereto and marked as Exhibit "U".

(Y) That on23.11.2012, the Hon'ble High Court perused the documents filed by the assistantpublic prosecutor and came to the finding that the station diary entry no.26

does not make any reference to usthat we had declined to sign the arrest form. Further

the affidavit of Respondent No.5 then Senior PoliceInspector Rao Saheb Sardesai dated, 03.08.2012 does not make any reference tothe arrest form being drawn. "We

have perused the originalarrest form of the petitioner and her son. Prima facie, it

appears to usthat endorsement that arrestees declined to sign the same has been

subsequentlymade as the handwriting appears to be different than the handwriting in whichvarious details have been filled in (FORGERY). In any case, additionalaffidavit

cannot be permitted to be filed to fill up any lacuna".Copy of the orderdated 23.11.2012 passed by the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay in Criminal WritPetition No. 1857 of 2012 is annexed hereto and marked as Exhibit "V".

(Z) On22.02.2013, EVEN AFTER 2 ABOVE CLEAR ORDERSPASSED BY HON.

BOMBAY HIGH COURT, Respondent No.4 Laxman Kale,Co-conspirator of

Respondents No. 1 and 2, also filed another FALSEadditional affidavit on Oath in Criminal Writ Petition No. 1857 of 2012 saying that Mohini Kamwani and her son wereArrested because they were going to Commit Suicide, which has ALREADY beenREJECTED By Hon. Bombay High Court and attached as Exhibit A therein ,

RespondentNo.1 DCP Purushottam Karad's Letter dated05-07-2012 to Hon. Bombay

High Court, which is a FALSE Reply on BEHALF of RespondentNo.2 Mr. Javed

Ahmed, to Hon. Bombay High Court's Letter to then Navi MumbaiPolice Commissioner

Mr. Ahmed Javed, REPEATING the same LIE that Mohini Kamwani and her son were

Arrestedbecause they were going to Commit Suicide. THIS IS A CLEAR PROOF

THATRESPONDENTS NO.1 AND 2 HAVE CONSPIRED WITH RESPONDENTS NO. 4

AND 5. HON. JMFC VASHI MAGISTRATE TOOK AN EXTRA COPY OFTHIS DCP P. KARAD'S LETTER FROM US, BEFORE ISSUING THE SAID FIR ORDER AGAINST

RESPONDENTSNO.1 AND 2, ALONGWITH 2 SPIs. + Respondent No.1 inhis said

Reply on Behalf of Respondent No.2 is Also Lying in Para 13that Mohini Kamwani and

her son were called from 16-01-2012 to 19-01-2012to Vashi Police Station by SPI,

ACP and by Respondent No.1 himself but they didnot listen - ENTIRE AZAD MAIDAN

POLICE AND SPECIAL BRANCH OFFICERS AREOUR WITNESSES THAT MOHINI KAMWANI WAS SITTING AT AZAD MAIDAN FOR HER HUNGERSTRIKE FROM 16-

01-2012 TO 24-1-2012, SO HOW DID SHE GO TO VASHI POLICE STATION???!!!. Copy ofthe additional FALSE affidavit dated 22.02.2013 filed by Respondent No.4

LaxmanKale with Respondent No.1 DCP Karad's False Reply vide Exhibit A therein

inCriminal Writ Petition No. 1857 of 2012 is annexed hereto and marked as Exhibit"W".

(AA) Applicant'sMother Mohini Kamwani filed Amendment in her Crim. WP 1857/2012

dated 27-2-2013once again explaining in detail with Exhibits therein about Criminal Conspiracyof Respondents No.1 and 2 with Respondents No.4 and 5 to Protect our

AccusedKarani Family members, that is why Police ONLY gave 2 'Soft' Notices toKaranis; Why 2nd Notice toKaranis for Repeat Offences of CONTINUOUSELY Threatening 79 year Senior CitizenMohini Kamwani ? Annexed and marked as Exhibit"X" is Copy of the said Amendment.

(BB) Applicant's Mother filed a rejoinder to theadditional reply filed by Respondent

No.4 and 5 Laxman Kale and DCP P. Karad's Letter as Exhibit A therein on22.02.2013, with clear Prayer toSuspend and Prosecute Respondent No. 1, 4 and 5 DCP P. Karad,

Laxman Kale andR. Sardesai, for their Criminal Conspiracy to Arrest and Jail the

Applicants byHook or Crook to Silence them so that Mohini Kamwani Stops

complaining about Rich and PowerfulAccused Karanis whom Police was Protecting

and violation of our fundamentalrights which were contrary to the law laid down in D. K.

Basu case. Copy of therejoinder affidavit dated 01.03.2013 filed by the Applicant's Mother inCriminal Writ Petition No. 1857 of 2012 is annexed hereto and marked as Exhibit"Y".

(CC) On 28.03.2013 and 30.03.2013 we sought amendmentsin the writ petition with

regard tothe prayers seeking Mandamus Writ/FIR against Respondents No. 1, 2, 4 and 5 DCPP. Karad, ADG Ahmed Javed, SPIs Laxman Kale and R. Sardesai, and that they

beimmediately Suspended and Prosecuted for Illegally Detaining and Arresting us

andfor Perjury by seeking detention order and judicial custody from JMFC VashiCourt

by filing a False case and Affidavit that Mohini Kamwani and her son weregoing to Commit Suicide. They also sought that the Respondents no. 1, 2, 4 and5 should be

Suspended and Prosecuted for Planned Criminal Conspiracy anddeliberate dereliction

of duty (as Bombay High Court Public Grievances Cell had sent a letter on21-01-2012

to Respondent No.2 then Navi Mumbai Police Commissioner Javed Ahmadand

Respondent No.1 DCP Vashi Zone 1 Purushotam Karad has submitted a FalseReply

to that through additional affidavit of Respondent No. 4 SPI Laxman Kale dated22.02.2013 by way of Exhibit 'A' therein) and Forgery, Filing False

SwornAffidavits/Replies, etc. Copy of the amendments dated 28.03.2013and

30.03.2013 sought and allowed in Criminal Writ Petition No. 1857 of 2012 isannexed hereto and marked as Exhibit "Z".

(DD) That TheHon'ble High Court vide its final Judgment and Order dated 13.06.2013

partlyallowed the Criminal Writ Petition No. 1857 of 2012 granting compensation

ofRs.3 lac each to Applicant and his Mother for their illegal arrest anddetention saying

"Therewas no impending threat of the petitioners for committing suicide and

inpassing, therefore, we may say that their arrest and detention itself was not

justified.However, the fact remains that the "authorities" (whichdefinitely include

Respondents No.1 and 2 DCP Purushottam Karad and ADG Ahmed Javed) have

committed a blatant violation ofthe directives of the Supreme Court in D. K. Basu's case

and the petition onthat score deserves to succeed". Nowhere in the entireFinal

Judgment Order has Hon. Bombay High Court given any relief to or Absolvedany

Respondent, including Respondents No. 1 and 2 DCP P. Karad and ADG

AhmedJaved. Annexed and markedas Exhibit "Z-1" is aCopy of Final Judgment Order of Hon. Bombay High Court dated 13-6-2013.

(EE) That theHon'ble Bombay High Court in the order dated 13-06-2013 stated, related toprayer of Petitioners for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the policeto register a offence on the basis of the complaint of the first petitioner in that respect,Hon'ble high court referred the petitioners to avail alternate remediesavailable to them in law. Copy of the Hon. Bombay High Court Order of FinalJudgment is already annexed and marked as Exhibit "Z".

(FF) It is also Pertinent to note here,that the Respondents No. 1, 2, 4 and5 along with

our other Original Accused had filed an SLP No. 6534/2013 in Hon. Supreme Court to

challengethe said impugned Hon. Bombay High Court Final Judgment Order dated 13-

6-2013,BUT HON. SUPREME COURT HAS DISMISSED THEIR SLP ON 23-9-2013

and NOT given themany Relief. Annexedand marked as Exhibit "Z-2" is a Copy of

Order of SC Dismissal of their SLP on 23-9-2013. Conviction of Petitioners No.1 and 2

with 2 SPIsattained Finality when SC dismissed their SLP and that has become the Law andno one can deny or change it.

(GG) Moreover,Maharashtra DGP has also clearly said vide Letter dated 2-9-2013 that

necessaryaction will be taken against 4 Guilty Police Officers, Respondents No.1, 2, 4and 5 DCP P. Karad, ADGP Ahmed Javed, Laxman Kale and Raosaheb Sardesai, afterthe outcome of their SC SLP which has long back been Dismissed by Hon. SC. Annexed and marked as Exhibit "Z-3" is a Copy of Letter from DGP's Office.

(HH) As NoAction was taken against 4Guilty Police Officers Respondents No.1, 2, 4

and 5 DCP P. Karad, ADGP AhmedJaved, Laxman Kale and Raosaheb Sardesai, as

per DGP's Letter; Hence as per theDirections given by the Hon. Bombay High Court in

the Final Judgment Orderdated 13-6-2013, Applicants filed a Complaint u/s 156(3)

CrPC for Registrationof FIR against Respondents No.1, 2, 4 and 5 in JMFC Vashi Court

on 30-1-2014and Hon. Learned JMFC Vashi Magistrate has passed the said Order on

1-2-2014.Annexed and marked as Exhibit "Z-4" is a Copy ofOrder dated 1-2-2014

passed by Hon. JMFC Vashi Court for registration of FIRagainst Respondents No.1, 2, 4, and 5 as per the directions of Hon. Bombay HighCourt in CrWP No. 1857/2012.

Afterfearing the proposed action resulting from the said FIR Order against them,

theRespondents No.1 and 2, our Original Accused in Crim. WP 1857/2012,

andRespondent No.3, are trying to Criminally Misuse the Process of Court by filingthe

FALSE Criminal Writ Petition No. 427/2014 by Dishonestly Concealing theMaterial

Facts. The material available on record and the documentsfiled by the Applicant makes

it Prima Facie clear that the Respondent No.1 to 5had Conspired with each other and

created False, Misleading and FabricatedEvidences in order to Mislead this Hon. Court

and thereby committed Offencesagainst Administration of Justice, Criminal Abuse of Court Process and CriminalContempt of Court.

(II) Inour Crim. WP 1857/2014 Petitioners No.1 and 2 DCP P. Karad and Ahmed Javed werealso our Original Accused; but they did Not file any Reply Affidavit, only 2SPIs filed the Reply Affidavits which were found False by the Hon. Bombay HighCourt. Hence the allegations against RespondentsNo.1 and 2 are Proved.

AIR 1964 Page No. 72 When allegations of Malafide are made againstMinister and

no Reply is filed by the Minister but Reply filed by theSecretary, this means that Malafied have been Proved against Minister.

AIR 1988 Allahabad Page No. 32  Subordinate Not to file Reply when Senior Officersare Accused.

10. That Applicantand his Mother had submitted most of the above Exhibits,

Documents, Proofs,Respondents' False Reports/Replies, False Case and Sworn

Affidavit in JMFCVashi Court, our entire CrWP 1857/2012 with Amendments,

Respondents' False Affidavits in HC and our Rejoinders,DGP's Letter, SC Dismissal

Order for Respondents' SLP in SC, etc., TO THE HON. JMFC VASHI COURT ASALSO

TO HON. BOMBAY HIGH COURT EARLIER IN OUR CrWP 1857/2012, required to

Provethe Falsity and Dishonesty of the Respondents and NEVER Hidden any Facts,

but on the Contrary it is the Respondentswho have Conspired with each other and

Filed the False CrWP 427/2014, Dishonestly Concealing the Material Facts,

createdFalse, Misleading and Fabricated Evidences in order to Mislead this Hon. Court,LIKE THEY HAVE DONE IT BEFORE ALSO IN JMFC VASHI COURT, HON. BOMBAY HIGH COURTIN OUR CrWP 1857/2012 AND IN SC.

11. POINT TO POINT REPLY FOR PETITIONERS FALSE ALLEGATIONS - WITH

PROOFS OFTHEIR FALSITY:

Para D and E Page 8 Statement: Respondent No.1 Complained of Amounts Due to her from Accused Karanis hence she was informed that this is a Civil Matter.

PROOFS OF THEIR fALSITY: Police Complaint of Mohini Kamwani dated 23-12-2010 of Threats, etc. has got Nothing to do with Past Dues of Accused Karanis, as explained

in: Exhibits A, E, F, G, T, X, Y, Z, Z-1.

Para E Page 9 Statement: There is no whisper/allegations against Petitioners in Respondents Complaint to JMFC Vashi Court.

PROOFS OF THEIR FALSITY: Para 23 of Respondents Complaint to JMFC Vashi Court

+ JMFC Exhibits A, D, I, N, O, P, and Exhibits B, C, F (Colly.), G, I in Reply Affidavit filed b y Ap p l i ca n t D i l i p Ka m w a n i .

Para F Page 9 Statement: Respondents were going to Commit Suicide.

PROOFS OF THEIR FALSITY: Undertaking given by Respondent No.1 to Azad Maidan

Police station on 24-1-2012 that she will NOT commit suicide and has Ended her Hunger Strike and gone home to Vashi + Exhibits M, R, T, X, Y, Z, Z-1.

Para 4 Page 11 Statement: Petitioners say that if allegations in Complaint are perused,

at the most it is about illegal arrest and Wrongful detention and preparation of arrest

Panchnama, which is in discharge of official duty

PROOFS OF THEIR FALSITY: Self Admission of Illegal Arrest and Wrongful Detention

+ Making a False Panchnama, but it is NOT Official Duty, it is OUTSIDE of Duty, to make a False Panchnama.

Para 5 Page 12 Statement: Petitioners are High Ranking Officers Respondents have

taken RevengeTheir Reputation will be tarnishedNo Conspiracy u/s 120B

PROOFS OF THEIR FALSITY: Respondent No.1 Mohini Kamwani is a 79 year Senior

Citizen COMPLAINANT Police has already Tarnished our Reputation by Arresting

and Jailing us ILLEGALLY and it has come in Newspapers Hon. Bombay High Court

has already Convicted the Petitioners No.1 and 2, DCP P. Karad and ADG Ahmed

Javed after giving them Fair Hearing for 1 year They did NOT file Reply affidavit to

DENY 120B and their involvement, and SC also Dismissed their SLP + DGP has also said necessary action will be taken against them.

12. In view of the above mentioned background and inthese Facts and Circumstances,

the Applicant is approaching this Hon. Court byfiling the present Application under

Section 340 CrPC. There is no otheralternate, speedy and efficacious remedy

available to the Applicant than thepresent Application which is filed on following

amongst the other Grounds whichare without prejudice to each other:

13.GROUNDS FOR INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS UNDER SECTION340 OF

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE:

(a) That theRespondents No.1 to 3 Deliberately filed the False CrWP 427/2014, with

FalseDocuments, Exhibits, Sworn Affidavit, etc., to Fraudulently Misguide this

Hon.Court to obtain a favorable ad-interim relief of Stay Order dated 6-4-2014 inorder

to Stop the registration of FIR against Respondents No.1, 2, 4 and 5, asOrdered by

Hon. JMFC Vashi Court dated 1-2-2014. Hence the Applicant files thisApplication and Respondent No.1 to 3 and 4 and 5 are liable to be Prosecutedu/s 191, 192, 193, 196, 199, 200, 201, 217, 218, 219, 465, 466, (467, 468,)471, 474 read with 120(B) of Indian Penal Code for their Illegal acts.

(b) Section 340 CrPC reads as under:

(1)When, upon an application made to itin this behalf or otherwise, any Court is of

opinion that it is expedient inthe interests of justice that an inquiry should be made into

any offencereferred to in clause (b) of sub- section (1) of section 195, which appears

tohave been committed in or in relation to a proceeding in that Court or, as thecase

may be, in respect of a document produced or given in evidence in aproceeding in that

Court, such Court may, after such preliminary inquiry, ifany, as it thinks necessary,-

(a) record a finding to that effect;

(b) make a complaint thereof in writing;

(d) take sufficient security for the appearanceof the accused before such Magistrate, or if the alleged offence is non-bailable and the Court thinks it necessary so to do, send the accused incustody to such Magistrate; and

(e) bind over any person to appear and giveevidence before such Magistrate.

(2) The power conferredon a Court by sub- section (1) in respect of an offence may, in any case wherethat Court has neither made a complaint under sub- section (1) in respect ofthat offence nor rejected an application for the making of such complaint, beexercised by the Court to which such former Court is subordinate within themeaning of sub- section (4) of section 195.

3) A complaint madeunder this section shall be signed,-

(a) where the Courtmaking the complaint is a High Court, by such officer of the Court as the Courtmay appoint;

(b) in any other case,by the presiding officer of the Court.

(4) In this section," Court" has the same meaning as in section 195.

(c) That the Applicant states and submits that thefiling False Affidavit or making False Statement on Oath is a Serious Offence,the Hon. Apex Court, Hon High Courts discussed the said issue in followingdecisions;

(i) M/s A-One Industries Vs. D.P. Garg (Delhi HighCourt) reported in 1999 Cri. L J. 4743

"B)Filing of False Affidavit - Effect of - It needs to be highlighted that filing a False Affidavit or giving aFalse Evidence in Judicial proceeding is a serious matter –

Supreme Court in AIR 1995 SC 795 observed that

".filingof false affidavit or making false statement on oath in court aims at strikinga blow at the Rule of law and no court can ignore such conduct which has thetendency toshake public confidence in the judicial institutions because the very structureof an ordered life is put at stake. It would be a great public disaster if thefountain of justice is allowed to be poisoned by anyone resorting to filing of falseaffidavits or giving false statements and fabricating falseevidence in a court of law. The stream of justice has to be kept clear and pureand anyone soiling its purity must be dealt with sternly so that no one can bepermitted to undermine the dignity of Court and interfere with due course ofjudicial proceedings or the administration."

(ii) Pritesh Vs. State ofMaharashtra (SCC) reported in 2002 Cri. L. J. 548

(iii) AIR 1927 Allahbad 45 Full Bench

(iv) Kapol Co-op Bank Ltd. Vs.State of Maharashtra reported in 2005 Cr. L. J. 765

(d) That theApplicants state and submit that Respondents No. 1 to 5 made False

Statementson oath and also are trying to Prejudice this Hon. Court against the

Applicantand his Mother. Therefore it is also necessary to initiate Contempt proceedingsagainst Respondents No. 1 to 5.

(e) Hon. Supreme Court in the case of (2010) 3SCC (Cri) 574 UP Resident Employees

Co-op Housing Society and Ors Vs. New OkhlaIndustrial Development Authority and

Anr held as follows:

A. Contemptof Court Act 1971 - S.2(c) - Criminal Contempt - Filing of False Affidavit

intentionally- Held, amounts to Contempt of Court - On facts held, P by making a

FalseStatement on Affidavit with the intention of inducing the Supreme Court not topass

any adverse order against Noida Authority had committed Contempt of Court.(para 7)

B. Contemptof Court Act 1971 - S.12 - P filing Affidavit intentionally - He

submittingthat apology tendered should be accepted and/or in any event fine would

suffice- Held on facts. Apology tendered only after it was worthless since it was

notgenuine and bona fide and was tendered only after it was found that falsestatement had an attempt to get out of consequences of having been caught -Hence sentence of

simple imprisonment for one week imposed (para 9 to 11)

(f) The Applicant has no other equally efficacious andalternative remedy than to

approach this Hon. Court for securing the ends ofJustice and it is just fair and essential

that Applicant and his Mother berelieved from the clutches of irregular and futile litigation.

(g) No otherpetition except present petition has been filed by the Applicant either

beforethis Hon. Court or before any other Court in India in respect of the subjectmatter of the present petition.

1 4 . PR AYER S:

Therefore the Applicant Prays that this Hon. Courtbe pleased to:

a. Admit and allow the present Application;

b. Record a finding that Respondents No. 1 to 5 havein connivance with each other filed False case, made false statements on oathand filed false affidavit, committed Forgery, Perjury, etc. before this Hon.Court to mislead the Court;

c. Initiate proceedings u/s 191, 192, 193, 196, 199,200, 201, 217, 218, 219, 465, 466, 471, 474, read with 120(B) of IPC as perprovisions of section 340 of CrPC against Respondents No.1 to 5 and make acomplaint in writing and send it to the Magistrate of First Class havingjurisdiction;

d. Send Respondents No. 1 to 5 to custody in view ofsection 340 (1) (d) of CrPC as the offence u/s 471 is non baillable one;

e. Take suo motocognizance of contempt of Court committed by Respondents No. 1 to 5 and proceedagainst them under provision of contempt of Court's Act;

f. Grant acompensation of Rs. 1 Crore to the Applicant and his Mother for the mentaltorture, annoyance, inconvenience caused to the Applicant and his Mother due tofiling a False Writ Petition by Respondents No. 1 to 3;

g. Grant any other reliefs as this Hon. Court deemsjust, fit and proper;

h. Provide cost to the Applicants.

FOR THIS ACT OF KINDNESS AND JUSTICE APPLICANTS ASIN DUTY BOUND SH AL L EVER PR AY.

Pl a ce : M u m b a i

Date: 5-4-2014

A p p l i ca n t i n P e rso n  D i l i p K a m w a n i 

Source:- https://www.facebook.com/notes/mohini-kamwani/how-to-file-a-criminal-application-

us-340-crpc-against-dirty-cops-when-they-file/648806171865501

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

Quash u/s 482 on Point of Law by husband alone

SOME1 wrote:

OK. Quash petition on question of law is very case dependent - what was the FIR, statements recorded U/S 161 CrPC, documents filed by IO along with CS, contradictions between them (FIR and statements), whether any other case is filed by the 498a gang (125 CrPC, DV, etc.) and if there are self-contradictions, etc. etc. There is no sample as such that can be reused each time but there are certain principled that you can apply. Also, procedural (CrPC) violation by the IO or bias or mala fide are other grounds available to file for quashing the FIR (and CS).

At what stage are you in - pre or post CS? If post - have you filed for discharge? If pre, do you have any documentary evidence that can prove the falsity of the FIR? I can give you tips on preparing 482 application if you want. I ended up doing Law in the process of fighting my case.

aturchatur wrote:

Quash on the basis of vague allegations, & proof in contrary related to some of her falsity, contradictions in FIR & Divorce filed by her, perjury, unclean hands, order VII Rule 11, Order X, Contempt of Court, Order XI Rule 1 Interrogatory provisions etc etc etc etc etc etc. Thanks & Regards

aturchatur wrote:

To make Quash easy, Order XI Rule 1 can act as a Pre-requisite.

The questions need to be directed towards making the exact dates vague & prove w ro n g .

Just prove that those dates were wrong & based on the result of Order XI Rule 1 you can apply for FIR Quash.

In between you might be using Order XI Rule 14 as a double proof for other non-dated or even dated allegations wherever it deems fit.

STEPS TO QUASH FIR U/S 482 CrPC ARE AS FOLLOWS :-

(1) Order XI Rule 1 INTERROGATORY

(2) Interrogatory in (1) above should be based on dated events in FIR/Complaint Copy.

(3) All dated events should be cut down using your creative & probative mind.

(4) Probative mind must concentrate only on Closed Probe because only that can bring out a conclusion .

Example:- Tumne chappal pehni thi ? Haa ya Naa Answer:- Huzoor foot me kuch chubh gaya tha.

Objection:- Maine pucha haan ya naa

Answer:- Lekin me lord mai ye kehna chahta hun

Objection:- HAAAAN YAA NAAAA (Loudly) . . for exact style PM me Answer:- Arr,, mai mai . . . .

Judge:- Haan ya naa me jawab dijiye, apni kahani tab tak mat sunaiye jab tak puchhe na

Hubby/Hubby's Lawyer:- Thank you me lord

Judge:- Notes down this aspect in register

(5) Take all dated events BREAKING NOTING SHEETS COPY from this court thru CC &put this CC in HC Quash Petition u/s 482

(6) Crush the False FIR which is based upon falsity.

(7) Finish your cases with WINNING in very short period of time.

(8) If u also use CrPC 91, RTI's, Order XI Rule 14 then sone pe suhaga.

(9) The cases can be won even before the limitation for DEFAMATION ends.

aturchatur@yahoo.com

Source of Order XI Rule 1:- http://www.orderxirule1.blogspot.com

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

SOME9

Can someone post second appeal format also as RTI Consultant Delhi site has a lot of info but I am unable to find the one that fits my exact needs. If someone has used & got results too then kindly share.

aturchatur

USE RTI IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER (for RTI Activists only)

Friends, I wanted to share this after few months but since fasgaya498amain brother has asked hence let me share the new secret strategy that I have developed. Let me discuss it here itself instead of whispering in the ears so mass suffererers/victims of false cases can learn.

Traditional Approach:-

Step 1:- RTI

Step 2:- FA to FAA Step 3:- SA to CIC Step 4:- Writ in HC

This Traditional approach is still valid & works for almost 90% victims of false cases.

But if bribing & corruption is involved & you are not able to fetch desired results, then I have developed a new strategy as follows:-

Aturchatur Approach:-

Step 1:- RTI

Step 2:- RTI

Step 3:- RTI .....

Step N:- RTI

If they are NOT giving you information & you know that they have defaulted & YOU ALSO KNOW THAT THEY WILL DEFAULT AGAIN & AGAIN, only then follow this approach.

Now, learn the next steps:-

Since, they are again & again defaulting despite citations & judgments used by you within RTI (assuming you used correct judgments), then keep collecting RTI RESPONSES & follow silent approach as if you have no idea about first appeal etc.

NEXT STEP:- When you have collected enough mistakes by them then you have these options viz.,

(A) Writ in HC

(B ) C P A ct p l a i n t

Thanks & Regards

Atur Chatur

A 498a Victim - cum - RTI Activist

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

TEP Guru Srinivasbr - Follow his footsteps fellow victims

srinivas wrote:

I gave these list of Docs as evidences in my TEP against FIL: All got legally through RTI.

1 Copy of previous "Tax Evasion Petition" complaint dated XXXXXX

2 Copy of BBMP notice with reference no XXXXXX dated XXXX(Prooving that he runs a Hotel without Licenses)

3 PAN Card copy of Mr.FIL bearing PAN no: AEXXXXXXXXN

4 Copy of Sanctioned Plan bearing LP no:XXX/XX-XX dated XX/XX/XXXX

5 Actual Photographs of the Property

6 Copy of ownership proof bearing New PID no: XX-XXX/X 7 Property Tax paid information for New PID no: XX-XXX/X

8 Tax paid details from Municipal Department, AREA NAME

9 Receipt for the year 2013-2014 from BBMP

10 Tender agreement B/W GOVT DEPT and M/S FIL's FIRM(Bills paid for more than 22lakhs, may have been concealed from IT n ST)

11 Vijaya Bank, Statement of M/S FIL's FIRM bearing A/C no: 1XXXXXXXXXXX(Transfered money to his son's A/C from a current a/c which needs explanation)

12 SBM, statement of Mr.FIL, bearing A/c no: 1XXXXXXXXXXX(Transfered money to his son's A/C from a current a/c which needs explanation)

13 SBM, statement of Mr.BIL, bearing A/c no: 1XXXXXXXXXXX(Huge transaction, no source of income specified)

14 B-Extract from RTO, Central for the Vehicle KA-XX XX XXXX(proves that they bought car in full-cash)

15 Gold & Silver articles Purchase Receipts numbered 26 to 47

IT inspector sent for asking for their statement and proofs for all these things, now in- laws are running behind IT dept.

Srini

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

NO Proclaimed Offender if 498a FIR is ON

Helpful for NRI's & Others

SOME3 wrote:

Coutesy SOME2; posted after collecting this from another thread

Do U know 498A Accused cant be declared Proclaimed Offender

Following is the Judgement:

=====================

An FIR was registered U/S Sections 279 and 337 IPC, which was not there under section 4 of 82 and hence quashed. The same judgement can be used for challenging P.O. declared under any section which is not there under section 4 of crpc 82. Note that 498A also, doesn’t fall under that section of 82. So technically P.O. should not be declared if any FIR is filed under section 498A.

------------------------

CWP No.13842 of 2010

Satinder Singh Vs. The State of U.T., Chandigarh and another

Present: Mr.Vivek Singla, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Sanjay Kaushal, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms.Smriti Dhir, Advocate for U.T., Chandigarh.

***

Permod Kohli, J. (Oral)

Petitioner is an accused in FIR No.177, dated 15.8.2002, under Sections 279 and 337 IPC, registered at Police Station Sector 19, Chandigarh.

Admittedly, the petitioner did not appear before the trial Court for considerable period and the trial Court was constrained to issue notice under Section 82 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. It appears that on the basis of

the report of constable serving the notice, petitioner has been declared proclaimed offender by passing order dated 1.5.2008.

The petitioner has challenged the notice as well as the order passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Chandigarh in this petition.

The only contention raised by learned counsel for the petitioner is that the Magistrate could not have declared the petitioner as proclaimed offender as he is not accused of any of offences specified under sub section 4 of Section 82 Cr.P.C. and as such he could be declared proclaimed offender.

So far as the order declaring the petitioner otherwise as proclaimed offender is concerned, the same is in contravention to sub section 4 Section 82 Cr.P.C and thus liable to be quashed.

I order, accordingly

In so far as the proclamation to declare the petitioner as a proclaimed person is concerned, the petitioner may surrender before the Magistrate and the Magistrate will proceed in accordance with law. Petition disposed of in view of the above directions.

(Permod Kohli)

Judge

11.08.2010

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

How to get my proofs recorded by police in CS

aturchatur wrote:

How to ensure Fair Investigation while making CS

to ensure that those proofs in your favor get recorded loop the IO, SHO, DCP & PHQ in a single letter (paper tiger)

letter to SHO

copy to IO

copy to DCP

copy to PHQ

(1) then same day goto first SHO & give him first two copies & get receiving (diary number) hand to hand.

(2) then same day after above step goto DCP & get stamp & sign.

(3) then same day after above steps goto PHQ & get stamp & sign.

then after three working days goto DCP & get diary number recorded by them on the (2 ) a b o ve .

then after four working days goto PHQ & get diary number recorded by them on the (3) a b o ve .

Now, if in next CS if that is not recorded then that entails departmental action against the IO thru PHQ. On that basis you can do the following:-

(1) Complaint to CP PHQ for non-compliance

(2) Complaint to Vigilance CP PHQ or at lower level you can also complaint to CB CID

(3) Contempt of Court complaint to concerned judge or MM citing SC Judgment of Jan'2014 against IO

That's it!!! So Simple!!! So Fast!!!

What to do after CS – Study the post below with the heading:-

Source:- CHARGE SHEET Expedition & FAIR INVESTIGATION before CS !!!

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

SOME5

thanks sir, this is exactly what i was looking for.

aturchatur

WHEN I APPLY FOR QUASH IN HC , POLICE COMES UP WITH CHARGE SHEET

Friends, there is a technique to come out of this trauma.

State/IO will try to get your quash petition rejected.

If you have many many proofs/ evidences to prove your innocence then follow these steps:-

Step 0:- I am assuming that there have been at least 6 months & no CS yet filed by cops.

Step 1:- Keep your Quash Petition ready with all proofs.

Step 2:- Give those proofs to IO & SHO & DCP & PHQ as suggested above at my above post:-

with a request to use these proofs within CS or 'B' Report as those will prove your innocence.

Step 3:- I am now assuming that IO can't do all the investigation etc in mere 15 days as u have many proofs.

Step 4:- Apply for Quash after 15 days from doing those steps above.

Step 5:- Be ready for arguments if IO comes with CS at HC and ask them did you went to this hospital, that location, that witness, verified this that document etc etc etc etc.

Step 6:- Be ready with Jan'2014 SC Judgment regarding action against IO, also July'2014 judgment, also go through above posted Perjury against Dirty Cops (just a quick go through)

NOTE:- whenever the IO is present in front of you then you can raise your questions as follows:-

(1) did you take into consideration this that X, Y, bla bla for which proofs were attached by me.

(2) did you went to this that, bla bla hospital & took their statements etc.

Remember:- This will give you just an extra point. Quash will happen on law points mainly. Go through Bhajan Lal judgment by SC also if you are fighting Party-in-Person.

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

SOME3

aturchatur sir, i am an NRI, my wife left home & she is asking huge amount as extortion through caw & thereafter FIR against me & my parents & they are worried in India. Can you pls help me get this case quashed from High Court ?

SOME4

can anyone suggest some quash tips

aturchatur

friends, please PM me the details of your case & write heading quash498 or quash dv. aturchatur@yahoo.com

Quash of Some Sections of FIR only

aturchatur wrote:

Best Wishes SOME5, kindly go ahead with quash. Use the term "no prima facie case is made out"

Remember that, there are three stages/ three options to have sections quashed/ or to have a case quashed viz.,

(A) Quash of FIR

(B) Quash of CS

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

SOME8

aturchatur sir

hve seen many valuable posts of yours in the forum.

hve sent u a pm for guidence

aturchatur

Dear SOME8, I have sent you PM with the reply

aturchatur@yahoo.com

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

Husband Filed Civil Suit but Wife NOT filing WS

IN THE COURT OF JFC, Rohini, Delhi

H u sb a n d

V e rsu s

Wife

A p p lic a t io n t o s t r ik e - o f f t h e d e f e n s e u n d e r O r d e r X V R u le 5 o f th e C P C

Most respectfully Showeth,

1) That the above noted petition filed on XYZ date and the respondent appeared on dated ABC date through her counsel. The time for filing the written reply is 30days according to CPC. But till today the respondent has not filed her reply of the petition. It is pertinent to mention here that the respondent received summons on PQR date.

2) That the reply of the respondent is not filed till today without any reason or without the permission of this Hon'ble Court.

3) That now the defense of the respondent should be struck off in accordance with the Order XV Rule 5 of the CPC.

PR A YER

It is therefore prayed with folded hands that this application may kindly be allowed and the defense of the respondent/s may kindly be struck-off in the interest of justice.

Delhi

Dated . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Applicant

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

NINDAK

aturchatur wrote:

@ SOME1 brother, Nindak are everywhere. Most of us neglect them. That is one of the biggest mistake one does. They are the ones who correct our mistakes. They are the ones who make us succeed in life.

@ SOME2, SOME3, SOME4, friends, et al:- "NINDAK SACHA SATHI HOTA HAI"

because he is the one who puts deep into our mind when something is wrong. He sometimes yell at you. Abuses you, But if one looks at it positively then he is actually the one who guides you, candles you, shows you the way.

A Nindak is infact the pain taker.

A Nindak is the experienced fellow.

A Nindak puts into your mind those things which your friends, family or even god is sometimes unable to.

If you want to win, then you need to take a nindak along with you.

Nindak's invited.

N i n d a i s a d vi se d . . .

SOME5 wrote:

@ Aturchatur

agree on nindak.

it can be you fighting with youself to make a decision, your parents, brthers sisters etc who fight with you, scold you that becouse of u we r in this mess but after 15 min come by your side and tell you " lets fight it up togather till the end"

They can be seniors helping you fight, giving suggestions and inspirations

@ Aturchatur

I h a ve g o t yo u r p o i n t re g a rd i n g n i n d a k b u t ca n yo u sh a re w h a t yo u re a d a b t n i n d a k o n Internet

re g a rd s

SOME6 wrote:

N in d a k n iy a r e r a k h iy e , A n g a n k u t I c h a w a i, B in p a n i s a b u n b in a , n ir m a l k a r e s u b h a iy

Kabir says that one should keep his critic close to him. One should even give him a cottage in the Angan of ones house, because he will clean our nature without soap and water

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

PER J U R Y

(1) Perjury explained very easily by Anindya here:-

http://zodiac498.blogspot.in/2012/11/perjury-us-340-crpc-fight-back-tool-for.html?showComment=1409147819741#c7828881518561012528

(2) Mr. D Arun Kumar gave valuable tips here :-

http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/Family-Law-Vs-Perjury-a-quot-aam-adami-s-quot-take--23513.asp#.U_35gJzWJky

(3) Proforma / Sample by bharatchugh & 498agladiator :-

http://bharatchugh.wordpress.com/2012/08/24/sampledraft-s-340-crpc-application-for-perjury/

(4) Read this article also (re: Jessica Lall Murder Case) : Perjury

http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2013-12-23/news/45510412_1_shayan-munshi-

two-gun-theory-murder-case

SOME1:- Perjury is made as an application & not as a complaint. Hon'ble court will take cognizance & then court itself will be the complainant as it is fraud on court.

SOME2:- Perjury needs to be filed at first available opportunity. Otherwise, if other party files apology before your application (re: condonation of perjury) then you cannot file perjury. Hence, BHAI LOG KRIPYA KAR K PERJURY LAGANE K LIYE TATPAR RAHEN. Jaise hi kuchh valid mile, file the perjury as you know what mananniye mahatma gandhi ji ne kaha tha. . . . . . . . . . lol & enjoy the fight against false cases.

AturChatur:- http://www.perjury340.blogspot.com

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

Catch False Allegations of Wife - Order XI CPC & CrPC 91

May'2014

SOME12 wrote:

Dear aturchatur

Im ispired by u....can u message me ur number so that i can discuss my xase with u...

Also, can u share the benefits you got of Order XI...PLZ SHARE

aturchatur wrote:

welcome SOME12, It is a powerful tool. It might be used by those with ill motives. This is a n u n u se d p ro vi si o n . I h v P M u .

aturchatur@yahoo.com

Other tools to use viz.,

Order VII Rule 11 if she has NO CAUSE OF ACTION against you & you can prove that,

Order VII Rule 11 will end all false cases on u in one instance if used effectively.

Order X can be applied along with Order VII rule 11

Order X can be referred as a double blow on those who file false cases

Order VII Rule 11 needs to be used effectively instead of simple application, only then it will deliver results with certainty. Perjury u/s 340 r/w 195(2).

All these needs to be filed along with WS itself with rigorous arguments only then it is bound to succeed. Your pleader must be able to handle this issue & NOT misguide you .

instead of phone, if you can pls discuss thru my email aturchatur@yahoo.com that will be great because whenever I have time in a day I can reply to the max possible based u p o n m y kn o w l e d g e .

F R IE N D S & E X P E R T S M Y C r P C 9 1 A G A IN S T P O L IC E IS A L M O S T R E A D Y ! ! !

But people are discouraging me not to go against police, nothing will benefit Crpc91 against police bla bla. I will post it asap for all of you to learn with.

coolniranjan wrote:

"ONLY YOU KNOW THE MERITS OF THE CASE & ONLY YOU CAN HANDLE IT.

Never ask lawyer to sail u through."

ONE SHOULD BE MASTER OF IT OWN SHIP RATHER THAN GIVING IN HANDS OF SOMEONE ELSE!

Eg: Titanic, the captain was professional though it sank the ship.

Doing great job atur, soon u'll become a preacher from a Teacher!

U r exploiting law as per yr whim n fancies, great job bro!!

co o l n i ra n j a n wrote:

chutad laal kar do ya karwa lo

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

Atur Chatur's Small Success Story - Part I

Jul'2014

aturchatur wrote:

M a h a t m a G a n d h i J i Z IN D A B A A D ! ! !

My dear friend SOME1 & Others, "My wife filed Divorce. I filed on very first date WS+Annexures+Perjury+VII,11+X. Now, next date also wife absent, her lawyer was paseena paseena as he is their family friend & he spoke EXAM EXAM the same way tulsidas when illiterate spoke UTAR UTAR on seeing a camel."

Ab baat samajh mein aayee. Ki Chunki maine perjury file kar k yudh ka reply/aaghaz kiya that's why they are now fearing ki agar exam hai uske agar uske lawyer ne bola aur maine vo order copy nikaal kar perjury laga di ya unko poochh liya ki affidavit par bolo ki exam tha wife ka & then OR asked them to write it on affidavit, & then I filed perjury then VO TO GAYE in unclean hands, abuse of law, perjury, etc etc etc etc.

NOW, SOME1 Bhai, before that I myself use my mind, you are requested to use your CONSTRUCTIVE / DESTRUCTIVE MIND & tell me how to achieve this. If there is name of this application in criminal court then tell me section.

If there is CPC Order no. & Rule no. then also tell me, OTHERWISE MUJHE CPC & C rP C p a d h n a p a d e g a . . . . . . l o l

Pls tell the strategy very soon. My friend SOME12 is also waiting on email for this strategy to be shared. Pls devise within max 20 hours from now.

Thanks & Regards

Atur Chatur

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

Atur Chatur's Small Success Story - Part II

Mid Year 2014

aturchatur wrote:

I have myself fled case on dirty cops (i.e., corrupt police who were part of criminal co n sp i ra cy a g a i n st m e ).

I then applied CrPC 91 which was an innovation & even MM was in a fix that it works from complainant side or not, but I pursued the CrPC 91 vehemently. The result:- Opp party i.e., IO is NOT attending court despite summons which is also a contempt.

But instead of filing contempt, I am concentrating on getting CrPC 91 replied by them.

Once they reply to it then I will have a lot of contempt proofs against them at various levels.

My energy should not be wasted in all this. Every1 told me this. I agreed & took the advise. HOW? i.e., instead of thinking about that case day & night, I just concentrate on that case only one day before date like one prepares a day before exam by reading KUNJI (i.e., King's Champion)

The opp g@ng is also playing dirty tactics by doing something just one day before the date but since I am fighting PIP hence I include a favorable reply to their dirty tactics thru court

@DWH, if you want to go ahead then go ahead in that case, but do NOT dare to look back once you go ahead, and remember you need to yourself saill thru it.

NOTE:- Every police personnel is not corrupt. File case only if something wrong has been done to you & u can prove that.

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

Adultery or Incest or Male

SOME1:- Adultery, Incest, or Male Member preferably Jijaji of Wife (or Boyfriend) out of these are usually the instigators for a woman filing false 498a & other false cases.

Friends, PM me if anyone has done research on this issue. aturchatur@yahoo.com

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

Wife Arrested for Female Foeticide

SOME1:- Wife says in CAW that my abortion done after 6 months pregnancy. Husband denies in WS as not in his knowledge. But Husband files case on Wife & unknown doctor that she did abortion of 6 months pregnancy & using CrPC 91 asks to bring documents in relation thereto. Using M Power wife gets arrested as it's an offence with 10 year imprisonment.

SOME2:- This is a counter. And counters fail.

SOME3:- It is matter of murder so not treated as counter. Example:- like she says dowry given & you said that not asked or taken hence she is liable but seldom gets punished due to 7(1) exemption/immunity to wives. But in abortion case, there is no exemption as in CAW she herself admits that 6 months pregnancy was terminated but husband says no. Now if husband files case on wife then she is most likely to be convicted as husband didn't knew whether wife was pregnant or not as she might have not disclosed or extra-marital etc etc bla bla. But now thru CAW plaint husband comes to know about it hence he can very well file case on it. Wife now has to prove that husband/inlaws got pregnancy terminated to get them arrested. And she also has to prove no such thing happened to get herself acquitted. Or she needs to compromise with husband / plea bargaining to close all cases i.e., settlement.

SOME4:- POCSO Act & Female Foeticide Act, PNDT Act, Child Abuse Act, Children related Crimes Act & Other Acts made for Children's Protection have an over-riding act & These will NEVER be termed as Counter Attacks.

Murder of Unborn Child (espl Murder of Unborm Girl Child) will mean arrest of Wife definitely if pursued vehemently.

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

ONE PAGE CRIMINAL APPLICATION

SOME1:- Criminal Application should be short & to the point.

SOME2:- File Crl case on the basis of ONE SHORT ALLEGATION.

SOME3:- Do not put explananations etc in a Crl Petition. Put Crl Petition in Lower Court first or better a FIR route

SOME4:- Keep judgments, Citations, Explanations in bag. Do NOT open the bag at all. Let MM/Judge/Opp.G@ng/her'lawyer jhakjhod you at such a level that your armour start by them NOT by you.

ATURCHATUR:- I agree with SOME1,SOME2,SOME3,SOME4.

SOME5:- Eent ka jawab pathar & Loha hi lohe ko kat ta hai

Atur Chatur's Noble Thoughts in relation to Non-Violence are as follows:-

Write very very very very very very very long WS but do NOT put any single allegation in it.

FORUMLA:- She threw the rope on you. Just pull it. Pull her words. And gift her back her own words. And write in such a way that, "You Don't Know due to want of knowledge. But since she said that, hence hmmmm, isi ne kiya hoga. me lord, she herself admits this/that bla bla fact. I don't agree as NOT in my knowledge at all. But since it was her duty to inform the respective authorities & she didn't despite being an educated lady who knows all her rights. Hence, Hmmmmm, Yahi hai Vo. Isi ne kiya hai, Pakdo is ko plzzzzzzz !!!" Mahatma Gandhi Ji's principle of Non-Violence are still valid.

Now I came to know why Mahatma Gandhi is termed as Father of Nation i.e., BAPU.

Long live dear Mahatma Gandhi Ji. At least some points I love about you if not all.

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

CHANAKYA NEETI

SOME1:- Bhay se hi preet hoti hai

SOME2:- Wife wants to come back to her husband but how.

SOME3:- This is how?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CEd9HVt6jyQ

SOME4:- Let's unite the families no matter what. . . . lol about this video

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

SAARAANSH

Saaraansh safalta ki kunji hoti hai.

Summary is the key to success.

Saaraansh:- CrPC91 & RTI & Perjury

That's it !!! So Simple !!! So Fast !!!

Thanks & Regards

Pati Chanakya Neeti Aap Beeti

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

BAND-AID FORMULA

This is also known as DHAKKAN FORMULA or PUT-A-DOT FORMULA.

Remember that, PROCASTRINATION is the key to success so far as WRITING/STATEMENT giving is concerned. You should procastrinate many things,

But so far as overall strategy to fight false cases on you is concerned, you need NOT procastrinate & instead use BAND-AID FORMULA.

i.e., Zakhm ko badne se pehle hi yani chot lagte hi ya chot lagne se pehle ya jab pata chale ki chot lag gayi hai etc BAND-AID laga kar theek kar lo instead of letting the Zakhm increase & later on use Betadine or Soframycine.

Examples of Band-Aid Formula are start using RTI's, then shift to CrPC 91, then PERJURY asap .

In a famous judgment related to unclean hands SC has also directed HC & LC to NIP-IN-THE- BUD whenever a complaint is found to be vexatious.

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

Maintenance to Parents means less maintenance to Wifey

SOME1 wrote:

Proper use of Sec 125(1)

For people with high Salary who are expecting Maint cases and cannot show less Salary or afraid that the employer might be asked by court to cut Maint from Salary. Ask your parents to put a suit for Maint u/s 125 (1). Yes 125 (1) can also be used by parents. Let them ask 35% of your take home Salary (or more as need be) for monthly expenses incl medical needs in old age. Let them put a suit and ask for fast dates as for senior citizens.

You go to court on first date and apologize to parents in court and agree to the amount and have it ordered in the first date itself and let the case be decided in their favor.

Leave only 10K for yourself after this. Let wife go to any court anywhere in !ndia but she will not get a penny more than 3K if case fought properly. The max the judg3 can give her even if he/she is her relative is 5K. If any amount more than 5K is given you can approach HC and the amount will be limited to a low sum.

After this sit and relax and enjoy your Salary. B!tch apni puri takat bhi laga degi to $he will not be able to milk you to p@y for her case expenses beyond limit.

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

SOCIAL STIGMA (WOMEN) !!!

At what stage it becomes difficult or most of the times almost impossible to re-unite the once so much in love these love birds who might still want to live together but unable to.

Source:- SOCIAL STIGMA (WOMEN) !!! . . . . . . . . below post

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

Perjury - Sworn Affidavit

Those things which are said/spoken within sworn affidavit constitute the strongest part of p e rj u ry.

Such perjurious act doesn't merit condonation even if wife applies for condonation of perjury

as follows:-

Source:- SOCIAL STIGMA (WOMEN) !!! . . . . . . . . below post

& any rejoinder in regard thereof must be challenged vehemently through amendment at least i.e., one must challenge it within very next & first available opportunity. Few Perjury Judgments which can be used or quoted.

Source:- http://www.perjury340.blogspot.com

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

Atur Chatur's Small Success Story - Part III

Jun'2014

SOME1 got success in an innovation i.e., CrPC 91 against the dirty cops.

EVERY1 said that CrPC 91 is NOT applicable against dirty cops but SOME2 studied law provisions little in-depth & found out that it can be done against dirty cops & SOME1 pursued vehemently & got small success therein.

coolniranjan wrote:

i am not saying u paid money to officers, the officers try to extort money legally from you in the garb of 498A.

Your version is like this-"Police officers in connivance with your wife demanding 10 lac rupees in lieu of settlement of cases otherwise you have to see JAIL soon.., Officers at police station instigated your wife against you and your family and misguided her to file false 498A ....in that way your husband will cough up money. This is the brilliant stroke at your end.

Police guys need to save their asses, if case is registered against them. They need to prove that they were not demanding rs 10 lac or they did not force your wife/misguided h e r.

A guy wid a username:-aturchatur did the same. Chutad laal kar di police waalon ki usne.

consult him , he is a good stratergist. His case is registered against the SHO. He will guide you better.

these cases are not like that you assume or think, these are always the reverse of what yo u a re a n a l ysi n g .

Secondly, agar tum corruption ke charge mein fasonge to jisne corruption ka maal khaya wo anti-corruption mein mukaddaama jhelega.

Tumne rishwat di nahin, usne maangi same as ladki ke baap ne dowry di nahin par tumne maangi. (i hope point is clear)

You have two options:

1. either attack or become a sordid tale of another victim.

karam karo beta karam se hi phal milega, tumhari biwi kar rahi hai tum bhi karo.

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

RTI ACTIVISM

aturchatur wrote:

YES SOME1, This is a utter violation.

Mr. SOME2, SOME3, SOME4, Other fighters & false arrest victims, kindly learn the procedure as follows:-

RTI Activism against / after False Arrest by Dirty Cops

(1) Ask whether Arnesh Kumar Judgment was followed in this FIR no. . . . . . . ?

(A) If PIO reply is:- It was done on behest of wife.

Then file second RTI quoting above PIO response, whether, Justice Dhingra 2010 Judgment by Delhi HC was followed ?

Source:- http://498a.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=13355&p=93162#p93162

RESULT:- They are now in contempt of both above judgments.

(B) If PIO reply that the arrest was done prior to Arnesh Kumar Judgment.

Then file a complaint to PHQ that section 41 was in effect since many decades &Arnesh Kumar Judgment only provides punishment for Contempt.

(C) File RTI after 15 days of that complaint letter to PHQ & ask for ATR (Action Taken Report). They will be bound to close your case. If NOT then at least will be highly pressurized to present 'B' Report or other tactics to save their dirty deed. (Post FIR &Pre CS Stage)

(D) If CS is already presented then you can go for PERJURY AGAINST DIRTY COPS also

http://perjuryagainstcops.blogspot.com

Write very short half page RTI's brother. And to the point RTI as advised above else they will find ways to get out of it. This is like CLOSE PROBE which often police/lawyer does with any accused. Example:- Haan ya Naa

Example:- Whether followed CrPC 41 or NOT in this case no, FIR no., Diary number??.

That's it !!!

I myself became as RTI Activist around one year back. You all are also encouraged to become RTI Activists for your own causes at least.

Remember the 3 tools viz., RTI, CrPC 91 and Perjury.

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

SOME1

brother atur

tomorrow i am planning to file rti first appeal for the reply so far provided by mha and phq in my ca se .

on my detailed rti (i had sent an advance copy to u also), mha ut division have just said that all the advisoryes are in their website. they are silent on teh officer to whom complaint to be made if violation etc. and some other points on the delhi police front, the phq have just forwarded my application to dcp east and spuwc without providing information available with them.

so will file first appeal after bringing the papers from home. seek advice and guidance.

aturchatur

RTI Activists - Be in Touch with me thru below link

@ SOME1, I have replied your query at below link:-

aturchatur@yahoo.com

@ SOME1, other fighters, pls ask RTI Activism related questions related to Dirty Cops, FIR, CS at the thread named :-

CHARGE SHEET Expedition & FAIR INVESTIGATION before CS !!!

Source:- CHARGE SHEET Expedition & FAIR INVESTIGATION before CS !!!

See below thread named CHARGE SHEET Expedition & FAIR INVESTIGATION before CS !!!

or feel free to PM me.

aturchatur@yahoo.com

Thanks & Regards

Atur Chatur

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

Use CrPC 91 against Dirty Cops

@ SOME1, In this post of yours, you have written headline as "Getting my wife arrested- Help needed in Burdwan (WB)" and I have also read your post, "Summons issued against my lovely wife-u/s 406 & 420"

SOME3 wrote:

Hi,

Arrest warrants will be issued against my wife in two different non bailable icases in this month. Since it is an inter state matter, the warrant will go through the SP office in Burdwan (WB) to the concerned police station. I have been told by my lawyer that I have to contact some one in the SP office to make sure that the warrant is forwarded to the police station of my wife.

If any of us have any such contacts, kindly PM me. I would be very grateful to you. It is very important to bring her on the negotiating table.

Thanks..

Suggestion by Atur Chatur is to use CrPC 91 as follows:-

Use CrPC 91 on Police(SHO) & FWD a copy to DCP & PHQ & Respective Court.

Same day, forward the copy to respective court who issued summons. Paste Rs.5 court stamp on it.

FORMULA:- SHO, DCP, PHQ get looped here within & under the COURT now. What you need to ask from Police, You already know it better.

For fellow fighters let me share this helpful link so EVERY1 can develop their own strategies. Here is the link:-

http://SocialStigma999.blogspot.com

Many more Strategies/Counters/RTI-CrPC91-Perjury can be found by fellow fighters at

SOCIAL STIGMA. Check this link:-

http://SocialStigma.in

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

Is Perjury a Waste of Time ?

aturchatur wrote:

Is Perjury a Waste of Time ?

SOME1 wrote:

Family courts are extremily biased towards women. It will be a himalian task to take forward prejury case. you will end up frustrated with poor knowledge lawyer, insensitive courts and judges and end up wasting your time in this already clogged up court system which rarely delivers justice. Best way is to defend your self and concentrate on your carrier. Try to minimize your court visits.

SOME1

aturchatur wrote (in the year 2014):

Thanks SOME3,

I am relying on three things viz., RTI, CRpc 91 & Perjury to break her false cases. I am NOT using any lawyer.

I am doing it all alone myself PIP i.e., Party-in-Person.

I of course want to get out of this mess & minimize court visits but on the same hand it is also important to break the falsity of these cases which can be done thru above three tools.

WHAT I WANT IS :-

(a) That the MM court itself should try Perjury & hear it before MAIN PLAINT under DV.

(b) If MM doesn't allow it or keeps it on side for later referral then goto Sessions (Perjury Revision) without asking for STAY on Main Case because till this application is with Sessions then the file is already with Sessions so it is automatically or at least understandable stay. I myself can argue vehemently on that basis if need be.

but remember that you should move at upper level only after exhausting all available opportunities at the lower level.

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

Perjury u/s 340 r/w section 312 IPC

I discussed with SOME1 regarding "Wife arrested for Female Foeticide" posted above at http://www.SocialStigma.in

Friends, I have been advised by SOME1 that, if husband files case of 312 IPC on wife then it might backfire.But, I strongly feel that, It won't backfire so far as husband uses her & only her statement only. But that NINDAK (SOME1) has helped me devise a new strategy. I am sharing for benefit et al as follows:-

Step 1:- Using CrPC 91 ask wife to present documents in her possession. She will of course come back with some weird reply as husband knows that nothing as such happened. Now, you have legal proof that this is a wild allegation. This is now proved in court of law that she used this wild allegation with a criminal intent to misled the process of justice which is an abuse of the process of law.

NINDAK:- This matter will be put to trial now. So for speedy & effectiveness of this perjury, It is pertinent to mention some more wild allegations which have been spoken by her with an intent (civil or criminal intent) to misled the court thereby to deliver (misdeliver) some justice (injustice) based on those facts.

Step 2:- Add those perjurious facts which have been proved (or which can be easily proved from her statements (mis-statements) itself.

Step 3:- Now, You pursue Perjury PIP vehemently from MM, Sessions, HC to SC.

That's it !!! So Simple !!! So Fast !!!

NINDAK:- In above strategy, I myself acted as my own NINDAK. Friends, perjury experts, et al, pls PM me your inputs.

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

Passport Impounding of Wife after Criminal Case on her on True Grounds

SOME1 wrote:

I do not know about anyone else but my wife is in SOCIAL STIGMA after I filed 420 &406 cases against her. I informed her family and her three brother in laws about the case and how she ran away from home for my money and jewelry.

My sources tell me that they are very stressed and my wife regularly fights with her bhabhis. I will be sending arrest warrants against her in this months itself in both the cases provided the courts functions (magistrate are being transferred).

I will also be getting her passport impounded u/s 10(3)(e) of the passport act 1967.

Very few people successfully file counter cases against 498 A wife. People think that it is next to impossible to file counter cases against a 498 A wife. But it is not true. Yes it is not as easy as to file a false dowry case but with proper planning and evidence it is p o ssi b l e .

I not only filed cases against my wife but also helped two other victims to file non bailable cases against their wife and family.

I will discuss about one of those cases-

The guy got married and after two years of the marriage the wife conceived a baby.

During tests it was discovered that the wife is infected with a disease which is in chronic stage. The disease can be equated with aids but less deadly. The disease was also transferable as aids putting husbands life at risk if he continued with the conjugal life. He spoke to her parents to find out about the origin of the disease and he came to know that it has come from her family.

The disease was non curable. The boy was poorly advised by his lawyer and instead of filing for annulment of marriage, he filed for divorce on ground of disease and some other ground as suggested by his lawyer. The girl's side filed 498 A. He stood the ground and kept on fighting. He was on provisional bail and was under tremendous pressure from the other side.

He contacted me through one of his relatives whom I helped to secure bail. I advised him to file a criminal case against his wife and his family under various sections including 420 IPC. He will also get bail shortly because we will present his case in a proper manner.

I am confident that his wife and her parents will be arrested in next 3-6 months. They will face SOCIAL STIGMA.

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

MEDIA NEEDS TO TAKE THE RESPONSIBILITY

Media must take the responsibility for destroying the life & image of a SHO when a lady constable alleges such charges on him which appear to be vexatious.

In year 2014, a SHO from Punjab side was trapped into false cases by a colleague and the media went ahead to make the SHO (i.e., MAN) a culprit to sell their newspapers or increase TRP of their respective channels. Now, the women constable despite in police herself never complained it to other officers of police for many years and when relationship turned sour then she put allegation of rape or harassment or something similar.

In this regard, it is pertinent to mention here that, if a woman tries to file false rape charge on a married man then that man just has to prove that she either induced or seduced the husband to develop relationship with her despite knowing that he is a married man.

Or the husband can say that she consented to have sx with him and being herself an adult she is not barred from any law of the country to give her consrent in respect thereof. And further, she was very well aware before giving that consent that the boy/ man is a married man with a family so later on such lady can not say that she consented for sx as the man promised her to marry.

Remember that, it is very essential that a woman knows already that the man is married. And after that, no power on entire earth can trap that man in rape related charges in case he proves that she consented to have intercourse.

Now, if you can not prove that she consented to deveop relationship with you but you can prove that she already knew that the man was married before speeling with him then in that case, AFTER THOUGHT can help such man. For Instance:- if after 3 to 15 years of side by side relationship with a married man her behavior changes and the man wishes to leave such relationship then contacts with her should be totally finished and if for next 6-8 months no contacts are there and she thereafter files a rape charge or other allegations then it can be cut down through AFTER THOUGHT.

Further, if in a rarest of rare situation if neither such husband can prove consent nor such husband can prove that whether she knew already about the marital status of that man before giving her consent to marry then in that case only the wife of that husband can save him if she gives a statement that she met that lady before such relationship or immediately after some exchange of some phone calls and befoe that relationship and she even warned that lady to stay away from her husband but therefafter she developed relationship with that marrid man without his wife;s consent. But such dated allegation (write truth I advise) can only save the husband. If there is a phone exchange with a mobile issued with wife’s name to the mobile of that lady and even better if there is a video recording of such warning then that married man will not go to jail howsoever corrupt the system may be.

Media needs to take the responsibility and also should not show or encourage such false cases popularity enhancement as this destroys/ shatters the life of a man on whom such false case has been put. Let the courts do their work. And lets not put pressurize on the courts in a manner so as to punish the man. Let the trial be fair without media intervention. Lets pledge to not issue media fatwa against any man against whom only an allegation has been put.

Updated 2017 March end as follows:-

Rohtak Sisters false case proved in the court as told to me by a client. In 2014 I went to ROHTAK COURTS in the hon’ble court of Kriti Jain where this false case was tried. I had prepared a perjury application with around 10-12 sections and went to file perjury but due to my busy schedule I gave the copy to the boys and I told them to change their lawyer as women commission of the country are putting eye on their case. RESULT:- Around 6 months thereafter a friend/ fan of mine told me, “Sir, do you know a 200 page charge sheet has been prepared agains the rohtak sisters”. I was happy but could not check the updates. But recently in 2017 March end deepshikha’s (name changed) phone came to me who congratulated me about the success of rohtak sisters case and she was really happy because I helped her prepare DV against his bhabhi from his mother and also divorce for his brother and also criminal defamation for her mother with supported evidences, in her case even 354 IPC related sections were also invoked against her bhabhi’s brothers one of whom is a government servant and rohini court (archna sinha) even rejected their bail twice i.e., one before mediation and one after mediation. Cctv and video evidences which sh had or which I guided to their family had helped them.

Friends, give reference to ROHTAK SISTERS CASE & remind the police that they have the powers to file CS against the woman complainant for filing false case. This is very much possible. Mouth, hands, face wash kar k peechhe pad jayo to lodge FIR against your wife by catching her unrebuttable falsity with documentary evidences.

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

Charge Sheet can be Challenged/ Returned due to Lacunae

aturchatur wrote:

Charge Sheet Returned due to LACUNA

https://in.news.yahoo.com/court-returns-charge-sheet-against-amit-shah-

080211662.html

UP court returns charge sheet against Amit Shah

The magistrate returned the charge sheet with directions to police that the case should be re-investigated as there were many lacuna in the sections slapped on Shah.

The rejection left the Akhilesh Yadav government red-faced as the BJP state unit has alleged that the Samajwadi Party government added new sections - some serious and non-bailable - against Shah out of political vendetta.

Shah reportedly delivered the speedch April 4. He was then booked by police for breaching prohibitory orders under Section 144. He was at that time in charge of the BJP poll campaign in Uttar Pradesh.

Now, more Sections - 153(a), 295(a) and 505 of the Indian Penal Code - have been added to the charge sheet filed by Nai Mandi police of Muzaffarnagar.

Meanwhile, home department officials said police would will be asked to re-investigate the matter thoroughly and submit a new charge sheet..

SOME1 wrote:

Neta logo ka kanoon aam aadmi pe apply nahi hota

These are political moves

aturchatur wrote:

You are correct SOME1, that's why heading includes the terminology LACUNA.

Summary:- If any1 wants to raise questions on CS then it will be lacuna (i.e., the gaps) which one needs to concentrate on.

LACUNA are of Two Types viz.,

(A) that favors accused:- SOME1 uses M Power & get dirty cops leave some lacuna in CS so that accused can file for quash. This is practical one which was suggested to me by a lawyer some time back to which I said no as my complaint against dirty cops was already started & i wanted all my fight on ethics & contempt & standing circulars &guidelines etc.

(B) When there is NO lacuna using M power:- but SOME2 still finds such lacuna. for instance:- FIR starts from 498/406/34. But in CS 313 is also added. Now, after getting CC of CS & annexed documents, the accused PIP/counsel finds that there are no proofs i.e., Lacuna, that can be way of fighting. Hope it clarifies.

Thanks & Regards

Atur Chatur

Also check:-

http://www.lacunaeinthechargesheet.blogspot.com

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

Order XI Judgment

Sh. Shravan Kumar Gupta vs Sh. Tara Chand Gupta & Ors on 12 September, 2013

D e l h i H i g h C o u rt

Source:- http://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/28656936/

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

Atur Chatur's Small Success Story - Part IV

Sep'2014

aturchatur wrote:

Dear SOME1 Bro:

I went alone on my last DV date. The wife & her lawyer were NOT present, but she sent a proxy lawyer. Her proxy lawyer told the MM that protection officer report needs to be waited so pls hold the case.

MM turned the papers & shouted on proxy that PO report (DIR) is already there in file for last 7 months. MM then gave the next date with warning for petitioner to be present in next meeting else case will be dismissed.

I took CrPC 91 with me, Mediation Application with me and Also Perjury Application with me but seeing their fights among themselves I just kept shut & watched the scene in an innocent manner & just took next date & came back without forwarding any of those applications.

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

Atur Chatur's Small Success Story - Part V

Sep'2014

L@wyer's have formed a Lobby & started working against Atur Chatur.

That is one of biggest achivement's of Atur Chatur because within 5 months of starting this thread called SOCIAL STIGMA, Atur Chatur has reached almost 65,000 audiences who regularly read the posts.

And due to this L@wyer's Collective's have formed Lobby's against Atur Chatur within this forum.

Atur Chatur's Two Motives:-

(A) To develop a l@wyer free society, and

(B) To save & unite at least those families where cldren are involved or at least where there is some hope of settlement. L@wyer's lobby seem to be unhappy & don't want families to unite because in that case their ATM Machines (i.e., their clients) will NOT be their long term clients.

NINDAK:- Only save those families where there is at least some hope of settlement. And make full efforts to save those families where clren/issues are born out of the wed-lock.

FROSTIK:- This is a list of l@wyers who want to discourage & have formed a lobby against Atur Chatur.

Source:- below post with the heading NINDAK also also check SOCIAL STIGMA (WOMEN) !!!

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

RTI to ask FIR done or NOT when CAW doesn't apprise you next date of reconciliation

SOME1 wrote:

in the absence of this recommendation how to get this information that CAW is sending the case for FIR ??

aturchatur wrote:

Simply write a RTI to DCP concerned that:-

PIO , DCP

NWD , Delhi-110052

Sub:- Request for information u/s 6 & 7 of RTI Act'2005.

(1) Kindly supply Certified copy of all documents associated with this CAW Case number or CAW Diary number XYZ.

(2) Kindly supply the certified copy of ACP & DCP permissions & orders in respect to the above mentioned number & status of the case number.

The Postal Order no. ____________________ of Rs. 10 dated ______________ is attached herewith as requisite fee under RTI Act 2005. The requested information shall be supplied free of charge in case the same could not be supplied within the time limit prescribed under the RTI Act 2005. Kindly provide the information to each point separately. Please do not club the information to the points even if the information is repeated. The requisite information shall be furnished within 48 hrs as per section 7(1) of RTI Act 2005 as the information also concerns life and liberty as applicable vide Article 21 of Constitution of India r/w judgment in case of Sheela Barse V. State of Maharashtra AIR 1983 SC 378.

(Pati Chanakya Neeti Aap Beeti)

C/o A-35/155, GF, Sector-7, Rohini, Delhi-110085

aturchatur@yahoo.com

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

RTI Activists - You can file RTI's Anonymously

RTI Activists are now allowed to use post box number in filing RTI which will enable contact of a user with the authority without revealing personal details of the information seeker.

You do not need to worry about your safety when Post Box is there.

Also you do not need anybody else to file RTI on your behalf.

DoPT in its circular dated 8th January 2014 has forwarded the circular to all ministries to allow the use of Post Box as a valid communication medium between an applicant and authority.

Source:- http://rti.cc/pub/2b2a486eadba.pdf

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

CrPC91 regarding Call data Record(CDR)

SOME1 wrote:

Below is the format to get call data record and cell info thru 91 CrPC.. It might not help ramesh421 but may help others who are searching for the same.

APPLICATION U/S 91 (CALL FOR RECORD ) OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

IN THE COURT OF  MAGISTRATE, AT ...

Crl.Misc.No. XX/XXXX

Between:

Smt. XXXXX . . . . . Petitioner

An d

XXXX . . . . . R e sp o n d e n t

APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 91 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE:

The respondent above named most respectfully submits as hereunder:

1. The petitioner has lied on oath before this Hon'ble court that she was harassed by the respondent after the marriage at his native place whereas the respondent was not there. The respondent also further submits that he went to Pune after the marriage and attending his duties since XX-XX-XXXX.

2. The respondent further submits that his mobile call data records with cell tower info for XX-XX-XXXX to XX-XX-XXXX will expose her false claims as she intentionally making false statements.

3. It is further submitted that as the petitioner has made false claims in her affidavit and if not proven wrong could put the respondent in a disadvantage position in this case.

PR AYER

WHEREFORE, the respondent in the above matter most respectfully prays that this Hon'ble court be pleased to direct XXX MOBILE SERVICE PROVIDER to provide CDR with Cell tower Information in the interest of Justice.

Place:

Partu-in-person

Date: XX-XX-XXXX

GOI, Min. of Communication regulation No. 10-21/2004-BS-II/TTSL/Delhi dated 14-11-2003 clause 41.17 states

The licensee shall maintain all commercial records with regard to the communications exchanged on the network. Such records shall be archieved for atleast one year for scrutiny by the Licensor for security reasons and may destroyed thereafter unless directed otherwise by the licensor.

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

PIP

SOME1 wrote:

I found something about atur chatur sir as follows:-

aturchatur wrote:

PARTY IN PERSON Examples

SOME2 wrote:

As have tried to give directions in the prior stage myself and the answer I got was "Tum vakil ho ya mein? Tumhe zyaada pata ho toh apna case khud hi l a d l o m e ri kya za ru ra t h a i "

So according to my experience if we want to go ahead with lawyers it would be as per their knowledge a n d w a y o n l y.

Bro SOME2, you need to come out of this myth that if you hired a lawyer then you need to work as per his directions.

SOME2 wrote:

I also woul share my personal experience when I started defending pip i n m y ca se the result were amaising(with gods grace) which I never thought could come.

aturchatur wrote:

You yourself self-contradicted your views brother. See your own example above i.e., when u started defending your case yourself the results were a m a zi n g .

See below one more man who fought his case:-

PARTY IN PERSON

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XTj8DAMO70

I have NOT seen the whole movie but SOME3 told me that this man wins in the end fighting PIP.

Also read the above views of SOME4 brother within this thread as follows:-

SOME4 wrote:

Hai, I agree 100% to your view.

Those who got capacity to present the matter at court they have to do that. It will definitely give good results. I have done this partially and got the result also.

During the initial stage of the case most of them will be frustrated and our decisions may go wrong and also we may over react.

The moment husbands start presenting their case, the system will change. As far as I can I will support you.

FIGHT FOR WHAT YOU WANT

SOME5 wrote:

CONCLUSION:- All brothers, Try to fight PARTY IN PERSON or at least be an active participant.

I REPEAT:- Never blindly follow the advise of your/any lawyer of the world even if that lawyer is close relative else before having faith on you lawyer just watch the movie:- HADD KAR DEE AAPNE which is a classic example to open your eyes & present the dirty tactics of lawyers who may conniv with each other.

MY QUESTION TO ALL

If u have to fall in the pit then is it to good to yourself jump into it or bending in front of your lawyer with your back in front of his foot so you are at his mercy? EVERY1 knows what all things he can do if you blindly follow his advise.

SOME1 wrote:

i really like and want to appreciate this post

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

FORENSIC TEST

aturchatur wrote:

Forensic Jaanch of Call recordings at cross-examination

Yes, Forensic's can be done but let her deny or accept or even pretend. Take that fact on paper in writing thru CERTIFIED COPY.

After that apply for Forensic either private party somewhere around Rs.5,000 as SOME1 told me few days back. (These are discussions of the year 2014)

Yes, Originals need to be given OF COURSE YAAR (Common Sense)

And, It's located at Rohini, New Delhi (Near Jaipur Golden Hospital) if you are in Delhi else check the Internet.

You can also move an application to the concerned court itself regarding this with a mention that I am ready to bear expenses (if any). Usually there are no charges if the court allows as it is a Criminal Case (498a). In Civil Cases OF COURSE you will have to bear all the expenses of such nature.

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

POCSO

aturchatur wrote:

MANDATORY TO REPORT SEXUAL OFFENCES AGAINST CHILDREN

"any person who knows of an instance of child sexual abuse must report it to the police, and can face punitive action for not doing so"

- it's a new act

- it's an over-riding act

Source:- https://in.news.yahoo.com/should-you-blow-the-whistle-on-child-sexual- abuse-075503613.html

@ SOME1, you yourself are the one whom i am talking about above. it's good to see u coming to this topic immediately. since you have studied a lot about POCOSO so instead of me explaining you yourself carry on with this thread & post important points & if possible keep coming again & again with examples regarding how POCOSO can be used ethically in the fight against false cases.

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

Gifts or Dowry at time of Marriage or Engagement

SOME1 wrote:

I got engaged in August 2013 and got married in Dec 2013.

At the time of engagement my in-laws gave me 5.5 Lacks cash, In marriage we did not take a single thing from them.

At the time of engagement also we did not want to take that, however they forced us by saying that it is first occasion in their family after a long time and we should accept this.

Now I am getting threats from my wife and my in-laws for filing 498a.

It looks like they will make that 5.5 lacks amount given at the time of engagement as we demanded that and they have given it as dowry.

Please advice me what should I do. That amount is kept as it is, in the same currency given by them.

aturchatur wrote:

chusat ban mere bhai.

chust ban . . . active ban bhai

"jahan sach na chale vahan jhooth sahi"

"jahan haq na mile vahan loot sahi"

kya kisi ne dekha . koi witness tha.

koi written documentation tha.

agar tha to vo naqli tha ya dikhava tha. Ya agle din le gaye uske ghar wale.

darr mat bandhu

himmat rakh

aapni dhaun agge naa kar katvaan vaaste

FIGHT BACK DEAR FELLOW VICTIM !!!

Video dekh aur samajh jaa mere bhai & teach the fellow fighters some ways to reduce fear.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uZmf4-yw3GQ

Or if on that basis you want to file dp3 complaint u/s 156(3) CrPC r/w 200 then check my above post named application format/ eample of filingdp3. Most of the facts of your case match the dp3 scenario written above so kindly read that also. Also check the above funny video.

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

CROSS - Two Basic Ingredients

aturchatur wrote:

I will come up asap with one new thread regarding cross. I will include many live examples in that.

There will be two basis for CROSS viz.,

(A) No one in entitled to get benefits from his/her own wrongs, &

(B) Ignorance of law is NOT an excuse.

With these two points in mind I will try to include live examples & will also invite other

members, fighters & experts to pour their inputs in that. That will basically be a question-answer series.

And the motivation will also come from:-

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XTj8DAMO70

In above scene also notice, if fought vehemently then Order VII Rule 11 regarding, "NO CAUSE OF ACTION" can also form the basis to ask for dismissal of any false plaint against you. And one can ask to NIP-IN-THE-BUD:-

Source:- above post with the heading NIP-IN-THE-BUD

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

REQUEST FOR MEDIATION

Despite her perjurious accusations & shirking responsibilities i want to save my family & married life & thereby request that the mediation be conducted for amicable settlement.

It is hereby again re-iterated that undersigned is willing to save his marriage and family culture and is ready for any kind of efforts made through counseling even with the help of independent marriage counselors, psychologists at my own expenditure so that any kind of misunderstanding be cleared between the parties so that marriage can be save for betterment of family culture.

Mediation can be asked in the way of written manner in any court. And now if MM/JFC rejects this application or opp party declines this offer then there will be a written proof that husband wants re-union but wife is adamant (as per court order).

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

SAPINDA

SOME1:- SAPINDA marriages are VOID

SOME2:- as per Manusmriti SAPINDA & INCEST are NOT allowed

SOME3:- Marriages b/w first cousins are VOID-AB-INITIO

SOME4:- Sapinda marriages can be challenged even after years or decades.

SOME5:- If religion is converted to get married then as per SAPINDA act such conversion is sh a m .

SOME6:- INCEST . . . . . . . .Hnnn !!!

SOME7:- Below Source can be studied to legally challenge such marriages http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/What-is-SAPINDA-How-to-Break-it--6152.asp#.VB58QZzWJkw

SOME8:- Filed sapinda case on his wife's cousin who married SOME1 else & that couple was first cousins among themselves

SOME9:- Took help of Religious Organizations to put pressure on opp gang. (SAPINDA is AGAINST manusmriti)

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

NEGOTIATION AT YOUR TERMS u/s 89 CPC

aturchatur wrote:

NEGOTIATION AT YOUR TERMS ELSE FILE EXTORTION

SOME1 wrote:

Anyways, I will not initiate any negotiation and wait patiently.

aturchatur wrote:

If you feel like going for negotiation on your terms then write a MEMO in DV (wherever she will file it & after she files) u/s 89 of CPC specifying your terms within.

Within this section 89 of the code there is a mandatory clause & your negotiation terms are included on record. And her intention is expected to be clarified in writing on record which can help a lot in Perjury at a later stage. The order based on this section 89 CPC will be useful in the long-run to screw her up in her own wordings. Otherwise, if her lawyer is smart enough then he will try to fusss your sec-89 bomb by telling her to attend mediation, pass time, come back & let mediation fail. Even after failure of mediation, at least your terms of negotiation are recorded on court record's officially this time.

Step1:- Memo u/s 89 CPC also understood as ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution)

http://www.mediationadvisory.in/html/Sec89CPC.pdf

http://www.keralamediation.gov.in/Sec89CPC.pdf

Step2:- Judge accepts due to mandatory clause of 89 CPC. Or Rejects (rarest of rare) Step3:- Judge might formulate terms of settlement & give parties for their responses & after that sends for Mediation, Lok Adalat or Judicial Settlement (M,LA,JS).

Step4:- Even Consent of parties is NOT mandatory for referring to ADR viz., M,LA,JS (mandatory clause). NOTE:- ADR suits matrimonial, partition, neighbours, partnership, emp-emp, client-service provider type cases

Step6:- Settlement at your terms. If NOT & girl's side lawyer active then mediation fails but still your negotiation terms comes on record of court.

NOTES:-

(A) If no settlement, then court proceedings continue.

(B) Referral judge is NOT allowed to ask reasons for failure.

TRICK:- But your terms already comes on record vide Memo u/s 89 CPC.

Example:- If girl side had asked 50 lacs & you plan to file extortion on her. Then u/s MEMO shall be made cleverly saying that you are able to pay Rs. 5 Lakhs. Now, if mediation fails then as per LAW OF CONFIDENTIALITY of mediation no talks can be disclosed. Even judge has NOT powers to ask reasons for failure.

Now, whenever you will file this extortion complaint then include the CC of that Memo &also CC of order sheet that mediation failed. Which proves girl wants more than 5 lakhs.

Now, file TEP & screw them from both sides.

NRI Brothers:- Since Wifey asks usually crores in your cases hence instead of 5 lacs, you offer her 20 lacs if that is your capacity. Now, if the mediation fails, let her come with bills worth more than 20 lakhs to prove this was NOT extortion (assuming she has NO injury marks / MLC in lieu thereof)

Now, Coming back to our

PARAM PUJNIYE SHRIMAN MAHATMA GANDHI JI

The father of our Nation, Late Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi said as regards a settlement being made between the parties in any litigation, which is quoted as under:- "My joy was boundless. I had learnt to find out the better side of human nature and to enter men's hearts. I realized that the true function of a lawyer was to unite parties driven as under. The lesson was so indelibly burnt into me that a large part of my time during the twenty years of my practice as a lawyer was occupied in bringing about private compromises of hundreds of cases. I lost nothing thereby - not even money, certainly not my soul."

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

SOME1

But 89 CPC wont apply to DV case as u wrote in opening lines Its driven by CrPC

aturchatur

dear SOME1

89 CPC will certainly apply to DV case.

DV is a quasi civil and quasi criminal case.

In my case, my request for mediation on my written terms were recorded and thereafter in order to protect the wifey a 89 CPC document was made signed from me to weaken my mediation representation but that was also broken down with further write-up.

CPC is very much applicable in DV and even if the procedure followed in CrPC then also we can use certain strong CPC applications in DV because DV being quasi civil quasi criminal is actually a civil case until some orders are not obeyed.

In my own case, I even filed arrest warrant request again sthe wife for avoiding criminal proceedings against her which I had filed long back and several dates have passed after that but she kept avoiding replying to that.

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

False dowry compliant, court issues arrest warrant for woman doctor

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mangalore/False-dowry-compliant-court-issues-arrest-warrant-for-woman-doctor/articleshow/43094829.cms

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

Senior Citizen's Non-Appearance / Exemption

SOME1:- Besides CrPC 205 provisions; One can take help of S.Citizen Act 2005 (SCA) Section 21 Chapter V where the protection of Senior citizen is guaranteed by State by law and apply for non-appearence ;The same has been used successfully by many.

SOME2:- 205 App can contain reference of SCA

SOME3:- SCA is a seprate Act and you can move an appl under the SCA in the same court where you want the relief

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

SPEEDY TRIAL

aturchatur wrote:

SOME1 wrote:

Aturchatur can you please upload sample application for speedy trial in hc so all of us can go through it and utilise it.

re g a rd s

aturchatur wrote:

DISTRICT: XXXXXX

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION.

APPELLATE SIDE.

W. P. No. (w) of 2014.

Subject matter relating to: Expeditiously dispose of the proceeding under Hindu Marriage Act 1955.

CAUSE TITLE

Mr. Satyaprakash Bani.  Petitioner in-person.

V e rsu s

The State of West Bengal & Ors. Opposite Parties.

Mr. Satyaprakash Bani

Petitioner In Person,

Shantinagar,

S h i vp o re ,

V i a . S h i vp o re ,

Dist. Shantinagar,

Pi n 7 0 0 XXX

DISTRICT: XXXXX

DISTRICT: XXXXXX

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION.

APPELLATE SIDE.

W. P. No. (w) of 2013.

In the matter of:

An application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Articles 21 of the Constitution of India and The

H i n d u M a rri a g e A ct 1 9 5 5 ;

Mr. Satyaprakash Bani.  Petitioner in-person.

V e rsu s

The State of West Bengal & Ors. Opposite Parties.

INDEX

Sl. No. Description of Documents. Annexure Page

1. Writ Petition 1 to

2. Police Report. 'A' 13 to

3. Police Report for further investigation. 'B' 17 to

4. Petition on 144 CrPC. 'C' 18 to

5. Order of 144 CrPC. 'D' 19 to

6. All money orders slips. 'E' 20 to

7. Blah Blah <Any more Submission>. 'F' 27 to 7. Blah Blah <Any more Submission>. 'G' 28 to 8. Blah Blah <Any more Submission>. 'H' 29 to 9. Blah Blah <Any more Submission>. 'I' 37 to

LISTOFDATES

Sl. No. Description of Documents. Date Annexure Page

1. Police Report. 17th March, 2012. 'A' 13 to

2. Police Report for further investigation. 29th March, 2012 'B' 17 to

3. Petition on 144 CrPC. 13th April, 2012 'C' 18 to

4. Order of 144 CrPC. 24th April, 2012. 'D' 19 to

5. All money orders slips. 16th May 2012. 'E' 20 to

6. Blah Blah <Any more Submission>. 12th June, 2012. 'F' 27 to 7. Blah Blah <Any more Submission>. 20th July, 2012. 'G' 28 to 8. Blah Blah <Any more Submission>. 2nd July, 2012 'H' 29 to 9. Blah Blah <Any more Submission>. 10th July, 2012. 'I' 37 to

POINT OF LAW INVOLVED

1. The current age of the applicant must be taken into cognizance by this Hon'ble Court as the delay in this trial can cause destruction of the remaining life of the Applicant.

"RIGHT TO LIFE" has been given by Article. 21 of CONSTITUTION OF INDIA to every Indian citizen. If there is delay in the said case caused by any type of obstruction created by the respondent then the Right given by the Constitution of India can be violated in concern with the Applicant. This causes irreparable loss to the Applicant & his whole family, because Applicant is the only son of his parents.

2. The provision in HINDU MARRIAGE ACT 1955 is very clear as given below to run the trial in matrimonial matters expeditiously i.e fastely & conclude it within 6 months from the date of service of notice to respondent.

* PROVISION IN "THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT 1955" CAN BE READ AS FOLLOWS:

21B. Special provision relating to trial and disposal of petitions under the Act.

1) The trial of a petition under this Act shall, so far as is Practicable consistently with the interests of justice in respect of the trial, be continued from day to day until its conclusion unless the court finds the adjournment of the trial beyond the following day to be, necessary for reasons to be recorded.

2) Every petition under this Act shall be tried as expeditiously as possible and endeavour shall be made to conclude the trial within six months from the date of service of notice of the petition on the respondent.

3) Every appeal under this Act shall be heard as expeditiously as possible, and endeavour shall be made to conclude the hearing within three months from the date of service of notice of appeal on the respondent.

JUDGEMENTS TO BE CITED

1. Uttaranchal High Court

http://indiankanoon.org/doc/144059419/

Khushi Ram Kandwal, vs Smt. Jaya Kandwal, on 15 September, 2011

Considering the provision of sub-section (2) of Section 21B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, in the interest of justice, the Principal Judge, Family Court, Dehradun is directed to decide the O.S. No. 178 of 2007 Khushi Ram Kandwal Vs. Smt. Jaya Kandwal, on merits in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. Both the parties shall co- operate in the speedy disposal of the divorce petition before the court concerned.

2. Kolkata High Court (Appellete Side) http://indiankanoon.org/doc/1050618/

3073/2011 on 14 September, 2011

The revisional application stands disposed of with a request to the learned Judge of the trial Court to proceed with utmost expedition. Subject to her convenience and without granting unnecessary adjournment, sincere endeavour ought to be made so as to conclude the trial and decide the suit by April, 2012. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties as quickly as possible.

3 . M a d ra s H i g h C o u rt

http://indiankanoon.org/doc/80781/

Narayana Nadar vs Jayakodi Ammal on 17 October, 1989

Matrimonial proceedings should be dealt with expeditiously and relief afforded to the

parties. That is why a special provision is made under Section 21B of the Act to the effect that proceedings should be tried as expeditiously as possible and concluded within six months from the date of service of notice and that the trial of the proceedings should also be continued day-to-day until its conclusion. A further provision is also made that an appeal should also be heard as expeditiously as possible and should be concluded within three months of the service of notice of appeal. Section 21-B thus clearly gives expression to the need for speedy and expeditious disposal of matrimonial causes.

4 . D e l h i H i g h C o u rt

http://indiankanoon.org/doc/1319570/

Savitri Balchandani vs Mulchand Balchandani on 14 February, 1986

(35) All matrimonial proceedings need to be decided expeditiously and the proceedings shortened Infact Section 21B of the Act, requires that as far as possible the trial should conclude within six months of the service of notice on the respondent and the appeals disposed off with in three months from the service of notice of appeal on the respondent.

(39) All matrimonial proceedings need to be decided expeditiously It is desirable that matrimonial litigation be shortened, in fact Section 21B of the Act requires it, and multiplicity of proceedings of matrimonial nature be prevented

5 . D e l h i H i g h C o u rt

http://indiankanoon.org/doc/548589/

Prem Nath Sarvan vs Prem Lata Sarvan on 3 March, 1986

Liberty to the parties to move an application before the trial court under Section 21B, if they so desire.

6 . M a d h ya P ra d e sh H i g h C o u rt

http://indiankanoon.org/doc/1586124/

L i l a S a h u vs K a i l a sh N a ra ya n S a h u o n 1 2 N o ve m b e r, 1 9 9 0

The Matrimonial Court is directed to proceed with the trial of the case expeditiously, as Contemplated by the provisions of Section 21B of the Act.

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

MEMO FOR MEDIATION REQUEST

BEFORE THE HON'BLE FAMILY COURT JUDGE, DELHI

OP No. 515 of 2014

Between:

Smt. Atur Chatur, D/o. xxx, aged about xx

Years, Occ: xxx, R/o. xxx

Plaintiff

An d

Atur Chatur

 R e sp o n d e n t

MEMO FILED ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT

It is humbly submitted the aforesaid OP was filed by my wife praying for the grant of divorce ."fill in ".

However, in the interests of my children and myself, I wish this Hon'ble Court to direct us to mediation as I want to keep my wife with me for the sake of our family.

So, I humbly pray that this Hon'ble Court send us for reconciliation in order that our marriage can be saved or pass such other orders or order that this Hon'ble court deems fit and proper in the interests of justice.

RESPONDENT

aturchatur@yahoo.com

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

If Husband was Ever Convicted / Sentenced, then after acquittal IO & Erring Officials be

ready for Deptt Action against you all

aturchatur wrote:

@ SOME1, other fighters, i found that judgment:-

http://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/169097470/

Every acquittal should be understood as a failure of the justice delivery system, in serving the cause of justice. Likewise, every acquittal should ordinarily lead to the inference, that an innocent person was wrongfully prosecuted. It is therefore, essential that every State should put in place a procedural mechanism, which would ensure that

the cause of justice is served, which would simultaneously ensure the safeguard of interest of those who are innocent. ........

On the culmination of a criminal case in acquittal, the concerned investigating/prosecuting official(s) responsible for such acquittal must necessarily be identified. A finding needs to be recorded in each case, whether the lapse was

innocent or blameworthy. Each erring officer must suffer the consequences of his lapse, by appropriate departmental action, whenever called for. ........"

In view of the serious lapses noted above in the conduct of investigation, we direct the

concerned Joint Commissioner of Police to initiate departmental action against the Investigating Officer of the case and the other erring officials.

conclusion:-

It means, after acquittal, action against IO if ever HUSBAND was sentenced or convicted.

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

Get ANTICIPATORY BAIL - Party in Person u/s 438

SOME1 wrote:

@aturchatur

- can you please provide me more information/some post....about getting notice bail in Delhi ??

aturchatur wrote:

JUST WRITE THE FACTS starting from:-

Your wife filed false case on you / false complain t on you in Women Cell.

Polic e has started taking rounds outsid e / near your house. You fear apprehension of arrest.

You promise that you will keep attending so there is no question / need for arrest.

No criminal case etc on you in life.

This is just a criminal tactic / pressure tactic by your wife bla bla .

Any previous police complaint if you filed regarding fear of false cases.

Your parents senior citizens, heart patient etc. It's very simple dear.

Just put the facts simply.

aturchatur wrote:

SOME1 wrote:

Special Thanks mates - @ Atur, SOME2, SOME3 for your valuable advice.

One question:

Can I get AB for myself and my Parents, by applying though Complaint copy received under RTI from CAW.

FIR is yet not registered. Case is with CAW yet.

aturchatur wrote:

Yes, you can take.

I myself appeared PIP in my case & that too even much before I received CAW Complaint copy.

You will apply for AB, but what you will get is called NB (Notice Bail)

Do NOT pay huge amount to lawyer. You must pay max 2,000 Rs. only per person or get it done FREE OF COST by appearing party in person.

Best Wishes !!!

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

How to Remove Sec-406 STRIDHAN (or At Least Dilute sec-406)

SOME1 wrote:

Hi,

I have to give the belongings to my wife under 406. there are only few utencils and her cloths which I have to give back my bitch. How to return all these things?? any proper method I need to follow?

suggestion please.

SOME2 wrote:

Make list of everything... get it signed by your wife that she has received everything in list in PS/CAW... or wherever they have asked you for the same to return ???

Also try record every conversation held with the opposite gang...!!!

aturchatur wrote:

Recording conversation seems ok, but get it signed by wife, this part is not easy as her lawyer will suggest her to not to take back otherwise her 406 will become weak & her dream of getting you behind bars will be diluted.

So pursuing sec-406 with legality is best.

Example:-

Make a list.

Tell to SHO, DCP, PHQ that you have this this that that & you want to return. In the mean time, call opp gang & record full conversation.

Even better before conversation you can call 100 no. & tell that you are about to call opp g@ng & within that you want to talk regarding goods return. Then record conversation.

Then call 100 no. again & tell that you called & this this that that talked &you have re co rd i n g s.

Goto PHQ & give/deposit that recording, (copy to DCP & SHO & IO concerned) Within that PHQ write the transcript of CD also besides submitting CD.

Immediately apply RTI to 100 no. i.e., RTI to PCR & ask for CC Audio, Transcript etc etc When you get that, then again goto CP, PHQ and copy to DCP & SHO. After this 406 is diluted to the ma possible extent.

To make it even further stronger, make this list very long.

For Example:- If she has gave you 100 items list then put 40-50 more items in that list

like those things which she forgot to mention like chandi ka chammach, honeymoon ki chaddi, do nikkaren, 4 glass sheshe k, mehandi bachi hui, bra, panty etc bla bla bla &write down whatever I had I am presenting here.

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

SENIOR CITIZENS ACT (SCA'2007 application format/sample)

SOME1 wrote:

Here is the application I filed under SCA 2007.

1. That Accused A2 & A5 are the applicants for application filed U/s 21 (Chapter V) for the protection of life and property of senior citizens of Senior Citizen Act, 2007. That the applicants are senior citizens of age about 63 years and 72 years, respectively and are aggrieved by their false implication in the complaint filed by the complainant who is abusing the process of law by not complying with the Criminal Procedure Code and deliberately delaying the proceedings in the related matter and they are liable to be given relief as prayed considering the following grounds.

2. That applicant (Accused A2) is a retired senior citizen aged about 63 years and has been suffering from serious health issues as detailed below: -

a. Accused A2 is an ORAL CANCER patient from last 7 years and has been suffering from severe after effects of radiation therapy and extensive cancer treatment.

b. Due to deterioration of dental health as an after effect of cancer treatment, the applicant (Accused A2) had to undergo several dental surgeries in the recent past and she is still undergoing extensive dental treatment.

c. Applicant (Accused A2) has also been recently diagnosed with Osteoradionecrosis coupled with a fungal infection - Actinomycosis and underwent several major surgeries due to the invasive nature of the disease. Additionally, she underwent an extensive medical treatment with infusion of strong antibiotics into her body on a daily basis for a long time. Currently, she is on strong antibiotics medication taken orally.

d. Applicant (Accused A2) has also been diagnosed with a nerve disorder - TRIGEMINAL NEURALGIA also known as suicide disease. This has been described as among the most painful conditions known to mankind. Even after extensive medication, the painful condition did not alleviate and the applicant already underwent a neural surgery and currently suffering from various after effects of the surgery.

e. Applicant (Accused A2) also suffers from various joint inflammation disorders and has been on constant medication.

3. That applicant (Accused A5) is retired senior citizen aged about 72 years and has been suffering from serious health issues as detailed below: -

a. Applicant (Accused A5) has MILD PARALYSIS in the right side of the body due to which he suffers from extreme weakness and is unable to walk on his own.

b. Applicant (Accused A5) underwent a major surgery called LEFT HEMICOLECTOMY in November 2012 which left him bedridden for several months. Owing to the after effects, applicant (Accused A5) suffers from bouts of extreme pain in his abdomen and su b se q u e n t w e a kn e ss.

c. Applicant (Accused A5) also suffers from GLAUCOMA and very poor vision.

d. Applicant (Accused A5) is a DIABETIC and suffering from CHRONIC HYPERTENSION which have led to many other health complications.

e. For the past two years, applicant (Accused A5) has also been suffering from major d e p re ssi o n .

4. That in order to attend the proceedings in this case, the applicants are required to undertake a journey from Delhi to Amritsar which will require them to travel a very long distance of 500 KM every time. That the frequent travel to personally appear before this Hon'ble court is putting them into undue hardship and jeopardizing their already precarious health.

5. That applicants are retired personnel having miniscule income of their own and are financially dependent on their son (Accused A1) who himself is under tremendous pressure to fight this case and fears losing his job due to frequent absenteeism because of litigation and is unable to enjoy his fundamental right to earn his livelihood and take care of his dependent parents.

6. That the complainant has been deliberately manufacturing delays in the proceedings of this case by not filing his written statements in response to applications filed U/s 205 of CrPC as well discharge application filed U/s 239 of CrPC by the applicants.

a. That the two separate applications U/s 205 of CrPC were filed by the applicants on 18th December 2013 but no response has been filed by the complainant yet causing unjustified delay in the proceedings of this case.

b. Additionally, two applications U/s 205 of CrPC as well as U/s 239 of CrPC were filed by Accused A1 on 26th February 2014 but the complainant hasn't responded yet to these applications.

7. Because of the act and conduct of the complainant, the health of the applicants has been seriously affected as uncongenial circumstances have created by the complainant by ruthlessly exploiting the legal system.

8. That due to these court proceedings, applicants are unable to travel to Pune and reside with their son (Accused A1) who serves as their sole caregiver during this old- age. That the applicants are unable to enjoy their basic right to live with security and dignity and are forced to live on their own without any support.

9. That due to deteriorating health as well as extremely difficult circumstances, the applicants are unable to fight the case on merits and are forced to give up their right to justice.

10. That it is the duty of the state to ensure that life and property of the applicants who are senior citizens are protected and they are able to live with security and dignity. That this Hon'ble court must take necessary steps to protect the life and property of the applicants under Rule 21 (Chapter V) of Senior Citizen Act.

It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble court may be pleased to:-

• Dispense with personal appearance of the applicants (Accused A2 and A5) on condition that the accused will appear before this Hon'ble court whenever required, at the time of 313 CrPC questioning and on the date of judgment and permit the applicants to be represented by their counsel, learned Advocate Vicky Mehra during their absence. This is in accordance with applications filed U/s 205 of CrPC by the applicants.

• Protect their Right to Justice and fair trial by considering convenience of the applications to attend legal proceedings while scheduling dates in this case.

• Pass such other order or further orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper to protect life and property of the applicants under Senior Citizen Act, 2007.

(The medical records of the applicants have been enclosed with this application as a n n e xu re )

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

Wife can NOT file Divorce after husband files RCR - r/w discussions below

SOME1 wrote:

Hi SOME1, Section 10c is a civil procedure section which stop patitioner to file multiple case for the same re a so n .

Like in my case I filed rcr sec 9 before 498a which is still under evidence stage. So if my wife file divorce and contained te same statement which she had given in rcr then it's null and void or court can put on hold until the other cases closed.

aturchatur wrote:

Dear SOME1: Few questions regarding 10C

(1) Can anyone put application in the court after the wife puts many different cases like Divorce, DVC, 125, 24HMA, 498A etc ?

(2) If application is put in sessions level (i.e., at family court level) then can this application stop her from filing DVC, 125, 24HMA later on ?

(3) Does this section put a dot on only civil cases or also puts a dot on criminal cases & quasi criminal cases as well. The reasoning behind is that FAMILY COURT is topmost court in lower court& is equivalent to sessions court ?

(4) Pls tell the complete section (also rule no. if applicable & also sub-sections if a p p l i ca b l e )

(5) Also provide only link to this section 10C

(6) Also pls send the weblink for judgments in relation thereto.

(7) If any other judgments you have & feel like sharing privately then also kindly forward me at EMAIL: aturchatur@yahoo.com

I am seeing a fighter in you brother. Best Wishes & screw the false case filers.

Thanks & Regards

SOME1 wrote:

Reply to above seven questions by aturchatur sir are as follows:-

(1) Can anyone put application in the court after the wife puts many different cases like Divorce, DVC, 125, 24HMA, 498A etc ?

Only Civil No Criminal cases also you can check cpc 11

http://www.vakilno1.com/bareacts/laws/civil-procedure-code-1908.html#10_Stay_of_suit

Stay of suit.

No Court shall proceed with the trial of any suit in which the matter in issue is also directly and substantially in issue in a previously instituted suit between the same parties, or between parties under whom they or any of them claim litigating under the same title where such suit is pending in the same or any other Court in 1[India] having jurisdiction to grant the relief claimed, or in any Court beyond the limits of 1[India] established or continued by 2[the Central Government] 3[***] and having like jurisdiction, or before 4[the Supreme Court].

Explanation- The pendency of a suit in a foreign Court does not preclude the Courts in 1[India] from trying a suit founded on the same cause of action.

COMMENTS

(i) The language of section 10 suggests that it is referable to a suit instituted in the civil court and it cannot apply to proceedings of other nature instituted under any other statute; National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro-Sciences v. C. Parmeshwara, AIR 2005 SC 242.

(ii) Two suits—Between same parties—Involving same subject‑matter and same questions—Held, subsequent suit should be stayed; Radhika Konel Parekh v. Konel Parekh, AIR 1993 Mad 90: (1993) LW 159: (1993) 1 Mad LJ 163.

1. Subs. by Act 2 of 1951, sec. 3, for "the States" (w.e.f. 1-4-1951)

2. Subs. by A.O. 1937, for "the G.G. in C."

3. The words "or the Crown Representative" omitted by the A.O. 1948. 4. Subs. by the A.O. 1950, for "His Majesty in Council".

2) If application is put in sessions level (i.e., at family court level) then can this application stop her from filing DVC, 125, 24HMA later on ?

Will advise to take your advocate suggestion as i am also not aware about the same in depth.

As per the law only CIVIL however you can check with advocate as well if there are any other section as well for criminal

All the details mention above however i am still under process and delaying the cases by mean.

SOME1 wrote:

Atur sir, I am not fighting for myself as i just bailed out in One day from the jail, however i saw a man who is 80 yrs old and can not even eat his food by his own hand and he spend 4 days as her daughter in law filed the case against him without any reason.

I am not against of any women law if its applicable for all women including our sisters, sister in law and mothers, but i am defiantly against of these biased law those don't see whats truth and what a lie.

I wanted to share that after this case i filed a petition under change.org and i found it really helps police stop supported my in laws. i found so many ways from Internet including this forum and filed everything against my in laws.

http://www.change.org/p/appeal-against-the-misuse-of-dowry-law-by-my-wife-and-their-parents

But i really want to thank to this forum as i got lots of courage and strength to fight back.

Thanks to all members like SOME1, SOME2, SOME3, SOME4 and so many fighters blogs.

if my wife watching this forum i dont care as i am fighting for the justice not for a lie.

aturchatur wrote:

SOME2 wrote:

Now, tell me about change.org site. How that site helped.

How & Who informed the dirty cops that you have filed something at change.org because as per me these dirty cops never check such sites.

Tell me in detail pls how strongly you can say that, change.org was a reason for that or that's just your belief ki aisa hua hoga.

Also share your other fighting propoganda & fights already initiated or completed.

Best Wishes !!!

SOME1 wrote:

Sir on every petition you filed on Change.org it gives you the option to add the email address of the receiver or responded and you can put there names including there email ID. after you got 25 signature which is very easy. one

email will goes to those officers including the signature saying this is the complaint and so many people supported this petition please take the action.

If you got 200 signatures its too good. you can nail them badly. you can also promote this by paying some fees otherwise its free.

its worked as when i filed the RTI I saw my petition in the RTI file from DGP haryana. and after that all the officers like SP and others officer speak to me in a manner.

Please check the link which i sent and you will find on internet as well by put my wife name and on google.

http://www.change.org/p/appeal-against-the-misuse-of-dowry-law-by-my-wife-and-their-parents

From ATUR CHATUR TO SOME1:-

(1) was your dp3 initiated & converted into FIR ?

(2) is it NOT defamation by putting name of your wife & relatives on internet ?

(3) do u give me permission to copy-paste that whole petition in SOCIAL STIGMA for benefit of fellow fighters if u think there's no harm posting that on 498a.org ?

(4) what about those negative comments on the above change.org page ? does those si g n s a l so co u n t i n 2 5 ?

Thanks & Best Wishes from the fellow fighters community !!!

SOME1 wrote:

(1) was your dp3 initiated & converted into FIR ?

No Sir it was not but good impact on Police officers.

(2) is it NOT defamation by putting name of your wife & relatives on internet ?

I have not write anything wrong about my wife and there parents i just wanted if the all is correct then take the action against accordingly,if i don't have any political background i will use all the things which save me. again right to express and equity

(3) do u give me permission to copy-paste that whole petition in SOCIAL STIGMA for benefit of fellow fighters if u think there's no harm posting that on internet ?

Sure if they can use the application or you can edit if you think in any matter it will harm my case.

(4) what about those negative comments on the above change.org page ? does those signs also count in 25 ?

Yes sir that will also count, negativity is everywhere but you can use the same against them.

aturchatur wrote:

@ SOME2, This explanation is very good & I am convinced.

Best Wishes !!!

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

RTI on TEP after 270 days

To Dated:- 02/10/2014

PIO,

Central Board of Direct Taxes

North Block,

New Delhi

New Delhi - 110001

Sub:- Request for information u/s 6 & 7 of RTI Act 2005.

S i r/ M a d a m ,

I sent a Tax Evasion Petition on 03/01/2014 to your esteemed authority regarding Tax Evasion by Mr/Mrs. XXXXXXXXX resident/s of 420, Jahannum Puri, Delhi-110009

(1) I request your esteemed authority to kindly provide me information whether the information provided by me has been found to be false or true

CITATION:- As per File No.CIC/RM/A/2013/000635 it was held by CIC that, "The complainant has a right to know whether the information provided by him has been found to be false or true".

I request you to provide the information at the earliest. If not I'll be compelled to approach the Chief Information Commissioner &/ or Delhi High Court &/ or Consumer Redressal Forum &/ or http://www.pgportal.gov.in for any attempt to restrict the flow of information guaranteed vide Constitution of India vide RTI Act'2005.

I am sending a Blank Postal Order no. 13F 412398 of Rs. 10 dated 02/01/2014 is attached herewith. Kindly fill the PIO details as it is the duty of PIO to provide reasonable assistance u/s 5 (3) of the RTI act to applicant. The requested information shall be supplied free of charge in case the same could not be supplied within 30 days u/s 7(6) of RTI Act 2005.

ATUR CHATUR

C/o :- A-11/461, Ground Floor, Sector-33, Rohini, Delhi-110085

Enclosed:- File No.CIC/RM/A/2013/000635

http://indiankanoon.org/docfragment/119159165/?formInput=CIC/RM/A/2013/000635

Mr.Omprakash Singh vs Cbdt on 29 November, 2013

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION

Room No.-307, 2nd Floor, B-Wing, August Kranti Bhawan

B h i ka j i C a m a P l a ce , N e w D e l h i -1 1 0 0 6 6 .

Website : cic.gov.in

Telephone No.: +91-11-26105682

File No.CIC/RM/A/2013/000635

Appellant: Shri Om Prakash Singh, New Delhi

Public Authority: DCIT, Circle 25(1) and JCIT, Range-25,

New Delhi

Date of Hearing: 29.11.2013

Date of decision: 29.11.2013

Heard today, dated 29.11.2013.

Appellant is present.

The Public Authority is represented by Shri Raj Kumar, ITO 25(2)/CPIO.

FACTS

Vide RTI dt 23.2.13, appellant had sought information regarding action taken on his TEP dt 6.12.12.

2. CPIO CIT-IX vide letter dt 12.3.13, transferred the RTI to CPIO/JCIT Range- 25, who in turn transferred the RTI vide letter dt 19.3.13 to ACIT, Circle 25(1), ITOs Ward 25(1),(2),(3),(4).

3. An appeal was filed on 25.4.13.

4. AA vide order dt 1.5.13, fixed the date for hearing on 8.5.13. Subsequently ITO Ward 25(2) denied the information sought u/s 8(h) and (j) of the RTI Act.

5. Submissions made by the appellant and public authority were heard.

DECISION

6. It has been the consistent stand of the Commission that some sort of a feedback should be provided to the information provider once investigation into a tax evasion complaint has been finalized. The complainant has a right to know whether the information provided by him has been found to be false or true. We accordingly direct the CPIO to disclose the broad outcome of the TEP to the appellant once the enquiry is completed. Details of investigation are, however, not required to be disclosed.

The appeal is disposed of.

Sd/-

(Rajiv Mathur) Central Information Commissioner Authenticated true copy forwarded to:

The Dy. CIT Tax & CPIO O/o the Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 25(1), ITO Ward 25(2), Minto Road, New Delhi The Joint Commissioner of Income tax & FAA O/o the Adll. Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-25,Pratyaksh Kar Bhawan, Civic Center,Block -2, Room No.1706 Minto Road, New Delhi Shri Om Prakash Singh 495/35, Onkar Nagar-C, Tri Nagar, New Delhi-110035 (Raghubir Singh) Deputy Registrar .12.2013

ATUR CHATUR's FORMULA (RTI on TEP)

If they say information is true, file dp3

if they say information is false, file quash, defamation, extortion & so on whatever suits u well &after discussion with your trusted sources.

HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO FATHER OF NATION MAHATMA GANDHI (Today is 02ND OCT' 2014)

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

ORDER 39 RULE 1 & 2 TO RESTRAIN SON & DIL TO ENTER YOUR HOUSE

SOME1 wrote:

Application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC., for issuing exparte ad-interim injunction against defendants, till decision of suit was filed in the trial court along with the application of permanent injunction.

The Hon,ble court issued the notices to defendant.

IN THE COURT OF ______

Application No:______ of 2014

Ap p l i ca n t

ve rsu s

re sp o n d e n t

Application under order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of the Civil Procedure Code

Respectfully Sheweth

1. That the applicant/plaintiff has filed a case before this honorable court hearing where of will take some time.

2. That it is apparent from perusal of grounds and documents attached therewith that the applicant has prima facie a very good case in his favour and the case is likely to succeeds. The balance of convenience is in favour of the applicant. The grounds of the case may be read as part of this application to save the repetition.

3. That the interest of justice demands that the respondent is restrained from ______. In case the respondents are not restrain that the applicant will suffer irreparable loss and injury which cannot be compensated in terms of money and filing of this case will become infructuous.

4. It is therefore most respectfully prayed that the respondents be restrained from ____ in the interest of justice. Such other orders he also passed in favour of the applicant as deemed fit in facts and circumstances of the case.

Ap p l i ca n t _ _ _ _ _ _

Through, PARTY-IN-PERSON (include affidavit)

add their senior citizen certi if any.

Other way is your parents does an fir in the local ps.

you should consult with atur chatur as well as experts before initiating......

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

Husband's Mother Files Domestic Violence on DIL

SOME1 wrote:

Till now It was known that mother in law cannot file dv case against daughter in law due to section 2 q of the dv act that the respondent can be only male. But there is a news in times of India on sep 26 2014 that now this is possible. The link is

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/Woman-too-can-take-daughter-in-law- to-court-under-Domestic-Violence-Act-HC/articleshow/43480213.cms.

T h e c a s e is o f h a ji A li a g e 5 4 . Is t h is is t r u e . If a n y b o d yh a v e t h e c o p y o f t h is ju d g e m e t f o r r e f e r e n c e p lsf o r w a r d . N e e d t o s t u d y m o r e o n t h is f o r p e r s u a l.

aturchatur wrote:

Why at all do you need judgment ?

Here at forum's husband's, in at least in 95% cases Women have been the respondents.

Why the h@ll you or anyone needs a judgment. Pls don't mind the wordings.

GO STRAIGHT AWAY A FILE A SHORTEST APPLICATION.

Source:- check my above post named ONE SHORT ALLEGATION

aturchatur wrote:

Let opp party deny or let judge refuse the application & then come back to the forum. You might NOT be needing judgment at all.

Because if u filed WOMEN Vs. WOMEN then the circus will begin from your end.

But remember that you need to initiate first else it will NOT just be a counter but also troublesome for your mother because:-

If A says B hit her then B can always say that I used to live separately.

And if B says A has hit her and also A says B hit her then one thing is 100% sure . . . . hmmm . . . . DV no tha dono mein. Kisne maara kisko vo baad mein dekhenge, pehle bachchu tum dono aa jao

REMEMBER:- File / Initiate MIL's DV Plaint towards DIL only if DIL has NOT filed either NCR/498A/CAW/PS/107/151/DV or any other case.

If u can file first then only file otherwise baith jao chup kar k for other strategies.

To make MIL's DV stronger SOME9 told me that it is necessary to put name of husband also in it, but I (atur chatur) do NOT recommend that.

Hmmm . . . as SOME7 told me that if name of DIL's Father/Mother is put in it then masala increases TADKA MAAR K. But seriously speaking aturchatur is an ardent fan of Mahatma Gandhi Ji hence I suggest that jo likhna sach hi likhna sach k siva kuchh nahi likhna. Because in the end only truth prevails.

Haaan . . . raaste mein harassment to ho sakti hai, Parantu end mein TRUTH ONLY WINS.

So Do NOT file false cases. File it only if there is something genuine & all the more something that you can prove, (Of Course . . . . . . sprinted with 406 in case that is also a truth because MIL also had her STRIDHAN & aakhir SAAS BHI KABHI BAHU THI)

Best Wishes & Happy Fighting false cases & SOCIAL STIGMA on u & your family !!!

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

Complaint against Shaadi.com regarding Wife's Profile

SOME1 wrote:

To,

Shaadi.com Customer Relations,

People Interactive (I) Pvt. Ltd. Unit no 4,

Film Centre Building , Tardeo AC Market ,

Tardeo, Mumbai - 400034

Sub: Complaint regarding profile id XXXXXX

D e a r Si r / M a d a m ,

We have become aware that a profile displayed on your website shaadi.com, is false a n d m i sg u i d i n g .

According to your website, this person's marriage has been claimed to be annulled, which is completely false.

This person is still married and no annulment have taken place between her and her partner and we have documentary evidence for the same.

Is this an attempt by Shaadi.com to misguide innocent people who are trying to find a partner online?

We seek a full explanation within 7 days from the receipt of this letter from M/s. People Interactive (I) Pvt. Ltd (owners of Shaadi.com) on this matter,

Failing to provide any reasonable explanation, we will have no choice but to file a legal case against M/s. People Interactive (I) Pvt. Ltd. for representing false information on your website under Section 420[1] of the Indian Penal Code which covers offences relating to cheating.

R e g a rd s,

ABC

REPLY FROM SHAADI.COM

SOME1 wrote:

Success!!

D e a r XXXXXX,

Thank you for contacting Shaadi.com.

Having acknowledged your complaint necessary steps against the member XXXXXX has been taken and profile is removed immediately.

We really are indebted to members like you who take the time and effort for complaining about such profiles, and help us maintain Shaadi.com as a clean site having serious matrimony seekers.

Good luck for your partner search and we hope we can continue to assist you in future.

S i n ce re l y

Shaadi.com Customer Relations

People Interactive

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

NRI's - Save yourself from Greedy L@wyers thru PIP

aturchatur wrote:

PIP FOR NRI'S - TRUE FIGHTING TACTICS

Dear Friends, a True Fighter needs to have sound tactics to counter & reply to the false cases filed on him.

Remember that, if a case is filed on any1 by his wife then that doesn't make him a true fighter. He is NOT even called a fighter unless he fights those cases thru vehemently persuation.

RTI, Perjury & CrPC 91 are the three tools to fight these false cases on any1.

If any1 has filed all those three cases (whether won or not) then he is able to put pressure on OP.

This is known as true fighting tactics, which we all need to learn & understand.

NRI Friends & Foreigners Indians & Paise Wala Indians Trapped in False 498a & similar cases

Dear NRI Friends, Foreigners Indians & Paise Wala Indians (hereinafter called as NRI'S for the sake of brevity.)

I request all my friends to practise PIP but dear NRI'S remember that PIP doesn't means standing alone foolishly in front of court without any pre-preparations.

For NRI'S PIP would mean guiding the lawyer (any local lawyer who is good at drafting) & then directing the lawyer to work as per their own terms & instructions. They can advise you of course, but you need NOT give them their all the proofs (keep some with you) & remember PIP means NEVER give your complete case file to any lawyer.

And you should be in such a situation that you can change a lawyer at any point of time without worrying about what he will do if you leave him.

This is the theme behind PIP for NRI'S

You can see how Atur Chatur learns Fighting Tactics

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O6hRPInxM7o

Mahatma Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"

Atur Chatur says, "WHAT YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"

Vidyavaan Guni Ati Chatur, Ram Kaj Karibe Ko Atur

Email : aturchatur@yahoo.com

disclaimer:- all advises here to be r/w profile aturchatur.com

…………………………………………………………………

aturchatur

PIP does NOT mean Bhookha Nanga Tactics - PIP means to WIN with 99% + 1% assurance

aturchatur wrote:

PIP does NOT mean a bhookha nang tactics as SOME group of people may pretend to present it.

PIP MOVEMENT BY ATUR CHATUR

PIP means fighting the case PIP if you can draft the applications also.

PIP means guiding the lawyer how to draft the letters & then showing to diff lawyers @ 500 rs. each & if you have a lot of money then give 2000 each to 2-3 lawyers for such consultation.

PIP for NRI/Foreigner Indians means consulting the strategies with fellow forum fighters here at 498a.org/forum & based on those suggestions guiding their lawyers instead of giving their case files to them.

PIP has a deeper meaning than how some people feel like.’

PIP essentially means that you work with your lawyer in such a manner that you can change your lawyer any time if he doesn't acts as efficiently & timely as you want him to be.